Guest guest Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 Hi Sharon-- My stats were exactly like yours. I opted to treat it agressively. I had mast, then a phrophy mast, 4 rounds of A/C, and I'll start Tamoxifen shortly. I must add that when I went to the oncologist, I told her, " I don't want chemo, don't want to take Tamoxifen, and I don't want cancer again. " In the end, I wanted to do everything within my power, lifestyle changes included, so that if there is a recurrence, I can feel that I did everything that I should have. As far as the chemo, I went through it without a hitch. I had the " condensed " treatment: every other week instead of every third week. That meant that I had my 4th treatment on week 7. I started on 6/8 and was finished on 7/20 of this year. I had my treatments on Thursday. I took off from work on Thursday and Friday and was back to work on Monday morning. My oldest daughter played traveling fast-pitch softball this summer and I traveled with her all summer long. Biggest issue was that it was awfully hot. I was never nauseated and really not very tired. I did prepare for it by significantly increasing my exercise to get physically fit between my first surgery and chemo. Everyone has to do what they feel is best for them. You'll make the decision that is right for you. in MS > > > > Hi All! > > > > Well, met with the Onc on Thursday - he has left it up to me and > my > > husband if I want to do 4 rounds of A/C before my radiation. After > > many hours of research (not just U.S. based figures, but Canada > and > > the UK as well) we have decided that quality of life outweighs the > 1- > > 2 percentage points that the doctor (and the research) has shown > to > > be the difference between rad/tamoxofin and chemo/rad/tamoxofin. I > > have grade 1, negative nodes, clear margins, Her2 -, ER/PR high > > positive (97%). We feel that those 1-2 extra percentage points can > be > > made up by a more healthy diet and exercise program (which was not > > part of my pre-cancer life) without the severe short and long term > > effects of the chemo. I know this is rolling the dice - but > honestly > > so is chemo right now for someone in my position. I could go > through > > it all just to end up right back where I am now a year or two > longer > > down the road than if i did not do chemo. Any thoughts anyone? All > > your feedback is appreciated and if anyone else has made this > > decision, I would love to hear from you! > > > > Lots of Love and Hugs > > Sharon in Vegas > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 Hi Sharon-- My stats were exactly like yours. I opted to treat it agressively. I had mast, then a phrophy mast, 4 rounds of A/C, and I'll start Tamoxifen shortly. I must add that when I went to the oncologist, I told her, " I don't want chemo, don't want to take Tamoxifen, and I don't want cancer again. " In the end, I wanted to do everything within my power, lifestyle changes included, so that if there is a recurrence, I can feel that I did everything that I should have. As far as the chemo, I went through it without a hitch. I had the " condensed " treatment: every other week instead of every third week. That meant that I had my 4th treatment on week 7. I started on 6/8 and was finished on 7/20 of this year. I had my treatments on Thursday. I took off from work on Thursday and Friday and was back to work on Monday morning. My oldest daughter played traveling fast-pitch softball this summer and I traveled with her all summer long. Biggest issue was that it was awfully hot. I was never nauseated and really not very tired. I did prepare for it by significantly increasing my exercise to get physically fit between my first surgery and chemo. Everyone has to do what they feel is best for them. You'll make the decision that is right for you. in MS > > > > Hi All! > > > > Well, met with the Onc on Thursday - he has left it up to me and > my > > husband if I want to do 4 rounds of A/C before my radiation. After > > many hours of research (not just U.S. based figures, but Canada > and > > the UK as well) we have decided that quality of life outweighs the > 1- > > 2 percentage points that the doctor (and the research) has shown > to > > be the difference between rad/tamoxofin and chemo/rad/tamoxofin. I > > have grade 1, negative nodes, clear margins, Her2 -, ER/PR high > > positive (97%). We feel that those 1-2 extra percentage points can > be > > made up by a more healthy diet and exercise program (which was not > > part of my pre-cancer life) without the severe short and long term > > effects of the chemo. I know this is rolling the dice - but > honestly > > so is chemo right now for someone in my position. I could go > through > > it all just to end up right back where I am now a year or two > longer > > down the road than if i did not do chemo. Any thoughts anyone? All > > your feedback is appreciated and if anyone else has made this > > decision, I would love to hear from you! > > > > Lots of Love and Hugs > > Sharon in Vegas > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2006 Report Share Posted October 22, 2006 I made the same decision with a stage 2 cancer regarding chemo. The 1 to 2% did not seem worth what I would be giving up in quality of life. Like you< I am going the healthier eating route, even more so than before. It is all organic for me, from now on. Ruth PS Did you have a lumpectomy? I didn't have to think about radiation as I had no choice other than a mastectomy. > > Hi All! > > > > Well, met with the Onc on Thursday - he has left it up to me and > my > > husband if I want to do 4 rounds of A/C before my radiation. After > > many hours of research (not just U.S. based figures, but Canada > and > > the UK as well) we have decided that quality of life outweighs the > 1- > > 2 percentage points that the doctor (and the research) has shown > to > > be the difference between rad/tamoxofin and chemo/rad/tamoxofin. I > > have grade 1, negative nodes, clear margins, Her2 -, ER/PR high > > positive (97%). We feel that those 1-2 extra percentage points can > be > > made up by a more healthy diet and exercise program (which was not > > part of my pre-cancer life) without the severe short and long term > > effects of the chemo. I know this is rolling the dice - but > honestly > > so is chemo right now for someone in my position. I could go > through > > it all just to end up right back where I am now a year or two > longer > > down the road than if i did not do chemo. Any thoughts anyone? All > > your feedback is appreciated and if anyone else has made this > > decision, I would love to hear from you! > > > > Lots of Love and Hugs > > Sharon in Vegas > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.