Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Contraception

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

> Cue hilarious conversation with Mum on the Monday: " , I think

> you've left your mobile phone behind "

My Mum asked me today which of the children needed an inhaler. None, I

answered and asked why she was asking.

" Because there's one in the kitchen. "

It was a breast pump.

Lynda

SAHM to (8), (5), Fraser (3), Callum (15/5/00)

Newsletter editor, Mid-Northumberland Branch

Area Rep, Region 7

www.familygarland.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I have a Persona baby too - conceived on a GREEN day. I ovulated on

day 10

> which it just couldn't have predicted as the usual was 13 - 17 days!

I got

> my money back though (Boots) - for both the device and the extra

sticks I

> had bought (always keep the receipt I say!)<<

Do you know I never even thought to take mine back. Guess it is a

little late now. DH says we should keep it as a souvenir. We did

joke about selling it " Persona, barely used, one pregnancy " hahahaha.

Lorraine

Mum to 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>I would like to use Persona. I don't really think DH would be

>dreadfully upset if we conceived a third child accidentally but not

>using contraception wouldn't be acceptable. But it always says you

>can't use it if you are breastfeeding - I wonder if that really holds

>true if your breastfeeding partner is 20 months and you've been

>menstruating regularly for 16 months plus?

>--

>

>jennifer@...

> Vaudin

I have wondered that very thing, have been making do with temp. taking

/condoms,

Angi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

My DH keeps asking if I'd like him to have the snip. I'm holding off just

in case I can change his mind about no. 3

Cerys

-----Original Message-----

From: Vaudin

If I felt happy with the notion that I was done with childbearing I

would be urging DH to have a vasectomy (wonder if he would - I am not

mentioning it because I don't feel done with child bearing)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>>I would like to use Persona. I don't really think DH would be

>>dreadfully upset if we conceived a third child accidentally but not

>>using contraception wouldn't be acceptable. But it always says you

>>can't use it if you are breastfeeding - I wonder if that really holds

>>true if your breastfeeding partner is 20 months and you've been

>>menstruating regularly for 16 months plus?

>>--

>>

>>jennifer@...

>> Vaudin

>

>

> I have wondered that very thing, have been making do with temp. taking

> /condoms,

> Angi

>

Well I have also been doing the temp taking/condoms whilst

breastfeeding 16 month old 2/3 times a day. My periods only came back

at 13 months (what joy!) and I thought I'd give it four normalish

cycles before I am able to drop the condoms for part of my cycle.

--

(24)

Mum to Tabby (16 months)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I don't log on at weekends so have just read through pages and pages

of postings about contraception - all very interesting! I have been

on the pill since I was 19 apart from 2 pregnancy breaks and

breastfeeding each of them for a year when I was on the mini-pill. I

am now 42 and my girls are 14 and 11. I've never had any problems

though I did change brands after the last pill scare, whatever and

whenever that was. I know all the risks but love the convenience

of " anytime, anywhere " ! Also love knowing that my periods will come

every 4th Friday morning at 7:00 am regular as clockwork and last 3

days with hardly any pains. I have also been known to take 2 packets

without break if my period is due in the middle of a holiday. I'm

prabably totally screwing up my body but, what the heck, I might fall

under a bus tomorrow!

Akiko Hickey

ANT NW London (Willesden Green actually!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Akiko wrote:

> I have also been known to take 2 packets without break ... I'm

> prabably totally screwing up my body ...

There was a number of articles in magazines last summer that debated over

taking the pill continuously, the end conclusion was that it wasn't a

problem. The only reason for the original 'pill free days' was to prevent

psychological problems that women might have from not experiencing

periods/they wouldn't know if they were pregnant. The articles also said

that women are having more periods in a lifetime than they would have had

years ago, therefore experiencing more blood loss and that that could be

*more* harmful than taking the pill continuously. Anecdotally my GP also

said it wasn't a problem.

>>> If anyone wants me to dig out, scan and email the articles to them off list

I will try and find them - just let me know & I'll do my best :-) <<<

In the same vein the reason for modern day existence of PMS is that we would

either have been pregnant or lactating for most of our reproductive years.

As a PMS sufferer (delightfully symptom free during pregnancy!) I found this

information reassuring.

Jenni.

DH Gethyn, Mam to (16.5yrs); Mari (2.5yrs,HB); Babi Bach (exp.09/01)

>

> Akiko Hickey

> ANT NW London (Willesden Green actually!)

>

>

>

> *** NCT enquiry line - 0 ***

>

> Live chat http://www.yahoogroups.com/chat/nct-coffee

>

> Have you found out about all the other groups for the NCT online?

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

was a number of articles in magazines last summer that debated over

> taking the pill continuously, the end conclusion was that it wasn't

a

> problem. The only reason for the original 'pill free days' was to

prevent

> psychological problems that women might have from not experiencing

> periods/they wouldn't know if they were pregnant.

I read something in a magazine years ago that basically said that the

only reason there was a weeks break between each packet of pills was

because research had shown that women liked having periods. I suppose

it was a simplistic way of saying the above but I can remember

thinking at the time - Who the hell did they ask to come to that

conclusion???

