Re: Question, Criminal Negligence

[Guest guest]

Criminal charges are filed by prosecutors.

Prosecutors are elected, and do have a lot of discretion. It is a

political question.

I think the charge would be reckless endangerment, and would fail on

the basis that most physicians didn't in fact have the sense to figure

it out. But it would be a very interesting prosecution.

There is a potential not very good civil rights case against the AMA

and med board members for suppressing debate in the area, leading to

other doc's not knowing any better.

I think criminal prosecution of some of the more obnoxious vaccine

proponents would be an excellent wake up call for the medical

profession, but would probably be unsuccessful legally. It could be

very bad for the prosecutor involved, losing the case then having all

the MD's in town campaign against him at the next election.

But who knows? Maybe you can find a willing and adequately pissed off

DA. Maybe one with an autistic kid.

Once some states pass laws about no thimerosal in medicine (or

vaccines), a prosecution or two will be easy to come up with and if

some DA's do their job it will have a tremendously positive effect on

medicine.

Andy . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .

> Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges filed

> against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing the

> autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> injected into our babies, physicians should have known this fact.

> Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> think that there must be laws that protect our children from having

> poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this is

> worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged with the

> crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison. The

> AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli Lilly

> et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer to the

> possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup has to

> stop somewhere. Best

[Guest guest]

I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be targeted. They expect

the products they are given have been tested adequately and shown to be

safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about the toxicity of

this product are responsible.

Barb

[ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges filed

> against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing the

> autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> injected into our babies, physicians should have known this fact.

> Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> think that there must be laws that protect our children from having

> poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this is

> worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged with the

> crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison. The

> AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli Lilly

> et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer to the

> possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup has to

> stop somewhere. Best

>

>

>

> =======================================================

>

[Guest guest]

You're right, Barb. The companies who made the drugs are responsible.

Unfortunately, they are also protected by our illustrious

politicians. And, since the M.D.s are among the most intelligent

people on the planet, they have no excuse for shooting the poison

into our babies so, if they are not protected like the drug companies

are, they should answer to us for their malpractice. And, if they

wind up in prison, it serves them right for not policing their own

industry.

> I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be targeted.

They expect

> the products they are given have been tested adequately and shown

to be

> safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about the

toxicity of

> this product are responsible.

> Barb

>

> [ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

>

>

> > Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges filed

> > against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing the

> > autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> > injected into our babies, physicians should have known this fact.

> > Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> > think that there must be laws that protect our children from

having

> > poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this is

> > worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged with

the

> > crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> > enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison. The

> > AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> > limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli

Lilly

> > et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer to

the

> > possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> > charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup

has to

> > stop somewhere. Best

> >

> >

> >

> > =======================================================

> >

[Guest guest]

I think the best way to get the issue going would be to get a couple

of states to file lawsuits against vaccine mfg for reimbursement for

special ed services, just like states did with the tobacco industry.

Debi

[Guest guest]

We actually also " hire " the MD's assuming they have done all their

homework and know what they are doing and injecting. What really

bothers me is when the possible dangers of vaccines and the

thimerosol, etc. they contain are mentioned to the MD's to have those

MD's look no further into the issue than what the pharma company

tells them. At this point I believe they are no longer able to say

they were unaware and I believe their continued injections are

criminal.

> > I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be targeted.

> They expect

> > the products they are given have been tested adequately and shown

> to be

> > safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about the

> toxicity of

> > this product are responsible.

> > Barb

> >

> > [ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> >

> >

> > > Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges

filed

> > > against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing

the

> > > autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> > > injected into our babies, physicians should have known this

fact.

> > > Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> > > think that there must be laws that protect our children from

> having

> > > poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this

is

> > > worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged

with

> the

> > > crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> > > enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison.

The

> > > AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> > > limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli

> Lilly

> > > et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer

to

> the

> > > possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> > > charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup

> has to

> > > stop somewhere. Best

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > =======================================================

> > >

[Guest guest]

Any Vaccine Bully gets what they deserve.

[ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges filed

> against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing the

> autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> injected into our babies, physicians should have known this fact.

> Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> think that there must be laws that protect our children from having

> poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this is

> worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged with the

> crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison. The

> AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli Lilly

> et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer to the

> possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup has to

> stop somewhere. Best

>

>

>

> =======================================================

>

[Guest guest]

And then the states take the money and throws it into a general fund. The state

employees all get new vehicles and the state legislature votes themselves pay

raises.

