Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 I think you are smart for double-checking. A friend of mine also sent in hair samples for her NT child but didn't say so on the form because she was worried that the lab just fabricates the results based on what the diagnosis is. I doubt that is the case, but who knows. It does seem odd that only certain labs run these tests. best, Lora _________________________________________________________________ Stay informed on Election 2004 and the race to Super Tuesday. http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Your child's hair must really grow fast to have enough to send an inch worth from close to the scalp twice that close together! S <tt> Hello,<BR> In January I ordered a DDI hair analysis on my 23 month old.<BR> The results came back with very high levels of antimony. My<BR> pediatric neurologist and pediatrician both discounted the<BR> results and said that hair testing was unreliable.<BR> <BR> About three weeks after the first test, I spent another $89<BR> through Direct Lab Services and did a second test on my son.<BR> In the interim, we did not make any changes to his diet,<BR> shampoo, or anything else. I was surprised that a number of<BR> the elements came back with significant differences from the<BR> original test. Below are both test results. The original<BR> test is listed first, the second test is listed below the<BR> first.<BR> <BR> I'm interested to hear comments regarding the accuracy of<BR> the tests. Thanks,<BR> Malinda<BR> <BR> POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS<BR> element result ref range color<BR> ==============================================<BR> aluminum 4.3 < 8.0 green<BR> aluminum 7.7 < 8.0 green<BR> <BR> antimony 0.99 < .066 red<BR> antimony 1.00 < .066 red<BR> <BR> arsenic 0.024 < .08 green<BR> arsenic 0.022 < .08 green<BR> <BR> beryllium <0.01 < 0.02 no line<BR> beryllium <0.01 < 0.02 no line<BR> <BR> bismuth .042 < .13 green<BR> bismuth .053 < .13 green<BR> <BR> cadmium .14 < .15 green<BR> cadmium .092 < .15 green<BR> <BR> lead .52 < 1.0 green<BR> lead .68 < 1.0 green<BR> <BR> mercury 0.12 < 1.4 green<BR> mercury 0.07 < 1.4 green<BR> <BR> platinum <.003 < .005 no line<BR> platinum <.003 < .005 no line<BR> <BR> thallium < .001 < .01 no line<BR> thallium .001 < .01 green<BR> <BR> thorium < .001 < .005 no line<BR> thorium < .001 < .005 no line<BR> <BR> uranium .031 < .06 green<BR> uranium .18 < .06 yellow<BR> <BR> nickel .17 < .4 green<BR> nickel .15 < .4 green<BR> <BR> silver .04 < .2 green<BR> silver .07 < .2 green<BR> <BR> tin .14 < .3 green<BR> tin .38 < .3 yellow<BR> <BR> titanium 1.6 < 1.0 yellow<BR> titanium .90 < 1.0 green<BR> <BR> ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS<BR> element result ref range color under/over 50%<BR> <BR> ============================================================<BR> <BR> Calcium 501 125-370 yellow over 50%<BR> Calcium 546 125-370 yellow over 50%<BR> <BR> Magnesium 120 12-30 red over 50%<BR> Magnesium 130 12-30 red over 50%<BR> <BR> Sodium 64 12-90 green over 50%<BR> Sodium 13 12-90 green under 50%<BR> <BR> Potassium 74 12-40 yellow over 50%<BR> Potassium 5 12-40 yellow under 50%<BR> <BR> Copper 9.2 8.0-16 green under 50%<BR> Copper 19 8.0-16 yellow over 50%<BR> <BR> Zinc 170 100-190 green over 50%<BR> Zinc 160 100-190 green over 50%<BR> <BR> Manganese 0.07 0.2-0.55 red under 50%<BR> Manganese 0.15 0.2-0.55 yellow under 50%<BR> <BR> Chromium 0.35 0.26-0.5 white middle<BR> Chromium 0.38 0.26-0.5 green over 50%<BR> <BR> Vanadium 0.12 0.03-0.1 yellow over 50%<BR> Vanadium 0.10 0.03-0.1 green over 50%<BR> <BR> Molybdenum 0.084 0.05-0.13 white over 50%<BR> Molybdenum 0.10 0.05-0.13 green over 50%<BR> <BR> Boron 2.5 0.6-4.0 green over 50%<BR> Boron 0.39 0.6-4.0 yellow under 50%<BR> <BR> Iodine 3.2 0.25-1.3 yellow over 50%<BR> Iodine 7.0 0.25-1.3 red over 50%<BR> <BR> Lithium 0.009 0.007-0.023 green under 50%<BR> Lithium 0.011 0.007-0.023 