Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: PLS vs ALS ???

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi, ,

Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is misdiagnosed

as PLS.

While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of onset.

PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, and

in some cases much longer.

The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS.

the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. The

EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS and

suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients.

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

hi all,

steven hawkings does not have ALS, he has some form of spinal ataxia

jim hauck

Posted by: " Don " don-wilson@... scouter427

Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:55 pm (PST)

Hi, ,

Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is misdiagnosed

as PLS.

While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of onset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Jim,

It would be so nice If you share your docs about hawkings regarding he has some

form of spinal ataxia

Best

Alper Kaya MD

Ophthalmologist

Jim Hauck jimhauck@...> yazdı: hi all,

steven hawkings does not have ALS, he has some form of spinal ataxia

jim hauck

Posted by: " Don " don-wilson@... scouter427

Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:55 pm (PST)

Hi, ,

Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is misdiagnosed

as PLS.

While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of onset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hello

Jim where did you get the info that Hawkings has Spinal

Ataxia i would be very interested in finding out . GEO

>

> hi all,

>

> steven hawkings does not have ALS, he has some form of spinal

ataxia

>

> jim hauck

>

> Posted by: " Don " don-wilson@... scouter427

> Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:55 pm (PST)

> Hi, ,

>

> Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

> degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

misdiagnosed

> as PLS.

>

> While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

> one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

onset.

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

from stephen hawkins website:

I am quite often asked: How do you feel about having ALS? The answer

is, not a lot. I try to lead as normal a life as possible, and not

think about my condition, or regret the things it prevents me from

doing, which are not that many.

It was a great shock to me to discover that I had motor neurone

disease. I had never been very well co-ordinated physically as a

child. I was not good at ball games, and my handwriting was the

despair of my teachers. Maybe for this reason, I didn't care much

for sport or physical activities. But things seemed to change when I

went to Oxford, at the age of 17. I took up coxing and rowing. I was

not Boat Race standard, but I got by at the level of inter-College

competition.

In my third year at Oxford, however, I noticed that I seemed to be

getting more clumsy, and I fell over once or twice for no apparent

reason. But it was not until I was at Cambridge, in the following

year, that my father noticed, and took me to the family doctor. He

referred me to a specialist, and shortly after my 21st birthday, I

went into hospital for tests. I was in for two weeks, during which I

had a wide variety of tests. They took a muscle sample from my arm,

stuck electrodes into me, and injected some radio opaque fluid into

my spine, and watched it going up and down with x-rays, as they

tilted the bed. After all that, they didn't tell me what I had,

except that it was not multiple sclerosis, and that I was an a-

typical case. I gathered, however, that they expected it to continue

to get worse, and that there was nothing they could do, except give

me vitamins. I could see that they didn't expect them to have much

effect. I didn't feel like asking for more details, because they

were obviously bad.

The realisation that I had an incurable disease, that was likely to

kill me in a few years, was a bit of a shock. How could something

like that happen to me? Why should I be cut off like this? However,

while I had been in hospital, I had seen a boy I vaguely knew die of

leukaemia, in the bed opposite me. It had not been a pretty sight.

Clearly there were people who were worse off than me. At least my

condition didn't make me feel sick. Whenever I feel inclined to be

sorry for myself I remember that boy.

Not knowing what was going to happen to me, or how rapidly the

disease would progress, I was at a loose end. The doctors told me to

go back to Cambridge and carry on with the research I had just

started in general relativity and cosmology. But I was not making

much progress, because I didn't have much mathematical background.

And, anyway, I might not live long enough to finish my PhD. I felt

somewhat of a tragic character. I took to listening to Wagner, but

reports in magazine articles that I drank heavily are an

exaggeration. The trouble is once one article said it, other

articles copied it, because it made a good story. People believe

that anything that has appeared in print so many times must be true.

