Guest guest Posted March 7, 2004 Report Share Posted March 7, 2004 Hi Phil If I were you I wouldn’t worry about the spinal. In my case it did not work and a mild form of general anaesthetic was applied then. I felt no pain that I can recollect. I’m not sure what you mean by catheterised but if you mean a tube to help me pass water, I did not have one. In fact, the first night I passed water four times (it must have been more than a pint each time) without any problems. Otherwise I had no catheters in me; no drains whatsoever; the incision was done with self-dissolving stitches (no staples) – I had, as all post-op patients do, a saline drip and the morphine pump (which I did not use). There were no other instruments/implements used. I was disconnected from it all at the end of Day 1 and all the implements were removed the following morning before I had a shower. The procedure was remarkably smooth, relatively painless (although I have extremely high pain threshold, I would say that one is bound to feel discomfort at least, especially lying in bed in an uncomfortable position). I could not detect any significant risk factors – risks of infections were, I’d say, negligible (the hospital prides itself on stringent anti-MRSA procedures and the fact that they had no incidents of this hospital super-bug [all visitors have to disinfect their hands when visiting]) as the key place where an infection could germinate – the op wound – was superbly monitored and regularly re-dressed); risks of post-op injury were, I’d say, non-existent (there were always trained staff there when a patient started a new programme/procedure). I can’t tell you about the risks during the op, but I assume that these fall within acceptable medical tolerances or otherwise the op protocol would not have been passed by so many hospitals. I have not heard of any problems during operations. I do know however that some patients are not assured by their OS that resurfacing will be the procedure that will be performed, but will be attempted, as their X-rays suggested a quite advanced state of deterioration of their hip joint and THR remained a distinct possibility (in fact, we had a patient in our room – not one of Mr Krikler’s patients – who had been warned about such a possibility; prior to his op I saw his OS discussing this patient’s case with Mr Krikler; subsequently, the patient ended up with a THR as his hip was damaged beyond resurfacing). I’d say that there must be a small risk of the op being successful, but the degenerative process not being arrested – this generally means, I understand, that a revision will be required sometime in the future (I tried to research the resurfacing failures and they seem to be, for 3 – 8 year-old ops below 1%; it further seemed to me that most revisions were required between 6 – 18 months after the op [this makes sense if the OA continued under the femoral cap – within such a time-frame micro fractures and pain would normally manifest themselves]). So, I plan to consider my resurfacing as a complete success if I do not experience problems within 24 months of the op. I think the biggest risk will be boredom – I managed to read a quite difficult book while in hospital. Luckily, I had great co-patients there and being very mobile I was able to help them with fetching stuff or escorting them to the wash/bath-rooms – anything to make the time go by. I would not worry if I were you. This does seem like a relatively simple and well understood and rehearsed procedure. The hospital rehab is fantastically simple and fast, but, as I said, the physiotherapy requirements, once one is discharged from the hospital, will mean, I think, months of exercises. Good luck. Let us know how you’re getting on. Regards Dan * +44 (0)7974 981-407 * +44 (0)20 8501-2573 @ dan.milosevic@... _____ From: Phil Deem Sent: 07 March 2004 12:33 To: surfacehippy Subject: Attn Dan Hi Dan: Iv'e downloaded your posting of your experiences. extremely valuable I must say. You had such a positive experience it seems. Im a bit concerned about the spinal. High anxiety about it really and wether you were cathetarised, which also fills me with forboding. How were those aspects for you. Im not really concerned about the rehab, just the procedure and risk factors. Thanks for the great info you are providing. Phil Exeter Dear Surfacehippies This may turn out to be a long message/post, so I'll divide it into various headings. I’ll be posting snapshots as well – check the Photos link on the left side of the surfacehippy home page. Facts I had my left hip resurfaced on Monday, 16th February 2004, at St. Cross Hospital in Rugby, Warwickshire, United Kingdom. The operation was performed by Mr. Krikler. The procedure was done on the NHS (National Health Service), or free of charge. Chronology Sunday, 15/02/04 Checked in St. Cross's Cedar Ward; met Harry who is also a 53-year old with a left hip due for resurfacing by Mr Krikler; Harry is very fit) I carry some 8 pounds of excess weight round my waist) Monday, 16/02/04 Agreed with anaesthetist to have spinal anaesthetic (like epidural for women in birth); Mr Krikler was happy to provide a " running commentary " At approx. 