Guest guest Posted June 11, 2006 Report Share Posted June 11, 2006 Hi, , Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is misdiagnosed as PLS. While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical differences. The first is duration. While there are well known cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of onset. PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, and in some cases much longer. The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. The EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS and suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. Don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2006 Report Share Posted June 11, 2006 hi all, steven hawkings does not have ALS, he has some form of spinal ataxia jim hauck Posted by: " Don " don-wilson@... scouter427 Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:55 pm (PST) Hi, , Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is misdiagnosed as PLS. While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical differences. The first is duration. While there are well known cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of onset. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2006 Report Share Posted June 12, 2006 Jim, It would be so nice If you share your docs about hawkings regarding he has some form of spinal ataxia Best Alper Kaya MD Ophthalmologist Jim Hauck jimhauck@...> yazdı: hi all, steven hawkings does not have ALS, he has some form of spinal ataxia jim hauck Posted by: " Don " don-wilson@... scouter427 Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:55 pm (PST) Hi, , Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is misdiagnosed as PLS. While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical differences. The first is duration. While there are well known cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of onset. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2006 Report Share Posted June 12, 2006 Hello Jim where did you get the info that Hawkings has Spinal Ataxia i would be very interested in finding out . GEO > > hi all, > > steven hawkings does not have ALS, he has some form of spinal ataxia > > jim hauck > > Posted by: " Don " don-wilson@... scouter427 > Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:55 pm (PST) > Hi, , > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is misdiagnosed > as PLS. > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of onset. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2006 Report Share Posted June 12, 2006 from stephen hawkins website: I am quite often asked: How do you feel about having ALS? The answer is, not a lot. I try to lead as normal a life as possible, and not think about my condition, or regret the things it prevents me from doing, which are not that many. It was a great shock to me to discover that I had motor neurone disease. I had never been very well co-ordinated physically as a child. I was not good at ball games, and my handwriting was the despair of my teachers. Maybe for this reason, I didn't care much for sport or physical activities. But things seemed to change when I went to Oxford, at the age of 17. I took up coxing and rowing. I was not Boat Race standard, but I got by at the level of inter-College competition. In my third year at Oxford, however, I noticed that I seemed to be getting more clumsy, and I fell over once or twice for no apparent reason. But it was not until I was at Cambridge, in the following year, that my father noticed, and took me to the family doctor. He referred me to a specialist, and shortly after my 21st birthday, I went into hospital for tests. I was in for two weeks, during which I had a wide variety of tests. They took a muscle sample from my arm, stuck electrodes into me, and injected some radio opaque fluid into my spine, and watched it going up and down with x-rays, as they tilted the bed. After all that, they didn't tell me what I had, except that it was not multiple sclerosis, and that I was an a- typical case. I gathered, however, that they expected it to continue to get worse, and that there was nothing they could do, except give me vitamins. I could see that they didn't expect them to have much effect. I didn't feel like asking for more details, because they were obviously bad. The realisation that I had an incurable disease, that was likely to kill me in a few years, was a bit of a shock. How could something like that happen to me? Why should I be cut off like this? However, while I had been in hospital, I had seen a boy I vaguely knew die of leukaemia, in the bed opposite me. It had not been a pretty sight. Clearly there were people who were worse off than me. At least my condition didn't make me feel sick. Whenever I feel inclined to be sorry for myself I remember that boy. Not knowing what was going to happen to me, or how rapidly the disease would progress, I was at a loose end. The doctors told me to go back to Cambridge and carry on with the research I had just started in general relativity and cosmology. But I was not making much progress, because I didn't have much mathematical background. And, anyway, I might not live long enough to finish my PhD. I felt somewhat of a tragic character. I took to listening to Wagner, but reports in magazine articles that I drank heavily are an exaggeration. The trouble is once one article said it, other articles copied it, because it made a good story. People believe that anything that has appeared in print so many times must be true. My dreams at that time were rather disturbed. Before my condition had been diagnosed, I had been very bored with life. There had not seemed to be anything worth doing. But shortly after I came out of hospital, I dreamt that I was going to be executed. I suddenly realised that there were a lot of worthwhile things I could do if I were reprieved. Another dream, that I had several times, was that I would sacrifice my life to save others. After all, if I were going to die anyway, it might as well do some good. But I didn't die. In fact, although there was a cloud hanging over my future, I found, to my surprise, that I was enjoying life in the present more than before. I began to make progress with my research, and I got engaged to a girl called Jane Wilde, whom I had met just about the time