white over 50%<BR> <BR> Phosphorus 221 160-250 green over 50%<BR> Phosphorus 158 160-250 green under 50%<BR> <BR> Selenium 0.79 0.95-1.7 yellow under 50%<BR> Selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under 50%<BR> <BR> Strontium 1.7 0.16-1.0 yellow over 50%<BR> Strontium 2.2 0.16-1.0 yellow over 50%<BR> <BR> Sulfur 53700 45500-53000 yellow over 50%<BR> Sulfur 45400 45500-53000 green under 50%<BR> <BR> Barium 0.57 0.16-0.8 green over 50%<BR> Barium 0.48 0.16-0.8 green over 50%<BR> <BR> Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under 50%<BR> Cobalt 0.011 0.013-0.035 yellow under 50%<BR> <BR> Iron 9.1 8.0-19 green under 50%<BR> Iron 19 8.0-19 green over 50%<BR> <BR> Germanium 0.082 0.045-0.065 yellow over 50%<BR> Germanium 0.074 0.045-0.065 yellow over 50%<BR> <BR> Rubidium 0.062 0.016-0.18 white over 50%<BR> Rubidium 0.008 0.016-0.18 yellow under 50%<BR> <BR> Zirconium 0.62 0.04-1.0 green over 50%<BR> Zirconium 0.99 0.04-1.0 green over 50%<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> <BR> </tt> <br><br> <tt> =======================================================<BR> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 The first test obviously did not render him bald. I used other spots on the back of his head for the second test. Malinda <_Shepard@e...> wrote: > > Your child's hair must really grow fast to have enough to send an inch worth from close to the scalp twice that close together! > S > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Hi Malinda, You may laugh at this, but I think the 2 results are pretty close. This doesn't mean you should not wonder why the differences, nor that the differences don't matter. But, overall, the 2 tests look very similar. If I were looking at them as my ONLY available evidence, and wondering about the question " do hair tests really test the elements they report on? " I would have to say that the evidence seems to point to that the tests are useful/reliable. As for the differences, we can reasonably wonder if this is due to a change in the hair itself, a " gross " mistake at the lab, or expected inexactness of the testing method (yes, of course there is some inexactness that is expected.) My response is not meant to cover all bases. I think there would/should be lots of other angles. I'm not sure if DDI has anything on their site about what amounts of variance are expected in testing error or not, for example. I'm pretty sure that DDI would have data they can give you on HOW they test their testing methods. I'd ask for that. My guess is that the way DDI tests their testing is WAY more rigourous then most of what you or I could dream up. Let me know if I'm wrong about that LOL! I guess now I'm going to be curious. Anyway, I'd bet that they do things to test their test procedures that I would not even understand if explained to me If you mean to test their testing equipment and processes, I think takeing a large hair sample, chopping the hair finely and mixing it, then dividing it into 2 and testing both would be a " better " test. However, I am NOT suggesting you should spend the money to do this. And I would guess that DDI does this or something far better on a routine basis. They also have a general article on their site that is a rebuttal to some article (in a med journal I think) about that hair testing is not valid--- I think that article is too general to address the sort of specific in your hair test, but you might still find it interesting. good wishes, Moria > Hello, > In January I ordered a DDI hair analysis on my 23 month old. > The results came back with very high levels of antimony. My > pediatric neurologist and pediatrician both discounted the > results and said that hair testing was unreliable. > > About three weeks after the first test, I spent another $89 > through Direct Lab Services and did a second test on my son. > In the interim, we did not make any changes to his diet, > shampoo, or