My dreams at that time were rather disturbed. Before my condition

had been diagnosed, I had been very bored with life. There had not

seemed to be anything worth doing. But shortly after I came out of

hospital, I dreamt that I was going to be executed. I suddenly

realised that there were a lot of worthwhile things I could do if I

were reprieved. Another dream, that I had several times, was that I

would sacrifice my life to save others. After all, if I were going

to die anyway, it might as well do some good. But I didn't die. In

fact, although there was a cloud hanging over my future, I found, to

my surprise, that I was enjoying life in the present more than

before. I began to make progress with my research, and I got engaged

to a girl called Jane Wilde, whom I had met just about the time my

condition was diagnosed. That engagement changed my life. It gave me

something to live for. But it also meant that I had to get a job if

we were to get married. I therefore applied for a research

fellowship at Gonville and Caius (pronounced Keys) college,

Cambridge. To my great surprise, I got a fellowship, and we got

married a few months later.

The fellowship at Caius took care of my immediate employment

problem. I was lucky to have chosen to work in theoretical physics,

because that was one of the few areas in which my condition would

not be a serious handicap. And I was fortunate that my scientific

reputation increased, at the same time that my disability got worse.

This meant that people were prepared to offer me a sequence of

positions in which I only had to do research, without having to

lecture.

We were also fortunate in housing. When we were married, Jane was

still an undergraduate at Westfield College in London, so she had to

go up to London during the week. This meant that we had to find

somewhere I could manage on my own, and which was central, because I

could not walk far. I asked the College if they could help, but was

told by the then Bursar: it is College policy not to help Fellows

with housing. We therefore put our name down to rent one of a group

of new flats that were being built in the market place. (Years

later, I discovered that those flats were actually owned by the

College, but they didn't tell me that.) However, when we returned to

Cambridge from a visit to America after the marriage, we found that

the flats were not ready. As a great concession, the Bursar said we

could have a room in a hostel for graduate students. He said, " We

normally charge 12 shillings and 6 pence a night for this room.

However, as there will be two of you in the room, we will charge 25

shillings. " We stayed there only three nights. Then we found a small

house about 100 yards from my university department. It belonged to

another College, who had let it to one of its fellows. However he

had moved out to a house he had bought in the suburbs. He sub-let

the house to us for the remaining three months of his lease. During

those three months, we found that another house in the same road was

standing empty. A neighbour summoned the owner from Dorset, and told

her that it was a scandal that her house should be empty, when young

people were looking for accommodation. So she let the house to us.

After we had lived there for a few years, we wanted to buy the

house, and do it up. So we asked my College for a mortgage. However,

the College did a survey, and decided it was not a good risk. In the

end we got a mortgage from a building society, and my parents gave

us the money to do it up. We lived there for another four years, but

it became too difficult for me to manage the stairs. By this time,

the College appreciated me rather more, and there was a different

Bursar. They therefore offered us a ground floor flat in a house

that they owned. This suited me very well, because it had large

rooms and wide doors. It was sufficiently central that I could get

to my University department, or the College, in my electric wheel

chair. It was also nice for our three children, because it was

surrounded by garden, which was looked after by the College

gardeners.

Up to 1974, I was able to feed myself, and get in and out of bed.

Jane managed to help me, and bring up the children, without outside

help. However, things were getting more difficult, so we took to

having one of my research students living with us. In return for

free accommodation, and a lot of my attention, they helped me get up

and go to bed. In 1980, we changed to a system of community and

private nurses, who came in for an hour or two in the morning and

evening. This lasted until I caught pneumonia in 1985. I had to have

a tracheotomy operation. After this, I had to have 24 hour nursing

care. This was made possible by grants from several foundations.

Before the operation, my speech had been getting more slurred, so

that only a few people who knew me well, could understand me. But at

least I could communicate. I wrote scientific papers by dictating to

a secretary, and I gave seminars through an interpreter, who

repeated my words more clearly. However, the tracheotomy operation

removed my ability to speak altogether. For a time, the only way I

could communicate was to spell out words letter by letter, by

raising my eyebrows when someone pointed to the right letter on a

spelling card. It is pretty difficult to carry on a conversation

like that, let alone write a scientific paper. However, a computer

expert in California, called Walt Woltosz, heard of my plight. He

sent me a computer program he had written, called Equalizer. This

allowed me to select words from a series of menus on the screen, by

pressing a switch in my hand. The program could also be controlled

by a switch, operated by head or eye movement. When I have built up

what I want to say, I can send it to a speech synthesizer. At first,

I just ran the Equalizer program on a desk top computer.