I do believe that the states are just as guilty for mercury poisoning our

children. They could have recalled the vaccines immediately if they wanted to.

[ ] Re: Question, Criminal Negligence

I think the best way to get the issue going would be to get a couple

of states to file lawsuits against vaccine mfg for reimbursement for

special ed services, just like states did with the tobacco industry.

Debi

=======================================================

[Guest guest]

They knew. MDs denied it because it would hurt their vaccine sales. Shots

enhance the profits of practices.

[ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> >

> >

> > > Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges

filed

> > > against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing

the

> > > autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> > > injected into our babies, physicians should have known this

fact.

> > > Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> > > think that there must be laws that protect our children from

> having

> > > poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this

is

> > > worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged

with

> the

> > > crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> > > enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison.

The

> > > AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> > > limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli

> Lilly

> > > et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer

to

> the

> > > possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> > > charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup

> has to

> > > stop somewhere. Best

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > =======================================================

> > >

[Guest guest]

The argument here that is the most shaky is that " MD's are among the

most intelligent people on the planet. "

Re: [ ] Re: Question, Criminal Negligence

They knew. MDs denied it because it would hurt their vaccine sales.

Shots enhance the profits of practices.

[ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> >

> >

> > > Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges

filed

> > > against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing

the

> > > autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> > > injected into our babies, physicians should have known this

fact.

> > > Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> > > think that there must be laws that protect our children from

> having

> > > poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this

is

> > > worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged

with

> the

> > > crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> > > enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison.

The

> > > AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> > > limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli

> Lilly

> > > et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer

to

> the

> > > possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> > > charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup

> has to

> > > stop somewhere. Best

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > =======================================================

> > >

[Guest guest]

I was wondering alot about this lately? Do you think that Brokovich's

lawfirm would take on some of these cases?

Has anyone contacted them?

I went to their website and got their information.

I saw the movie and she seems really determined to get to the bottom of BIG

coverups. She did it before.

I really think she would be a wonderful person to get on our side.

What do you think?

Vicki 's Mommy HFA/Mercury poisoned 7 years old

[Guest guest]

The problem is if you bully the vaccine makers they will counter by saying

if there is a outbreak of anthrax or some other mass destruction virus they

will not make the vaccine because of the liability. This is why the

government is protecting these A holes.

It is just a matter of time until this all comes to a head and the axe will

fall on these #!!$#?@ A holes.

I can't wait to see their stock plummet to the ground and the executives

jumping ship when the first law suit is won in our favor.

------------------------Bill H.

Matts DAD

At 12:40 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:

>They knew. MDs denied it because it would hurt their vaccine sales. Shots

>enhance the profits of practices.

>

> [ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> > >

> > >

> > > > Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges

> filed

> > > > against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing

> the

> > > > autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> > > > injected into our babies, physicians should have known this

> fact.

> > > > Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> > > > think that there must be laws that protect our children from

> > having

> > > > poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this

> is

> > > > worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged

> with

> > the

> > > > crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> > > > enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison.

> The

> > > > AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> > > > limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli

> > Lilly

> > > > et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer

> to

> > the

> > > > possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> > > > charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup

> > has to

> > > > stop somewhere. Best

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > =======================================================

> > > >

[Guest guest]

> I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be targeted. They expect

> the products they are given have been tested adequately and shown to be

> safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about the toxicity of

> this product are responsible.

> Barb

I agree. This is the current (shockingly immoral) standard in

medicine, but being the standard it is cruel to punish the doctors for

doing it the way they were told to.

Which is why I suggested starting with some obnoxioiusly out of control

vaccine proponent who actually gives them, so you are getting someone

who deserves it.

Criminal charges are in theory possible against the people at CDC etc.

who sat on committee4s, fudged data, had conflicts of interest, and

after that continued to recommend and support the safety of vaccines.

However this is extremely difficult to prosecute due to jurisdictional

issues and the concept of " sovereign immunity, " where people acting for

the government are allowed to do things anyone else would go to prison

for. Even when " sovereign immunity " isn't a legitimate legal doctrine,

both courts and prosecutors give way too much leeway to their fellow

government bureaucrats.

All this starts with some pissed off prosecutor who is high enough on

the totem pole to make decisions as to what to do.

A MAJOR advantage of finding such a guy is that prosecutors don't have

to rely on discovery where Eli Lilly is not providing the requested

incriminating documents, they can get search warrants and go dig in the

files themselves. And even if they dropped the charges later the

documents they found might blow up the NVIC kangaroo court case.