12:00 taken to pre-op theatre room where spinal was applied Apparently was taken to op theatre where Mr Krikler started the incision and I mentioned that I could feel it - he asked the anaesthetist to apply general anaesthetic. I do not recall this exchange. I understand that the op lasted 1 hour and 45 min. Mr Krikler said that the hip was very stiff and that I had very hard bones. It appears a bit more work than usual. He fitted a Cormet device with a 48mm cup on femoral head. At about 16:30 I was awake and back at the Cedar ward. A couple of hours later Mr Krikler saw Harry and me (Harry was operated after I was and his op lasted 1.15, I understand). By then the small of my back was quite uncomfortable and I asked Mr Krikler if it would be OK to turn on my 'good' side (non-operated right). He said that'd be OK (many nurses were later surprised by this - I guess they are still more familiar with the THR post-operative procedure which prohibits sleeping on your side, or crossing legs, for months, I understand) Spent the night mostly awake; did not use PCA (Patient Controlled Analgesia) - morphine pump to you and I - as the discomfort was bearable (I have to stress here that I was not playing macho, but that I have extremely high pain threshold and went through years of OA with bone-on-bone and a cyst without ever taking a single pain killer); passed water 4 times (nearly a pint each time?!?) and sat-up on the bed to wee (I could never do it using the 'goose' bottle lying down in bed); constant sitting-up and fidgeting led to some leakage and oozing from the incision which got redressed 3 times that night; all-in-all not too bad a night. Tuesday, 17/02/04 Day 1 - is how the hospital staff refer to the day after the op; given a 'Zimmer walking frame at about 08:00 (after breakfast) and told to apply full weight bearing on the operated leg/hip Walked round the Ward and to the main corridor all the way to the lifts where use of mobile phones is permitted; phoned friends and loved ones to inform them that all's OK; couldn't find a place to connect my laptop (rather found a connector but the hospital switchboard could not enable it for external calls to an ISP - however, this week a new cable system went live there and each bed will have cable TV, telephony [outgoing only, I understand] and full internet access); alternated the day between walking, laying in bed reading an obscure book and talking to Harry and the other 4 patients in our room; had bowel movement and used toilet. Wednesday, 18/02/04 Day 2 - had a shower in the bathroom; no problem washing both legs; could see bits of bruising on my bottom; very little swelling. Told that I have a 9-10 " incision/scar (22.5 - 25 cm); not bothered by that; it is healing beautifully. Harry and I are given 2 walking sticks/canes each cut to our size; we start walking with these; usual destination: outside the lifts in the main corridor; spending a fortune on mobile calls; after an hour I drop one stick/cane and use one only (I'd like to stress here - mainly for our Yankee friends - that one is free to walk round and explore as we do not have the culture of suing the hospital should we stumble, fall and injure ourselves; it is pretty much left to the patient to be sensible; I always informed the duty nurse when I went for a walk, especially at night when I couldn't sleep; but I appreciated the unrestricted, yet caring, environment I was in). The continuous walking, interspersed with periods of rest/sleep/reading appear to have speeded-up the healing tremendously - both the bruising and the swelling are fast disappearing. Made a mistake of not asking for a sleeping pill and spent most of the night awake but without any pain. Thursday, 19/02/04 Day 3 - Physiotherapist gives us (Harry and I) the steps (up and down) and the platform test (up and down) with one cane/stick - we pass and are ready to go home. Blood test shows our INR (International Normalcy Ratio) for blood coagulation is too low at 1.2 and 1.4 respectively for myself and Harry; the hospital decides not to release us until we reach the accepted INR window of 1.5 - 2.5 (apparently, if our blood coagulates faster that 1.5 times the blood of a normal person, i.e. the range between 