Guest guest Posted December 28, 2006 Report Share Posted December 28, 2006 Have you been talking to my mom? LOLOLOL........I know I know...... I will have to jump in that pool some day! But the water seems so darn cold!! Mike T Re: Re: Speaking of Cruises..... > You can't go into a relationship expecting the worst tho Mike. Do you > want to live your life in fear of a divorce? I'd rather take a chance & > love someone. :-) > > W > 380/255/160 > > Mike Tune wrote: >> No wonder your the rain check/Sale king!! Sorry Mike, that is what scares >> me! >> >> Mike T >> > > > > We are a very active support group. > If the email becomes overwhelming, > please change your setting to NO EMAIL! > Please contact Group Creator > Robyn@... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2006 Report Share Posted December 28, 2006 Buy a wet suit! W 380/255/160 Mike Tune wrote: > Have you been talking to my mom? LOLOLOL........I know I know...... > > I will have to jump in that pool some day! But the water seems so darn > cold!! > > Mike T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2006 Report Share Posted December 28, 2006 What is all the good stuff you lose in California?LOL Kim RNY 6/23/06 298/206/135 > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I am going on a seven nights cruise in the first week of > > > Feb. > > > > I > > > > > am still in the rapid weight loss phase, so I will wait to buy > > > > outfits > > > > > a few days prior to the cruise (yes, newbies, I said a few days > > > > > prior;you can't imagine how fast the weight falls off!)...I > > plan > > > to > > > > > have all my vitamins ready to go and a few protien > > > > > supplements/shakes...does anyone have suggestions for eating > > > while on > > > > > the ship? I am hoping to find something...anything else I > > > should > > > > > pack? lisamathis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are a very active support group. > > If the email becomes overwhelming, > > please change your setting to NO EMAIL! > > Please contact Group Creator > > Robyn@... > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2006 Report Share Posted December 28, 2006 Mike, Why do you have to pay her child support?Don't the kids live with you? Kim RNY 6/23/06 298/206/135 > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I am going on a seven nights cruise in the first week > > of > > > > Feb. > > > > > I > > > > > > am still in the rapid weight loss phase, so I will wait to > > buy > > > > > outfits > > > > > > a few days prior to the cruise (yes, newbies, I said a few > > days > > > > > > prior;you can't imagine how fast the weight falls off!)...I > > > plan > > > > to > > > > > > have all my vitamins ready to go and a few protien > > > > > > supplements/shakes...does anyone have suggestions for > eating > > > > while on > > > > > > the ship? I am hoping to find something...anything else I > > > > should > > > > > > pack? lisamathis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2006 Report Share Posted December 29, 2006 We have joint legal and joint physical custody. However, she is still designated as the custodial parent and I am the non-custodial parent. This allows me to see my kids very often while still making any time she gives them to me in addition to my already liberal time perceived by her, the court, most people as a gift to me. These designations also allow her to receive massive support payments, after all she is the custodial parent right? The court worked very hard to, while allowing me a lot of time with the kids, to not allow me a lot of overnights. Overnights with the non- custodial father are the financial killer for women. At a certain amount of overnights she would get less support. Now with joint physical/legal I get the ability to weigh in on school, medical, etc. decisions. Strangely enough in our judgement of divorce (JOD) it says specifically that we are to work out their school issues between ourselves but if she decides to send them to private school she must pay. That may appear inoxious but that has essentially had the effect in practice of her having the final say since all she has to do is say they're going to private school. So what right? Well they were both going to private. Then she managed to convince a suburban district that she was moving to their district. Now my daughter goes there but my son, after having gone there for a semester and having difficulties academically and they had few sixth grade sports, was brought back, unilaterally by her, to his original school. Of course you could argue none of this is massively hurtful to my children's career but don't fool yourself into thinking I have any say into any of this. She calls me on these things and, granted bitterly, my first words are, " I appreciate the call but what exactly do you want from me here? What choice do I have in the matter? " I certainly do express my opnion to her but it does little good. Of course I haven't tested the medical arena and hopefully won't have to. After all she's the custodial parent and, well, there you have it. There's no doubting that custodialness simple because it's her title. She lives about a half mile from my house so as the children enter their teen years the idea of where they spend their evenings is getting even more ridiculous. Heck, on either of our designated weekends they're doing sleep overs with their friends frequently. If you can avoid getting all pent up over the stupidity of the whole thing and realize that certainly SOME of your money, about 