However Mason, of Cambridge Adaptive Communication, fitted a

small portable computer and a speech synthesizer to my wheel chair.

This system allowed me to communicate much better than I could

before. I can manage up to 15 words a minute. I can either speak

what I have written, or save it to disk. I can then print it out, or

call it back and speak it sentence by sentence. Using this system, I

have written a book, and dozens of scientific papers. I have also

given many scientific and popular talks. They have all been well

received. I think that is in a large part due to the quality of the

speech synthesiser, which is made by Speech Plus. One's voice is

very important. If you have a slurred voice, people are likely to

treat you as mentally deficient: Does he take sugar? This

synthesiser is by far the best I have heard, because it varies the

intonation, and doesn't speak like a Dalek. The only trouble is that

it gives me an American accent.

I have had motor neurone disease for practically all my adult life.

Yet it has not prevented me from having a very attractive family,

and being successful in my work. This is thanks to the help I have

received from Jane, my children, and a large number of other people

and organisations. I have been lucky, that my condition has

progressed more slowly than is often the case. But it shows that one

need not lose hope.

Hawking

For more information on Motor Neurone Disease and Amyotrophic

Lateral Sclerosis, as well as other progressive conditions, please

follow one of the links below:

The Motor Neurone Disease Association (UK)

International Alliance of ALS/MND Associations on the internet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi ,

I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now

been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they

had ALS.

Arlene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I was diagnosed in May, 2002 with probable PLS but with some slight

abnormalities in my EMG. After two more EMG's and more prominent symptoms and

nerve loss my diagnosis was changed in July, 2004 to ALS. This has been

confirmed by two neurologists who specialize in ALS, but mine is relatively slow

in progression.

If anyone would like more information on my diagnosis they can e-mail me

personally if that will be of any help.

Jo.

Re: PLS vs ALS ???

Hi ,

I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now

been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they

had ALS.

Arlene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Don,

My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road

Re: PLS vs ALS ???

To: PLS-FRIENDS

> Hi, ,

>

> Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

> degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

> misdiagnosed

> as PLS.

>

> While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

> one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

> onset.

> PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years,

> and

> in some cases much longer.

>

> The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS.

> the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

> involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

> involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS.

> The

> EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

>

> I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS

> and

> suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients.

>

>

> Don

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

my neuro also said the same thing, and he has been dealing with als and pls for

20 yrs......denise

>

> From: bthompson2@...

> Date: 2006/06/15 Thu PM 11:11:37 EDT

> To: PLS-FRIENDS

> Subject: Re: PLS vs ALS ???

>

> Hi Don,

> My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road

>

> Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> To: PLS-FRIENDS

>

> > Hi, ,

> >

> > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

> > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

> > misdiagnosed

> > as PLS.

> >

> > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

> > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

> > onset.

> > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years,

> > and

> > in some cases much longer.

> >

> > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS.

> > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

> > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

> > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS.

> > The

> > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

> >

> > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS

> > and

> > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients.

> >

> >

> > Don

> >

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dldl@... wrote:

>

> my neuro also said the same thing, and he has been dealing with als

> and pls for 20 yrs......denise

> >

> > From: bthompson2@...

> > Date: 2006/06/15 Thu PM 11:11:37 EDT

> > To: PLS-FRIENDS

> > Subject: Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> >

> > Hi Don,

> > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road

> >

> > Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> > To: PLS-FRIENDS

> >

> > > Hi, ,

> > >

> > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

> > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

> > > misdiagnosed

> > > as PLS.

> > >

> > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

> > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

> > > onset.

> > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years,

> > > and

> > > in some cases much longer.

> > >

> > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS.

> > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

> > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

> > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS.

> > > The

> > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

> > >

> > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS

> > > and

> > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients.

> > >

> > >

> > > Don

> > >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no definitive

test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases, the

diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression time of

say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along.

Lynn

http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com>

Re: PLS vs ALS ???

>

> Hi Don,

> My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road

>

> Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> To: PLS-FRIENDS

>

> > Hi, ,

> >

> > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not

> > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

> > misdiagnosed

> > as PLS.

> >

> > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for

> > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

> > onset.

> > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years,

> > and

> > in some cases much longer.

> >

> > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS.

> > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

> > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

> > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS.

> > The

> > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

> >

> > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS

> > and

> > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients.

> >

> >

> > Don

> >

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes...when I had my latest EMG a few weeks ago, one of my 3

neuros...he specializes in ALS and PLS...told me that PLS is

probably a form of ALS......but moves very much slower. He said some

people may be only moderately effects and others much more severely.

But he feels eventually PLS will be reclassifed as something

like " ALS-2 " or something.

Di.............Canada

>

> My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no

definitive

> test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases,

the

> diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression

time of

> say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along.

>

> Lynn

> http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com

http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com>

>

> Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> >

> > Hi Don,

> > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the

road

> >

> > Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> > To: PLS-FRIENDS

> >

> > > Hi, ,

> > >

> > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does

not

> > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

> > > misdiagnosed

> > > as PLS.

> > >

> > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins

for

> > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

> > > onset.

> > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20

years,

> > > and

> > > in some cases much longer.

> > >

> > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In

PLS.

> > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

> > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

> > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS.

> > > The

> > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

> > >

> > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to

PLS

> > > and

> > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with

patients.

> > >

> > >

> > > Don

> > >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes...when I had my latest EMG a few weeks ago, one of my 3

neuros...he specializes in ALS and PLS...told me that PLS is

probably a form of ALS......but moves very much slower. He said some

people may be only moderately effects and others much more severely.

But he feels eventually PLS will be reclassifed as something

like " ALS-2 " or something.

Di.............Canada

>

> My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no

definitive

> test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases,

the

> diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression

time of

> say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along.

>

> Lynn

> http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com

http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com>

>

> Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> >

> > Hi Don,

> > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the

road

> >

> > Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> > To: PLS-FRIENDS

> >

> > > Hi, ,

> > >

> > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does

not

> > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

> > > misdiagnosed

> > > as PLS.

> > >

> > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins

for

> > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

> > > onset.

> > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20

years,

> > > and

> > > in some cases much longer.

> > >

> > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In

PLS.

> > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

> > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

> > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS.

> > > The

> > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

> > >

> > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to

PLS

> > > and

> > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with

patients.

> > >

> > >

> > > Don

> > >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes...when I had my latest EMG a few weeks ago, one of my 3

neuros...he specializes in ALS and PLS...told me that PLS is

probably a form of ALS......but moves very much slower. He said some

people may be only moderately effects and others much more severely.

But he feels eventually PLS will be reclassifed as something

like " ALS-2 " or something.

Di.............Canada

>

> My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no

definitive

> test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases,

the

> diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression

time of

> say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along.

>

> Lynn

> http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com

http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com>

>

> Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> >

> > Hi Don,

> > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the

road

> >

> > Re: PLS vs ALS ???

> > To: PLS-FRIENDS

> >

> > > Hi, ,

> > >

> > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does

not

> > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is

> > > misdiagnosed

> > > as PLS.

> > >

> > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical

> > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known

> > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins

for

> > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of

> > > onset.

> > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20

years,

> > > and

> > > in some cases much longer.

> > >

> > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In

PLS.

> > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal

> > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply

> > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS.

> > > The

> > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved.

> > >

> > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to

PLS

> > > and

> > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with

patients.

> > >

> > >

> > > Don

> > >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Donna,

You have described me to the tee, except for the slurring of the words. My

doctors do not have other PLS patients, due to the fact that PLS is extremely

rare. The interesting thing is my GP is more helpful than my neurologist!