Additionally, if they found documents that should have been turned over

in discovery but weren't, then separate and independent obstruction of

justice charges might be possible, and those would be a LOT easier to

prevail on than criminal negligence, RICO, or reckless endangeerment

charges.

From a practical standpoint I suspect this would be almost impossible

for a motivated prosecutor to pursue if he wanted to. If any of you

konw district attorneys or state's attorneys or US attorneys this

doesn't mean you can't talk to them, but don't be ridiculous and

present it as an open and shut or clear case - it is a difficult and

ambiguous one where even without the enormous political pressures it

would create, it would be difficult to decide what to charge the people

with, and more difficult to prevail.

Andy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Andy . . . . . .. . . . ..

[Guest guest]

What to charge them with??? Murder for one! Theres so many children

who have died because of vaccine injurys! and then you can charge

them for assault.. Its not fair that thousands have suffered because

of this. Martha goes to prison for 250.000 dollars, But some

moron that has ALLOWED children to be killed and disabled, Gets away

with it! Thats NOT Justice!

> > I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be targeted.

They expect

> > the products they are given have been tested adequately and

shown to be

> > safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about the

toxicity of

> > this product are responsible.

> > Barb

>

> I agree. This is the current (shockingly immoral) standard in

> medicine, but being the standard it is cruel to punish the doctors

for

> doing it the way they were told to.

>

> Which is why I suggested starting with some obnoxioiusly out of

control

> vaccine proponent who actually gives them, so you are getting

someone

> who deserves it.

>

> Criminal charges are in theory possible against the people at CDC

etc.

> who sat on committee4s, fudged data, had conflicts of interest,

and

> after that continued to recommend and support the safety of

vaccines.

> However this is extremely difficult to prosecute due to

jurisdictional

> issues and the concept of " sovereign immunity, " where people

acting for

> the government are allowed to do things anyone else would go to

prison

> for. Even when " sovereign immunity " isn't a legitimate legal

doctrine,

> both courts and prosecutors give way too much leeway to their

fellow

> government bureaucrats.

>

> All this starts with some pissed off prosecutor who is high enough

on

> the totem pole to make decisions as to what to do.

>

> A MAJOR advantage of finding such a guy is that prosecutors don't

have

> to rely on discovery where Eli Lilly is not providing the

requested

> incriminating documents, they can get search warrants and go dig

in the

> files themselves. And even if they dropped the charges later the

> documents they found might blow up the NVIC kangaroo court case.

>

> Additionally, if they found documents that should have been turned

over

> in discovery but weren't, then separate and independent

obstruction of

> justice charges might be possible, and those would be a LOT easier

to

> prevail on than criminal negligence, RICO, or reckless

endangeerment

> charges.

>

> From a practical standpoint I suspect this would be almost

impossible

> for a motivated prosecutor to pursue if he wanted to. If any of

you

> konw district attorneys or state's attorneys or US attorneys this

> doesn't mean you can't talk to them, but don't be ridiculous and

> present it as an open and shut or clear case - it is a difficult

and

> ambiguous one where even without the enormous political pressures

it

> would create, it would be difficult to decide what to charge the

people

> with, and more difficult to prevail.

>

> Andy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

>

> Andy . . . . . .. . . . ..

[Guest guest]

I think you are right, I think it's Air Pollution the case she is on right

now with Beverly Hills High and alot of the ex-students are being diagnosed with

multiple cancers.

I saw the movie A Civil Action, excellent movie.

Thanks,

Vicki

[Guest guest]

I E-mailed Mark Geier and a couple of lawyers to see if they had any

opinion on this but have not heard back from any of them. I suppose,

if the laws are there to be enforced and we compiled enough viable

evidence that we could make a citizen's arrest and drag some M.D.

into a Police station and force the issue that way. Our government

thinks they can just sweep us under the rug and forget about us so I

think it's important for us to look for alternative means to gain

justice. Best

> > > I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be

targeted.

> They expect

> > > the products they are given have been tested adequately and

> shown to be

> > > safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about the

> toxicity of

> > > this product are responsible.

> > > Barb

> >

> > I agree. This is the current (shockingly immoral) standard in

> > medicine, but being the standard it is cruel to punish the

doctors

> for

> > doing it the way they were told to.

> >

> > Which is why I suggested starting with some obnoxioiusly out of

> control

> > vaccine proponent who actually gives them, so you are getting

> someone

> > who deserves it.

> >

> > Criminal charges are in theory possible against the people at CDC

> etc.