1.0 and 1.49, we are at risk of DVT of sorts where a thrombocite can get lodged in our lungs causing sometimes deadly pulmonary thrombosis; if, however, our blood coagulates slower than 2.5 times that of a non-operated person who moved round normally, we are at risk of suffering bleed which could be very difficult to stop and even fatal if internal and unobserved); at St. Cross's hospital, or maybe even at that Health Trust, the DVT is dealt with using Warfarin tablets (also known as rat poison as that what it is commonly used for). Mr Krikler visits us and I take snapshots - I hope I'll be able to post these. Nicola, the occupational therapist, is moving heaven and earth to arrange all the necessary equipment for me when I'm released - there are peculiar problems as I am way out of my area (I live in North East London, some 120 miles south-east of Rugby), and I shall be staying at my sister's place in Essex, another 50 miles east from my home. Nicola is trying to arrange through the local social services for raised toilet seat, bed mats, raised chairs, bath boards (to enter a bath tub safely), grabbers, long shoehorns etc. to be provided by one Health Trust, via another one where I live in the third one where I'll be staying - ah the vagaries of bureaucracy. Friday, 20/02/04 Day 4 - failed the test again; Warfarin dosage upped to max. Saturday, 21/02/04 Day 5 - failed again; only managed to get the ratio to 1.49; Harry is allowed to go home for the night as he lives only 7 miles away. I continue my 15 min walks round hospital complex/park at least twice daily without a cane or stick which I carry in my arms but do not use. I regret not bringing my car to the hospital - I could have driven it already on Day 3 as it is an automatic and given that in the UK the steering column is on the right and I had my left hip operated, I could have driven my car without any problems for, say, 3 hours. Sunday, 22/02/04 Day 6 - finally passed my INR test (barely, with 1.51); in the afternoon my daughter and her boyfriend gave me a lift back to my sister's place. 22/03/04 - 29/02/04 Daily - walks approx. 1 mile without any aides. Bruising has nearly all disappeared; there's no swelling; once a day, usually before going to bed, I take 2 Paracetamol tablets and 1 Ibuprofen tablet - these are meant to be pain killers and anti-inflammatory in their actions; the latter I welcome, the former I do not need, but I do want to be a 'good patient' I can do most things without a major inconvenience - dressing and undressing; using the toilet; walking; using the stairs; putting on/off left sock & shoe; washing/drying left foot etc. 01/03/04 – 06/03/06 Moved back home; I’m using my bath shower now; I no longer wear a dressing/plaster over the scar (Mr Krikler used subcutaneous self-dissolving stitches – the 9-10†incision has fully healed). I’ve been driving my car for the last 6 days – no problems in driving it, getting in/out, etc. Went to Central London – the usual Friday lunchtime drinks with pals – I went there unaided (no walking stick/cane) using public transport (bus and London Underground, or Tube as we call it). Again, no problems using any of these means of transport. Comments Leg length Mr Krikler explained the mechanics of the procedure in detail; my leg was 1.5 cm shorter; once the bio-physics of the pelvis-to-foot is clear and the resurfacing procedure is factored in, it is clear to me why the resurfacing procedure can do very little regarding leg length (mine looks OK now, but I'll have to wait until my gait and posture are corrected and straight before I can establish if there'll be a discrepancy) while THR can be much more effective in mitigating leg length. That's about the only advantage that I could see that THR may have over resurfacing. Mobility Extremely high extremely early - I'm absolutely impressed. Recovery / rehabilitation Unbelievably fast and painless (for me at least). However, I realise now that the operation is less than 50% of the solution - the larger part is recovery/rehabilitation. ROM Could not have imagined that the range of movement would be restored to such a high level so quickly. I said, probably too optimistically, to Mr Krikler that I plan to come for a 6-week check-up on my Honda Hornet to Rugby (ha thought I was mad and he is a biker too). My final challenge – to tie the shoelace on my left foot/shoe. I hope I’ll be able to do that in a few weeks time. Standing on my operated leg, with my good leg in the air (crane-like position), I not a problem but I lack the balance I have when I stand on my ‘good’ leg. Blood coagulation risks & management Probably the least impressive of the otherwise superb NHS (or, at least that particular