2/3 I figure, does end up paying for utilities and clothing, etc. for the kids then it's not so bad. Oh she does work by the way. She HAD a full time job as well as a part time waitressing job (not moving beyond that was one of the reasons we divorced). She rarely takes a vacation, certainly not more than a week a year. She often asks that I pick the kids up outside my time with them although I'm often at their events anyway. Speaking of which, what's the deal with practices and not allowing parents to attend? I mean I understand it might be a distraction I guess but damn it's sort of a hassle to drive the kids out, usually in rush hour traffic, drive back home again in rush hour traffic to eat dinner alone or clean alone, drive back 1.5-2 hrs later, drive them back home again and have to feed them separately either before or after. Not to mention that ALL the parents are doing this. Just seems stupid to me. Her full time work changed this summer when she quit her office management position out of lack of satisfaction and suspecion of being plotted against or something (I try not to get involved in her life ya know) and took a job with a start up company that repaired industrial trucks or something. That job turned out to be a shell or poorly run or both and checks started to bounce and banks came a calling. So now she's seeking employment and, of course, making waves about taking me to court to refigure support. I laugh at her (often). She tells me she worked for a law firm (the job she quit at the beginning here) and she knows what she's doing. I respond with, " Honey, I have budgeted about $2500 a year, and always purchase an extra week of vacation from my employer. You just pick the day and time and I'll show up in a suit with my attorney. " I'll usually throw in something like, " Make it a Friday, I know that's a busy day for you and it might as well inconveince one of us right? " I also explain to her that she's not a victim of employment circumstance here but her one poor choices. If she feels the court will reward her for poor choices then she should pursue this but don't expect it to be a free ride through court because I'll fight it. You gotta love the drama! Needless to say no papers have been filed and she's just blowing smoke. You also can't just bring this stuff up on support ever month. The court would tire of that but quick. She'll probably bring it up on schedule, every two years. Obviously there's all sorts of other drama in many other areas of this whole thing outside of finances and children that she's brought into this. Me? I just wanted to get the hell out of the relationship, that's why I filed, makes sense right? She still doesn't seem to really want to severe things. Hopefully when the children are 18+ that will change. I think it will. It looks like this might be a day of rambling on my part. Feel free to send me a private email if you want the information on other drama. I'm not completely without guilt in any of this either. Often I'm petty too. What make she and I different is I have a high degree of follow through and can carry a grudge much longer and with much more effectiveness than she can. By that I mean I forgive but never forget and I choose my revenge through means that require little or no effort/$ on my part and benefit me more than her. That usually makes her pretty crazy. Funny. I always tell my fellow divorcees that you can't spend time and money trying to get even with anyone. You're basically spending time and money to make yourself crazy and screw up or ignore what's really important in your life. However, if you can think things through and find that golden route of ease and yet poignant revenge it's pure magic. Examples: I earned three additional college degrees while our divorce progressed. One at a 3.75GPA and two masters at a 4.0GPA. I kept my job and yet was able to drop work and take days off virtually at will. I own a house (duplex) and manage it/rent it, etc. Of course, surgery to improve my health. Add to that working out daily and looking better (so others tell me sometimes). I'm usually happy and pleasant especially when she's highly stressed and pissed. I also discount her regular apologies (after all the get old and repetative). I'm consistant, predictable and reliable. Dating, having friends, traveling, etc. Reminds me, she complained recently that I take the kids out of town on purpose so she can't spend a dinner with them during my week long times with them. Huh? I spend thousands of dollars on trips with my kids maybe twice a year so she can't have a couple of dinners with them? Holy crap I dated/married this woman? These are all things I like about myself and that make her crazy. It's most funny to me when she's crazy over things that I've done to benefit myself. Why would anyone get so worked up over what someone else does for themselves? I pray every day she gets off her ass and tries to better herself career, education, financially, etc. I guess I think it would only help the kids and really me. Mike in GR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay, I am going on a seven nights cruise in the first > week > > > of > > > > > Feb. > > > > > > I > > > > > > > am still in the rapid weight loss phase, so I will wait > to > > > buy > > > > > > outfits > > > > > > > a few days prior to the cruise (yes, newbies, I said a > few > > > days > > > > > > > prior;you can't imagine how fast the weight falls > off!)