Guest guest Posted February 18, 2004 Report Share Posted February 18, 2004 In January I called the WSJ and talked for 15 minutes with a female editorial writer. After correcting her on all the lies in their editorials, I asked if she would at least publish the opposing veiw. She said no. I told her that I would then mention her name in correspondence to other media and let them know that she was lying about the facts. She responded that she " did not like being threatened " and hung up on me. When I called back the receptionist would not put me through. These are the threats and harrasment they're refering to. These people are nothing but cruel, lying cowards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2004 Report Share Posted February 19, 2004 Thank you for sharing this. Does anyone else have similar stories? Is there a way I can contact you somehow by phone? Or, if you could, please write me at lorimcilwain@.... Thanks, Lori McIlwain > In January I called the WSJ and talked for 15 minutes with a female > editorial writer. After correcting her on all the lies in their > editorials, I asked if she would at least publish the opposing veiw. > She said no. I told her that I would then mention her name in > correspondence to other media and let them know that she was lying > about the facts. She responded that she " did not like being > threatened " and hung up on me. When I called back the receptionist > would not put me through. These are the threats and harrasment > they're refering to. These people are nothing but cruel, lying > cowards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2004 Report Share Posted February 19, 2004 You're the third person I e-know who called the WSJ and talked with the female editorial writer. At one point, the parent arranged a conference call including the parent, the ed writer, and Dr. Geier. Nonetheless, the WSJ did not give credence to the Geier and Geier findings. Nor did the reporter/also-ed-writer attend a Geier presentation in NYC despite having been notified in advance. Apparently, the reporter/ed-writer is willing to do as her supervisers and the WSJ publishers and principal stockholders decree: protect thimerosal injections, because their neurologic sequelae are a huge market for psychopharmaceuticals like Ritalin, Risperdal, etc. mwagnit wrote: > In January I called the WSJ and talked for 15 minutes with a female > editorial writer. After correcting her on all the lies in their > editorials, I asked if she would at least publish the opposing veiw. > She said no. I told her that I would then mention her name in > correspondence to other media and let them know that she was lying > about the facts. She responded that she " did not like being > threatened " and hung up on me. When I called back the receptionist > would not put me through. These are the threats and harrasment > they're refering to. These people are nothing but cruel, lying > cowards. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2004 Report Share Posted February 19, 2004 Has anyone considered contacting Matt Drudge on this? I don't know if he'd give the time of day on it or not, but he's controversial enough he might be willing to publish something if he got enough credible sources who are willing to use their names. Debi > You're the third person I e-know who called the WSJ and talked with the > female editorial writer. At one point, the parent arranged a conference > call including the parent, the ed writer, and Dr. Geier. Nonetheless, > the WSJ did not give credence to the Geier and Geier findings. Nor did > the reporter/also-ed-writer attend a Geier presentation in NYC despite > having been notified in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.