Health Trust). Two of us were kept in valuable beds for 3 days - the only thing that happened throughout these 3 days was the dispensing of the correct dosage of Warfarin in the evening and a subsequent INR test in the morning. I'm certain that could have been done in the local surgery / health centre where the patient is based. Thanks & appreciation Where do I start? Mr Krikler for his wonderful manner and style with patients. He answered every question without ambiguity, without use of a patronising tone, with the patience that professionals have to have when they're dealing with a layman. The fact that he was nearly invisible and that he made himself appear accidental in this process, helped reassure me, and I suppose other patients of his, that this is a routine op. By the way, Mr Krikler has performed 330+ resurfacings using Cormet in the last 8+ years. If you ask him, he'll tell you openly about the 3-4 cases that needed revisions and why. He does also perform this procedure privately - I understand that the package costs £9,000.00 (US$16,200.00 at 1.8 exchange rate) all inclusive (of course, there's the added travel costs for our USA friends). Considering that the Cormet device costs some £2,000.00, I believe this is very good value for money. Admittedly, it is slightly more expensive than DeSmet in Ghent, Belgium, but we might be splitting hairs here. I must mention Safi, a Ward Nurse who appears to be quietly running the show. She is a perfect example of a person who gains respect through her actions and deeds. Her dedication, application, thoroughness, devotion and professionalism were a sight to watch. Luckily, she was given a student nurse to teach as well - the student was in perfect hands and would learn the profession well by being tutored by Safi. Nicola, who joined this site and offered to help with advice, is one of these people for whom no problem is unsolvable. One felt safe if she said she would look into something. I can't thank her enough. There were numerous staff that were ever so eager to help - I'll mention Ivan (from Zimbabwe, if I remember correctly) and Riki (from Zambia, I believe). These guys were there throughout the long night shift and would respond immediately if you pressed the buzzer - you could have tea at any time of day or night. Whatever you needed, they provided it. Lastly, it would be unfair if I did not mention and thank all the other staff at St Cross hospital. This is a nice hospital with diligent and conscientious staff that look well after their patients. Even the food was nice. I must finish by mentioning the NHS - this is for the Brits - and stress that anybody who wants to abolish it or plans to privatise it is either insane or deliberately criminal. We have institutions for both types. And for the unfortunate Yanks who have to fork out personal cash for the op - consider strongly Mr Krikler and St Cross in Rugby (although Mr Krikler may suggest another hospital where he operates also). I'll shut up now. I hope to have more good news in 4 weeks time when I'm due to see Mr Krikler for a check-up. 3 +44 (0)7974 981-407 * +44 (0)20 8501-2573 @ dan.milosevic@... * 1A Cypress Grove Hainault ILFORD Essex IG6 3AT United Kingdom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2004 Report Share Posted March 13, 2004 Hi Phil If I were you I’d inquire about the process that would force your GP to write a referral letter to you. As I understand it, a GP has no authority to deny required medical treatment. In fact, no one, as I understand it, can deny that right. They can put you on a waiting list and you can ask them repeatedly to be shown what progress you’re making on the list. There has to be a deadline by which your treatment has to be delivered – if not, the local Health Trust has to purchase a solution on the market (either private health in the UK or in EU). It might be wise to call your MP – a researcher of hers/his will probably call you back promptly and will take down all the necessary details (by the way, you can interact with most MPs’ surgeries via email). Remember, if your MP is from the Labour party, s/he will be very sensitive to waiting list issues. If your constituency is served by a Conservative or a Liberal MP, they’ll be keen to show that Labour have failed to deliver in health services, and there therefore likely to press the local Health Trust with vigour on your behalf. I think it’s best not to accept your GP’s decision and to carry on requesting that your rights when it comes to health issues be fully protected. If your GP however decides to hide behind a medical diagnosis-prognosis-treatment by saying that s/he is of the opinion that your condition/health is such that treatment (say, resurfacing) is not required at this stage, challenge her/him as this should be a judgment made by a specialist consultant orthopaedic surgeon. Even then, if it doesn’t go your way, seek a second (and third) opinion if need be. Maybe you live in an area where you have to make a nuisance of yourself in order to get attention. It’s your body and your health, so, what do you care if you make yourself unpopular, if this approach yields the right result. Good luck. Sorry I couldn’t have been of more help to you. I hope I haven’t mislead you about your rights, but if I have, better informed members ( springs to mind) will correct me accordingly. Regards Dan * +44 (0)7974 981-407 * +44 (0)20 8501-2573 @ dan.milosevic@... _____ From: Phil Deem Sent: 13 March 2004 12:41 To: surfacehippy Subject: Attn Dan Hi Dan: Thanks again for addressing some of my angst on risk factors, pre and post op. It seems a long way off, as I cant get my GP to refer me right now, so I dont even have the bottom spot an any waiting list yet. Will keep you posted. Phil Exeter Dear Surfacehippies This may turn out to be a long message/post, so I'll divide it into various headings. I’ll be posting snapshots as well – check the Photos link on the left side of the surfacehippy home page. Facts I had my left hip resurfaced on Monday, 16th February 2004, at St. Cross Hospital in Rugby, Warwickshire, United Kingdom. The operation was performed by Mr. Krikler. The procedure was done on the NHS (National Health Service), or free of charge. Chronology Sunday, 15/02/04 Checked in St. Cross's Cedar Ward; met Harry who is also a 53-year old with a left hip due for resurfacing by Mr Krikler; Harry is very fit) I carry some 8 pounds of excess weight round my waist) Monday, 16/02/04 Agreed with anaesthetist to have spinal anaesthetic (like epidural for women in birth); Mr Krikler was happy to provide a " running commentary " At approx. 12:00 taken to pre-op theatre room where spinal was applied Apparently was taken to op theatre where Mr Krikler started the incision and I mentioned that I could feel it - he asked the anaesthetist to apply general anaesthetic. I do not recall this exchange. I understand that the op lasted 1 hour and 45 min. Mr Krikler said that the hip was very stiff and that I had very hard bones. It appears a bit more work than usual. He fitted a Cormet device with a 48mm cup on femoral head. At about 16:30 I was awake and back at the Cedar ward. A couple of hours later Mr Krikler saw Harry and me (Harry was operated after I was and his op lasted 1.15, I understand). By then the small of my back was quite uncomfortable and I asked Mr Krikler if it would be OK to turn on my 'good' side (non-operated right). He said that'd be OK (many nurses were later surprised by this - I guess they are still more familiar with the THR post-operative procedure which prohibits sleeping on your side, or crossing legs, for months, I understand) Spent the night mostly awake; did not use PCA (Patient Controlled Analgesia) - morphine pump to you and I - as the discomfort was bearable (I have to stress here that I was not playing macho, but that I have extremely high pain threshold and went through years of OA with bone-on-bone and a cyst without ever taking a single pain killer); passed water 4 times (nearly a pint each time?!?) and sat-up on the bed to wee (I could never do it using the 'goose' bottle lying down in bed); constant sitting-up and fidgeting led to some leakage and oozing from the incision which got redressed 3 times that night; all-in-all not too bad a night. Tuesday, 17/02/04 Day 1 - is how the hospital staff refer to the day after the op; given a 'Zimmer walking frame at about 08:00 (after breakfast) and told to apply full weight bearing on the operated leg/hip Walked round the Ward and to the main corridor all the way to the lifts where use of mobile phones is permitted; phoned friends and loved ones to inform them that all's OK; couldn't find a place to connect my laptop (rather found a connector but the hospital switchboard could not enable it for external calls to an ISP - however, this week a new cable system went live there and each bed will have cable TV, telephony [outgoing only, I understand] and full internet access); alternated the day between walking, laying in bed reading an obscure book and talking to Harry and the other 4 patients in our room; had bowel movement and used toilet. Wednesday, 18/02/04 Day 2 - had a shower in the bathroom; no problem washing both legs; could see bits of bruising on my bottom; very little swelling. Told that I have a 9-10 " incision/scar (22.5 - 25 cm); not bothered by that; it is healing beautifully. Harry and I are given 2 walking