...I > > > > plan > > > > > to > > > > > > > have all my vitamins ready to go and a few protien > > > > > > > supplements/shakes...does anyone have suggestions for > > eating > > > > > while on > > > > > > > the ship? I am hoping to find something...anything else > I > > > > > should > > > > > > > pack? lisamathis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2006 Report Share Posted December 29, 2006 Tim tried to call the girls' mom today again about the child support. That went over like a ton of bricks. LOL! I don't understand how she thinks it's fair we keep paying the full amount when Jane is living here? I'm sure this will wind up in court costing both parties thousands and ending in the same thing we originally offered her. And Tim told her that. We've offered her more than what the court says we should pay to help out w/ her making Jane's car payment & such. Tim told her if it goes back to court she can forget that. And it will be retroactive to the date Jane moved in w/ us instead of starting from now. We'll see. I hate it comes down to this because the kids are the ones who suffer. But, when you can't make ends meet you gotta do something. just doesn't realize how lucky she's had it...she should be in my shoes when it comes to child support! I think that's what bothers me most about the whole thing. W 380/255/160 Mike wrote: > We have joint legal and joint physical custody. However, she is still > designated as the custodial parent and I am the non-custodial parent. > This allows me to see my kids very often while still making any time > she gives them to me in addition to my already liberal time perceived > by her, the court, most people as a gift to me. > > These designations also allow her to receive massive support > payments, after all she is the custodial parent right? The court > worked very hard to, while allowing me a lot of time with the kids, > to not allow me a lot of overnights. Overnights with the non- > custodial father are the financial killer for women. At a certain > amount of overnights she would get less support. > > Now with joint physical/legal I get the ability to weigh in on > school, medical, etc. decisions. Strangely enough in our judgement of > divorce (JOD) it says specifically that we are to work out their > school issues between ourselves but if she decides to send them to > private school she must pay. That may appear inoxious but that has > essentially had the effect in practice of her having the final say > since all she has to do is say they're going to private school. So > what right? Well they were both going to private. Then she managed to > convince a suburban district that she was moving to their district. > Now my daughter goes there but my son, after having gone there for a > semester and having difficulties academically and they had few sixth > grade sports, was brought back, unilaterally by her, to his original > school. Of course you could argue none of this is massively hurtful > to my children's career but don't fool yourself into thinking I have > any say into any of this. She calls me on these things and, granted > bitterly, my first words are, " I appreciate the call but what exactly > do you want from me here? What choice do I have in the matter? " I > certainly do express my opnion to her but it does little good. > > Of course I haven't tested the medical arena and hopefully won't have > to. After all she's the custodial parent and, well, there you have > it. There's no doubting that custodialness simple because it's her > title. > > She lives about a half mile from my house so as the children enter > their teen years the idea of where they spend their evenings is > getting even more ridiculous. Heck, on either of our designated > weekends they're doing sleep overs with their friends frequently. > > If you can avoid getting all pent up over the stupidity of the whole > thing and realize that certainly SOME of your money, about 2/3 I > figure, does end up paying for utilities and clothing, etc. for the > kids then it's not so bad. > > Oh she does work by the way. She HAD a full time job as well as a > part time waitressing job (not moving beyond that was one of the > reasons we divorced). She rarely takes a vacation, certainly not more > than a week a year. She often asks that I pick the kids up outside my > time with them although I'm often at their events anyway. Speaking of > which, what's the deal with practices and not allowing parents to > attend? I mean I understand it might be a distraction I guess but > damn it's sort of a hassle to drive the kids out, usually in rush > hour traffic, drive back home again in rush hour traffic to eat > dinner alone or clean alone, drive back 1.5-2 hrs later, drive them > back home again and have to feed them separately either before or > after. Not to mention that ALL the parents are doing this. Just seems > stupid to me. > > Her full time work changed this summer when she quit her office > management position out of lack of satisfaction and suspecion of > being plotted against or something (I try not to get involved in her > life ya know) and took a job with a start up company that repaired > industrial trucks or something. That job turned out to be a shell or > poorly run or both and checks started to bounce and banks came a > calling. So now she's seeking employment and, of course, making waves > about taking me to court to refigure support. I laugh at her (often). > She tells me she worked for a law firm (the job she quit at the > beginning here) and she knows what she's doing. I respond > with, " Honey, I have