my condition was diagnosed. That engagement changed my life. It gave me something to live for. But it also meant that I had to get a job if we were to get married. I therefore applied for a research fellowship at Gonville and Caius (pronounced Keys) college, Cambridge. To my great surprise, I got a fellowship, and we got married a few months later. The fellowship at Caius took care of my immediate employment problem. I was lucky to have chosen to work in theoretical physics, because that was one of the few areas in which my condition would not be a serious handicap. And I was fortunate that my scientific reputation increased, at the same time that my disability got worse. This meant that people were prepared to offer me a sequence of positions in which I only had to do research, without having to lecture. We were also fortunate in housing. When we were married, Jane was still an undergraduate at Westfield College in London, so she had to go up to London during the week. This meant that we had to find somewhere I could manage on my own, and which was central, because I could not walk far. I asked the College if they could help, but was told by the then Bursar: it is College policy not to help Fellows with housing. We therefore put our name down to rent one of a group of new flats that were being built in the market place. (Years later, I discovered that those flats were actually owned by the College, but they didn't tell me that.) However, when we returned to Cambridge from a visit to America after the marriage, we found that the flats were not ready. As a great concession, the Bursar said we could have a room in a hostel for graduate students. He said, " We normally charge 12 shillings and 6 pence a night for this room. However, as there will be two of you in the room, we will charge 25 shillings. " We stayed there only three nights. Then we found a small house about 100 yards from my university department. It belonged to another College, who had let it to one of its fellows. However he had moved out to a house he had bought in the suburbs. He sub-let the house to us for the remaining three months of his lease. During those three months, we found that another house in the same road was standing empty. A neighbour summoned the owner from Dorset, and told her that it was a scandal that her house should be empty, when young people were looking for accommodation. So she let the house to us. After we had lived there for a few years, we wanted to buy the house, and do it up. So we asked my College for a mortgage. However, the College did a survey, and decided it was not a good risk. In the end we got a mortgage from a building society, and my parents gave us the money to do it up. We lived there for another four years, but it became too difficult for me to manage the stairs. By this time, the College appreciated me rather more, and there was a different Bursar. They therefore offered us a ground floor flat in a house that they owned. This suited me very well, because it had large rooms and wide doors. It was sufficiently central that I could get to my University department, or the College, in my electric wheel chair. It was also nice for our three children, because it was surrounded by garden, which was looked after by the College gardeners. Up to 1974, I was able to feed myself, and get in and out of bed. Jane managed to help me, and bring up the children, without outside help. However, things were getting more difficult, so we took to having one of my research students living with us. In return for free accommodation, and a lot of my attention, they helped me get up and go to bed. In 1980, we changed to a system of community and private nurses, who came in for an hour or two in the morning and evening. This lasted until I caught pneumonia in 1985. I had to have a tracheotomy operation. After this, I had to have 24 hour nursing care. This was made possible by grants from several foundations. Before the operation, my speech had been getting more slurred, so that only a few people who knew me well, could understand me. But at least I could communicate. I wrote scientific papers by dictating to a secretary, and I gave seminars through an interpreter, who repeated my words more clearly. However, the tracheotomy operation removed my ability to speak altogether. For a time, the only way I could communicate was to spell out words letter by letter, by raising my eyebrows when someone pointed to the right letter on a spelling card. It is pretty difficult to carry on a conversation like that, let alone write a scientific paper. However, a computer expert in California, called Walt Woltosz, heard of my plight. He sent me a computer program he had written, called Equalizer. This allowed me to select words from a series of menus on the screen, by pressing a switch in my hand. The program could also be controlled by a switch, operated by head or eye movement. When I have built up what I want to say, I can send it to a speech synthesizer. At first, I just ran the Equalizer program on a desk top computer. However Mason, of Cambridge Adaptive Communication, fitted a small portable computer and a speech synthesizer to my wheel chair. This system allowed me to communicate much better than I could before. I can manage up to 15 words a minute. I can either speak what I have written, or save it to disk. I can then print it out, or call it back and speak it sentence by sentence. Using this system, I have written a book, and dozens of scientific papers. I have also given many scientific and popular talks. They have all been well received. I think that is in a large part due to the quality of the speech synthesiser, which is made by Speech Plus. One's voice is very important. If you have a slurred voice, people are likely to treat you as mentally deficient: Does he take sugar? This synthesiser is by far the best I have heard, because it varies the intonation, and doesn't speak like a Dalek. The only trouble is that it gives me an American accent. I have had motor neurone disease for practically all my adult life. Yet it has not prevented me from having a very attractive family, and being successful in my work. This is thanks to the help I have received from Jane, my children, and a large number of other people and organisations. I have been lucky, that my