Guest guest Posted September 15, 2001 Report Share Posted September 15, 2001 Hi > And it seems to me that steppers make " sobriety " such an absolute thing. If someone has > too much to drink at a party on Saturday night, it would seem to me that such a person is > not sober only as long as s/he is impaired. But once the hangover is past and such a > person is back to normal, s/he is once again " sober " . But the steppers would see that > person as " not sober " all the time, till s/he comes into the program and abstains > completely. Yep. Another thing that fred Rotgers points out is that for better or worse *most* ppl get a bit drunk every now and again, typically on commemorative occasions, when their team won something big or whatever. Not only are absurdly absolute standards demanded by many ppl for sobriety, but it is insisted that moderators must achieve a standard of drinking that is more strict than ppl in general. But why should this be so? So long as a person never drinks to endanger themselves or others in any way or to impair their health or life functioning, what does it matter if ppl get a bit tipsy every now and again. It is of course amusing and informative that Jews are well- known for their very low levels of alcoholism yet their religion actually calls for ppl to get safely sloshed on a commemorative day. P. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2001 Report Share Posted September 23, 2001 > And it seems to me that steppers make " sobriety " such an absolute thing. If someone has Yes they do. Its either don't drink or die. That is pretty extreme or even absolute. > too much to drink at a party on Saturday night, it would seem to me that such a person is > not sober only as long as s/he is impaired. But once the hangover is past and such a > person is back to normal, s/he is once again " sober " . But the steppers would see that > person as " not sober " all the time, till s/he comes into the program and abstains > completely. Their (steppers') definition of sober in objective words = brainwashed by and complying with the tenets of XA. The sane people's defition of sober = not drunk and/or habitually temperate. In fact my dictionary (from the 60s) has 9 definitions of the word including: 1 not intoxicated or drunk, 2 habitually temperate, 3 quiet or sedate in demanor, 4 marked by seriousness, gravity, solemnity, 5 subdued in tone, not showy, 6 free from excess, 7 showing SELF control, 8 sane or rational, 9 to make or become sober. Nowhere does it say sober is a synonym of abstinent. Nor does it say sober = the only known " cure " for certain " diseases " , specifically " alcoholism " , " drug addiction " , and " eating disorders. " However, we can see how XA has had an impact on the definition of the word by reading the current 21st century definition at www.m- w.com. It has evolved as the " addiction " concept has caught on, but the word " sober " still means what it did in the 1960s definition above (which is quite different from the typical stepper definition): 1 a : sparing in the use of food and drink : ABSTEMIOUS b : not addicted to intoxicating drink c : not drunk 2 : marked by sedate or gravely or earnestly thoughtful character or demeanor 3 : UNHURRIED, CALM 4 : marked by temperance, moderation, or seriousness 5 : subdued in tone or color 6 : showing no excessive or extreme qualities of fancy, emotion, or prejudice It is funny, by that definition, " not addicted to intoxicating drink, " when one becomes sober, they are no longer addicted... I wonder what the steppers can say about that? I thought steppers said addiction was incurable, and had to be " fought " one day at a time for the rest of my life? Or is it not possible for an addict to be sober, since he will always be addicted? Maybe they are all dry drunks!!! They certainly are all a little fucked up (and some are very fucked up). > If a stepper were to ask me how I stay sober, I'd say, " Not get drunk. " Well, how do I > refrain from getting drunk if I'm not in the program? Well, just don't open the bottle > and drink, that's how. If that makes me " dry drunk " , okay. Fine. So I'm dry drunk by > stepper definition.... Right, and so what! You are a dry-drunk (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by XA definition. You are an infidel (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by bin Laden definition. You are a heathen (bound for Hell) (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by Christian definition. You are an Anti-Semite (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by Jewish definition. You are a damn Capitalist (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by most of the rest of the world's definition. You are probably a stupid southerner (with a stupid hick