budgeted about $2500 a year, and always purchase > an extra week of vacation from my employer. You just pick the day and > time and I'll show up in a suit with my attorney. " I'll usually throw > in something like, " Make it a Friday, I know that's a busy day for > you and it might as well inconveince one of us right? " I also explain > to her that she's not a victim of employment circumstance here but > her one poor choices. If she feels the court will reward her for poor > choices then she should pursue this but don't expect it to be a free > ride through court because I'll fight it. You gotta love the drama! > > Needless to say no papers have been filed and she's just blowing > smoke. You also can't just bring this stuff up on support ever month. > The court would tire of that but quick. She'll probably bring it up > on schedule, every two years. > > Obviously there's all sorts of other drama in many other areas of > this whole thing outside of finances and children that she's brought > into this. Me? I just wanted to get the hell out of the relationship, > that's why I filed, makes sense right? She still doesn't seem to > really want to severe things. Hopefully when the children are 18+ > that will change. I think it will. > > It looks like this might be a day of rambling on my part. Feel free > to send me a private email if you want the information on other > drama. I'm not completely without guilt in any of this either. Often > I'm petty too. What make she and I different is I have a high degree > of follow through and can carry a grudge much longer and with much > more effectiveness than she can. By that I mean I forgive but never > forget and I choose my revenge through means that require little or > no effort/$ on my part and benefit me more than her. That usually > makes her pretty crazy. Funny. I always tell my fellow divorcees that > you can't spend time and money trying to get even with anyone. You're > basically spending time and money to make yourself crazy and screw up > or ignore what's really important in your life. However, if you can > think things through and find that golden route of ease and yet > poignant revenge it's pure magic. > > Examples: > I earned three additional college degrees while our divorce > progressed. One at a 3.75GPA and two masters at a 4.0GPA. > > I kept my job and yet was able to drop work and take days off > virtually at will. > > I own a house (duplex) and manage it/rent it, etc. > > Of course, surgery to improve my health. Add to that working out > daily and looking better (so others tell me sometimes). > > I'm usually happy and pleasant especially when she's highly stressed > and pissed. I also discount her regular apologies (after all the get > old and repetative). > > I'm consistant, predictable and reliable. > > Dating, having friends, traveling, etc. Reminds me, she complained > recently that I take the kids out of town on purpose so she can't > spend a dinner with them during my week long times with them. Huh? I > spend thousands of dollars on trips with my kids maybe twice a year > so she can't have a couple of dinners with them? Holy crap I > dated/married this woman? > > These are all things I like about myself and that make her crazy. > It's most funny to me when she's crazy over things that I've done to > benefit myself. Why would anyone get so worked up over what someone > else does for themselves? I pray every day she gets off her ass and > tries to better herself career, education, financially, etc. I guess > I think it would only help the kids and really me. > > Mike in GR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2006 Report Share Posted December 29, 2006 I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to court, but some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad for her and almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and what is the need for dragging that through the court system that is already bogged down heavily and costing too much money to do it. Lin 422-338-250 Lhsh@... American by birth, Saved by the grace of God. Re: Re: Speaking of Cruises..... Tim tried to call the girls' mom today again about the child support. That went over like a ton of bricks. LOL! I don't understand how she thinks it's fair we keep paying the full amount when Jane is living here? I'm sure this will wind up in court costing both parties thousands and ending in the same thing we originally offered her. And Tim told her that. We've offered her more than what the court says we should pay to help out w/ her making Jane's car payment & such. Tim told her if it goes back to court she can forget that. And it will be retroactive to the date Jane moved in w/ us instead of starting from now. We'll see. I hate it comes down to this because the kids are the ones who suffer. But, when you can't make ends meet you gotta do something. just doesn't realize how lucky she's had it...she should be in my shoes when it comes to child support! I think that's what bothers me most about the whole thing. W 380/255/160 Mike wrote: > We have joint legal and joint physical custody. However, she is still > designated as the custodial parent and I am the non-custodial parent. > This allows me to see my kids very often while still making any time > she gives them to me in addition to my already liberal time perceived > by her, the court, most people as a gift to me. > > These designations also allow her to receive massive support > payments, after all she is the custodial parent right? The court > worked very hard to, while allowing me a lot of time with the kids, > to not allow me a lot of overnights. Overnights with the non- > custodial father are the financial killer for women. At a certain > amount of overnights she would get less support. > > Now with joint physical/legal I get the ability to weigh in on > school, medical, etc. decisions. Strangely enough in our judgement of > divorce (JOD) it says specifically that we are to work out their > school issues between ourselves but if she decides to send them to > private school she must pay. That may appear inoxious but that has > essentially had the effect in practice of her having the final say > since all she has to do is say they're going to private school. So > what right? Well they were both going to private. Then she managed to > convince a suburban district that she was moving to their district. > Now my daughter goes there but my son, after having gone there for a > semester and having difficulties academically and they had few sixth > grade sports, was brought back, unilaterally by her, to his original > school. Of course you could argue none of this is massively hurtful > to my children's career but don't fool yourself into thinking I have > any say into any of this. She calls me on these things and, granted > bitterly, my first words are, " I appreciate the call but what exactly > do you want from me here? What choice do I have in the matter? " I > certainly do express my opnion to her but it does little good. > > Of course I haven't tested the medical arena and hopefully won't have > to. After all she's the custodial parent and, well, there you have > it. There's no doubting that custodialness simple because it's her > title. > > She lives about a half mile from my house so as the children enter > their teen years the idea of where they spend their evenings is > getting even more ridiculous. Heck, on either of our designated > weekends they're doing sleep overs with their friends frequently. > > If you can avoid getting all pent up over the stupidity of the whole > thing and realize that certainly SOME of your money, about 2/3 I > figure, does end up paying for utilities and clothing, etc. for the > kids then it's not so bad. > > Oh she does work by the way. She HAD a full time job as well as a > part time waitressing job (not moving beyond that was one of the > reasons we divorced). She rarely takes a vacation, certainly not more > than a week a year. She often asks that I pick the kids up outside my > time with them although I'm often at their events anyway. Speaking of > which, what's the deal with practices and not allowing parents to > attend? I mean I understand it might be a distraction I guess but > damn it's sort of a hassle to drive the kids out, usually in rush > hour traffic, drive back home again in rush hour traffic to eat > dinner alone or clean alone, drive back 1.5-2 hrs later, drive them > back home again and have to feed them separately either before or > after. Not to mention that ALL the parents are doing this. Just seems > stupid to me. > > Her full time work changed this summer when she quit her office > management position out of lack of satisfaction and suspecion of > being plotted against or something (I try not to get involved in her > life ya know) and took a job with a start up company that repaired > industrial trucks or something. That job turned out to be a shell or > poorly run or both and checks started to bounce and banks came a > calling. So now she's seeking employment and, of course, making waves > about taking me to court to refigure support. I laugh at her (often). > She tells me she worked for a law firm (the job she quit at the > beginning here) and she knows what she's doing. I respond > with, " Honey, I have budgeted about $2500 a year, and always purchase > an extra week of vacation from my employer. You just pick the day and > time and I'll show up in a suit with my attorney. " I'll usually throw > in something like, " Make it a Friday, I know that's a busy day for > you and it might as well inconveince one of us right? " I also explain > to her that she's not a victim of employment circumstance here but > her one poor choices. If she feels the court will reward her for poor > choices then she should pursue this but don't expect it to be a free > ride through court because I'll fight it. You gotta love the drama! > > Needless to say no papers have been filed and she's just blowing > smoke. You also can't just bring this stuff up on support ever month. > The court would tire of that but quick. She'll probably bring it up > on schedule, every two years. > > Obviously there's all sorts of other drama in many other areas of > this whole thing outside of finances and children that she's brought > into this. Me? I just wanted to get the hell out of the relationship, > that's why I filed, makes sense right? She still doesn't seem to > really want to severe things. Hopefully when the children are 18+ > that will change. I think it will. > > It looks like this might be a day of rambling on my part. Feel free > to send me a private email if you want the information on other > drama. I'm not completely without guilt in any of this either. Often > I'm petty too. What make she and I different is I have a high degree > of follow through and can carry a grudge much longer and with much > more effectiveness than she can. By that I mean I forgive but never > forget and I choose my revenge through means that require little or > no effort/$ on my part and