condition has progressed more slowly than is often the case. But it shows that one need not lose hope. Hawking For more information on Motor Neurone Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, as well as other progressive conditions, please follow one of the links below: The Motor Neurone Disease Association (UK) International Alliance of ALS/MND Associations on the internet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2006 Report Share Posted June 13, 2006 Hi , I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they had ALS. Arlene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2006 Report Share Posted June 13, 2006 I was diagnosed in May, 2002 with probable PLS but with some slight abnormalities in my EMG. After two more EMG's and more prominent symptoms and nerve loss my diagnosis was changed in July, 2004 to ALS. This has been confirmed by two neurologists who specialize in ALS, but mine is relatively slow in progression. If anyone would like more information on my diagnosis they can e-mail me personally if that will be of any help. Jo. Re: PLS vs ALS ??? Hi , I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they had ALS. Arlene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 Hi Don, My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road Re: PLS vs ALS ??? To: PLS-FRIENDS > Hi, , > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is > misdiagnosed > as PLS. > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of > onset. > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, > and > in some cases much longer. > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. > The > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS > and > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. > > > Don > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 my neuro also said the same thing, and he has been dealing with als and pls for 20 yrs......denise > > From: bthompson2@... > Date: 2006/06/15 Thu PM 11:11:37 EDT > To: PLS-FRIENDS > Subject: Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > Hi Don, > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > > Hi, , > > > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is > > misdiagnosed > > as PLS. > > > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of > > onset. > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, > > and > > in some cases much longer. > > > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. > > The > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. > > > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS > > and > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. > > > > > > Don > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 dldl@... wrote: > > my neuro also said the same thing, and he has been dealing with als > and pls for 20 yrs......denise > > > > From: bthompson2@... > > Date: 2006/06/15 Thu PM 11:11:37 EDT > > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > Subject: Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > > > Hi Don, > > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road > > > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > > > > Hi, , > > > > > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is > > > misdiagnosed > > > as PLS. > > > > > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of > > > onset. > > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, > > > and > > > in some cases much longer. > > > > > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. > > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal > > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply > > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. > > > The > > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. > > > > > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS > > > and > > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. > > > > > > > > > Don > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no definitive test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases, the diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression time of say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along. Lynn http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com> Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > Hi Don, > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > > Hi, , > > > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is > > misdiagnosed > > as PLS. > > > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of > > onset. > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, > > and > > in some cases much longer. > > > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. > > The > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. > > > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS > > and > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. > > > > > > Don > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Yes...when I had my latest EMG a few weeks ago, one of my 3 neuros...he specializes in ALS and PLS...told me that PLS is probably a form of ALS......but moves very much slower. He said some people may be only moderately effects and others much more severely. But he feels eventually PLS will be reclassifed as something like " ALS-2 " or something. Di.............Canada > > My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no definitive > test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases, the > diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression time of > say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along. > > Lynn > http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com> > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > > > Hi Don, > > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road > > > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > > > > Hi, , > > > > > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is > > > misdiagnosed > > > as PLS. > > > > > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of > > > onset. > > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, > > > and > > > in some cases much longer. > > > > > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. > > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal > > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply > > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. > > > The > > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. > > > > > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS > > > and > > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. > > > > > > > > > Don > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Yes...when I had my latest EMG a few weeks ago, one of my 3 neuros...he specializes in ALS and PLS...told me that PLS is probably a form of ALS......but moves very much slower. He said some people may be only moderately effects and others much more severely. But he feels eventually PLS will be reclassifed as something like " ALS-2 " or something. Di.............Canada > > My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no definitive > test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases, the > diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression time of > say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along. > > Lynn > http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com> > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > > > Hi Don, > > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road > > > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > > > > Hi, , > > > > > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is > > > misdiagnosed > > > as PLS. > > > > > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of > > > onset. > > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, > > > and > > > in some cases much longer. > > > > > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. > > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal > > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply > > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. > > > The > > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. > > > > > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS > > > and > > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. > > > > > > > > > Don > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Yes...when I had my latest EMG a few weeks ago, one of my 3 neuros...he specializes in ALS and PLS...told me that PLS is probably a form of ALS......but moves very much slower. He said some people may be only moderately effects and others much more severely. But he feels eventually PLS will be reclassifed as something like " ALS-2 " or something. Di.............Canada > > My doctors actually phrased it differently…Because there is no definitive > test for PLS or ALS and the progressive nature of both diseases, the > diagnosis of PLS today may be wrong and only after a progression time of > say, 5 years, we may actual find you had ALS all along. > > Lynn > http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com http://http://spoilingaunty.tripod.com> > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > > > Hi Don, > > My Neuro said the same thing that PLS can turn into ALS down the road > > > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > > > > Hi, , > > > > > > Your neurologist is not thinking clearly. PLS cannot and does not > > > degenerate to ALS. However, there are time when ALS is > > > misdiagnosed > > > as PLS. > > > > > > While the symptoms of both appear the same, there are critical > > > differences. The first is duration. While there are well known > > > cases of ALS lasting 10, 20, 30 years or more ( Hawkins for > > > one), 80% of ALS victims fall to the disease within 5 years of > > > onset. > > > PLS victims have an estimated life span of better than 20 years, > > > and > > > in some cases much longer. > > > > > > The other difference is which motor neurons are involved. In PLS. > > > the disease affects the upper motor neurons, with only minimal > > > involvement of the lower motor neurons. In ALS. both are deeply > > > involved, which explains the loss of body (muscle) mass in ALS. > > > The > > > EMG test can help determine which motor neurons are involved. > > > > > > I fear that your neurologist has have very little exposure to PLS > > > and > > > suggest that he should better informed before talking with patients. > > > > > > > > > Don > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Hi Donna, You have described me to the tee, except for the slurring of the words. My doctors do not have other PLS patients, due to the fact that PLS is extremely rare. The interesting thing is my GP is more helpful than my neurologist! If anyone knows of a PLS specialist in the NY area please let me know. Good luck to you Donna. Carol Endicott, N.Y. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this topic. Its been very interesting to me. My question to anyone is: I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen one neuro. He is the one who diag. me. My lower body (legs) are very weak & have been in walker for almost 2 yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor. My upper body is very strong. When I fall, I crawl to something " heavy " and pull myself up. I do have slurring of speech at times. I have not checked to see if there are other neuros that know about PLS, but honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how much he knows of this disease. I should ask him how many PLS patients he has! I see him the 26th for 6 mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very appreciated. PLS vs ALS ?? Thanks a bunch, take care, Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa Re: PLS vs ALS ??? Hi , I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they had ALS. Arlene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 HI DONNA, I ALSO HAVE HAD PLS FOR 10 YRS. I ALSO USE A WALKER, MY SYMPTOMSSTARTED IN MY TONGUE SO MY SPEECH WAS THE FIRST TO GO. I CAN TALK BUT ONLY A FEW WORDS AT A TIME, I TIRE OUT VERY QUICK. I GO TO AN ALS CLINIC AT THE EMORY. I'VE BEEN WITH THEM SINCE 2001. I DID AT ONE TIME TRY A LOCAL NEURO BUT QUICKLY FOUND HE DIDN'T HAVE THE INTEREST THAT THEY HAD AT THE ALS CLINIC. THEY ARE REALLY UP TO DATE WITH PLS, AND STAY ON TOP OF EVERYTHING! IF YOU HAVE A MAJOR HOSP. NEAR YOU WITH AN ALS CLINIC, IT MIGHT BE TO YOUR BENIFIT...............DENISE > > > Date: 2006/06/17 Sat AM 08:45:52 EDT > To: PLS-FRIENDS > > Subject: Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this topic. Its been very interesting to me. My question to anyone is: > I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen one neuro. He is the one who diag. me. My lower body (legs) are very weak & have been in walker for almost 2 yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor. My upper body is very strong. When I fall, I crawl to something " heavy " and pull myself up. I do have slurring of speech at times. I have not checked to see if there are other neuros that know about PLS, but honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how much he knows of this disease. I should ask him how many PLS patients he has! I see him the 26th for 6 mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very appreciated. > PLS vs ALS ?? > Thanks a bunch, take care, > Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > > Hi , > I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now > been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they > had ALS. > Arlene > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Hi Donna, I dont have any input as to what to tell your neuro, but reading about you describing how you are and for how long you have had your symptoms, is exactly how I am down to a tee. It was like I was reading about myself except for one small exception and that is, that I dont have a confirmed DX as yet. And I think you meant that you are using a walker as opposed to " in " walker for 2 years?? Aussie Maureen > > I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this topic. Its been very interesting to me. My question to anyone is: > I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen one neuro. He is the one who diag. me. My lower body (legs) are very weak & have been in walker for almost 2 yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor. My upper body is very strong. When I fall, I crawl to something " heavy " and pull myself up. I do have slurring of speech at times. I have not checked to see if there are other neuros that know about PLS, but honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how much he knows of this disease. I should ask him how many PLS patients he has! I see him the 26th for 6 mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very appreciated. > PLS vs ALS ?? > Thanks a bunch, take care, > Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa > > Re: PLS vs ALS ??? > > > Hi , > I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now > been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they > had ALS. > Arlene > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Donna, Sounds like you probably have PLS. If you had ALS you probably wouldn't have a strong upper body--especially after 10 years. Are your muscles in your legs significantly wasted away? If not, another sign that you don't have ALS. What are the results of everyone's favorite test--the EMG? Does it show either no lower motor neuron involvement or very minor involvement. If so, you don't have ALS. Having had your symptoms for over 4 years, the new PLS diagnostic criteria say you have PLS--assuming no significant lower motor neuron involvement. Mark P.S. If you'd (or anyone) would like a copy of a medical journal article with the new PLS diagnostic criteria, please contact me off-list at markw732@... . --- Rick and Donna Swartzendruber dandrswartz@...> wrote: > I'm glad there has been so much discussion on this > topic. Its been very interesting to me. My question > to anyone is: > I've been diag. with PLS for 10 yrs., & only seen > one neuro. He is the one who diag. me. My lower body > (legs) are very weak & have been in walker for > almost 2 yrs. now. Feet drag at times, balance poor. > My upper body is very strong. When I fall, I crawl > to something " heavy " and pull myself up. I do have > slurring of speech at times. I have not checked to > see if there are other neuros that know about PLS, > but honestly, I do like him, but sometimes ques. how > much he knows of this disease. I should ask him how > many PLS patients he has! I see him the 26th for 6 > mo. checkup. Any imput on the above is very > appreciated. > PLS vs ALS ?? > Thanks a bunch, take care, > Donna ~ PLS ~ Iowa > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 The neuro that dx me has only one other PLS patient. But he has sent me to two Dr's who specialize in MND's. He sent me to one after all the tests he did and dx me and said he wanted a second opinion. Then about a year later he asked me to go to another one just to make sure. The second opinion drs were a two and one-half hours drive each way and I agreed with the first " second opinion " visit but balked at the second. But my neuro talked me into it so I went. So even tho my neuro doesn't have much experience with PLS I think he is very conscientious and I really get most of my info about online and from this group. Susieq Re: PLS vs ALS ??? Hi , I agree with Don. I told my neuro that several on the PLS site have now been diagnosed with ALS. He said they never had PLS to begin with, they had ALS. Arlene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 Hi Carol! I see Gordon, MD at Columbia-Presbyterian in NYC. He wrote several articles about PLS, including the one that classifies PLS into different sub-groups. And he is a great doc. Mark --- Dearold@... wrote: > Hi Donna, > > You have described me to the tee, except for the > slurring of the words. My > doctors do not have other PLS patients, due to the > fact that PLS is extremely > rare. The interesting thing is my GP is more helpful > than my neurologist! > If anyone knows of a PLS specialist in the NY area > please let me know. Good > luck to you Donna. > > Carol > Endicott, N.Y. > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2006 Report Share Posted June 18, 2006 Hi, Bart, Perhaps I can share a few experiences which my help to understand why physicians might say " PLS and progress to ALS " . In 1991, only two years after Bettie Jo was able to recognize symptoms, her neurlogist referred her to Wake First University School of Medicine, North Carolina Baptist Hospital for a consult. The neurologist was, and still is, the ALS expert at that facility. He was provided with all records, and had reviewed then before the appointment. She arrived for the appointment (she drove herself) and was placed in an examining room. The doctor arrived, along with the students that he had on