Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 I had some posts with someone on a different board the last couple of days. In brief, she has been looking into and considering having cranialsacral work done but has been told " no " by her neurosurgeon. She feels he is wrong, so do I. But then, neither of us is a neurosurgeon. I am doing some checking on it. In the meantime, I am going to copy my posts with her, along with my request for additional information, as general information for this list. I will post an update when I hear something back. ---------------- " McCoy " wrote: I " ve looked into cranialsacral therapy a lot. I plan on asking my neurosurgeon when i see him in April if it's okay to do. I have a craniocervical fusion from my skull down to C4. I talked to another person that was fused but not in the way i was. Hers were anterior and posterior fusions of C2-C4 and she was told by the same neurosurgeont hat she couldn't and mine's much more serious than hers so I'm not sure if it will be allowed. From what i read i don't see how it can be harmful, but I'm not the doctor. ------------- Thank you very much for the above post. I agree with you about not seeing how it can be harmful. But also like you, neither am I a neurosurgeon. At the moment, I don't know whether there is something about CST in this situation that I don't know and critically do need to know, or if we are dealing with another case of a " conventional " medicine practitioner bad-mouthing what they consider " fringe " medicine out of their own ignorance. I say what I do above because I KNOW in other cases where the conventional side of the house is flat dead-wrong and their opposition is driven more by greed and ignorance than any thing else. Be that as it may, there is still the issue of the law being on their side when it comes to anything even approaching diagnostics. More importantly, you raised an issue that I personally have to assume as a personal ethical and moral responsibility to investigate. Because of that, I have taken the liberty to copy your post and send it to the Upledger Institute, asking for clarification. As info for you, I am copying below what I sent them. ----------- I am an LMP and have taken both CST 1 and 2 and LDT 1 and 2. I also have extensive training in MFR, Polarity Therapy and Jin Shin Do Acupressure, among others. At any rate, I belong to an internet based support group for persons with the connective tissue disorder Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. As part of my involvement with the group I pretty much act as the groups advisor for questions and issues involving any bodywork modalities, alternative and/or complimentary therapies, and energy medicine topics. I also help members locate quailifed practitioners in their areas, particularly for CST and LDT. The Find a Practitioner section, by the way, has been extremely helpful for this. I just got hit with a posting tonight that I need some help with. The original subject was lymphatic drainage therapy. Someone was not familiar with it so I posted a fairly detailed explanation of what the lymph system is, does, and how LDT works. That led to a couple of other posts, including one in which I listed some of the modalities I practice, including CST. The response to that is what I need help with. When you read it, you will see why I need help and guidance. The entire posting is below: I " ve looked into cranialsacral therapy a lot. I plan on asking my neurosurgeon when i see him in April if it's okay to do. I have a craniocervical fusion from my skull down to C4. I talked to another person that was fused but not in the way i was. Hers were anterior and posterior fusions of C2-C4 and she was told by the same neurosurgeon that she couldn't and mine's much more serious than hers so I'm not sure if it will be allowed. From what i read i don't see how it can be harmful, but I'm not the doctor. This issue of safety post-cervical fusion is extremely important because spinal fusions at all locations (lumber to cervical) are unfortunately very common for more advanced cases of EDS. In spite of my personal aversion to and suspicion of spinal fusions in general, they none the less are rather frequently done in this population. Since CST is a modality that I highly recommend for a number of reasons, I need to know if there is in fact any legitimacy to the above neurosurgeon's claims. I agree with the statement about not seeing how it could be harmful, but I NEED something more than that if I am going to be recommending the modality. Any information you can provide on this issue would be appreciated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 Mike - Gut feeling says that the neurosurgen is speaking out of ignorance and an aversion to alternative. That's not at all substantial I know. I'll ask my chiro on Mon.....no promises. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.