If anyone knows of a PLS specialist in the NY area please let me know. Good

luck to you Donna.

Carol

Endicott, N.Y.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this topic. Its been very

interesting to me. My question to anyone is:

I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen one neuro. He is the one who

diag. me. My lower body (legs) are very weak & have been in walker for almost 2

yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor. My upper body is very strong. When I

fall, I crawl to something " heavy " and pull myself up. I do have slurring of

speech at times. I have not checked to see if there are other neuros that know

about PLS, but honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how much he knows of

this disease. I should ask him how many PLS patients he has! I see him the 26th

for 6 mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very appreciated.

PLS vs ALS ??

Thanks a bunch, take care,

Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa

Re: PLS vs ALS ???

Hi ,

I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now

been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they

had ALS.

Arlene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

HI DONNA, I ALSO HAVE HAD PLS FOR 10 YRS. I ALSO USE A WALKER, MY

SYMPTOMSSTARTED IN MY TONGUE SO MY SPEECH WAS THE FIRST TO GO. I CAN TALK BUT

ONLY A FEW WORDS AT A TIME, I TIRE OUT VERY QUICK. I GO TO AN ALS CLINIC AT THE

EMORY. I'VE BEEN WITH THEM SINCE 2001. I DID AT ONE TIME TRY A LOCAL NEURO BUT

QUICKLY FOUND HE DIDN'T HAVE THE INTEREST THAT THEY HAD AT THE ALS CLINIC.

THEY ARE REALLY UP TO DATE WITH PLS, AND STAY ON TOP OF EVERYTHING! IF YOU HAVE

A MAJOR HOSP. NEAR YOU WITH AN ALS CLINIC, IT MIGHT BE TO YOUR

BENIFIT...............DENISE

>

>

> Date: 2006/06/17 Sat AM 08:45:52 EDT

> To: PLS-FRIENDS >

> Subject: Re: PLS vs ALS ???

>

> I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this topic. Its been very

interesting to me. My question to anyone is:

> I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen one neuro. He is the one who

diag. me. My lower body (legs) are very weak & have been in walker for almost 2

yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor. My upper body is very strong. When I

fall, I crawl to something " heavy " and pull myself up. I do have slurring of

speech at times. I have not checked to see if there are other neuros that know

about PLS, but honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how much he knows of

this disease. I should ask him how many PLS patients he has! I see him the 26th

for 6 mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very appreciated.

> PLS vs ALS ??

> Thanks a bunch, take care,

> Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa

>

> Re: PLS vs ALS ???

>

>

> Hi ,

> I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now

> been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they

> had ALS.

> Arlene

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Donna,

I dont have any input as to what to tell your neuro, but reading about

you describing how you are and for how long you have had your

symptoms, is exactly how I am down to a tee. It was like I was

reading about myself except for one small exception and that is, that

I dont have a confirmed DX as yet.

And I think you meant that you are using a walker as opposed to " in "

walker for 2 years??

Aussie Maureen

>

> I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this topic. Its been

very interesting to me. My question to anyone is:

> I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen one neuro. He is

the one who diag. me. My lower body (legs) are very weak & have been

in walker for almost 2 yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor. My

upper body is very strong. When I fall, I crawl to something " heavy "

and pull myself up. I do have slurring of speech at times. I have not

checked to see if there are other neuros that know about PLS, but

honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how much he knows of this

disease. I should ask him how many PLS patients he has! I see him the

26th for 6 mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very appreciated.

> PLS vs ALS ??

> Thanks a bunch, take care,

> Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa

>

> Re: PLS vs ALS ???

>

>

> Hi ,

> I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site

have now

> been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with,

they

> had ALS.

> Arlene

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Donna,

Sounds like you probably have PLS. If you had ALS you

probably wouldn't have a strong upper body--especially

after 10 years.

Are your muscles in your legs significantly wasted

away? If not, another sign that you don't have ALS.

What are the results of everyone's favorite test--the

EMG? Does it show either no lower motor neuron

involvement or very minor involvement. If so, you

don't have ALS.