sticks/canes each cut to our size; we start walking with these; usual destination: outside the lifts in the main corridor; spending a fortune on mobile calls; after an hour I drop one stick/cane and use one only (I'd like to stress here - mainly for our Yankee friends - that one is free to walk round and explore as we do not have the culture of suing the hospital should we stumble, fall and injure ourselves; it is pretty much left to the patient to be sensible; I always informed the duty nurse when I went for a walk, especially at night when I couldn't sleep; but I appreciated the unrestricted, yet caring, environment I was in). The continuous walking, interspersed with periods of rest/sleep/reading appear to have speeded-up the healing tremendously - both the bruising and the swelling are fast disappearing. Made a mistake of not asking for a sleeping pill and spent most of the night awake but without any pain. Thursday, 19/02/04 Day 3 - Physiotherapist gives us (Harry and I) the steps (up and down) and the platform test (up and down) with one cane/stick - we pass and are ready to go home. Blood test shows our INR (International Normalcy Ratio) for blood coagulation is too low at 1.2 and 1.4 respectively for myself and Harry; the hospital decides not to release us until we reach the accepted INR window of 1.5 - 2.5 (apparently, if our blood coagulates faster that 1.5 times the blood of a normal person, i.e. the range between 1.0 and 1.49, we are at risk of DVT of sorts where a thrombocite can get lodged in our lungs causing sometimes deadly pulmonary thrombosis; if, however, our blood coagulates slower than 2.5 times that of a non-operated person who moved round normally, we are at risk of suffering bleed which could be very difficult to stop and even fatal if internal and unobserved); at St. Cross's hospital, or maybe even at that Health Trust, the DVT is dealt with using Warfarin tablets (also known as rat poison as that what it is commonly used for). Mr Krikler visits us and I take snapshots - I hope I'll be able to post these. Nicola, the occupational therapist, is moving heaven and earth to arrange all the necessary equipment for me when I'm released - there are peculiar problems as I am way out of my area (I live in North East London, some 120 miles south-east of Rugby), and I shall be staying at my sister's place in Essex, another 50 miles east from my home. Nicola is trying to arrange through the local social services for raised toilet seat, bed mats, raised chairs, bath boards (to enter a bath tub safely), grabbers, long shoehorns etc. to be provided by one Health Trust, via another one where I live in the third one where I'll be staying - ah the vagaries of bureaucracy. Friday, 20/02/04 Day 4 - failed the test again; Warfarin dosage upped to max. Saturday, 21/02/04 Day 5 - failed again; only managed to get the ratio to 1.49; Harry is allowed to go home for the night as he lives only 7 miles away. I continue my 15 min walks round hospital complex/park at least twice daily without a cane or stick which I carry in my arms but do not use. I regret not bringing my car to the hospital - I could have driven it already on Day 3 as it is an automatic and given that in the UK the steering column is on the right and I had my left hip operated, I could have driven my car without any problems for, say, 3 hours. Sunday, 22/02/04 Day 6 - finally passed my INR test (barely, with 1.51); in the afternoon my daughter and her boyfriend gave me a lift back to my sister's place. 22/03/04 - 29/02/04 Daily - walks approx. 1 mile without any aides. Bruising has nearly all disappeared; there's no swelling; once a day, usually before going to bed, I take 2 Paracetamol tablets and 1 Ibuprofen tablet - these are meant to be pain killers and anti-inflammatory in their actions; the latter I welcome, the former I do not need, but I do want to be a 'good patient' I can do most things without a major inconvenience - dressing and undressing; using the toilet; walking; using the stairs; putting on/off left sock & shoe; washing/drying left foot etc. 01/03/04 – 06/03/06 Moved back home; I’m using my bath shower now; I no longer wear a dressing/plaster over the scar (Mr Krikler used subcutaneous self-dissolving stitches – the 9-10†incision has fully healed). I’ve been driving my car for the last 6 days – no problems in driving it, getting in/out, etc. Went to Central London – the usual Friday lunchtime drinks with pals – I went there unaided (no walking stick/cane) using public transport (bus and London Underground, or Tube as we call it). Again, no problems using any of these means of transport. Comments Leg length Mr Krikler explained the mechanics of the procedure in