Re: Chelation with amalgams...

[Guest guest]

> I`m wondering what happens if one does the chelation process with

> amalgams in your mouth.

You get worse, not better.

> My doctor, who seems pretty bright in other

> areas,says that Dmsa/Ala won`t leach anything near the amount of

> mercury out of the teeth as this will from blood and tissues.

He is not correct.

> Has anyone tested the theory....

Not only have a large number of people foolishly tested this theory and

gotten horribly permamently worse, but it is quite easy to tell from

the literature that this is the case if one goes over the data reported

in relevant studies instead of just reading the medline abstract and

maybe conclusions section.

Andy . . . . . . .. . . .

[Guest guest]

>

> > Has anyone tested the theory....

>

> Not only have a large number of people foolishly tested this theory

and

> gotten horribly permamently worse, but it is quite easy to tell from

> the literature that this is the case if one goes over the data

reported

> in relevant studies instead of just reading the medline abstract and

> maybe conclusions section.

>

> Andy . . . . . . .. . . .

Thanks for your thoughts...

Where would I look for relevant studies. As you know, mainstream

studies give mercury a clean bill of health. Is there a PUBMED style

source of peer reviewed studies that illustrates your viewpoint.

Perhaps I can teach my DR something and help myself out at the same

time.

.

[Guest guest]

>

> >

> > > Has anyone tested the theory....

> >

> > Not only have a large number of people foolishly tested this theory

> and

> > gotten horribly permamently worse, but it is quite easy to tell from

> > the literature that this is the case if one goes over the data

> reported

> > in relevant studies instead of just reading the medline abstract and

> > maybe conclusions section.

> >

> > Andy . . . . . . .. . . .

>

>

> Thanks for your thoughts...

>

> Where would I look for relevant studies.

Grandjean, 1997 or 8, Sandborgh-Englund, 1994 J Dent Rsch.

> As you know, mainstream

> studies give mercury a clean bill of health.

These studies also pretend to do that, but the relevant parts are the

great increase in urinary mercury with chelation, while blood mercury

is unchanged.

> Is there a PUBMED style

> source of peer reviewed studies that illustrates your viewpoint.

Cited above.

> Perhaps I can teach my DR something and help myself out at the same

> time.

I doubt it, but good luck. At least you can not hurt yourself.

> .

[Guest guest]

[ ] Re: Chelation with amalgams...

>

> >

> > >

> > > > Has anyone tested the theory....

> > >

> > > Not only have a large number of people foolishly tested this theory

> > and

> > > gotten horribly permamently worse, but it is quite easy to tell from

> > > the literature that this is the case if one goes over the data

> > reported

> > > in relevant studies instead of just reading the medline abstract and

> > > maybe conclusions section.

> > >

> > > Andy . . . . . . .. . . .

> >

> >

> > Thanks for your thoughts...

> >

> > Where would I look for relevant studies.

>

> Grandjean, 1997 or 8, Sandborgh-Englund, 1994 J Dent Rsch.

>

> > As you know, mainstream

> > studies give mercury a clean bill of health.

>

> These studies also pretend to do that, but the relevant parts are the

> great increase in urinary mercury with chelation, while blood mercury

> is unchanged.

>

> > Is there a PUBMED style

> > source of peer reviewed studies that illustrates your viewpoint.

>

> Cited above.

>

> > Perhaps I can teach my DR something and help myself out at the same

> > time.

>

> I doubt it, but good luck. At least you can not hurt yourself.

>

> > .

>

>

>

>

>

> =======================================================

>