Guest guest Posted May 9, 2004 Report Share Posted May 9, 2004 In a message dated 5/8/2004 5:36:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, duncancrow@... writes: > > Can the careful use of entheogens really aid in spiritual > development? Many who have experienced it first-hand would answer in > the affirmative. In a famous psilocybe experiment in 1962, of nine > divinity students given the placebo, five (55.5 percent) were still > in the ministry 25 years later; of the ten given the manna, eight (80 > percent) were still in the ministry. The researcher remarked, " All of > the psilocybin subjects…but none of the controls, still considered > their original experience to have had genuinely mystical elements and > to have made a uniquely valuable contribution to their spiritual > life. The positive changes… had persisted over time and had deepened > in some cases. " > > That last paragraph is the kicker, isn't it? Note that these > individuals are qualified to offer these opinions. > > Please don't shoot the messenger. I didn't come up with this on my > own. Now can we get back to science and organic subjects and > hopefully stay with those topics? > > regards, > > (rev) Duncan Crow > > Hi Duncan, funny, but I have never felt the need or desire to have a drug induced religious state. I kind of doubt that a Doctorate in Theology would be enhanced by this, either. I remember the 60's quite well. I doubt very much that O'Leary's " trips " left him with any special education, or views that would have been of interest to a normal person. Just my humble opinion ;-) I think this is a whole lot of hogwash! LOL Enjoyed today immensely as my youngest granddaughter was dedicated to The Lord. Big hugs, Marilyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2004 Report Share Posted May 10, 2004 > I remember the 60's quite well. I doubt very much that > O'Leary's " trips " left him with any special education, or views Marilyn, There might be one or two in the world that might disagrees with that statement... Name withheld for protection of identity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2004 Report Share Posted May 10, 2004 In a message dated 5/10/2004 2:47:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, arenot@... writes: > > Marilyn, > > There might be one or two in the world that might disagrees with that > statement... > > Name withheld for protection of identity > > LOLOL yes, I imagine there are plenty left around! I remember driving up to the Haight Ashbury about this time. It felt like it was a movie set of a very strange movie. Hugs, M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.