When I was on the pill I used to take two packets one after the other

when I was on holiday etc. I must have done that about half a dozen

times. Now I rely on breastfeeding and crossed fingers as a

contraceptive ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

was a number of articles in magazines last summer that debated over

> taking the pill continuously, the end conclusion was that it wasn't

a

> problem. The only reason for the original 'pill free days' was to

prevent

> psychological problems that women might have from not experiencing

> periods/they wouldn't know if they were pregnant.

I read something in a magazine years ago that basically said that the

only reason there was a weeks break between each packet of pills was

because research had shown that women liked having periods. I suppose

it was a simplistic way of saying the above but I can remember

thinking at the time - Who the hell did they ask to come to that

conclusion???

When I was on the pill I used to take two packets one after the other

when I was on holiday etc. I must have done that about half a dozen

times. Now I rely on breastfeeding and crossed fingers as a

contraceptive ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>> The only reason for the original 'pill free days' was

to prevent

>> psychological problems that women might have from not

experiencing

>> periods/they wouldn't know if they were pregnant.

>I read something in a magazine years ago that basically

said that the

>only reason there was a weeks break between each packet of

pills was

>because research had shown that women liked having

periods.

That’s odd, I had heard that they were made so you had a

period, because their creator hoped that if the woman had

an apparently normal cycle, they would be approved by the

Catholic church. Don’t know if it’s true though.

Phyllis

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>> The only reason for the original 'pill free days' was

to prevent

>> psychological problems that women might have from not

experiencing

>> periods/they wouldn't know if they were pregnant.

>I read something in a magazine years ago that basically

said that the

>only reason there was a weeks break between each packet of

pills was

>because research had shown that women liked having

periods.

That’s odd, I had heard that they were made so you had a

period, because their creator hoped that if the woman had

an apparently normal cycle, they would be approved by the

Catholic church. Don’t know if it’s true though.

Phyllis

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>> The only reason for the original 'pill free days' was

to prevent

>> psychological problems that women might have from not

experiencing

>> periods/they wouldn't know if they were pregnant.

>I read something in a magazine years ago that basically

said that the

>only reason there was a weeks break between each packet of

pills was

>because research had shown that women liked having

periods.

That’s odd, I had heard that they were made so you had a

period, because their creator hoped that if the woman had

an apparently normal cycle, they would be approved by the

Catholic church. Don’t know if it’s true though.

Phyllis

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> That's odd, I had heard that they were made so you had a

> period, because their creator hoped that if the woman had

> an apparently normal cycle, they would be approved by the

> Catholic church. Don't know if it's true though.<<

Could be but unlikely that the Catholic church would accept it. They

don't really give a dot

about a woman's cycle (why should they, they're all men!) - they just

don't want you doing anything to prevent God's gift of a baby.

I can speak frankly as I am a Catholic so I'm not in any sense running

the Religion down or anything.

Lorraine

Mum to: 10, Natasha 8, 5, ph nearly 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> That's odd, I had heard that they were made so you had a

> period, because their creator hoped that if the woman had

> an apparently normal cycle, they would be approved by the

> Catholic church. Don't know if it's true though.<<

Could be but unlikely that the Catholic church would accept it. They

don't really give a dot

about a woman's cycle (why should they, they're all men!) - they just

don't want you doing anything to prevent God's gift of a baby.

I can speak frankly as I am a Catholic so I'm not in any sense running

the Religion down or anything.

Lorraine

Mum to: 10, Natasha 8, 5, ph nearly 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>I read something in a magazine years ago that basically said that the

>only reason there was a weeks break between each packet of pills was

>because research had shown that women liked having periods. I suppose

>it was a simplistic way of saying the above but I can remember

>thinking at the time - Who the hell did they ask to come to that

>conclusion???

Me probably. I missed having periods when I was pregnant - though it

didn't make me any more sanguine (!) when I had bleeding episodes. I

was pleased when my periods returned almost without a pause - apart

from the slight implication I wasn't breastfeeding 'properly'. I

think it is a bit like not wanting to live somewhere where there are

no seasons. I did find it a bit of a shock to go back to getting

organised on the protection front (ditto contraception) when I hadn't

been negative about it before - but my Keeper has sorted those

feelings out a treat :-))))

But it looks as though there could be a sound reasons for women to be

rather negative about periods (fuss, pain, PMS aside) Then again, I'm

not convinced that years on end of pregnancy/birth/lactation is

wonderful for the health - it wasn't in the past but maybe better

nutrition and being able to fix some problems are the answer.

--

jennifer@...

Vaudin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> >I read something in a magazine years ago that basically said that

the

> >only reason there was a weeks break between each packet of pills

was

> >because research had shown that women liked having periods. I

suppose

> >it was a simplistic way of saying the above but I can remember

> >thinking at the time - Who the hell did they ask to come to that

> >conclusion???

>

>

> Me probably. I missed having periods when I was pregnant - though it

> Vaudin

Sorry Jenifer. I just get annoyed annoyed when a bunch of men (most

likely in this case) make assumptions about what's best for a woman

without actually asking any. Now if a woman had invented the pill

maybe we would have got a choice. BTW I noticed you said you use the

keeper. I am seriously considering using this as well when my periods

come back (BF at mo) it seems a much more natural thing to use than

tampons (possibly another male invention)

p.s. I don't hate all men just the inconsiderate ones!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...