anything else. I was surprised that a number of > the elements came back with significant differences from the > original test. Below are both test results. The original > test is listed first, the second test is listed below the > first. > > I'm interested to hear comments regarding the accuracy of > the tests. Thanks, > Malinda > > POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS > element result ref range color > ============================================== > aluminum 4.3 < 8.0 green > aluminum 7.7 < 8.0 green > > antimony 0.99 < .066 red > antimony 1.00 < .066 red > > arsenic 0.024 < .08 green > arsenic 0.022 < .08 green > > beryllium <0.01 < 0.02 no line > beryllium <0.01 < 0.02 no line > > bismuth .042 < .13 green > bismuth .053 < .13 green > > cadmium .14 < .15 green > cadmium .092 < .15 green > > lead .52 < 1.0 green > lead .68 < 1.0 green > > mercury 0.12 < 1.4 green > mercury 0.07 < 1.4 green > > platinum <.003 < .005 no line > platinum <.003 < .005 no line > > thallium < .001 < .01 no line > thallium .001 < .01 green > > thorium < .001 < .005 no line > thorium < .001 < .005 no line > > uranium .031 < .06 green > uranium .18 < .06 yellow > > nickel .17 < .4 green > nickel .15 < .4 green > > silver .04 < .2 green > silver .07 < .2 green > > tin .14 < .3 green > tin .38 < .3 yellow > > titanium 1.6 < 1.0 yellow > titanium .90 < 1.0 green > > ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS > element result ref range color under/over 50% > > ============================================================ > > Calcium 501 125-370 yellow over 50% > Calcium 546 125-370 yellow over 50% > > Magnesium 120 12-30 red over 50% > Magnesium 130 12-30 red over 50% > > Sodium 64 12-90 green over 50% > Sodium 13 12-90 green under 50% > > Potassium 74 12-40 yellow over 50% > Potassium 5 12-40 yellow under 50% > > Copper 9.2 8.0-16 green under 50% > Copper 19 8.0-16 yellow over 50% > > Zinc 170 100-190 green over 50% > Zinc 160 100-190 green over 50% > > Manganese 0.07 0.2-0.55 red under 50% > Manganese 0.15 0.2-0.55 yellow under 50% > > Chromium 0.35 0.26-0.5 white middle > Chromium 0.38 0.26-0.5 green over 50% > > Vanadium 0.12 0.03-0.1 yellow over 50% > Vanadium 0.10 0.03-0.1 green over 50% > > Molybdenum 0.084 0.05-0.13 white over 50% > Molybdenum 0.10 0.05-0.13 green over 50% > > Boron 2.5 0.6-4.0 green over 50% > Boron 0.39 0.6-4.0 yellow under 50% > > Iodine 3.2 0.25-1.3 yellow over 50% > Iodine 7.0 0.25-1.3 red over 50% > > Lithium 0.009 0.007-0.023 green under 50% > Lithium 0.011 0.007-0.023 white over 50% > > Phosphorus 221 160-250 green over 50% > Phosphorus 158 160-250 green under 50% > > Selenium 0.79 0.95-1.7 yellow under 50% > Selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under 50% > > Strontium 1.7 0.16-1.0 yellow over 50% > Strontium 2.2 0.16-1.0 yellow over 50% > > Sulfur 53700 45500-53000 yellow over 50% > Sulfur 45400 45500-53000 green under 50% > > Barium 0.57 0.16-0.8 green over 50% > Barium 0.48 0.16-0.8 green over 50% > > Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under 50% > Cobalt 0.011 0.013-0.035 yellow under 50% > > Iron 9.1 8.0-19 green under 50% > Iron 19 8.0-19 green over 50% > > Germanium 0.082 0.045-0.065 yellow over 50% > Germanium 0.074 0.045-0.065 yellow over 50% > > Rubidium 0.062 0.016-0.18 white over 50% > Rubidium 0.008 0.016-0.18 yellow under 50% > > Zirconium 0.62 0.04-1.0 green over 50% > Zirconium 0.99 0.04-1.0 green over 50% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Malinda, Having been a lab technician at one time, if this was my child- I would not have been overly concerned about the differences. Always variability. I probably would have called DDI just too see what their take on it was. Allthough - they tend to force your doctor to call instead of talking with you directly - that's the one thing I like about Great Plains. Anyway, I find them to be quite similar. Without knowing the biology of the minerals/metals