Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 Greetings. Does anyone have an informed opinion regarding which of the available devices is superior? Medical's Conserve Plus? Corin Medical's Cormet 2000? Midland Medical's BHP implant? Are there any attributes (wear, material used, dislocation chances, etc) that would make a person choose one over another? Thanks so much for your imput. Eddie Mac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2004 Report Share Posted January 9, 2004 " This is a contorversial topic and can be explored in the archives. The BHR is cast. Midland Medical feels that a cast in porosity which is then coated with hydroxyapatite creates a unified stronger surface which promotes bone integration. They feel the heat treated sintering process (C+ Cormet)could possibly weaken, break, and the beads could create abrasion between the 2 surfaces. Check out Midlands site for the explanation. " > Greetings. > > Does anyone have an informed opinion regarding which of the available > devices is superior? > > Medical's Conserve Plus? > Corin Medical's Cormet 2000? > Midland Medical's BHP implant? > > Are there any attributes (wear, material used, dislocation chances, > etc) that would make a person choose one over another? > > Thanks so much for your imput. > > Eddie Mac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.