Xenoestrogens the next mercury? Composite the next amalgam?

[Guest guest]

I have read Cutler's book and decided to replace my 13 amalgams, but

composites have xenoestrogenic plastics like bishenol-A (and also

Aluminum Oxide). This has me very concerned and I am going crazy

trying to decide if I should get composites. After researching

xenoestrogens they seem horrific, with plenty of scientists claiming

them to be harmful. bisphenol-A affects the enodrine system in very

small amounts and accumulates in the body, cause breast/prostate

cancer and damage hormone activity.

Xenoestrogens/composites seems similar to where mercury amalgams

were a few decades ago - the ADA/dentists saying it is perfectly

safe, and unbiased scientists saying it is not. Is a composite

backlash coming soon, the way amalgams were exposed?

Gold and porcelain fillings have metals and are probably out of my

league financially. Which is the least evil - mercury in amalgams,

xenoestrogens in composites, aluminum in porcelain, or mixed metals

in gold?

Is my concern unfounded? Have my 13 mercury fillings made me

paranoid?

[Guest guest]

This " poison composite " issue is a fraud based rave by ADA supporters

to try to protect amalgam. There is nothing legitimate to it.

Andy . . .. . . . .

>

> I have read Cutler's book and decided to replace my 13 amalgams, but

> composites have xenoestrogenic plastics like bishenol-A (and also

> Aluminum Oxide). This has me very concerned and I am going crazy

> trying to decide if I should get composites. After researching

> xenoestrogens they seem horrific, with plenty of scientists claiming

> them to be harmful. bisphenol-A affects the enodrine system in very

> small amounts and accumulates in the body, cause breast/prostate

> cancer and damage hormone activity.

>

> Xenoestrogens/composites seems similar to where mercury amalgams

> were a few decades ago - the ADA/dentists saying it is perfectly

> safe, and unbiased scientists saying it is not. Is a composite

> backlash coming soon, the way amalgams were exposed?

>

> Gold and porcelain fillings have metals and are probably out of my

> league financially. Which is the least evil - mercury in amalgams,

> xenoestrogens in composites, aluminum in porcelain, or mixed metals

> in gold?

>

> Is my concern unfounded? Have my 13 mercury fillings made me

> paranoid?

[Guest guest]

Not sure I understand...

Are you saying composites are safe? Would you choose composites if

you had to choose replacements for amalgams?

Thanks

>

> This " poison composite " issue is a fraud based rave by ADA

supporters

> to try to protect amalgam. There is nothing legitimate to it.

>

> Andy . . .. . . . .

[Guest guest]

Testing is a good idea. Of course like mercury, xenoestrogens can

be harmful without producing " reactions " . So if the allergy test

says xenoestrogens are safe for you, this is only in an allergic

sense. The chemicals will still do their damage, like mercury does

to people who don't " react " to it - it still damages their brain and

CNS.

> Go to HalHuggins.com for literature on fillings. My

> husband had his mercury removed by a dentist

> recommended by the Hal Huggins organization (there are

> very few in the country). As we understood it, a

> filling with a negative charge (amalgams, mercury) is

> highly toxic. He was tested for tolerance to many

> types of dental material that would replace the

> mercury and the material that maintains a positive

> charge is used. Everyone tolerates different material

> so everyone's results to this type of test would be

> different and different dental material is used for

> different people. If the dentist tells you the exact

> composite in your teeth you can go to a naturpath and

> be tested for tolerance for about $50.00 If you don't

> know what is in your mouth and you are worried about

> cancer or testing positive for a cancer marker you

> should remove the teeth completely and have partials

> made. It is difficult to combat a toxin that seeps

> into your system constantly. Get yourself tested

> before the partials are made.

[Guest guest]

jedidonna

I'd like to add some perspective to my initial xenoestrogen/ mercury

comparison post. Although I abhor putting composites in my mouth

I'd rather have that than mercury. Bisphenol-A xenoestrogenic

methacrylate plastic in most composites is the same plastic stuff

used to line the inside of cans for canned food. To add to the

problem, the food is canned and then heated to cook/sterilize the

food while it is inside the can. Heat and food acids accelerate

leaching of chemicals from the lining to contaminate the food. This

plastic is also used to make baby bottles, which are often warmed in

microwave ovens. Again, heat leaching the chemicals. Tooth

sealants are also made of these plastics. You see my point - you

don't want xenoestrogens, but you might be getting enough from other

sources that your composites won't make a difference. Even bottled

water is affected from the plastic container.

There is a striking similarity to the mercury amalgam issue - most

people today are not even aware of xenoestrogens. People still heat

food and drinks in plastic containers/food wrapping. Xenoestrogens

do accumulate in fatty tissue over time, so a lifetime of exposure

could be a problem as one ages. Only in the past recent decades

have humans been exposed to these chemicals, and now

breast/prostate/uterine cancers are showing up in alarming numbers.

The plastics industry says these chemicals are safe, much like the

ADA said mercury was safe.