accent) (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by a Yankee's definition. You are white trash (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by yuppie definition. You are a lesser being (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by Harvard definition. You are an elephant (and probably a mean bitch) (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by the anorexic's definition. You are a criminal (and also a sheisty tax payer, and another idiot voter)(and probably lots and lots and lots of other derogatory things) by the government's definition. You are a stupid Democrat (baby killer!) (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by Republican definition. You are merely fodder by a general's definition. You are a fearful (rightly so) and lazy civilian by a soldier's definition. You are a bad student by your teacher's definition. You are an animal by nature's definition. You are an (put their word(s) here) by your parent's definition. You were a stepper by anti-XA definition. Who gives a rat's ass about other people's judgments of you. You are going to let it bother you or effect you in any way because ignorant people who don't know who or what you are need a label to put on you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2001 Report Share Posted September 23, 2001 Thanks for a good laugh, Cool Guy. Of course I'm a dry drunk by stepper definition, and frankly I don't care. I got a good laugh out of all the other things you listed I am by other people's definition. I can think of lots of other things people think I am. Did you see the post in when I casually mentioned my Buddhism? My post was promtly answered by another post bad-rapping the Buddha and pointing out that the guy was a real jerk. And another post blamed Buddhism for the undesirable behavior in Bushido. I had to chuckle. Glad to see you. I was wondering if you were still around. Cheers, nz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 23, 2001 Report Share Posted September 23, 2001 > > If that makes me " dry drunk " , okay. > > Fine. So I'm dry drunk by > > > stepper definition.... > > > > Right, and so what! > > OR - You're not an alcoholic...and that suits me just fine! Oh yeah, just state the obvious! Well done! Well in your opinion Netty! Ask any shrink or parole officer and they might have a different opinion. But you are right... that's just another label other some people gave you that doesn't have to effect you whatsoever and you don't have to accept it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2001 Report Share Posted September 24, 2001 While we are on this topic. I just got out of the shower, and I haven't used any expensive illegal drugs in quite some time (but I have abused them at times long ago) so am I clean or not according to XA? I wish someone would tell me. > > And it seems to me that steppers make " sobriety " such an absolute > thing. If someone has > > Yes they do. Its either don't drink or die. That is pretty > extreme or even absolute. > > > too much to drink at a party on Saturday night, it would seem to > me that such a person is > > not sober only as long as s/he is impaired. But once the hangover > is past and such a > > person is back to normal, s/he is once again " sober " . But the > steppers would see that > > person as " not sober " all the time, till s/he comes into the > program and abstains > > completely. > > Their (steppers') definition of sober in objective words = > brainwashed by and complying with the tenets of XA. The sane > people's defition of sober = not drunk and/or habitually temperate. > In fact my dictionary (from the 60s) has 9 definitions of the > word including: 1 not intoxicated or drunk, 2 habitually temperate, > 3 quiet or sedate in demanor, 4 marked by seriousness, gravity, > solemnity, 5 subdued in tone, not showy, 6 free from excess, 7 > showing SELF control, 8 sane or rational, 9 to make or become sober. > Nowhere does it say sober is a synonym of abstinent. Nor does it > say sober = the only known " cure " for certain " diseases " , > specifically " alcoholism " , " drug addiction " , and " eating disorders. " > > However, we can see how XA has had an impact on the definition of > the word by reading the current 21st century definition at www.m- > w.com. It has evolved as the " addiction " concept has caught on, but > the word " sober " still means what it did in the 1960s definition > above (which is quite different from the typical stepper definition): > > 1 a : sparing in the use of food and drink : ABSTEMIOUS b : not > addicted to intoxicating drink c : not drunk > 2 : marked by sedate or gravely or earnestly thoughtful character or > demeanor > 3 : UNHURRIED, CALM > 4 : marked by temperance, moderation, or seriousness > 5 : subdued in tone or color > 6 : showing no excessive or extreme qualities of fancy, emotion, or > prejudice > > It is funny, by that definition, " not addicted to intoxicating > drink, " when one becomes sober, they are no longer addicted... I > wonder what the steppers can say about that? I thought steppers > said addiction was incurable, and had to be " fought " one day at a > time for the rest of my life? Or is it not possible for an addict > to be sober, since he will always be addicted? Maybe they are all > dry drunks!!! They certainly are all a little fucked up (and some > are very fucked up). > > > If a stepper were to ask me how I stay sober, I'd say, " Not get > drunk. " Well, how do I > > refrain from getting drunk if I'm not in the program? Well, just > don't open the bottle > > and drink, that's how. If that makes me " dry drunk " , okay. > Fine. So I'm dry drunk by > > stepper definition.... > > Right, and so what! > > You are a dry-drunk (and probably lots of other derogatory things) > by XA definition. > You are an infidel (and probably lots of other derogatory things) > by bin Laden definition. > You are a heathen (bound for Hell) (and probably lots of other > derogatory things) by Christian definition. > You are an Anti-Semite (and probably lots of other derogatory > things) by Jewish definition. > You are a damn Capitalist (and probably lots of other derogatory > things) by most of the rest of the world's definition. > You are probably a stupid southerner (with a stupid hick accent) > (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by a Yankee's > definition. > You are white trash (and probably lots of other derogatory things) > by yuppie definition. > You are a lesser being (and probably lots of other derogatory > things) by Harvard definition. > You are an elephant (and probably a mean bitch) (and probably lots > of other derogatory things) by the anorexic's definition. > You are a criminal (and also a sheisty tax payer, and another > idiot voter)(and probably lots and lots and lots of other derogatory > things) by the government's definition. > You are a stupid Democrat (baby killer!) (and probably lots of > other derogatory things) by Republican definition. > You are merely fodder by a general's definition. > You are a fearful (rightly so) and lazy civilian by a soldier's > definition. > You are a bad student by your teacher's definition. > You are an animal by nature's definition. > You are an (put their word(s) here) by your parent's definition. > You were a stepper by anti-XA definition. > > Who gives a rat's ass about other people's judgments of you. You > are going to let it bother you or effect you in any way because > ignorant people who don't know who or what you are need a label to > put on you? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2001 Report Share Posted September 24, 2001 Most people, including AAer's, would conclude that you are clean since you just took a shower. > > > And it seems to me that steppers make " sobriety " such an > absolute > > thing. If someone has > > > > Yes they do. Its either don't drink or die. That is pretty > > extreme or even absolute. > > > > > too much to drink at a party on Saturday night, it would seem > to > > me that such a person is > > > not sober only as long as s/he is impaired. But once the > hangover > > is past and such a > > > person is back to normal, s/he is once again " sober " . But the > > steppers would see that > > > person as " not sober " all the time, till s/he comes into the > > program and abstains > > > completely. > > > > Their (steppers') definition of sober in objective words = > > brainwashed by and complying with the tenets of XA. The sane > > people's defition of sober = not drunk and/or habitually > temperate. > > In fact my dictionary (from the 60s) has 9 definitions of the > > word including: 1 not intoxicated or drunk, 2 habitually > temperate, > > 3 quiet or sedate in demanor, 4 marked by seriousness, gravity, > > solemnity, 5 subdued in tone, not showy, 6 free from excess, 7 > > showing SELF control, 8 sane or rational, 9 to make or become > sober. > > Nowhere does it say sober is a synonym of abstinent. Nor does > it > > say sober = the only known " cure " for certain " diseases " , > > specifically " alcoholism " , " drug addiction " , and " eating > disorders. " > > > > However, we can see how XA has had an impact on the definition > of > > the word by reading the current 21st century definition at www.m- > > w.com. It has evolved as the " addiction " concept has caught on, > but > > the word " sober " still means what it did in the 1960s definition > > above (which is quite different from the typical stepper > definition): > > > > 1 a : sparing in the use of food and drink : ABSTEMIOUS b : not > > addicted to intoxicating drink c : not drunk > > 2 : marked by sedate or gravely or earnestly thoughtful character > or > > demeanor > > 3 : UNHURRIED, CALM > > 4 : marked by temperance, moderation, or seriousness > > 5 : subdued in tone or color > > 6 : showing no excessive or extreme qualities of fancy, emotion, > or > > prejudice > > > > It is funny, by that definition, " not addicted to intoxicating > > drink, " when one becomes sober, they are no longer addicted... I > > wonder what the steppers can say about that? I thought steppers > > said addiction was incurable, and had to be " fought " one day at a > > time for the rest of my life? Or is it not possible for an > addict > > to be sober, since he will always be addicted? Maybe they are > all > > dry drunks!!! They certainly are all a little fucked up (and > some > > are very fucked up). > > > > > If a stepper were to ask me how I stay sober, I'd say, " Not get > > drunk. " Well, how do I > > > refrain from getting drunk if I'm not in the program? Well, > just > > don't open the bottle > > > and drink, that's how. If that makes me " dry drunk " , okay. > > Fine. So I'm dry drunk by > > > stepper definition.... > > > > Right, and so what! > > > > You are a dry-drunk (and probably lots of other derogatory > things) > > by XA definition. > > You are an infidel (and probably lots of other derogatory > things) > > by bin Laden definition. > > You are a heathen (bound for Hell) (and probably lots of other > > derogatory things) by Christian definition. > > You are an Anti-Semite (and probably lots of other derogatory > > things) by Jewish definition. > > You are a damn Capitalist (and probably lots of other > derogatory > > things) by most of the rest of the world's definition. > > You are probably a stupid southerner (with a stupid hick accent) > > (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by a Yankee's > > definition. > > You are white trash (and probably lots of other derogatory > things) > > by yuppie definition. > > You are a lesser being (and probably lots of other derogatory > > things) by Harvard definition. > > You are an elephant (and probably a mean bitch) (and probably > lots > > of other derogatory things) by the anorexic's definition. > > You are a criminal (and also a sheisty tax payer, and another > > idiot voter)(and probably lots and lots and lots of other > derogatory > > things) by the government's definition. > > You are a stupid Democrat (baby killer!) (and probably lots of > > other derogatory things) by Republican definition. > > You are merely fodder by a general's definition. > > You are a fearful (rightly so) and lazy civilian by a soldier's > > definition. > > You are a bad student by your teacher's definition. > > You are an animal by nature's definition. > > You are an (put their word(s) here) by your parent's definition. > > You were a stepper by anti-XA definition. > > > > Who gives a rat's ass about other people's judgments of you. > You > > are going to let it bother you or effect you in any way because > > ignorant people who don't know who or what you are need a label > to > > put on you? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2001 Report Share Posted September 25, 2001 but I haven't been to a meeting in over a year! Surely you jest. > > > > And it seems to me that steppers make " sobriety " such an > > absolute > > > thing. If someone has > > > > > > Yes they do. Its either don't drink or die. That is pretty > > > extreme or even absolute. > > > > > > > too much to drink at a party on Saturday night, it would seem > > to > > > me that such a person is > > > > not sober only as long as s/he is impaired. But once the > > hangover > > > is past and such a > > > > person is back to normal, s/he is once again " sober " . But the > > > steppers would see that > > > > person as " not sober " all the time, till s/he comes into the > > > program and abstains > > > > completely. > > > > > > Their (steppers') definition of sober in objective words = > > > brainwashed by and complying with the tenets of XA. The sane > > > people's defition of sober = not drunk and/or habitually > > temperate. > > > In fact my dictionary (from the 60s) has 9 definitions of the > > > word including: 1 not intoxicated or drunk, 2 habitually > > temperate, > > > 3 quiet or sedate in demanor, 4 marked by seriousness, gravity, > > > solemnity, 5 subdued in tone, not showy, 6 free from excess, 7 > > > showing SELF control, 8 sane or rational, 9 to make or become > > sober. > > > Nowhere does it say sober is a synonym of abstinent. Nor > does > > it > > > say sober = the only known " cure " for certain " diseases " , > > > specifically " alcoholism " , " drug addiction " , and " eating > > disorders. " > > > > > > However, we can see how XA has had an impact on the > definition > > of > > > the word