Guest guest Posted December 28, 2001 Report Share Posted December 28, 2001 In a message dated 12/28/2001 6:43:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, jannarone@... writes: > Andy has suggested that ALA alone is ok. Not to my knowledge nor from what he wrote me a year ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 Some time ago I tested high in copper. Should I retest for copper before using DMSA and ALA or ALA alone? How do I know if my copper levels are too high for ALA chelation? Is the use of zinc supposed to reduce copper levels? I know this was posted before, but I am not sure how to reduce copper levels. Does anyone know why high copper happens in patients who are chemically sensitive? It seems common that those who are chemically sensitive have high copper. Thanks, SJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 In a message dated 12/29/01 8:20:31 AM Central Standard Time, moriam@... writes: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Autism-Mercury/files/ANDY_INDEX > > I looked on the convenient above notes, and found the copper notation, with the mention of a level of " 50 " on a certain test. I cannot determine what company to send (is it a hair sample?) to. Is it Great Smokies? My high copper level is from some years ago and I don't recall how the test was done; however I did have the Clifford evaluation for dental materials and used a Hal Huggins doctor to remove my amalgams, Dr. Mark Breiner. I took the oral chelation that Hal Huggins recommends from Matrix (if memory serves.) Does everyone determine copper levels before chelating? Why did my doctor not test for copper prior to ordering DMPS IV therapy? Also, since I had ten DMPS treatments and four weeks of ALA on and off, might my copper be in better shape or is it unwise to speculate on this? If anyone can answer the above, please copy my questions and answer below, so that I'll remember the q. Thanks, SJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 In a message dated 12/29/2001 6:20:32 AM Pacific Standard Time, moriam@... writes: > I've made quite a habit out of knowing what Andy says, I've followed the Cutler protocol for 2 years. I had VERY high methyl mercury toxicity (and Pb and As, too) from years of bad fish (along with amalgams and vaccines). Andy last told me personally about a year ago to NOT take ALA without DMSA. I only use ALA to remove Hg from brain (no other metals now show in other tests). I expect I probably have some Hg in brain, even though DMSA could have gotten rid of some, and 2 ALA sessions likely also did. I don't want to chance removing Hg from brain to merely have it redeposit in body. ALA won't hold Hg long enough to reach excretory routes, from what I understand. Thus I am still waiting to hear from Andy. Which isn't nearly as easy to do as it used to be - possibly because I had a bad ALA experience, my first time, and reported on it (?) I will check on the archives though. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 I answered one of my own questions by reading at the site posted re: Andy Cutler. As fate would have it Doctor's Data is what I have been using. Once I saw the post I remembered that is where my tests have been sent. Now, I am wondering if I should ask my current physician to reorder copper levels. Anyone have any thoughts? I suppose the answer is to have them done, but I am going to chelate anyway because I have decided that mercury as high as mine is probably better treated than not. SJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 > > Andy has suggested that ALA alone is ok. > Not to my knowledge nor from what he wrote me a year ago Andy most certainly does say ALA alone is okay, in many circustances, and with a few caveats. I've heard him say so dozens of times. I've been cataloging things he says. If you'd like to read more about some of what Andy has said on this particular topic, you can go here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Autism-Mercury/files/ANDY_INDEX I would suggest that you read the following 2 sections: CHELATION AGENTS: ALA, DMSA, DMPS (includes comparisons, which to use & when) CHELATION AGENTS: ALA Without checking, I'd guess that these 2 sections include a number of instances of Andy saying ALA alone is fine, and also some discussion of the caveats. (The 2 main caveats are: if you have had RECENT mercury exposure ALA is considered higher risk, and if you have high copper....) (And those both apply to ANY use of ALA, with or without DMSA.) Of course, you can read other stuff if you wish, as well. I may not know much about mercury detox or chemistry, but I've made quite a habit out of knowing what Andy says, and being able to more-or-less repeat it (with my own wording, analogies, and such). Moria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 > > I've made quite a habit out of knowing what Andy says, > I've followed the Cutler protocol for 2 years. I had VERY high methyl mercury > toxicity (and Pb and As, too) from years of bad fish (along with amalgams and > vaccines). > > Andy last told me personally about a year ago to NOT take ALA without DMSA. I don't remember what I said (I talk to a lot of people) but that would be an unusual thing for me to say that would be based on an unusual situation. >I > only use ALA to remove Hg from brain (no other metals now show in other > tests). > > I expect I probably have some Hg in brain, even though DMSA could have gotten > rid of some, and 2 ALA sessions likely also did. 2 ALA sessions will not reduce brain mercury significantly, nor with any amount of DMSA you could have taken in the last year. >I don't want to chance > removing Hg from brain to merely have it redeposit in body. ALA won't hold Hg > long enough to reach excretory routes, from what I understand. I do believe you understand incorrectly. > > Thus I am still waiting to hear from Andy. Which isn't nearly as easy to do > as it used to be - possibly because I had a bad ALA experience, my first > time, and reported on it (?) Possibly because you are aggravating, waste very large amounts of time discussing irrelevant stuff, do random things mixing conflicting advice from different sources and then want me to sort it out for you, and write in the above " yellow journalistic " style which detracts greatly from communication. Please also note that you are in essence claiming to have gotten much information from me, that it didn't really help, and that you now want much MORE information. I already gave you the best information I have. If it isn't working (possibilities span the spectrum from it isn't right for your personal situation to you didn't actually use it) then I don't see it as productive to provide it again, or provide more. I also don't like to spend a lot of time in the details of being sick - I would rather talk about how to get better. Many people talk to me about mercury and other health topics of mutual interest in great detail, and I spend lots of time going over what they said and replying because they are trying to convey real information and discuss things related to solving problems and getting better. Some other people spend a lot of time corresponding about being sick, about people's motives in corresponding, or doctor's motives in prescribing, and generally " stir the pot to watch it boil, " as in your comment about my possible motivation for not responding to you based on your experiences with ALA. I don't spend my time corresponding with these people. As many on list who have communciated privately with me know I can sometimes take a looooong time to respond - my time is limited, it is valuable to me, and I share it with people who are trying to do something I respect and can participate productively in. I wish I had more time for that and needed less time for responses to stuff like this. Andy > > I will check on the archives though. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 > I answered one of my own questions by reading at the site posted re: Andy > Cutler. As fate would have it Doctor's Data is what I have been using. Once I > saw the post I remembered that is where my tests have been sent. Now, I am > wondering if I should ask my current physician to reorder copper levels. > Anyone have any thoughts? I suppose the answer is to have them done, but I am > going to chelate anyway because I have decided that mercury as high as mine > is probably better treated than not. SJ There is no need to do the test if you already made the decision and the result isn't going to change it. You can take 50 mg zinc 4 times a day and 500-1000 mcg molybdenum 3-4 times a day to reduce copper absorption, and milk thistle, taurine, and glycine to increase it's excretion. Andy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.