Guest guest Posted November 24, 2003 Report Share Posted November 24, 2003 Sheila, It's a shame your legs are not functioning as you wish. Dancing must be very demanding and to have to deal with a leg length discrepancy must be very frustrating. Are you aware that resurfacing does not provide any means of changing the length of one's leg? Stemmed THRs do come in various sizes, lengths, lateral offsets, Etc. but resurfacing pretty much replaces what existed before the surgery. This is good news for patients with relatively normal leg lengths. On the other hand, stemmed THR patients often wind up with significant discrepancies. This seems to be a function of the surgeon's skill, pre-op planning and a host of factors that can be difficult for the surgeon to control. With resurfacing, there's nothing that can be done to alter the anatomy of the joint. Bone can not be added to increase length, or removed to decrease length and the devices do not come in different " lengths " , only diameters meant to mimic the natural size of the joint. If your leg was lengthened by 1mm, it is probably due to the restoration of missing structure, previously lost to joint degeneration. This would normally be desirable as most patients have some lost bone structure to recoup. It sounds like your surgeon did not do a good job of informing you of the limitations of resurfacing. Your disappointment is understandable, but your expectations may have been for more then resurfacing could provide. The alternative of a stemmed THR might well have been even worse. All the best with your post op progress, Mike Trautman C2K, Sep 03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2003 Report Share Posted November 24, 2003 At 08:42 PM 11/24/2003 -0600, you wrote: >Are you aware that resurfacing does not provide any means of changing the >length of one's leg? >With resurfacing, there's nothing that can be done to alter the anatomy of >the joint. Mike, Be careful here. My left leg was lengthened over 2.5 cm, and right was lengthened slightly also. I ended up with perfectly even legs (my left leg was lengthened to even me up with the right side intentionally). Depending on where the cup was placed, there is actually room to change the effective length of the leg. It is possible then, that Sheila had a cup placed lower than the " original equipment " . It may have been the docs intent (although he apparently has not communicated that if that is the case), if her biologic acetabulum was originally out of whack. Cindy C+ 5/25/01 and 6/28/01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 Alistair---this is too tantalising. What have learned that you did not ask about beforehand? Eleanor Re: Birmingham Hip resurfacing Dear Alistair. Big decisions in life are always difficult and you will often find yourself in a position of uncertainty. Even if you spend hours collecting information you may find that opinions and experiences of others raise as many questions as they answer. This has been my experience in life. You may find that at the end of the day, you just have to close you eyes/ears and jump. This is perfectly acceptable in this case as you are not getting a full view of the operating surgeon's ability. (The silent majority syndrome) However what I have also noticed is that a more successful strategy is to accept that there will be both positive and negative aspects to whatever decision you take, but if you work hard to make the best of the outcome you will end up a sense of achievement, and will be satisfied with the result. Hip resurfacing is really the only option for an energetic future and a great deal of it's' success will be down to your weight and fitness. I had mine done 2 weeks ago and have learnt a lot from the recovery period, especially about things I didn't ask about beforehand. I do however feel that much of the future is in my own hands. Good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2004 Report Share Posted January 26, 2004 Treacey has possibly done more resurfacings than anyone else (over 3000). As far as I'm aware the only complaint I've seen was that of leg length post operation. I was totally happy with him and consider myself lucky to have been his patient. He is a person you can warm to and wouldn't hesitate to thoroughly recommend him Rog BHR March & May 2000 Re: Birmingham Hip resurfacing Dear Alistair, Whoever you choose, just make sure they measure your legs pre-op and address leg length issues with you beforehand. I was done by Treacy and my right leg was left between 1/2 and 1 inch longer than the other. While a BHR may reduce the risk of leg lengthening, I am living proof that it is no guarantee that you will be spared it. This result really compromised my ability to enjoy my restoration of function and ROM. It has really impaired my salsa dancing & balance and is a huge hassle re shoes and pant hems. I'm feeling especially mean around this topic at present because I need my other hip done and after months of e-mails to him, have yet to be obliged with an explanation as to how he will make this one longer to match without over or under correcting it. He scoffed at my leg lengthening concerns the first time, so I am doubly chary this time. The responses I receive back from his secretary ignore my questions and instead suggest that I book a date. Why would I want go back over without some guarantee that I will be left better off than I am and a thorough understanding as to how the improvement will be achieved? From some of the reports I've heard, I am starting to wonder if their success hasn't reduced their service to patients. If you are a simple, straightforward case, I'm sure you'll be fine with either. Just know that while choosing a doc with a great rep may reduce the variables associated with a less than optimum outcome, it doesn't eliminate them. If you're in England, you can meet these guys. I'd interview them and see who you like best. Good luck. Sheila > In a message dated 11/19/2003 12:35:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, > david.vale@b... writes: > These are the two who jointly developed BHR and (I believe) both have > done more of these ops than anyone else, ever. > > Choosing between them would be like deciding whether your hospital > dinner should be cooked by Gordon Ramsey or Le Blanc. You > cannot make a bad decision. > I agree with this sentiment, and I had both of mine done by Treacy. > > Des Tuck > 10/01 and 5/03 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.