Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 Sandy, Because you're slim, I'm also curious that you've been diagnosed a Type 2. I was diagnosed this year at age 44, but Type 2 was ruled out on the basis that I was already slim and active. I haven't had any antibody tests to confirm I'm a Type 1, but that's the assumption. My levels are good like yours, but those levels are most likely good because I'm in the " honeymoon " phase while my remaining beta cells keep chugging away. I'm on Avandia, which is usually just for Type 2's, but for now it seems to be helping me. I've been counseled by those on this list that insulin is important even now, so that's what I'm considering and will discuss with my endo next. Were you diagnosed because you had symptoms checked out, or was it a chance blood test? I've never had a single symptom myself. I consider myself really lucky that my OB/GYN added a glucose test to my lab work. Otherwise, I'd have NO idea! I may be naive, but honestly, I didn't know it was possible to develop Type 2 if you were slim and active. -- > > Hi Whimsy, > > Thanks for all the info. Though I'm a little scared you think I may be type > 1. I hope not. I have been on low dose Amaryl since being diagnosed and my > blood sugars through very low carb diet and exercise is now between 70 and > 120. I sure hope this means I can stay this way for a while as I do not > want to have to take insulin. I was told if I was type 1 that I would have > had to go on insulin immediately as I wouldn't be producing any. > > Sandy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2005 Report Share Posted December 16, 2005 Hi , I was pre-diabetic last August when my fasting glucose was 115. My doc (who I have since found a new one) never said anything to me - apparently oblivious to the fact that if I acted THEN, I could have prevented the full blown diabetes. I wish so bad I knew then what I know now. In the past year, I have lost over 20 pounds (I thought because I was eating better, which I was, and I stopped all sugar - not because of diabetes, but because I had been doing research and found how bad sugar was for you) People with type 2 can actually have unexplained weight loss. At any rate, I lost weight and was happy about it - I did NO exercise though - I sit all day long at my computer doing medical transcription and get no activity whatsoever. I started urinating a lot, extreme thirst, getting lows if I didn't eat, etc and then my vision got blurry, so I finally made an appt and requested the blood work (doc never told me to come back). Fasting glucose was 280 and A1c was 10.1. Doc just said " you have diabetes " and put me on meds. I was very unhappy with the care I was getting so got a new primary. In the last month, my sugars are all around 100 - even after meals - I exercise 1 hour a day now and eat very little carbs, lots of vegees, etc. So I really don't know. I sure hope that this isn't short lived - nobody has said I could be type 1 - the diabetes clinic said if you are type 1, you would need insulin immediately, so I assumed I wasn't. I had not heard about this other latent type 1 or whatever it is called until this list. I have another appt next week with my new doc and will bring it up with him. I believe he will be taking me off meds at some point to see how I do. ------------------------------- Sandy, Because you're slim, I'm also curious that you've been diagnosed a Type 2. I was diagnosed this year at age 44, but Type 2 was ruled out on the basis that I was already slim and active. (snip) I may be naive, but honestly, I didn't know it was possible to develop Type 2 if you were slim and active. -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.