> > who sat on committee4s, fudged data, had conflicts of interest,

> and

> > after that continued to recommend and support the safety of

> vaccines.

> > However this is extremely difficult to prosecute due to

> jurisdictional

> > issues and the concept of " sovereign immunity, " where people

> acting for

> > the government are allowed to do things anyone else would go to

> prison

> > for. Even when " sovereign immunity " isn't a legitimate legal

> doctrine,

> > both courts and prosecutors give way too much leeway to their

> fellow

> > government bureaucrats.

> >

> > All this starts with some pissed off prosecutor who is high

enough

> on

> > the totem pole to make decisions as to what to do.

> >

> > A MAJOR advantage of finding such a guy is that prosecutors don't

> have

> > to rely on discovery where Eli Lilly is not providing the

> requested

> > incriminating documents, they can get search warrants and go dig

> in the

> > files themselves. And even if they dropped the charges later the

> > documents they found might blow up the NVIC kangaroo court case.

> >

> > Additionally, if they found documents that should have been

turned

> over

> > in discovery but weren't, then separate and independent

> obstruction of

> > justice charges might be possible, and those would be a LOT

easier

> to

> > prevail on than criminal negligence, RICO, or reckless

> endangeerment

> > charges.

> >

> > From a practical standpoint I suspect this would be almost

> impossible

> > for a motivated prosecutor to pursue if he wanted to. If any of

> you

> > konw district attorneys or state's attorneys or US attorneys this

> > doesn't mean you can't talk to them, but don't be ridiculous and

> > present it as an open and shut or clear case - it is a difficult

> and

> > ambiguous one where even without the enormous political pressures

> it

> > would create, it would be difficult to decide what to charge the

> people

> > with, and more difficult to prevail.

> >

> > Andy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

> >

> > Andy . . . . . .. . . . ..

[Guest guest]

> What to charge them with??? Murder for one! Theres so many children

> who have died because of vaccine injurys! and then you can charge

> them for assault..

You can't charge them with either murder or assault because the parents

gave permission for the vaccination beforehand.

>Its not fair that thousands have suffered because

> of this. Martha goes to prison for 250.000 dollars, But some

> moron that has ALLOWED children to be killed and disabled, Gets away

> with it! Thats NOT Justice!

Maybe you should show up at a lot of Bush campaign events and ask him

when the s Jr. and Sidney Taurel death penalty act is

going to be passed to address this problem?

Andy . . . . . .. . . . . . . .

[Guest guest]

LOL....I think they would put me in Prison if I was at a BUSH

campaign!

> > What to charge them with??? Murder for one! Theres so many

children

> > who have died because of vaccine injurys! and then you can

charge

> > them for assault..

>

> You can't charge them with either murder or assault because the

parents

> gave permission for the vaccination beforehand.

>

> >Its not fair that thousands have suffered because

> > of this. Martha goes to prison for 250.000 dollars, But

some

> > moron that has ALLOWED children to be killed and disabled, Gets

away

> > with it! Thats NOT Justice!

>

> Maybe you should show up at a lot of Bush campaign events and ask

him

> when the s Jr. and Sidney Taurel death penalty act

is

> going to be passed to address this problem?

>

> Andy . . . . . .. . . . . . . .

[Guest guest]

> I E-mailed Mark Geier and a couple of lawyers to see if they had any

> opinion on this but have not heard back from any of them. I suppose,

> if the laws are there to be enforced and we compiled enough viable

> evidence that we could make a citizen's arrest

You can't make a citizen's arrest unless they are going to flee or osme

such where the police can't get around to it later.

> > and drag some M.D.

> into a Police station and force the issue that way.

The way to force the issue is during the election of some local

prosecutors. Work on the campaign of anyone who says they'll bring

charges.

> > Our government

> thinks they can just sweep us under the rug and forget about us so I

> think it's important for us to look for alternative means to gain

> justice. Best--- In Autism-

[Guest guest]

I know they will never be arrested. But from the first day I found

out about my sons mercury poison, It was my first thought!

If you do find a way to put these criminals behind bars....Please

let me know! There is NOTHING in this world that would bring me more

satisfaction, then to see men who have gotten away with murder for

YEARS behind bars!

> > I E-mailed Mark Geier and a couple of lawyers to see if they had

any

> > opinion on this but have not heard back from any of them. I

suppose,

> > if the laws are there to be enforced and we compiled enough

viable

> > evidence that we could make a citizen's arrest

>

> You can't make a citizen's arrest unless they are going to flee or

osme

> such where the police can't get around to it later.

