Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 I don't think it would be advisable to use the ASHA code of ethics with the SLP personally. I think you are right that it would cause bad feelings. I was thinking more of using it with the " educrats " - the ones who make the decisions at IEPS and tell you stuff like - the SLP can handle that - even when they can't! But I'd keep pushing the issue to make a time for the SLP to meet with (or work with Neal with) the private TOD. They will listen to another professional usually, even if it is just enough to let them know they are in over their head. Or to realize there is more to this CI thing than a brief inservice can cover. Re: ASHA > ><<Thanks for the ASHA tip ... Jill>> > >I read that ASHA code of ethics and one of the items mentions that they are to use all resources, including referrals if necessary. We have a private TOD in our IEP for consultations who the school's SLP has been reluctant to work with. That SLP is now out on maternity leave, and the replacement could have met with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 I don't think it would be advisable to use the ASHA code of ethics with the SLP personally. I think you are right that it would cause bad feelings. I was thinking more of using it with the " educrats " - the ones who make the decisions at IEPS and tell you stuff like - the SLP can handle that - even when they can't! But I'd keep pushing the issue to make a time for the SLP to meet with (or work with Neal with) the private TOD. They will listen to another professional usually, even if it is just enough to let them know they are in over their head. Or to realize there is more to this CI thing than a brief inservice can cover. Re: ASHA > ><<Thanks for the ASHA tip ... Jill>> > >I read that ASHA code of ethics and one of the items mentions that they are to use all resources, including referrals if necessary. We have a private TOD in our IEP for consultations who the school's SLP has been reluctant to work with. That SLP is now out on maternity leave, and the replacement could have met with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2006 Report Share Posted March 10, 2006 > We have a private TOD in our IEP for consultations > who the school's SLP has been reluctant to work with. For JD's first IEP (many moons ago) JD's Audiologist wrote a letter for the team stating that it was OK for JD to receive services from the school SLP, but it was to be for articulation work only and that she was to work under the guidance of his private AVT because she was trained in working with oral deaf children and the SLP was not. SO, in effect, we ended up with the Code of Ethics thing, without even having to mention it (and of course, way back then, I didn't even know who ASHA was.) -Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.