you did see differences in,including how these are excreted - its hard to speculate as to why. I do find the copper interesting - and I would just jot down possible sources and see if there might have been an exposure. Of coarse it was probably too long ago for you to remember. [ ] DDI test reliability? Hello, In January I ordered a DDI hair analysis on my 23 month old. The results came back with very high levels of antimony. My pediatric neurologist and pediatrician both discounted the results and said that hair testing was unreliable. About three weeks after the first test, I spent another $89 through Direct Lab Services and did a second test on my son. In the interim, we did not make any changes to his diet, shampoo, or anything else. I was surprised that a number of the elements came back with significant differences from the original test. Below are both test results. The original test is listed first, the second test is listed below the first. I'm interested to hear comments regarding the accuracy of the tests. Thanks, Malinda POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS element result ref range color ============================================== aluminum 4.3 < 8.0 green aluminum 7.7 < 8.0 green antimony 0.99 < .066 red antimony 1.00 < .066 red arsenic 0.024 < .08 green arsenic 0.022 < .08 green beryllium <0.01 < 0.02 no line beryllium <0.01 < 0.02 no line bismuth .042 < .13 green bismuth .053 < .13 green cadmium .14 < .15 green cadmium .092 < .15 green lead .52 < 1.0 green lead .68 < 1.0 green mercury 0.12 < 1.4 green mercury 0.07 < 1.4 green platinum <.003 < .005 no line platinum <.003 < .005 no line thallium < .001 < .01 no line thallium .001 < .01 green thorium < .001 < .005 no line thorium < .001 < .005 no line uranium .031 < .06 green uranium .18 < .06 yellow nickel .17 < .4 green nickel .15 < .4 green silver .04 < .2 green silver .07 < .2 green tin .14 < .3 green tin .38 < .3 yellow titanium 1.6 < 1.0 yellow titanium .90 < 1.0 green ESSENTIAL AND OTHER ELEMENTS element result ref range color under/over 50% ============================================================ Calcium 501 125-370 yellow over 50% Calcium 546 125-370 yellow over 50% Magnesium 120 12-30 red over 50% Magnesium 130 12-30 red over 50% Sodium 64 12-90 green over 50% Sodium 13 12-90 green under 50% Potassium 74 12-40 yellow over 50% Potassium 5 12-40 yellow under 50% Copper 9.2 8.0-16 green under 50% Copper 19 8.0-16 yellow over 50% Zinc 170 100-190 green over 50% Zinc 160 100-190 green over 50% Manganese 0.07 0.2-0.55 red under 50% Manganese 0.15 0.2-0.55 yellow under 50% Chromium 0.35 0.26-0.5 white middle Chromium 0.38 0.26-0.5 green over 50% Vanadium 0.12 0.03-0.1 yellow over 50% Vanadium 0.10 0.03-0.1 green over 50% Molybdenum 0.084 0.05-0.13 white over 50% Molybdenum 0.10 0.05-0.13 green over 50% Boron 2.5 0.6-4.0 green over 50% Boron 0.39 0.6-4.0 yellow under 50% Iodine 3.2 0.25-1.3 yellow over 50% Iodine 7.0 0.25-1.3 red over 50% Lithium 0.009 0.007-0.023 green under 50% Lithium 0.011 0.007-0.023 white over 50% Phosphorus 221 160-250 green over 50% Phosphorus 158 160-250 green under 50% Selenium 0.79 0.95-1.7 yellow under 50% Selenium 0.86 0.95-1.7 yellow under 50% Strontium 1.7 0.16-1.0 yellow over 50% Strontium 2.2 0.16-1.0 yellow over 50% Sulfur 53700 45500-53000 yellow over 50% Sulfur 45400 45500-53000 green under 50% Barium 0.57 0.16-0.8 green over 50% Barium 0.48 0.16-0.8 green over 50% Cobalt 0.013 0.013-0.035 green under 50% Cobalt 0.011 0.013-0.035 yellow under 50% Iron 9.1 8.0-19 green under 50% Iron 19 8.0-19 green over 50% Germanium 0.082 0.045-0.065 yellow over 50% Germanium 0.074 0.045-0.065 yellow over 50% Rubidium 0.062 0.016-0.18 white over 50% Rubidium 0.008 0.016-0.18 yellow under 50% Zirconium 0.62 0.04-1.0 green over 50% Zirconium 0.99 0.04-1.0 green over 50% ======================================================= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.