detail; my leg was 1.5 cm shorter; once the bio-physics of the pelvis-to-foot is clear and the resurfacing procedure is factored in, it is clear to me why the resurfacing procedure can do very little regarding leg length (mine looks OK now, but I'll have to wait until my gait and posture are corrected and straight before I can establish if there'll be a discrepancy) while THR can be much more effective in mitigating leg length. That's about the only advantage that I could see that THR may have over resurfacing. Mobility Extremely high extremely early - I'm absolutely impressed. Recovery / rehabilitation Unbelievably fast and painless (for me at least). However, I realise now that the operation is less than 50% of the solution - the larger part is recovery/rehabilitation. ROM Could not have imagined that the range of movement would be restored to such a high level so quickly. I said, probably too optimistically, to Mr Krikler that I plan to come for a 6-week check-up on my Honda Hornet to Rugby (ha thought I was mad and he is a biker too). My final challenge – to tie the shoelace on my left foot/shoe. I hope I’ll be able to do that in a few weeks time. Standing on my operated leg, with my good leg in the air (crane-like position), I not a problem but I lack the balance I have when I stand on my ‘good’ leg. Blood coagulation risks & management Probably the least impressive of the otherwise superb NHS (or, at least that particular Health Trust). Two of us were kept in valuable beds for 3 days - the only thing that happened throughout these 3 days was the dispensing of the correct dosage of Warfarin in the evening and a subsequent INR test in the morning. I'm certain that could have been done in the local surgery / health centre where the patient is based. Thanks & appreciation Where do I start? Mr Krikler for his wonderful manner and style with patients. He answered every question without ambiguity, without use of a patronising tone, with the patience that professionals have to have when they're dealing with a layman. The fact that he was nearly invisible and that he made himself appear accidental in this process, helped reassure me, and I suppose other patients of his, that this is a routine op. By the way, Mr Krikler has performed 330+ resurfacings using Cormet in the last 8+ years. If you ask him, he'll tell you openly about the 3-4 cases that needed revisions and why. He does also perform this procedure privately - I understand that the package costs £9,000.00 (US$16,200.00 at 1.8 exchange rate) all inclusive (of course, there's the added travel costs for our USA friends). Considering that the Cormet device costs some £2,000.00, I believe this is very good value for money. Admittedly, it is slightly more expensive than DeSmet in Ghent, Belgium, but we might be splitting hairs here. I must mention Safi, a Ward Nurse who appears to be quietly running the show. She is a perfect example of a person who gains respect through her actions and deeds. Her dedication, application, thoroughness, devotion and professionalism were a sight to watch. Luckily, she was given a student nurse to teach as well - the student was in perfect hands and would learn the profession well by being tutored by Safi. Nicola, who joined this site and offered to help with advice, is one of these people for whom no problem is unsolvable. One felt safe if she said she would look into something. I can't thank her enough. There were numerous staff that were ever so eager to help - I'll mention Ivan (from Zimbabwe, if I remember correctly) and Riki (from Zambia, I believe). These guys were there throughout the long night shift and would respond immediately if you pressed the buzzer - you could have tea at any time of day or night. Whatever you needed, they provided it. Lastly, it would be unfair if I did not mention and thank all the other staff at St Cross hospital. This is a nice hospital with diligent and conscientious staff that look well after their patients. Even the food was nice. I must finish by mentioning the NHS - this is for the Brits - and stress that anybody who wants to abolish it or plans to privatise it is either insane or deliberately criminal. We have institutions for both types. And for the unfortunate Yanks who have to fork out personal cash for the op - consider strongly Mr Krikler and St Cross in Rugby (although Mr Krikler may suggest another hospital where he operates also). I'll shut up now. I hope to have more good news in 4 weeks time when I'm due to see Mr Krikler for a check-up. 3 +44 (0)7974 981-407 * +44 (0)20 8501-2573 @ dan.milosevic@... * 1A Cypress Grove Hainault ILFORD Essex IG6 3AT United Kingdom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.