benefit me more than her. That usually > makes her pretty crazy. Funny. I always tell my fellow divorcees that > you can't spend time and money trying to get even with anyone. You're > basically spending time and money to make yourself crazy and screw up > or ignore what's really important in your life. However, if you can > think things through and find that golden route of ease and yet > poignant revenge it's pure magic. > > Examples: > I earned three additional college degrees while our divorce > progressed. One at a 3.75GPA and two masters at a 4.0GPA. > > I kept my job and yet was able to drop work and take days off > virtually at will. > > I own a house (duplex) and manage it/rent it, etc. > > Of course, surgery to improve my health. Add to that working out > daily and looking better (so others tell me sometimes). > > I'm usually happy and pleasant especially when she's highly stressed > and pissed. I also discount her regular apologies (after all the get > old and repetative). > > I'm consistant, predictable and reliable. > > Dating, having friends, traveling, etc. Reminds me, she complained > recently that I take the kids out of town on purpose so she can't > spend a dinner with them during my week long times with them. Huh? I > spend thousands of dollars on trips with my kids maybe twice a year > so she can't have a couple of dinners with them? Holy crap I > dated/married this woman? > > These are all things I like about myself and that make her crazy. > It's most funny to me when she's crazy over things that I've done to > benefit myself. Why would anyone get so worked up over what someone > else does for themselves? I pray every day she gets off her ass and > tries to better herself career, education, financially, etc. I guess > I think it would only help the kids and really me. > > Mike in GR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.29/608 - Release Date: 12/29/2006 8:22 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2006 Report Share Posted December 29, 2006 My thoughts exactly! And it's not like she needs the money. She will go 2-3 weeks w/out cashing the checks when we give them to her. If she needs it so badly then she can't afford to pay a lawyer to fight this either! I know it's going to cost us $1000 if she fights it. And that's just the retainer! It'll be more if it gets really ugly. Tim said money was their biggest issue when they were married. I can see that now. LOL She walked away w/ a car that was paid for, his 401K ($50K), $100 a week alimony & $250 a week childsupport. What more does she want? Sheesh! W 380/255/160 Lin Hunnicutt wrote: > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to court, but > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad for her and > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and what is the > need for dragging that through the court system that is already bogged down > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > Lin > 422-338-250 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2006 Report Share Posted December 29, 2006 She sounds like she is a greedy gold bricker to me. Lhsh@... American by birth, Saved by the grace of God. Re: Re: Speaking of Cruises..... My thoughts exactly! And it's not like she needs the money. She will go 2-3 weeks w/out cashing the checks when we give them to her. If she needs it so badly then she can't afford to pay a lawyer to fight this either! I know it's going to cost us $1000 if she fights it. And that's just the retainer! It'll be more if it gets really ugly. Tim said money was their biggest issue when they were married. I can see that now. LOL She walked away w/ a car that was paid for, his 401K ($50K), $100 a week alimony & $250 a week childsupport. What more does she want? Sheesh! W 380/255/160 Lin Hunnicutt wrote: > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to court, but > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad for her > and > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and what is > the > need for dragging that through the court system that is already bogged > down > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > Lin > 422-338-250 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.29/608 - Release Date: 12/29/2006 8:22 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 29, 2006 Report Share Posted December 29, 2006 That's one way to look at it. LOL! Although I'm sure my ex says the same about me. Would be ok if I could get the $$. LOL W 380/255/160 Lin Hunnicutt wrote: > She sounds like she is a greedy gold bricker to me. > > Lhsh@... > American by birth, > Saved by the grace of God. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2006 Report Share Posted December 30, 2006 Hey Mike T. I think I figured out how to work past your fears of marriage. You need to get sex change and then we won't have any issue with getting married. I think you'll agree the idea of divorce becomes less frightening financially when faced with the " problems " of the ex wife described below. Of course you'll have to marry a dude which is probably not desireable but at least you'd be getting paid for it. Mike in GR (ewwwww, how do women stand us) > > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to court, but > > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad for her and > > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and what is the > > need for dragging that through the court system that is already bogged down > > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > > Lin > > 422-338-250 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2006 Report Share Posted December 30, 2006 LMAO! You are too funny! You crack me up! I don't think Mike T will go for that idea. Would you? Men aren't all that bad. I kinda like the one I have. He's a great guy. W 380/254/160 Mike wrote: > Hey Mike T. I think I figured out how to work past your fears of > marriage. You need to get sex change and then we won't have any issue > with getting married. I think you'll agree the idea of divorce > becomes less frightening financially when faced with the " problems " > of the ex wife described below. Of course you'll have to marry a dude > which is probably not desireable but at least you'd be getting paid > for it. > > Mike in GR (ewwwww, how do women stand us) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2006 Report Share Posted December 30, 2006 OMG! hahaha Mike websculpt@...> wrote: Hey Mike T. I think I figured out how to work past your fears of marriage. You need to get sex change and then we won't have any issue with getting married. I think you'll agree the idea of divorce becomes less frightening financially when faced with the " problems " of the ex wife described below. Of course you'll have to marry a dude which is probably not desireable but at least you'd be getting paid for it. Mike in GR (ewwwww, how do women stand us) > > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to court, but > > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad for her and > > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and what is the > > need for dragging that through the court system that is already bogged down > > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > > Lin > > 422-338-250 > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2006 Report Share Posted December 30, 2006 Aaaaa.......Ill take the divorce and give all the money away.....thanks.........LOL Mike T Re: Speaking of Cruises..... > Hey Mike T. I think I figured out how to work past your fears of > marriage. You need to get sex change and then we won't have any issue > with getting married. I think you'll agree the idea of divorce > becomes less frightening financially when faced with the " problems " > of the ex wife described below. Of course you'll have to marry a dude > which is probably not desireable but at least you'd be getting paid > for it. > > Mike in GR (ewwwww, how do women stand us) > > >> > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to > court, but >> > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad > for her and >> > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and > what is the >> > need for dragging that through the court system that is already > bogged down >> > heavily and costing too much money to do it. >> > Lin >> > 422-338-250 >> > >> > > > > > We are a very active support group. > If the email becomes overwhelming, > please change your setting to NO EMAIL! > Please contact Group Creator > Robyn@... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2006 Report Share Posted December 30, 2006 LOL! Mike Tune tune1552@...> wrote: Aaaaa.......Ill take the divorce and give all the money away.....thanks.........LOL Mike T Re: Speaking of Cruises..... > Hey Mike T. I think I figured out how to work past your fears of > marriage. You need to get sex change and then we won't have any issue > with getting married. I think you'll agree the idea of divorce > becomes less frightening financially when faced with the " problems " > of the ex wife described below. Of course you'll have to marry a dude > which is probably not desireable but at least you'd be getting paid > for it. > > Mike in GR (ewwwww, how do women stand us) > > >> > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to > court, but >> > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad > for her and >> > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and > what is the >> > need for dragging that through the court system that is already > bogged down >> > heavily and costing too much money to do it. >> > Lin >> > 422-338-250 >> > >> > > > > > We are a very active support group. > If the email becomes overwhelming, > please change your setting to NO EMAIL! > Please contact Group Creator > Robyn@... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2006 Report Share Posted December 30, 2006 Uuuuhhhhhmmmmm..........hate to burst your bubble, but I'm a woman. I make more than twice what my husband makes and he's leaving the marraige with no child support payments, a car that is paid for and I have to pay for the insurance for a year, I've been paying his medical bills for the last four years and have to keep him on my insurance until he gets his own and I have to take 35% of the remaining medical bills from his accident that caused the TBI ($22,000). He is also leaving with an IRA that I've been funding for the past 8 years to shelter money from taxes, and of course I get to foot the entire bill for the divorce. Life isn't always grand for the fairer sex. Mike websculpt@...