Notice how girls are sexually mature at very early ages nowadays,

and how boys seem less masculine? And how reports of amphibians and

fish are found with both sex organs. Near me in VA, male fish in

the Potomac river are producing eggs.

Xenoestrogens are also found in laundry detergent, dishwashing

liquid, pesticides, meat and dairy products...

Porcelain has aluminum, etc... which has it's share of problems as

well. You probably made the best choice going with composites.

I'd say you are much much better off than before when you had

mercury fillings!

[Guest guest]

r7r7r7us,

I thought what you wrote was very informative. I might add that, no one should

be microwaving food, which creates unhealthy changes in the blood. Microwaving

food in plastic is even worse and really asking for troubles.

I have read and heard the same information about changes in fish. Herbal Healer

Academy has an article posted in the Breaking News section about the problem and

also one of the tapes. I have been taking the Naturopathic course with them and

was wondering if you were taking it also? Your post just reminded me of things

that I have been learning through the courses. It would be interesting to me to

talk to someone else that was taking the program.

Thanks,

a

Re: Xenoestrogens the next mercury? Composite the next

amalgam?

jedidonna

I'd like to add some perspective to my initial xenoestrogen/ mercury

comparison post. Although I abhor putting composites in my mouth

I'd rather have that than mercury. Bisphenol-A xenoestrogenic

methacrylate plastic in most composites is the same plastic stuff

used to line the inside of cans for canned food. To add to the

problem, the food is canned and then heated to cook/sterilize the

food while it is inside the can. Heat and food acids accelerate

leaching of chemicals from the lining to contaminate the food. This

plastic is also used to make baby bottles, which are often warmed in

microwave ovens. Again, heat leaching the chemicals. Tooth

sealants are also made of these plastics. You see my point - you

don't want xenoestrogens, but you might be getting enough from other

sources that your composites won't make a difference. Even bottled

water is affected from the plastic container.

There is a striking similarity to the mercury amalgam issue - most

people today are not even aware of xenoestrogens. People still heat

food and drinks in plastic containers/food wrapping. Xenoestrogens

do accumulate in fatty tissue over time, so a lifetime of exposure

could be a problem as one ages. Only in the past recent decades

have humans been exposed to these chemicals, and now

breast/prostate/uterine cancers are showing up in alarming numbers.

The plastics industry says these chemicals are safe, much like the

ADA said mercury was safe.

Notice how girls are sexually mature at very early ages nowadays,

and how boys seem less masculine? And how reports of amphibians and

fish are found with both sex organs. Near me in VA, male fish in

the Potomac river are producing eggs.

Xenoestrogens are also found in laundry detergent, dishwashing

liquid, pesticides, meat and dairy products...

Porcelain has aluminum, etc... which has it's share of problems as

well. You probably made the best choice going with composites.

I'd say you are much much better off than before when you had

mercury fillings!

[Guest guest]

Hi a

I am not taking any courses but am considering doing so. I will

look into the Herbal Healer course - sounds interesting. I have not

researched microwave ovens much but have heard of the issue. My 12

mercury amalgams and my symptoms of mercury poisoning led me to

research amalgam removal / chelation and safe alternative filling

materials, and thus composite materials. I don't want to replace

one problem with another. The Xenoestrogen issue is so widespread

that even though it may not be as harmful per dose as mercury, there

is so much of it out there that it might be creating a disaster for

humans and the environment. Some wildlife may be threatened with

extinction because of sexual deformities, and some males are " being

phased out " . Are humans next?

The fact that there are no completely safe natural materials in use

as fillings is a cruel joke and a dark side to technology and

capitalism. Lab created chemicals = patents = profits = power =

corruption. Natural filling materials do not lead to assembly line

profits. The US government should be protecting citizens by having

proof of safety before release to market and conducting unbiased lab

tests with our tax dollars. Instead the groups designed to protect

citizens are now policing themselves and protecting themselves...

ADA AMA...

Basically I realized that no one has my best interest at stake, and

it is up to me to demand proper treatment and control of my health.

I have been jerked around and lied to so many times by " medical

professionals " . I have been poisoned and hacked, and have lost a

good chunk of my life because of it. I trust no one now, and rely

only on my own judgment as to what is good for my body. So one of

my hobbies now is natural health, going back to evolution and nature

for answers instead of modern tainted technology. Best thing I ever

did for my health.

Like I said I'm not in your program but I am very interested in this

stuff, so feel free to email me!

> r7r7r7us,

> I thought what you wrote was very informative. I might add that,

no one should be microwaving food, which creates unhealthy changes

in the blood. Microwaving food in plastic is even worse and really

asking for troubles.

>

> I have read and heard the same information about changes in fish.

Herbal Healer Academy has an article posted in the Breaking News

section about the problem and also one of the tapes. I have been

taking the Naturopathic course with them and was wondering if you

were taking it also? Your post just reminded me of things that I

have been learning through the courses. It would be interesting to

me to talk to someone else that was taking the program.

> Thanks,

> a