Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 --- ph, Good to hear from you again. Very sorry to hear this news. I myself have BC/BS in Wash. State and it never ceases to amaze me how the forked tongue of the insurance world is in the viral stage. Sure wish there was a shot we could all take to prevent the spread of this bull. I didn't realize you had problems with your resurfased hip. Was it questionable when you were first examined before you got the resurfased hip? Sure hope you have many great years of pain free life on the new one. I really appreciated all your help when I was doing my investigation. I am at 8 wks and feeling so much better. I have been in therapy pool for the last mo. Sure feels good to get in the pool but I hate the strong chlorine they put in it. Next week I will be starting to go to the gym instead. Tug C+ Boyd 11/03 surfacehippy , " ph " wrote: > > When I had my resurfacing surgery last year, I had Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Western Pennsylvania, and they paid my entire bill. I even got preapproval twice from them, so they knew exactly what the procedure involved. My employer has since changed my insurance coverage to a Point of Service (POS) run by Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Western PA. > > When problems developed with my resurfaced hip a few months ago, I had to return to the doctor who performed the surgery--Dr. Victor Goldberg in Cleveland, OH. Unfortunately, he is now considered an " out-of-network " physician, and that caused all sorts of insurance problems. > > Regardless, I went and had Dr. Goldberg perform additional surgery on me in which he had to revise my hip with a large-head THR. When the insurance company tried to deny some of the payment because I used and out-of-network physician, I appealed. My argument was that no in-network physician had a clue about hip resurfacing, so how could they make a diagnosis or effect a repair, if it could be repaired? > > Today I received a letter from the insurance company conceding that they erred in saying that I should have gone to and in-network surgeon. However, they are now claiming that they do not pay for experimental surgery, so they intend to denying ALL payment for my revision surgery. Can you believe that? They want to deny payment for a traditional THR because it replaced an experimental resurfaced hip! > > All they've succeeded in doing is making me mad. They don't know who they're dealing with. I used to be an administrative law judge, and my job was conducting appeal hearings. This could get interesting. > > > ph K. Waltenbaugh > Conserve Plus 12/3/02 > Conserve Total 12/9/03 > > > _______________________________________________ > No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. > Introducing My Way - http://www.myway.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 ph: Just a quick thought here. If you STALL them long enough and the C+ is approved in late 2004....wouldn't they have to pay then? While you head into battle with BC/BS, it might prove to be a back-up tactic you could use. Best of luck, I think you'll be a formidable foe! Lois C+ 3/27/03 Dr. Mont Insurance denial for a THR??? When I had my resurfacing surgery last year, I had Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Western Pennsylvania, and they paid my entire bill. I even got preapproval twice from them, so they knew exactly what the procedure involved. My employer has since changed my insurance coverage to a Point of Service (POS) run by Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Western PA. When problems developed with my resurfaced hip a few months ago, I had to return to the doctor who performed the surgery--Dr. Victor Goldberg in Cleveland, OH. Unfortunately, he is now considered an " out-of-network " physician, and that caused all sorts of insurance problems. Regardless, I went and had Dr. Goldberg perform additional surgery on me in which he had to revise my hip with a large-head THR. When the insurance company tried to deny some of the payment because I used and out-of-network physician, I appealed. My argument was that no in-network physician had a clue about hip resurfacing, so how could they make a diagnosis or effect a repair, if it could be repaired? Today I received a letter from the insurance company conceding that they erred in saying that I should have gone to and in-network surgeon. However, they are now claiming that they do not pay for experimental surgery, so they intend to denying ALL payment for my revision surgery. Can you believe that? They want to deny payment for a traditional THR because it replaced an experimental resurfaced hip! All they've succeeded in doing is making me mad. They don't know who they're dealing with. I used to be an administrative law judge, and my job was conducting appeal hearings. This could get interesting. ph K. Waltenbaugh Conserve Plus 12/3/02 Conserve Total 12/9/03 _______________________________________________ No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. Introducing My Way - http://www.myway.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 hi joe- i have been following your story with much care and interest. i'm glad to hear that you are on this side of your revision surgery and that all seems to be going well. i really appreciate you sharing with us your circumstances and the details of it. it certainly adds to ther collective knowledge base going on here. but, this story of your insurance hassles now have me mad for you. you deserve peace of mind and all of the benefits of overcoming the limitations of a degenerative hip.....and then doing it all over again. i certainly hope you are able to appeal your insurance company's decision and maybe win a big fat legal lottery in the process. best of luck , jeff bionic left hip 6 weeks ago Insurance denial for a THR??? When I had my resurfacing surgery last year, I had Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Western Pennsylvania, and they paid my entire bill. I even got preapproval twice from them, so they knew exactly what the procedure involved. My employer has since changed my insurance coverage to a Point of Service (POS) run by Highmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Western PA. When problems developed with my resurfaced hip a few months ago, I had to return to the doctor who performed the surgery--Dr. Victor Goldberg in Cleveland, OH. Unfortunately, he is now considered an " out-of-network " physician, and that caused all sorts of insurance problems. Regardless, I went and had Dr. Goldberg perform additional surgery on me in which he had to revise my hip with a large-head THR. When the insurance company tried to deny some of the payment because I used and out-of-network physician, I appealed. My argument was that no in-network physician had a clue about hip resurfacing, so how could they make a diagnosis or effect a repair, if it could be repaired? Today I received a letter from the insurance company conceding that they erred in saying that I should have gone to and in-network surgeon. However, they are now claiming that they do not pay for experimental surgery, so they intend to denying ALL payment for my revision surgery. Can you believe that? They want to deny payment for a traditional THR because it replaced an experimental resurfaced hip! All they've succeeded in doing is making me mad. They don't know who they're dealing with. I used to be an administrative law judge, and my job was conducting appeal hearings. This could get interesting. ph K. Waltenbaugh Conserve Plus 12/3/02 Conserve Total 12/9/03 _______________________________________________ No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. Introducing My Way - http://www.myway.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.