Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Pat Boersma marypatb@...> wrote: they are quite worried about the possibility of accidentally burning up tissue surrounding the tumor(s). I was worried about this possibility before my FUS procedure and questioned the radiologist at length. They only aim for the center of the fibroid. There have not been any instances so far that they've burned surrounding tissue. just exactly why are they “practicing” on fibroids? Could it be because they consider the uterus to be “dispensable” – and that if they have an accident, it doesn’t really matter -- they’ve only damaged an unnecessary (useless?) organ? That they could always just fix any big mistakes by “simply” performing hysterectomy? It is true that many, many women go on to live normal and productive lives without a uterus, and yes, I suppose if they plan to use this treatment on brain tumors one day that it would be wise to start with a uterus. But why would they have to perform a hysterectomy? If the procedure doesn't work then a myo would still be an option... Could it be because being benign tumors – fibroids are considered “harmless” – and because it’s not a disaster if you don’t get the whole tumor completely gone? My understanding is that by destroying the center of the fibroid (in my case they treated a 6 cm. section of a 10 cm. fibroid) that the whole fibroid will die. What is the difference between this and reaching menopause, when perhaps the fibroid will shrink but not entirely dissapear? Could it be because it’s easier to get a treatment approved for “harmless” tumors located in “useless” organs? I'm personally glad they started with fibroids. I feel lucky and I feel that this treatment offers a much easier option than conventional surgery. Once approved, FUS will be less expensive than surgery. the fact that I suspect the REASON we may be guinea pigs is that there’s an attitude that we have “harmless” tumors which are growing in “dispensable”/even “useless” organs (our uteri)! - I mind perpetuating that attitude – I mind it A LOT. I hope that’s not the case, but I have my suspicions . . . There comes a point when one has to have faith, to surrender and TRUST in the treatment they chose. There is a certain amount of risk that comes with having fibroids, even if one choses not to treat them at all. Chosing surgery, or UAE or FUS....there are no guaranteed outcomes. That's life, nothing ventured, nothing gained. I feel extremely lucky to have been able to participate in the FUS study, very lucky to be able to go back to work the next day and have virtually no pain. I am not suspicious at all, only grateful to who ever thought of this wonderfully non-invasive treatment. If I end up eating my words, then so be it. It was worth a try IMHO to avoid surgery. No one participating in the FUS trial has had to have a hysterectomy because of damages incurred during the procedure~ P.S. In Boston they had me sign an inch worth of paper work explaining everything and anything that could happen to me during the FUS treatment. Including tissue burning, and the fact that it may not work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.