Guest guest Posted April 22, 2004 Report Share Posted April 22, 2004 More citations on heart health and hysterectomy with/out oophorectomy and before vs. after menopause: Premenopausal hysterectomy and cardiovascular disease. Centerwall BS. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan;139(1):58-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra\ ct&list_uids=7457522 Early menopause and the risk of myocardial infarction.Rosenberg L, Hennekens CH, Rosner B, Belanger C, Rothman KJ, Speizer FE. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan;139(1):47-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra\ ct&list_uids=7457520 Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. N Engl J Med. 1987 Apr 30;316(18):1105-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra\ ct&list_uids=3574358 Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and heart disease risk factors in older women. Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E, Wingard DL. Am J Public Health. 1997 Apr;87(4):676-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra\ ct&list_uids=9146454 A natural experiment on the effects of ovarian hormones on cardiovascular risk factors and stress reactivity: bilateral salpingo oophorectomy versus hysterectomy only. Stoney CM, Owens JF, Guzick DS, s KA. Health Psychol. 1997 Jul;16(4):349-58. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra\ ct&list_uids=9237087 Risk of myocardial infarction after oophorectomy and hysterectomy. Falkeborn M, Schairer C, Naessen T, Persson I. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Aug;53(8):832-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra\ ct&list_uids=10942866 Usefulness of prior hysterectomy as an independent predictor of Framingham risk score (The Women's Health Initiative). Hsia J, Barad D, Margolis K, Rodabough R, McGovern PG, Limacher MC, Oberman A, Smoller S; Women's Health Initiative Research Group. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Aug 1;92(3):264-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra\ ct&list_uids=12888128 A lot of conflicting research...probably time for a review of literature with data analysis/weighting, at this point... Also, I couldn't find the citations to the Women's Midlife Health Project (by Dennerstein, et al) I was looking for tonight, but I do think it contains even more relevant data on this issue. It might have been info she presented at a conference I attended in the last couple of years. Not sure. BTW, Dennerstein has come a long, long way since her 1977 paper on hysterectomy and sexual function -- and for the better in researching and understanding the science of female sexual function, if you ask me. Her early book on hysterectomy was a tosser. Patriarchal b.s. based on more speculation that science. Ugh. Made a dent in the sheetrock of my bedroom wall when I tossed it in a fit of anger quite a few years ago now.... Scientific evidence has a way of changing researcher perspective on a whole lot of issues...we just need to push the envelope on demanding more of it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.