the neuro rotation at that time. He gave the standard neurological examination, moving joints, checking strength, that stuff, and stepped back. He then told my spouse that " it could be multiple sclerosis of cord compression at C5-6, but I feel that it is early state ALS. With that pronouncement, he turned and left the room with his students following, and left my spouse setting there alone. She sat there in shock for quite a while, alone. A nurse finally poked her head in the door and ask if she were all-right. She shakenly answered yes, gathered her things and drive herself home. There she went to pieces and that is how I found her. Sure, I should have been with her, but at that time, the problem did not seem to be that big. That diagnosis ws not acceptable to her regular neurologist, so we kept watching and testing. Bettie Jo had a problem with her PCP, in that his staff generally left messages concerning her test results with anyone what answered the phone. PCP was changed. A 1991 letter from the neurologist to the PCP, the neurologist stated ..... " I believe we should repeat her tests and obtain a magnetic resonance scan of the head and cervical spine. Hopefully, we will find some treatable process. I am afraid that she suffers from primary lateral sclerosis, which is a form of motor neuron disease. " The bad part of this is that PLS was never mentioned to Bettie Jo, or at least she has no recollection of it, and this is before I was allowed to be present at doctor's appointments. The neurologist had never seen a case of PLS. Her PCP at that time was not inclined to make additional referral for tests or anything else, saying that her problem was that she was overweight and depression. The doctor never mentioned the letter from the neurologist. Another change in PCP was made. After about three years with the new primary care physician, the doctor became tired of not making a definite diagnosis and communicated with the neurologist. So, i tests for heavy metal, spinal for tests to rule out a number of possin 1997, Bettie Jo was referred to Dr. E. Wayne Massey at Duke in October. The letter from the neurologist that accompanied After reviewing all the result from multiple EMG's, myelogram,ble problems, MRI, CT, and PNVC to name a few, he confirmed the disease as upper motor neuron, generally determined to be Primary Lateral Sclerosis. That was the first time we heard those words. We move forward a couple of years when Bettie Jo decided that it was time to retire on disability. The paperwork was completed and Social Security requested that she be seen by one of their physicians. An appointment was made, and we spent an hour or so with that noted neurologist. He also reviewed the records and did the standard examination. Then he said, " Well, if you have to have ALS, this is the good kind to have. " I questioned that statement and asked if he did not agree with the diagnosis of PLS. He stated that he was a " lumper " lumping all of this type of motor neuron disease under ALS. He did not agree with " splitters " who look for distinctions between ALS, PLS and other diseases that might fall in that group. I have gotten verbose. Where I was trying to go was: One noted neurologist was ready to diagnose ALS in 1991. Another neurologist with no experience in PLS, was not comfortable making that diagnosis after a possible ALS diagnosis. As time (years) is one of the accepted criteria for a PLS diagnosis, the referral in 1997 satisfied that point and PLS became the diagnosis. At no time has she demonstrated appreciable lower motor neuron involvement through multiple EMG tests. If the disease has not progressed to involve the lower motor neurons, then the disease of classified as upper motor neuron, here PLS. If her next EMG demonstrates a significant lower motor neuron involvement, would we say that the PLS had progressed to ALS? I would not, nor would our neurologists, including the #2 ALS man at WFUSM. We might have to fall back on the Social Security neurologist who said " if you have to have ALS, this is the good kind to have. " But, right now she has PLS and that is our working diagnosis. Don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 19, 2006 Report Share Posted June 19, 2006 Carol, I live in Rhinebeck NY and see Dr. Clifton Gooch (neuro) and Dr. Stanly Myers (physiatris) at Columbia Presbyterian in NYC . It a lengthy drive (certainly not as far as from Endicott) but they are PLS literate. You could probably Amtrak it in from Endicott if you wanted to go there. Colleen > > Hi Donna, > > You have described me to the tee, except for the slurring of the words. My > doctors do not have other PLS patients, due to the fact that PLS is extremely > rare. The interesting thing is my GP is more helpful than my neurologist! > If anyone knows of a PLS specialist in the NY area please let me know. Good > luck to you Donna. > > Carol > Endicott, N.Y. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 , I think I followed what you were saying. I would suggest that you go to ALS Clinic for evaluation. G. California PLS dx 1997 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2006 Report Share Posted June 23, 2006 Thank you with everyone concerning my questioning on the possibility that diagnostic of PLS can to transform into SLA. According to what I read, all goes there from these opinions according to knowledge which they have on the subject… it is normal. For my part, I am currently very anxious because my condition is more disappointing that what was envisaged… The last year I had dianostic PLS after more than two years of light symptoms… My neuro suspected a PLS can-êre a HSP and believed that nothing important good would arrive. Here is that last week it drew aside the possibility of a HSP being given the speed to which I lost the possibility of going. Indeed, my legs weakened well since two months and contrary to what occurred front, my muscles of the legs are much less strong… Now, it said me well that nothing announces a SLA for the moment, but I know well that this weakness frightens me and is rapid… It perhaps will suggest me the installation of a pump for the baclofen in August… Thank you and sorry for the translation, I use a software of translation automatic… Montreal, Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.