Guest guest Posted July 16, 1999 Report Share Posted July 16, 1999 A few days ago I found the article you mentioned at the s Hopkins site (InteliHealth) and had the same reaction to the comments of Dr. Mannino. While I was irritated, I was not suprised. I had spoken with Dr. Mannino several months ago when I first began my personal quest for information regarding Stachybotrys and other types of mold contamination. Since then I have communicated with MANY other experts and none of them would agree with this statement. At best some may say that the jury is still out, that the science has not caught up with the problem, that many studies are underway to determine the effect of exposures to human health...Dr. Mannino told me that faults were found with the study of babies who died as a result of pulmonary hemmorage in Cleveland. I think that there has been evidence to show that it was not the stachy but rather the second hand smoke in combination with stachy that caused the deaths. If so, would the second hand smoke have caused this WITHOUT the stachy? It seems to me that stachy was a necessary factor.We put warnings on cigarette packages. Perhaps it should include a warning about the combination of second hand smoke with stachy, the way that pharmacueticals list drug interactions, or the way we warn people not to drink and drive? I think that there have been other studies to suggest a correlation exists. While the science is not there to support standards/acceptable levels, it is genearlly agreed by most World Health Organizations that mold in buildings is unhealthy. Sadly, we will have to wait for more studies to be completed to get any kind of acceptable levels...In the meantime building owners are able to hide behind this confusion to avoid addressing problems or correcting them adequately. p.s. I am a new member and have spent the moring scrolling through your archives. I began with the earliest postings and am interested to know whether your early questions regarding avenues for litigation when building owners fail to warn occupants, fail to properly correct problems, . I saw one string that said that people can't sue school districts over this since it is taxpayer $. Is that correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.