>

> > > and drag some M.D.

> > into a Police station and force the issue that way.

>

> The way to force the issue is during the election of some local

> prosecutors. Work on the campaign of anyone who says they'll

bring

> charges.

>

> > > Our government

> > thinks they can just sweep us under the rug and forget about us

so I

> > think it's important for us to look for alternative means to

gain

> > justice. Best--- In Autism-

[Guest guest]

Some one has to stop them! I just read an artice about anthrax and

the gulf war...It made a pit in my stomache, and now Bush is

oredering 75 million antrax vaccines...Ill tell him where he can

stick those vaccines!

> > > > I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be

targeted.

> > > They expect

> > > > the products they are given have been tested adequately

and shown

> > > to be

> > > > safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about

the

> > > toxicity of

> > > > this product are responsible.

> > > > Barb

> > > >

> > > > [ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > > Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal

charges

> > filed

> > > > > against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and

causing

> > the

> > > > > autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was

being

> > > > > injected into our babies, physicians should have known

this

> > fact.

> > > > > Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison,

one would

> > > > > think that there must be laws that protect our children

from

> > > having

> > > > > poison injected into them without our knowledge. I

think this

> > is

> > > > > worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was

charged

> > with

> > > the

> > > > > crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to

become the

> > > > > enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from

prison.

> > The

> > > > > AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the

statute of

> > > > > limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could

sue Eli

> > > Lilly

> > > > > et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the

answer

> > to

> > > the

> > > > > possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the

country and

> > > > > charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and

coverup

> > > has to

> > > > > stop somewhere. Best

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > =======================================================

> > > > >

[Guest guest]

> > I don't think the doctors are the ones that need to be targeted. They

> expect

> > the products they are given have been tested adequately and shown to be

> > safe. I think the pharmaceutical companies who knew about the toxicity of

> > this product are responsible.

> > Barb

>

>I agree. This is the current (shockingly immoral) standard in

>medicine, but being the standard it is cruel to punish the doctors for

>doing it the way they were told to.

Who told them how to do their job?

>[Andy in another thread] Doctors are taught in med school to believe

whatever the drug reps tell them without question or analysis.

Should the target be the heads of medical schools?

Jack

[Guest guest]

MDs seem to have the ability to remember vast reams of information but no

ability to think or analyze.

At 04:57 AM 20/03/2004, you wrote:

>The argument here that is the most shaky is that " MD's are among the

>most intelligent people on the planet. "

>

>

> Re: [ ] Re: Question, Criminal Negligence

>

>

>They knew. MDs denied it because it would hurt their vaccine sales.

>Shots enhance the profits of practices.

>

> [ ] Question, Criminal Negligence

> > >

> > >

> > > > Does anyone know if it is possible to have criminal charges

> filed

> > > > against M.D.s for putting the mercury in our kids and causing

> the

> > > > autism? Although we were never advised that mercury was being

> > > > injected into our babies, physicians should have known this

> fact.

> > > > Since it is common knowledge that mercury is a poison, one would

> > > > think that there must be laws that protect our children from

> > having

> > > > poison injected into them without our knowledge. I think this

> is

> > > > worth investigating since, if every pediatrician was charged

> with

> > the

> > > > crime of poisoning babies, it would force the AMA to become the

> > > > enemies of the drug companies to save themselves from prison.

> The

> > > > AMA has the power to force Congress to throw out the statute of

> > > > limitations and the whole damned VICP and then we could sue Eli

> > Lilly

> > > > et. al. for every dime they have. Does anyone have the answer

> to

> > the

> > > > possibility of arresting every pediatrician in the country and

> > > > charging them with criminal negligence? The blame and coverup

> > has to

> > > > stop somewhere. Best

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > =======================================================

> > > >

[Guest guest]

A friend of mine keeps up with Brokovich, My friend said she

thought was involved in some kind of Mercury case...I dont know

if its air pollution or vaccines..I think everyone should watch that

movie! And also read the book Please Read this BOOK! A civil action

by Harr, A friend of mine her son his a corporate lawyer,

She gave me this book to read. Its a MUST read!

> I was wondering alot about this lately? Do you think that

Brokovich's

> lawfirm would take on some of these cases?

> Has anyone contacted them?

> I went to their website and got their information.

> I saw the movie and she seems really determined to get to the

bottom of BIG

> coverups. She did it before.

> I really think she would be a wonderful person to get on our side.

> What do you think?

> Vicki 's Mommy HFA/Mercury poisoned 7 years old

>

>

>