Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Abstract: Increased Carotid Wall Stress in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Increased Carotid Wall Stress in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Pierre Boutouyrie, MD, PhD; Dominique P. Germain, MD, PhD; Jean-Noël

Fiessinger, MD; Brigitte Laloux, PhD; Jérôme Perdu, MD; Stéphane t,

MD, PhD

From the Departments of Pharmacology and INSERM EMI 0107 (P.B., B.L., S.L.),

Clinical Genetics (D.P.G.), and Vascular Medicine (J.-N.F., J.P.), Hôpital

Européen s Pompidou, Paris, France.

Correspondence to Pr Stéphane t, Service de Pharmacologie et INSERM

EMI 107, Hôpital Européen s Pompidou, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de

Paris, 20, Rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France. E-mail

stephane.laurent@...

Background— Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS), also known as EDS type

IV, an inherited disorder of connective tissue, results from mutations in

the gene encoding type III procollagen (COL3A1). Affected patients are at

risk for arterial dissection or rupture, the main cause of death. To

understand the pathogenesis of the vascular lesions, we used a biomechanical

approach and determined steady and pulsatile wall stress.

Methods and Results— Sixteen patients with vEDS and 16 age-, gender-, and

blood pressure–matched control subjects were included in this

cross-sectional noninvasive study. Circumferential wall stress was

determined under steady and pulsatile conditions at the site of an elastic

(common carotid) and a muscular (radial) artery from the measurements of

intima-media thickness and internal diameter with high-resolution

echo-tracking systems and either mean blood pressure or pulse pressure,

respectively. At the site of the carotid artery, steady circumferential wall

stress was 43% higher in vEDS patients than in control subjects (68.9±14.3

versus 48.2±12.1 kPa, P<0.001), and pulsatile circumferential wall stress

was 22% higher (28.2±7.7 versus 23.1±5.7 kPa, P<0.001). Carotid intima-media

thickness was 32% lower (408±56 versus 598±171 µm, P<0.001) in vEDS

patients, and internal diameter was not different between groups. Radial

artery parameters were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions— In vEDS patients, an abnormally low intima-media thickness

generates a higher wall stress than in control subjects at the site of an

elastic artery, which may increase the risk of arterial dissection and

rupture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...