Guest guest Posted May 31, 2004 Report Share Posted May 31, 2004 > Nine papers > published to date on HIFUS and fibroids: 4 animal studies, 4 early > investigative studies on the technology, and 1 human study--the Phase > II study done at Brigham's. Forgot to mention one other thing: the FDA ob/gyn device panel will not release information on the final details of Insightec's Phase III clinical trial application until June 2, 2004. One day before the panel convenes on June 3. This is SOP for the FDA -- but effectively prevents anyone from being able to say much of anything about a given device application submitted for approval. Afterall, what could the public say about the single human (Phase II) data published to date on this procedure without additional input from the larger Phase III study? Particularly since comments to the FDA were due by May 26 -- while information submitted by Insightec won't be made public until June 2. Nice catch-22 going on there at the FDA. It's been a problem in the past...and is a problem today. Why do you think this catch-22 exists? Why isn't the information submitted to them by a device manufacturer available to the public prior to the " due " date for comments? And, why and how is it that a fibroid drug treatment like mifepristone can languish by the wayside for a decade or so...while HIFUS sails through without commentary? Money. If GE had a vested interest in mifepristone the way they do with HIFUS...mifepristone may well have been approved eons ago. Mifepristone would treat ALL fibroids...not just 1 or 2 'select' fibroids. But, it won't bring in the revenue that HIFUS will... Carla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.