Having had your symptoms for over 4 years, the new PLS

diagnostic criteria say you have PLS--assuming no

significant lower motor neuron involvement.

Mark

P.S. If you'd (or anyone) would like a copy of a

medical journal article with the new PLS diagnostic

criteria, please contact me off-list at

markw732@... .

--- Rick and Donna Swartzendruber

dandrswartz@...> wrote:

> I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this

> topic. Its been very interesting to me. My question

> to anyone is:

> I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen

> one neuro. He is the one who diag. me. My lower body

> (legs) are very weak & have been in walker for

> almost 2 yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor.

> My upper body is very strong. When I fall, I crawl

> to something " heavy " and pull myself up. I do have

> slurring of speech at times. I have not checked to

> see if there are other neuros that know about PLS,

> but honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how

> much he knows of this disease. I should ask him how

> many PLS patients he has! I see him the 26th for 6

> mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very

> appreciated.

> PLS vs ALS ??

> Thanks a bunch, take care,

> Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The neuro that dx me has only one other PLS patient. But he has sent me to two

Dr's who specialize in MND's. He sent me to one after all the tests he did and

dx me and said he wanted a second opinion. Then about a year later he asked me

to go to another one just to make sure. The second opinion drs were a two and

one-half hours drive each way and I agreed with the first " second opinion " visit

but balked at the second. But my neuro talked me into it so I went. So even

tho my neuro doesn't have much experience with PLS I think he is very

conscientious and I really get most of my info about online and from this group.

Susieq

Re: PLS vs ALS ???

Hi ,

I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now

been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they

had ALS.

Arlene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Carol!

I see Gordon, MD at Columbia-Presbyterian in NYC.

He wrote several articles about PLS, including the

one that classifies PLS into different sub-groups.

And he is a great doc.

Mark

--- Dearold@... wrote:

> Hi Donna,

>

> You have described me to the tee, except for the

> slurring of the words. My

> doctors do not have other PLS patients, due to the

> fact that PLS is extremely

> rare. The interesting thing is my GP is more helpful

> than my neurologist!

> If anyone knows of a PLS specialist in the NY area

> please let me know. Good

> luck to you Donna.

>

> Carol

> Endicott, N.Y.

>

>

>

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi, Bart,

Perhaps I can share a few experiences which my help to understand why

physicians might say " PLS and progress to ALS " .

In 1991, only two years after Bettie Jo was able to recognize

symptoms, her neurlogist referred her to Wake First University School

of Medicine, North Carolina Baptist Hospital for a consult. The

neurologist was, and still is, the ALS expert at that facility. He

was provided with all records, and had reviewed then before the

appointment. She arrived for the appointment (she drove herself) and

was placed in an examining room. The doctor arrived, along with the

students that he had on the neuro rotation at that time. He gave the

standard neurological examination, moving joints, checking strength,

that stuff, and stepped back. He then told my spouse that " it could

be multiple sclerosis of cord compression at C5-6, but I feel that it

is early state ALS. With that pronouncement, he turned and left the

room with his students following, and left my spouse setting there

alone. She sat there in shock for quite a while, alone. A nurse

finally poked her head in the door and ask if she were all-right.

She shakenly answered yes, gathered her things and drive herself

home. There she went to pieces and that is how I found her. Sure, I

should have been with her, but at that time, the problem did not seem

to be that big. That diagnosis ws not acceptable to her regular

neurologist, so we kept watching and testing.

Bettie Jo had a problem with her PCP, in that his staff generally

left messages concerning her test results with anyone what answered

the phone. PCP was changed.

A 1991 letter from the neurologist to the PCP, the neurologist stated

..... " I believe we should repeat her tests and obtain a magnetic

resonance scan of the head and cervical spine. Hopefully, we will

find some treatable process. I am afraid that she suffers from

primary lateral sclerosis, which is a form of motor neuron disease. "

The bad part of this is that PLS was never mentioned to Bettie Jo, or

at least she has no recollection of it, and this is before I was

allowed to be present at doctor's appointments. The neurologist had

never seen a case of PLS.

