Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

UD

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi, I just wanted to chime in here and let you know I have also been diagnosed

with UD through an abdominal and vaginal u/s. I'm actually going tomorrow to

see the u/s pictures and determine whether or not I feel comfortable with this

diagnosis.

I think most of the ladies in this group will let you know that an u/s should

not be the only procedure you rely on for a correct diagnosis.

anyamelbourne anyamelbourne@...> wrote:

Hi everyone,

I was diagnosed with UD 2 years ago by an ultrasound scan. For those

of you who have the same condition, how were you diagnosed and do you

think an ultrasound can give a difinitive diagnosis? The more I read

the more confused I get. I would appreciate any information from

anyone.

Thankyou

Anya

Share bookmarks: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MullerianAnomalies/links/

Share files:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MullerianAnomalies/files/

The Congenital Uterine Anomalies Home Page:

http://www.wegrokit.com/uterineanomalies/

es/

The Congenital Uterine Anomalies Home Page:

http://www.wegrokit.com/uterineanomalies/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi I also have UD I was dianosed through ultra sound... I also was dianosed

through other tests. the US was my 1st test type thing

anyamelbourne anyamelbourne@...> wrote:Hi everyone,

I was diagnosed with UD 2 years ago by an ultrasound scan. For those

of you who have the same condition, how were you diagnosed and do you

think an ultrasound can give a difinitive diagnosis? The more I read

the more confused I get. I would appreciate any information from

anyone.

Thankyou

Anya

Share bookmarks: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MullerianAnomalies/links/

Share files:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MullerianAnomalies/files/

The Congenital Uterine Anomalies Home Page:

http://www.wegrokit.com/uterineanomalies/

es/

The Congenital Uterine Anomalies Home Page:

http://www.wegrokit.com/uterineanomalies/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first diagnosis was possible SU by ultrasound. A follow-up HSG to confirm

was a total waste of time, as technician didn't realize that I had a 2nd cervix/

vaginal septum - so only put dye through one uterus. I had no idea how the

procedure worked, so I didn't know there was anything wrong. Result:

diagnosis of UU - which I knew was wrong. Several years later, and thinking

about conceiving, I had lap/hysteroscopy to confirm diagnosis. The diagnosis

was SU, but the rationale/description was actually much closer to UD. I think

this is quite a problem in the NHS actually, general gynae doctors who seem

to think that a septate and double uterus are the same thing. Although 2 x

cervix, vaginal septum can happen with septate uterus (there are several

women on the board with this formation), it is more typical of UD - so that's

another piece of the picture. I had a UD diagnosis at time of my caesarean

section. The early pregnancy ultrasound I had this pregnancy also diagnosed

UD.

So - I've been SU, UU and UD and I think a degree of uncertainty/range of

diagnoses is pretty typical of women's experience on the board. I don't know

for definite which I am (though I think UU can be ruled out!). Obviously, it's

useful to know what to expect in pregnancy, but knowing can only change

reproductive outcomes if it makes a difference to treatment. That's why it's

useful to confirm SU, as resection is a possibility. A few doctors recommend

extensive surgery (metroplasty?) for UD, but most docs say UD should be left

alone. So, I can't say 100% whether I'm UD or SU - but if I'm complete SU, I've

been lucky, because I've been able to carry to term without need of resection.

For the moment, I'm assuming that UD is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anya,

I am UD and was diagnosed via Hystosapingogram which is a test where

they insert dye into your cervixes and look at the shape that the dye

forms. I have heard that a laproscopic hysteroscopy is the best to to

diagnos mullerian anomolies. I had many many unltrasounds growing up

due to losing an ovary (unrelated) and the ultrasounds never showed

anything unusual about my reproductive anatomy. That's just my

experience.

M. UD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anya,

I am UD and was diagnosed via Hystosapingogram which is a test where

they insert dye into your cervixes and look at the shape that the dye

forms. I have heard that a laproscopic hysteroscopy is the best to to

diagnos mullerian anomolies. I had many many unltrasounds growing up

due to losing an ovary (unrelated) and the ultrasounds never showed

anything unusual about my reproductive anatomy. That's just my

experience.

M. UD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anya,

I am UD and was diagnosed via Hystosapingogram which is a test where

they insert dye into your cervixes and look at the shape that the dye

forms. I have heard that a laproscopic hysteroscopy is the best to to

diagnos mullerian anomolies. I had many many unltrasounds growing up

due to losing an ovary (unrelated) and the ultrasounds never showed

anything unusual about my reproductive anatomy. That's just my

experience.

M. UD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was diagnosed by ultrasound and then later had an HSG when we were

considering ttc to find out more details. The HSG showed that one

ovary/tube might not be connected on my smaller side. This could not

be determined by the us. BTW, my docs all said they felt it better to

leave my UD as is and not attempt any surgery since it might cause

more complications with pg from scar tissue, etc. Turned out to be

fine - had no complications to speak of with my twin pg last year.

Liz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was diagnosed by ultrasound and then later had an HSG when we were

considering ttc to find out more details. The HSG showed that one

ovary/tube might not be connected on my smaller side. This could not

be determined by the us. BTW, my docs all said they felt it better to

leave my UD as is and not attempt any surgery since it might cause

more complications with pg from scar tissue, etc. Turned out to be

fine - had no complications to speak of with my twin pg last year.

Liz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was diagnosed by ultrasound and then later had an HSG when we were

considering ttc to find out more details. The HSG showed that one

ovary/tube might not be connected on my smaller side. This could not

be determined by the us. BTW, my docs all said they felt it better to

leave my UD as is and not attempt any surgery since it might cause

more complications with pg from scar tissue, etc. Turned out to be

fine - had no complications to speak of with my twin pg last year.

Liz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hey Trish

I'm UD also. I have 2 cervices & vaginas, the left side being the

dominant side. I always suspected I had 2 cervices but no MD could ever

locate it. I finally went to an RE & he was able to locate the rt side

(very painful) As for TTC, we have been trying for 13 months with no

luck. We did 4 rounds of clomid w/ IUI unsuccessfully. I started

injections last week. Does anyone have any encouraging stories with

repronex & pregnancy?

Best of luck to you.

Anne

UD

TTC #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...