Guest guest Posted April 2, 2004 Report Share Posted April 2, 2004 ALA also chelates arsenic and DMSA chelates lead and could pick up any mercury along the way. Consider identifying and reducing or eliminating exposure to these others. S R> POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS <BR> element result ref range color <BR> ============================================= <BR> aluminum 8.4 <8.0 yellow<BR> antimony 0.21 <0.066 red<BR> arsenic 0.12 <0.080 yellow<BR> cadmium 0.15 <0.15 yellow<BR> Lead 2.4 <1.0 yellow<BR> silver 3.2 <0.13 red<BR> tin 1.8 <0.30 red<BR> total toxic representation 98%<BR> ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS <BR> element result ref range color under/over 50% <BR> ============================================================ <BR> Calcium 189 160-500 green under<BR> Magnesium 11 12-50 green under<BR> Sodium 260 12-90 red over<BR> Potassium 230 10-40 red over<BR> Copper 16 9.0-30 white<BR> Zinc 100 110-190 yellow under<BR> Manganese 0.09 0.18-0.60 red under<BR> Chromium 0.18 0.23-0.50 yellow under <BR> Vanadium 0.043 0.025-0.10 green under<BR> Molybdenum 0.10 0.040-0.089 yellow over<BR> Boron 6.0 0.50-3.5 yellow over<BR> Iodine 0.40 0.25-1.3 green under<BR> Lithium 0.011 0.007-0.023 white <BR> Phosphorus 273 160-250 yellow over<BR> Selenium 0.87 0.95-1.7 yellow under<BR> Strontium 0.50 0.21-2.1 green under<BR> Sulfur 52100 45500-53000 yellow over<BR> Barium 0.28 0.19-1.6 green under<BR> Cobalt 0.010 0.013-0.035 yellow under<BR> Iron 8.7 6.0-17 green under<BR> Germanium 0.049 0.045-0.065 green under<BR> Rubidium 0.26 0.008-0.080 yellow over<BR> Zirconium 1.7 0.060-0.70 yellow over<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2004 Report Share Posted April 2, 2004 In a message dated 4/2/2004 10:33:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, marianne@... writes: > I understand that some have not met the counting rules, and chelated anyway > and had good results. Anyone out there??? > My son's test was a bit like yours -- did not meet the counting rules quite, but high in antimony and arsenic. I dilly-dallied for months, tried SCD and other supplemetation, finally decided to give Andy's protocol a try. Great improvements! I will say that the yeast battle is huge...but the positive changes have been wonderful. Much better socially, much better cognitive focus, sensory issues reduced, much better mood -- he's generally cheerful and cooperative now. He clearly feels better. I was scared of chelation before I tried it. But now I only wish I had started sooner. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 My son's hair test was suspicious, high in antimony and arsenic. It was a Great Smokies and so counting rules could only be approximated, and then it was only close. Chelation using Andy's protocol and craniosacral therapy have gotten him to were I don't think he would get a diagnosis today (Aspberger). --Lissy [ ] hair test results?and more?? Hi all, Here is a copy of my son's newest hair test results. As far as I can see he barely meets the #3 counting rule, of at least 11 elements within the normal range. He has 9. He has never been vaccinated, and I thought he got mercury from my amalgams. My hair test just came back not meeting the counting rules at all. I am really surprised as I figured I was totally polluted, having many, many amalgams. I am having them removed at this time, and to have my hair test come back OK, is a total shocker. Can anyone shed some light on this for me? I had a dentist say that my son couldn't have gotten mercury from me unless I had dental work done while I was pregnant or nursing (which I did not) Or unless I ate 18 cans of tuna a day. He is a dentist that is totally against mercury, fluoride etc, so now I am wondering whether to chelate my son or not??? I understand that some have not met the counting rules, and chelated anyway and had good results. Anyone out there??? Can someone lead me to some information about mercury getting into the fetus or thru breast milk from the mothers amalgams? Thanks to any responders. nne POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ============================================= aluminum 8.4 <8.0 yellow antimony 0.21 <0.066 red arsenic 0.12 <0.080 yellow beryllium <0.01 <0.020 bismuth 0.037 <0.12 green cadmium 0.15 <0.15 yellow Lead 2.4 <1.0 yellow mercury 0.15 <0.40 green platinum <0.003 <0.005 thallium 0.004 <0.010 green thorium <0.001 <0.005 uranium 0.017 <0.060 green nickel 0.20 <0.40 green silver 3.2 <0.13 red tin 1.8 <0.30 red titanium 0.80 <1.0 green total toxic representation 98% ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% ============================================================ Calcium 189 160-500 green under Magnesium 11 12-50 green under Sodium 260 12-90 red over Potassium 230 10-40 red over Copper 16 9.0-30 white Zinc 100 110-190 yellow under Manganese 0.09 0.18-0.60 red under Chromium 0.18 0.23-0.50 yellow under Vanadium 0.043 0.025-0.10 green under Molybdenum 0.10 0.040-0.089 yellow over Boron 6.0 0.50-3.5 yellow over Iodine 0.40 0.25-1.3 green under Lithium 0.011 0.007-0.023 white Phosphorus 273 160-250 yellow over Selenium 0.87 0.95-1.7 yellow under Strontium 0.50 0.21-2.1 green under Sulfur 52100 45500-53000 yellow over Barium 0.28 0.19-1.6 green under Cobalt 0.010 0.013-0.035 yellow under Iron 8.7 6.0-17 green under Germanium 0.049 0.045-0.065 green under Rubidium 0.26 0.008-0.080 yellow over Zirconium 1.7 0.060-0.70 yellow over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 >Chelation using Andy's protocol and craniosacral therapy have gotten him to were I don't >think he would get a diagnosis today (Aspberger). Is craniosacral therapy something like a brisk scalp massage or perhaps a dutch rub? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 > aluminum 8.4 <8.0 yellow > antimony 0.21 <0.066 red > arsenic 0.12 <0.080 yellow > cadmium 0.15 <0.15 yellow > Lead 2.4 <1.0 yellow > silver 3.2 <0.13 red > tin 1.8 <0.30 red Consider removing current sources of exposure, especially lead and antimony http://www.danasview.net/metals.htm > Calcium 189 160-500 green under > Magnesium 11 12-50 green under Consider cal/mag supplement. > Copper 16 9.0-30 white > Zinc 100 110-190 yellow under Add a little zinc. > Manganese 0.09 0.18-0.60 red under > Selenium 0.87 0.95-1.7 yellow under Consider adding these. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 Re: [ ] hair test results?and more?? >Chelation using Andy's protocol and craniosacral therapy have gotten him to were I don't >think he would get a diagnosis today (Aspberger). Is craniosacral therapy something like a brisk scalp massage or perhaps a dutch rub? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 No, more like spinal chiropractic, except it's performed on the bones/joints of the skull. Re: [ ] hair test results?and more?? >Chelation using Andy's protocol and craniosacral therapy have gotten him to were I don't >think he would get a diagnosis today (Aspberger). Is craniosacral therapy something like a brisk scalp massage or perhaps a dutch rub? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2004 Report Share Posted April 3, 2004 Thanks Re: [ ] hair test results?and more?? >Chelation using Andy's protocol and craniosacral therapy have gotten him to were I don't >think he would get a diagnosis today (Aspberger). Is craniosacral therapy something like a brisk scalp massage or perhaps a dutch rub? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 > Hi all, Here is a copy of my son's newest hair test results. As far as I can > see he barely meets the #3 counting rule, of at least 11 elements within the > normal range. He has 9. He has never been vaccinated, and I thought he got > mercury from my amalgams. My hair test just came back not meeting the > counting rules at all. I am really surprised as I figured I was totally > polluted, having many, many amalgams. I am having them removed at this time, > and to have my hair test come back OK, is a total shocker. > Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Chelate. There are lots of places to get mercury and some people never figure out where it came from. Andy . . . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 > Hi all, Here is a copy of my son's newest hair test results. As far as I can > see he barely meets the #3 counting rule, of at least 11 elements within the > normal range. He has 9. He has never been vaccinated, and I thought he got > mercury from my amalgams. My hair test just came back not meeting the > counting rules at all. I am really surprised as I figured I was totally > polluted, having many, many amalgams. I am having them removed at this time, > and to have my hair test come back OK, is a total shocker. > Can anyone shed some light on this for me? > I had a dentist say that my son couldn't have gotten mercury from me unless > I had dental work done while I was pregnant or nursing (which I did not) Or > unless I ate 18 cans of tuna a day. He is a dentist that is totally against > mercury, fluoride etc, I think he is mistaken about that. > so now I am wondering whether to chelate my son or > not??? I don't see why you would not. You I can see the question about since you have normal mineral transport. > > I understand that some have not met the counting rules, and chelated anyway > and had good results. Anyone out there??? try the following posts: 100805 100859 100952 105563 105583 105598 100797 87118 87123 78878 68467 73317 108019 96330 > Can someone lead me to some information about mercury getting into the fetus > or thru breast milk from the mothers amalgams? Try the book " Infertility and Birth Defects: is mercury from silver dental fillings an unsuspected cause? " by Sam Ziff and Dr Ziff. I would also be concerned about the following: > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > element result ref range color > ============================================= > aluminum 8.4 <8.0 yellow > antimony 0.21 <0.066 red > arsenic 0.12 <0.080 yellow > cadmium 0.15 <0.15 yellow > Lead 2.4 <1.0 yellow > silver 3.2 <0.13 red > tin 1.8 <0.30 red Some of this may be showing up incorrectly due to disordered mineral transport. So the above may or may not be accurate. But at least note it, consider it, and do another hair test after you chelate for 6 to 12 months. (He'll probably have normal mineral transport after a few months of chelation.) good wishes, Moria Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.