Her PCP at that time was not inclined to make additional referral for

tests or anything else, saying that her problem was that she was

overweight and depression. The doctor never mentioned the letter

from the neurologist.

Another change in PCP was made. After about three years with the new

primary care physician, the doctor became tired of not making a

definite diagnosis and communicated with the neurologist. So, i

tests for heavy metal, spinal for tests to rule out a number of

possin 1997, Bettie Jo was referred to Dr. E. Wayne Massey at Duke in

October. The letter from the neurologist that accompanied After

reviewing all the result from multiple EMG's, myelogram,ble problems,

MRI, CT, and PNVC to name a few, he confirmed the disease as upper

motor neuron, generally determined to be Primary Lateral Sclerosis.

That was the first time we heard those words.

We move forward a couple of years when Bettie Jo decided that it was

time to retire on disability. The paperwork was completed and Social

Security requested that she be seen by one of their physicians. An

appointment was made, and we spent an hour or so with that noted

neurologist. He also reviewed the records and did the standard

examination. Then he said, " Well, if you have to have ALS, this is

the good kind to have. " I questioned that statement and asked if he

did not agree with the diagnosis of PLS. He stated that he was a

" lumper " lumping all of this type of motor neuron disease under ALS.

He did not agree with " splitters " who look for distinctions between

ALS, PLS and other diseases that might fall in that group.

I have gotten verbose.

Where I was trying to go was: One noted neurologist was ready to

diagnose ALS in 1991. Another neurologist with no experience in PLS,

was not comfortable making that diagnosis after a possible ALS

diagnosis. As time (years) is one of the accepted criteria for a PLS

diagnosis, the referral in 1997 satisfied that point and PLS became

the diagnosis. At no time has she demonstrated appreciable lower

motor neuron involvement through multiple EMG tests.

If the disease has not progressed to involve the lower motor neurons,

then the disease of classified as upper motor neuron, here PLS. If

her next EMG demonstrates a significant lower motor neuron

involvement, would we say that the PLS had progressed to ALS? I

would not, nor would our neurologists, including the #2 ALS man at

WFUSM. We might have to fall back on the Social Security neurologist

who said " if you have to have ALS, this is the good kind to have. "

But, right now she has PLS and that is our working diagnosis.

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Carol,

I live in Rhinebeck NY and see Dr. Clifton Gooch (neuro) and Dr.

Stanly Myers (physiatris) at Columbia Presbyterian in NYC . It a

lengthy drive (certainly not as far as from Endicott) but they are PLS

literate. You could probably Amtrak it in from Endicott if you wanted

to go there.

Colleen

>

> Hi Donna,

>

> You have described me to the tee, except for the slurring of the

words. My

> doctors do not have other PLS patients, due to the fact that PLS is

extremely

> rare. The interesting thing is my GP is more helpful than my

neurologist!

> If anyone knows of a PLS specialist in the NY area please let me

know. Good

> luck to you Donna.

>

> Carol

> Endicott, N.Y.

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank you with everyone concerning my questioning on the possibility that

diagnostic of

PLS can to transform into SLA. According to what I read, all goes there from

these opinions

according to knowledge which they have on the subject… it is normal. For my

part, I am

currently very anxious because my condition is more disappointing that what

was

envisaged… The last year I had dianostic PLS after more than two years of light

symptoms…

My neuro suspected a PLS can-êre a HSP and believed that nothing important

good would

arrive. Here is that last week it drew aside the possibility of a HSP being

given the speed to

which I lost the possibility of going. Indeed, my legs weakened well since two

months and

contrary to what occurred front, my muscles of the legs are much less strong…

Now, it

said me well that nothing announces a SLA for the moment, but I know well that

this

weakness frightens me and is rapid… It perhaps will suggest me the

installation of a pump

for the baclofen in August…

Thank you and sorry for the translation, I use a software of translation

automatic…

Montreal, Canada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...