Re: Today Show about mercury

[Guest guest]

I happened to be flipping the channels yesterday morning and once again, I

feel I was " meant " to see this show. I had no idea that this would be on.

I just can't stand hearing another person say, it's MUCH WORSE if you don't

vaccinate, it is not proven that vaccines cause Autism!!! I just got so

disgusted again!!!

I did notice that the reporter from NBC did throw in to the interview,

" Well, what about the Autism/Mercury connection, so she did try to get it out

there at least, but she was shot down faster than she brought it up!

Vicki 's Mommy 7 1/2 years old Mercury Poisoned/HFA

[Guest guest]

I just read the transcript, and I'll tell you, I'm convinced if I

saw that segment before knowing about mercury, I'd be wondering a

lot about it. She was sort of " It could be bad for you, but we

aren't sure, so keep using it until we are. " That would not sit

well with me, and I'd like to think others as well.

I've also noticed a real trend in the TV media to take a similar

stand. (Not always, but more so then in the past). This is a good

shift! As more and more folks question it, the more likely it is

that my questions will be answered!!!! I think that is how the

whole shift came about with the tobacco industry. There was a buzz,

suspected/proven cover-up, and then it all came out. Of course, I

wish things would move along a lot faster!

Sio

> I happened to be flipping the channels yesterday morning and once

again, I

> feel I was " meant " to see this show. I had no idea that this

would be on.

> I just can't stand hearing another person say, it's MUCH WORSE if

you don't

> vaccinate, it is not proven that vaccines cause Autism!!! I just

got so

> disgusted again!!!

> I did notice that the reporter from NBC did throw in to the

interview,

> " Well, what about the Autism/Mercury connection, so she did try

to get it out

> there at least, but she was shot down faster than she brought it

up!

>

> Vicki 's Mommy 7 1/2 years old Mercury Poisoned/HFA

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Write NBC news or call. This is some directions for contacting them

from DAMS (Dental Amalgam Mercury Syndrome.)

They should be encouraged to invite Dr. Mark Geier on the Today Show

since he said the mercury does not leave the body but goes into the

brain. Dr. Reichman, an OB_GYN on the Today Show said after a vaccine

the mercury is gone in two months. She is probably thinking of the

blood tests where it doesn't show up.

Why don't they invite a mercury researcher instead of an OB-GYN?

Marie Flowers

www.MercuryPoisoned.com

Letter from DAMS----

HI Friends,

I was given the wrong e-mail address for the Today Show, sorry for

not verifying. I did get the other e-mail from the webpage, so it

should be right - letters@...

I did find another e-mail that we need to send our e-mails -

today@...

Share about mercury dental fillings by sending your e-mail to the

Today Show at letters@... and today@...

If possible, please take a minute and call 212-664-4444, to share,

too.

We are making a difference because we are educating as many people

that we can about the dangers of mercury dental fillings.

Thank you,

Ann Newell

[Guest guest]

It is amazing how the truth is so self-evident.

Everytime someone comes out on a show like this, to try and convince

us that Mercury is safe for our teeth, and safe for babies

bloodstreams, the more and more people wonder why? why are they are

trying so hard?

If I was a person watching the show, and didn't know anything about

the Mercury issue, and saw this segment, it would make me wonder too!

That is why the truth will always be known.

It is obvious when the liars are talking!

Mercury is unsafe, thats a fact, 2nd most toxic substance to man.

But they say " it's safe " or basically " we don't know, so keep using

it " .

Wow...

I mean, who is going to take that advice?

wrote:

> I just read the transcript, and I'll tell you, I'm convinced if I

> saw that segment before knowing about mercury, I'd be wondering a

> lot about it. She was sort of " It could be bad for you, but we

> aren't sure, so keep using it until we are. " That would not sit

> well with me, and I'd like to think others as well.

>

> I've also noticed a real trend in the TV media to take a similar

> stand. (Not always, but more so then in the past). This is a

good

> shift! As more and more folks question it, the more likely it is

> that my questions will be answered!!!! I think that is how the

> whole shift came about with the tobacco industry. There was a

buzz,

> suspected/proven cover-up, and then it all came out. Of course, I

> wish things would move along a lot faster!

>

> Sio

>