Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Well, " Good " is a relative term, even when applied to APCO and MPDS. As far as MPDS goes, only half the cards are as accurate as a coin flip at determining the appropriate level of response. And the other half aren't even THAT accurate. l a wrote: > > The major problem with telephone triage is the lack of a standard > questioning protocol in the communicaiton center. Some good ones are > put out by National Academy of Emergency Dispatch as well as by APCO. > The use of these protocols insures that dispatchers ask ALL the > pertinent questions and don't lose focus and control of the call while > trying to think of what to do next. The other major issue is a little > harder to solve. It is the inability of some communications centers > and personnel to work together on an incident without the power > struggles. (all areas of emergency service run into this at some time > --ex. police and ems at times have power struggles over crime > scenes.) Telephone triage can and does work with the proper tools and > training. It save time, money and lives. > L~ former communications officer, training officer and comm center > manager(police fire and ems) > > > > From: lnmolino@... lnmolino@... > > > Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San > To: texasems-l > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > > Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? > > Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection > Consultant > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > (Cell Phone) > > (IFW/FSS Office)/ > > (IFWF/SS Fax) > > " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " > > " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds > > discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author > and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated > with unless I > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended > only for its > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public > domain by the > > original author. > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: > > On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " net> > > said: > > > > > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > > > > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. > > Does anyone ever? > > Rob > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Well, " Good " is a relative term, even when applied to APCO and MPDS. As far as MPDS goes, only half the cards are as accurate as a coin flip at determining the appropriate level of response. And the other half aren't even THAT accurate. l a wrote: > > The major problem with telephone triage is the lack of a standard > questioning protocol in the communicaiton center. Some good ones are > put out by National Academy of Emergency Dispatch as well as by APCO. > The use of these protocols insures that dispatchers ask ALL the > pertinent questions and don't lose focus and control of the call while > trying to think of what to do next. The other major issue is a little > harder to solve. It is the inability of some communications centers > and personnel to work together on an incident without the power > struggles. (all areas of emergency service run into this at some time > --ex. police and ems at times have power struggles over crime > scenes.) Telephone triage can and does work with the proper tools and > training. It save time, money and lives. > L~ former communications officer, training officer and comm center > manager(police fire and ems) > > > > From: lnmolino@... lnmolino@... > > > Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San > To: texasems-l > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > > Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? > > Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection > Consultant > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > (Cell Phone) > > (IFW/FSS Office)/ > > (IFWF/SS Fax) > > " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " > > " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds > > discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author > and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated > with unless I > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended > only for its > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public > domain by the > > original author. > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: > > On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " net> > > said: > > > > > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > > > > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. > > Does anyone ever? > > Rob > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Where is the evidence that telephone triage or these dispatch schemes improves outcomes or do we just do them because a consultant said they are the thing to do? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San To: texasems-l Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com (Cell Phone) (IFW/FSS Office)/ (IFWF/SS Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " said: > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. Does anyone ever? Rob ------------ --------- --------- ------ Yahoo! Groups Links ************ **Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food. aol.com/frugal- feasts?ncid= emlcntusfood0000 0001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Where is the evidence that telephone triage or these dispatch schemes improves outcomes or do we just do them because a consultant said they are the thing to do? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San To: texasems-l Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com (Cell Phone) (IFW/FSS Office)/ (IFWF/SS Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " said: > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. Does anyone ever? Rob ------------ --------- --------- ------ Yahoo! Groups Links ************ **Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food. aol.com/frugal- feasts?ncid= emlcntusfood0000 0001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Where is the evidence that telephone triage or these dispatch schemes improves outcomes or do we just do them because a consultant said they are the thing to do? Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San To: texasems-l Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com (Cell Phone) (IFW/FSS Office)/ (IFWF/SS Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " said: > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. Does anyone ever? Rob ------------ --------- --------- ------ Yahoo! Groups Links ************ **Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food. aol.com/frugal- feasts?ncid= emlcntusfood0000 0001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 On Friday, April 3, 2009 10:22, bbledsoe@... said: > Where is the evidence that telephone triage or these dispatch schemes improves > outcomes or do we just do them because a consultant said they are the thing to > do? By " consultant " I assume you mean Shatner? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 On Friday, April 3, 2009 10:22, bbledsoe@... said: > Where is the evidence that telephone triage or these dispatch schemes improves > outcomes or do we just do them because a consultant said they are the thing to > do? By " consultant " I assume you mean Shatner? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 On Friday, April 3, 2009 12:44, lnmolino@... said: > The Fly Car concept works well in parts of PA Can you define " works well " for us? Can you point us towards some verifiable statistical evidence that this has a positive effect on morbidity and/or mortality, as well as proving there is no negative effect? Or is this just anecdotal speculation? Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Ya got me that was an anecdotal opinion based on 25 years of observation (plus or minus a year). Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/FSS Office)/ (IFWF/SS Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. In a message dated 4/3/2009 5:41:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rob.davis@... writes: On Friday, April 3, 2009 12:44, lnmolino@... said: > The Fly Car concept works well in parts of PA Can you define " works well " for us? Can you point us towards some verifiable statistical evidence that this has a positive effect on morbidity and/or mortality, as well as proving there is no negative effect? Or is this just anecdotal speculation? Rob ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 I'm afraid that I have a major disagreement with your assessment. You say " The use of these protocols INSURES (emphasis mine) that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next. " I couldn't disagree more. The major " evidence " of the efficacy of NAED's canned questions comes from them. Telephone triage may work, and it may not. There have been spectacular, embarrassing, and costly failures, as in costing human life. Use of a format of some sort makes sense, but reading canned questions simply does not. Fact is, regardless of the method used, much of the time, when we arrive, things are different from what dispatch thought they were, in spite of their questions. The theory of telephone triage using nurses has failed in every case I have ever heard of. Houston just started doing it again, and I cannot for the life of me understand why. If Dr. Clawson's canned questions are so great, then why would anybody need a nurse to ask more questions? And what training do nurses get in telephone triage in their education and training? Required to take EMS Telephone Triage 211? Doesn't exist. Well trained and educated communicators, using their knowledge and common sense, are the best way to get the information out and send the appropriate level. Sit in any dispatch center, and you'll see that the best call takers use a format that's based on the questions but vary them to meet the situation. Yes, this does require rational, critical thinking skills, and those are in short supply. In the meantime, we still under triage because, as stated, things are often not what dispatch led us to expect, even when all the questions were asked and answered. GG > > The major problem with telephone triage is the lack of a standard > questioning protocol in the communicaiton center.  Some good ones are put out by > National Academy of Emergency Dispatch as well as by APCO.  The use of these > protocols insures that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose > focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next.  The > other major issue is a little harder to solve. It is the inability of some > communications centers and personnel to work together on an incident without the > power struggles. (all areas of emergency service run into this at some time > --ex.  police and ems at times have power struggles over crime scenes.) >  Telephone triage can and does work with the proper tools and training.  It save > time, money and lives. > L~  former communications officer, training officer and comm center > manager(police fire and ems) > > > > > Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San > To: texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > > Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? > > Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection Consultant > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > (Cell Phone) > > (IFW/FSS Office)/ > > (IFWF/SS Fax) > > " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " > > " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds > > discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > > original author. > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: > > On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " > > said: > > > > > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > > > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. > > Does anyone ever? > > Rob > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 It exists mainly in the minds of the folks who sell the Priority Medical Dispatch System. GG > Where is the evidence that telephone triage or these dispatch schemes > improves outcomes or do we just do them because a consultant said they are the > thing to do? > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > > > Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San > > To: texasems-l > > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   > >       Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't > it? > > > > > > > > Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? > > > > > > > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI > > > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection > Consultant > > > > > > > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > > > > > > > (Cell Phone) > > > > (IFW/FSS Office)/ > > > > (IFWF/SS Fax) > > > > > > > > " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " > > > > > > > > " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds > > > > discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) > > > > > > > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and > the > > > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > > > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > > > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > > > > original author. > > > > > > > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > > > rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: > > > > > > > > On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " "  > > > > said: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > > > > > > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. > > > > > > > > Does anyone ever? > > > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > ************ **Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 > or > > > > less. (http://food. aol.com/frugal- feasts?ncid= emlcntusfood0000 0001) > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 Houston is not using nurses for telephone triage. We developed our own dispatching criteria and have been using it for a very long time. We continue to evaluate methods to better deliver the appropriate care the caller needs such as the limited and trial program we have for using nurses to assist callers who have non-urgent medical needs. We also have a program that identifies repeat callers and our Health Department provides direct contact with those individuals to determine if some other type of assistance services will better help them with their chronic problem. Our Tiered response and priority dispatching programs work well in our systems as it was designed to benefit from those program designs. Some departments operate well by sending an MICU unit on every call; however, as a fire based system, we see the benefit of sending the most appropriate level of service to a request for assistance. As with a call for " smoke in the building " we can send either a single engine or an entire high rise box alarm, depending on the information we get from the caller or callers. The mere fact that there are multiple calls helps determine the type of response that is sent. I would not make a system conform to something as complex as a tiered response program or priority dispatching if it does not serve the purpose of being able to deliver the best care and utilize the available resources to benefit the entire community. Systems wanting to explore these types of programs should visit departments that operate them and see, listen and investigate the pros and cons before jumping into one. Don't do it just because someone else is doing it. Do what is best for your circumstances. Be a leader in patient care, not a follower. Do things because they are the right thing to do, not because they are the new thing on the block. Response criteria, equipment, new meds, all can lure systems into areas that don't really benefit the patient. They are just 'cool' to have. But if any group, department or system wants to see how some of these things work and even how they don't, you are welcomed to come visit us. We'll keep the light on. Almaguer, Sr. Captain HFD - EMS Command _____ From: wegandy1938@... Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:20 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San I'm afraid that I have a major disagreement with your assessment. You say " The use of these protocols INSURES (emphasis mine) that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next. " I couldn't disagree more. The major " evidence " of the efficacy of NAED's canned questions comes from them. Telephone triage may work, and it may not. There have been spectacular, embarrassing, and costly failures, as in costing human life. Use of a format of some sort makes sense, but reading canned questions simply does not. Fact is, regardless of the method used, much of the time, when we arrive, things are different from what dispatch thought they were, in spite of their questions. The theory of telephone triage using nurses has failed in every case I have ever heard of. Houston just started doing it again, and I cannot for the life of me understand why. If Dr. Clawson's canned questions are so great, then why would anybody need a nurse to ask more questions? And what training do nurses get in telephone triage in their education and training? Required to take EMS Telephone Triage 211? Doesn't exist. Well trained and educated communicators, using their knowledge and common sense, are the best way to get the information out and send the appropriate level. Sit in any dispatch center, and you'll see that the best call takers use a format that's based on the questions but vary them to meet the situation. Yes, this does require rational, critical thinking skills, and those are in short supply. In the meantime, we still under triage because, as stated, things are often not what dispatch led us to expect, even when all the questions were asked and answered. GG In a message dated 4/3/09 7:55:24 AM, jslilkitten@ yahoo.com writes: > > The major problem with telephone triage is the lack of a standard > questioning protocol in the communicaiton center. Some good ones are put out by > National Academy of Emergency Dispatch as well as by APCO. The use of these > protocols insures that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose > focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next. The > other major issue is a little harder to solve. It is the inability of some > communications centers and personnel to work together on an incident without the > power struggles. (all areas of emergency service run into this at some time > --ex. police and ems at times have power struggles over crime scenes.) > Telephone triage can and does work with the proper tools and training. It save > time, money and lives. > L~ former communications officer, training officer and comm center > manager(police fire and ems) > > > > From: lnmolino (AT) aol (DOT) lnm lnm> > Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San > To: texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > > Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? > > Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection Consultant > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > (Cell Phone) > > (IFW/FSS Office)/ > > (IFWF/SS Fax) > > " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " > > " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds > > discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > > original author. > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: > > On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " > > said: > > > > > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > > > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. > > Does anyone ever? > > Rob > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 Houston is not using nurses for telephone triage. We developed our own dispatching criteria and have been using it for a very long time. We continue to evaluate methods to better deliver the appropriate care the caller needs such as the limited and trial program we have for using nurses to assist callers who have non-urgent medical needs. We also have a program that identifies repeat callers and our Health Department provides direct contact with those individuals to determine if some other type of assistance services will better help them with their chronic problem. Our Tiered response and priority dispatching programs work well in our systems as it was designed to benefit from those program designs. Some departments operate well by sending an MICU unit on every call; however, as a fire based system, we see the benefit of sending the most appropriate level of service to a request for assistance. As with a call for " smoke in the building " we can send either a single engine or an entire high rise box alarm, depending on the information we get from the caller or callers. The mere fact that there are multiple calls helps determine the type of response that is sent. I would not make a system conform to something as complex as a tiered response program or priority dispatching if it does not serve the purpose of being able to deliver the best care and utilize the available resources to benefit the entire community. Systems wanting to explore these types of programs should visit departments that operate them and see, listen and investigate the pros and cons before jumping into one. Don't do it just because someone else is doing it. Do what is best for your circumstances. Be a leader in patient care, not a follower. Do things because they are the right thing to do, not because they are the new thing on the block. Response criteria, equipment, new meds, all can lure systems into areas that don't really benefit the patient. They are just 'cool' to have. But if any group, department or system wants to see how some of these things work and even how they don't, you are welcomed to come visit us. We'll keep the light on. Almaguer, Sr. Captain HFD - EMS Command _____ From: wegandy1938@... Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:20 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San I'm afraid that I have a major disagreement with your assessment. You say " The use of these protocols INSURES (emphasis mine) that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next. " I couldn't disagree more. The major " evidence " of the efficacy of NAED's canned questions comes from them. Telephone triage may work, and it may not. There have been spectacular, embarrassing, and costly failures, as in costing human life. Use of a format of some sort makes sense, but reading canned questions simply does not. Fact is, regardless of the method used, much of the time, when we arrive, things are different from what dispatch thought they were, in spite of their questions. The theory of telephone triage using nurses has failed in every case I have ever heard of. Houston just started doing it again, and I cannot for the life of me understand why. If Dr. Clawson's canned questions are so great, then why would anybody need a nurse to ask more questions? And what training do nurses get in telephone triage in their education and training? Required to take EMS Telephone Triage 211? Doesn't exist. Well trained and educated communicators, using their knowledge and common sense, are the best way to get the information out and send the appropriate level. Sit in any dispatch center, and you'll see that the best call takers use a format that's based on the questions but vary them to meet the situation. Yes, this does require rational, critical thinking skills, and those are in short supply. In the meantime, we still under triage because, as stated, things are often not what dispatch led us to expect, even when all the questions were asked and answered. GG In a message dated 4/3/09 7:55:24 AM, jslilkitten@ yahoo.com writes: > > The major problem with telephone triage is the lack of a standard > questioning protocol in the communicaiton center. Some good ones are put out by > National Academy of Emergency Dispatch as well as by APCO. The use of these > protocols insures that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose > focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next. The > other major issue is a little harder to solve. It is the inability of some > communications centers and personnel to work together on an incident without the > power struggles. (all areas of emergency service run into this at some time > --ex. police and ems at times have power struggles over crime scenes.) > Telephone triage can and does work with the proper tools and training. It save > time, money and lives. > L~ former communications officer, training officer and comm center > manager(police fire and ems) > > > > From: lnmolino (AT) aol (DOT) lnm lnm> > Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San > To: texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > > Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? > > Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection Consultant > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > (Cell Phone) > > (IFW/FSS Office)/ > > (IFWF/SS Fax) > > " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " > > " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds > > discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > > original author. > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: > > On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " > > said: > > > > > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > > > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. > > Does anyone ever? > > Rob > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2009 Report Share Posted April 10, 2009 Houston is not using nurses for telephone triage. We developed our own dispatching criteria and have been using it for a very long time. We continue to evaluate methods to better deliver the appropriate care the caller needs such as the limited and trial program we have for using nurses to assist callers who have non-urgent medical needs. We also have a program that identifies repeat callers and our Health Department provides direct contact with those individuals to determine if some other type of assistance services will better help them with their chronic problem. Our Tiered response and priority dispatching programs work well in our systems as it was designed to benefit from those program designs. Some departments operate well by sending an MICU unit on every call; however, as a fire based system, we see the benefit of sending the most appropriate level of service to a request for assistance. As with a call for " smoke in the building " we can send either a single engine or an entire high rise box alarm, depending on the information we get from the caller or callers. The mere fact that there are multiple calls helps determine the type of response that is sent. I would not make a system conform to something as complex as a tiered response program or priority dispatching if it does not serve the purpose of being able to deliver the best care and utilize the available resources to benefit the entire community. Systems wanting to explore these types of programs should visit departments that operate them and see, listen and investigate the pros and cons before jumping into one. Don't do it just because someone else is doing it. Do what is best for your circumstances. Be a leader in patient care, not a follower. Do things because they are the right thing to do, not because they are the new thing on the block. Response criteria, equipment, new meds, all can lure systems into areas that don't really benefit the patient. They are just 'cool' to have. But if any group, department or system wants to see how some of these things work and even how they don't, you are welcomed to come visit us. We'll keep the light on. Almaguer, Sr. Captain HFD - EMS Command _____ From: wegandy1938@... Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:20 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San I'm afraid that I have a major disagreement with your assessment. You say " The use of these protocols INSURES (emphasis mine) that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next. " I couldn't disagree more. The major " evidence " of the efficacy of NAED's canned questions comes from them. Telephone triage may work, and it may not. There have been spectacular, embarrassing, and costly failures, as in costing human life. Use of a format of some sort makes sense, but reading canned questions simply does not. Fact is, regardless of the method used, much of the time, when we arrive, things are different from what dispatch thought they were, in spite of their questions. The theory of telephone triage using nurses has failed in every case I have ever heard of. Houston just started doing it again, and I cannot for the life of me understand why. If Dr. Clawson's canned questions are so great, then why would anybody need a nurse to ask more questions? And what training do nurses get in telephone triage in their education and training? Required to take EMS Telephone Triage 211? Doesn't exist. Well trained and educated communicators, using their knowledge and common sense, are the best way to get the information out and send the appropriate level. Sit in any dispatch center, and you'll see that the best call takers use a format that's based on the questions but vary them to meet the situation. Yes, this does require rational, critical thinking skills, and those are in short supply. In the meantime, we still under triage because, as stated, things are often not what dispatch led us to expect, even when all the questions were asked and answered. GG In a message dated 4/3/09 7:55:24 AM, jslilkitten@ yahoo.com writes: > > The major problem with telephone triage is the lack of a standard > questioning protocol in the communicaiton center. Some good ones are put out by > National Academy of Emergency Dispatch as well as by APCO. The use of these > protocols insures that dispatchers ask ALL the pertinent questions and don't lose > focus and control of the call while trying to think of what to do next. The > other major issue is a little harder to solve. It is the inability of some > communications centers and personnel to work together on an incident without the > power struggles. (all areas of emergency service run into this at some time > --ex. police and ems at times have power struggles over crime scenes.) > Telephone triage can and does work with the proper tools and training. It save > time, money and lives. > L~ former communications officer, training officer and comm center > manager(police fire and ems) > > > > From: lnmolino (AT) aol (DOT) lnm lnm> > Subject: Re: BLS-only ambulances to launch in San > To: texasems-l@yahoogrotexasem > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 10:41 PM > > Telephone triage has proven so well in the past in Texas hasn't it? > > Does anyone read history or do we just continue to repeat it? > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ EMSI > > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Author/Journalis t/Fire Protection Consultant > > LNMolino (AT) aol (DOT) com > > (Cell Phone) > > (IFW/FSS Office)/ > > (IFWF/SS Fax) > > " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " > > " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds > > discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > > original author. > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 10:35:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > > rob.davis@armynurse corps.com writes: > > On Thursday, April 2, 2009 20:44, " " > > said: > > > > > > The 9-1-1 dispatchers will decide which should get sent out. Chief > > > Hood says he doesn't anticipate any problems. > > Does anyone ever? > > Rob > > ------------ --------- --------- ------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.