> wrote: Hey Mike T. I think I figured out how to work past your fears of marriage. You need to get sex change and then we won't have any issue with getting married. I think you'll agree the idea of divorce becomes less frightening financially when faced with the " problems " of the ex wife described below. Of course you'll have to marry a dude which is probably not desireable but at least you'd be getting paid for it. Mike in GR (ewwwww, how do women stand us) > > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to court, but > > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad for her and > > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and what is the > > need for dragging that through the court system that is already bogged down > > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > > Lin > > 422-338-250 > > > We are a very active support group. If the email becomes overwhelming, please change your setting to NO EMAIL! Please contact Group Creator Robyn@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2006 Report Share Posted December 30, 2006 .....and to think this email string started with " speaking of cruises " - sounds like the love boat took a detour!! lol! Jackie in CA shellylori@...> wrote: Uuuuhhhhhmmmmm..........hate to burst your bubble, but I'm a woman. I make more than twice what my husband makes and he's leaving the marraige with no child support payments, a car that is paid for and I have to pay for the insurance for a year, I've been paying his medical bills for the last four years and have to keep him on my insurance until he gets his own and I have to take 35% of the remaining medical bills from his accident that caused the TBI ($22,000). He is also leaving with an IRA that I've been funding for the past 8 years to shelter money from taxes, and of course I get to foot the entire bill for the divorce. Life isn't always grand for the fairer sex. Mike websculpt@...> wrote: Hey Mike T. I think I figured out how to work past your fears of marriage. You need to get sex change and then we won't have any issue with getting married. I think you'll agree the idea of divorce becomes less frightening financially when faced with the " problems " of the ex wife described below. Of course you'll have to marry a dude which is probably not desireable but at least you'd be getting paid for it. Mike in GR (ewwwww, how do women stand us) > > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to court, but > > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad for her and > > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and what is the > > need for dragging that through the court system that is already bogged down > > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > > Lin > > 422-338-250 > > > We are a very active support group. If the email becomes overwhelming, please change your setting to NO EMAIL! Please contact Group Creator Robyn@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 Granted there are exceptions to the rule. It's also interesting that women default on child support payments more often then men. Of course men make more of the payments usually but still they're percentage of actual follow through is better than with the few ladies that do i.t Also, guess which parent comments more child abuse most often. Of course you can say that's because they're the ones that more often end up caring for the children the most or entirely. I still find it ironic that there's a general suspecion of the father that abuse is nearly a certainty when the statistics don't bare that out. I used to have an article/study on how men actually work more hours/harder than women even if you include the at home work that's done. It's something like a whole hour a week or something. It's really stupid to get worked up over this crap. I could spend my life trying to get the generalities and averages changed and budge them maybe a bit or I could spend my time trying to live my life for myself and my kids. I'd rather have the latter as my legacy. Mike in GR Mike in GR > > > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to > court, but > > > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be bad > for her and > > > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her and > what is the > > > need for dragging that through the court system that is already > bogged down > > > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > > > Lin > > > 422-338-250 > > > > > > > > > > We are a very active support group. > If the email becomes overwhelming, > please change your setting to NO EMAIL! > Please contact Group Creator > Robyn@... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2006 Report Share Posted December 31, 2006 Mike in GR, I have spent the last six years of my life as a CPS worker (child protective services investigations) You are right - women are more likely to perpetrate abuse and always neglect. I see it first hand on a daily basis. Granted, I don't work in the Child Support Enforcement Area in our state, but yes women barely pay child suppport. Good news though, I have seen a general shift in attitudes in the courts and cps regarding custody granted to men. People are finally coming around and realizing it's not the sex of the parent but the quality that counts. lisamathis > > > > I hate that you and Tim are going to have to take her back to > > court, but > > > > some people get greedy and just do not listen and it will be > bad > > for her and > > > > almost funny if the court gives her what Tim has offered her > and > > what is the > > > > need for dragging that through the court system that is already > > bogged down > > > > heavily and costing too much money to do it. > > > > Lin > > > > 422-338-250 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are a very active support group. > > If the email becomes overwhelming, > > please change your setting to NO EMAIL! > > Please contact Group Creator > > Robyn@ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.