by reading the current 21st century definition at www.m- > > > w.com. It has evolved as the " addiction " concept has caught on, > > but > > > the word " sober " still means what it did in the 1960s definition > > > above (which is quite different from the typical stepper > > definition): > > > > > > 1 a : sparing in the use of food and drink : ABSTEMIOUS b : not > > > addicted to intoxicating drink c : not drunk > > > 2 : marked by sedate or gravely or earnestly thoughtful > character > > or > > > demeanor > > > 3 : UNHURRIED, CALM > > > 4 : marked by temperance, moderation, or seriousness > > > 5 : subdued in tone or color > > > 6 : showing no excessive or extreme qualities of fancy, emotion, > > or > > > prejudice > > > > > > It is funny, by that definition, " not addicted to > intoxicating > > > drink, " when one becomes sober, they are no longer addicted... I > > > wonder what the steppers can say about that? I thought steppers > > > said addiction was incurable, and had to be " fought " one day at > a > > > time for the rest of my life? Or is it not possible for an > > addict > > > to be sober, since he will always be addicted? Maybe they are > > all > > > dry drunks!!! They certainly are all a little fucked up (and > > some > > > are very fucked up). > > > > > > > If a stepper were to ask me how I stay sober, I'd say, " Not > get > > > drunk. " Well, how do I > > > > refrain from getting drunk if I'm not in the program? Well, > > just > > > don't open the bottle > > > > and drink, that's how. If that makes me " dry drunk " , okay. > > > Fine. So I'm dry drunk by > > > > stepper definition.... > > > > > > Right, and so what! > > > > > > You are a dry-drunk (and probably lots of other derogatory > > things) > > > by XA definition. > > > You are an infidel (and probably lots of other derogatory > > things) > > > by bin Laden definition. > > > You are a heathen (bound for Hell) (and probably lots of other > > > derogatory things) by Christian definition. > > > You are an Anti-Semite (and probably lots of other derogatory > > > things) by Jewish definition. > > > You are a damn Capitalist (and probably lots of other > > derogatory > > > things) by most of the rest of the world's definition. > > > You are probably a stupid southerner (with a stupid hick > accent) > > > (and probably lots of other derogatory things) by a Yankee's > > > definition. > > > You are white trash (and probably lots of other derogatory > > things) > > > by yuppie definition. > > > You are a lesser being (and probably lots of other derogatory > > > things) by Harvard definition. > > > You are an elephant (and probably a mean bitch) (and probably > > lots > > > of other derogatory things) by the anorexic's definition. > > > You are a criminal (and also a sheisty tax payer, and another > > > idiot voter)(and probably lots and lots and lots of other > > derogatory > > > things) by the government's definition. > > > You are a stupid Democrat (baby killer!) (and probably lots of > > > other derogatory things) by Republican definition. > > > You are merely fodder by a general's definition. > > > You are a fearful (rightly so) and lazy civilian by a > soldier's > > > definition. > > > You are a bad student by your teacher's definition. > > > You are an animal by nature's definition. > > > You are an (put their word(s) here) by your parent's > definition. > > > You were a stepper by anti-XA definition. > > > > > > Who gives a rat's ass about other people's judgments of you. > > You > > > are going to let it bother you or effect you in any way because > > > ignorant people who don't know who or what you are need a label > > to > > > put on you? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2001 Report Share Posted September 25, 2001 > While we are on this topic. I just got out of the shower, and I > haven't used any expensive illegal drugs in quite some time ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ Dunno about AA, but I would perhaps wonder if you were being a tad ingenuous - or is that ingenious? I'm sure I could have driven a coach and horses (loaded with six packs?) through that statement - subject to the availability of funds of course... OT: Dintya just hate those oldtimers using phrases like " quite some time " or " a little while " to refer to their " sobriety " and then wait for the murmered AApproval and other psychophantic simperings? When I arrived in AA, I genuinely wanted to know how much people had drunk, what were their experiences, how did they STOP and what did they do instead etc. It was all just so cliche-ridden... Mack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2001 Report Share Posted September 25, 2001 > While we are on this topic. I just got out of the shower, and I > haven't used any expensive illegal drugs in quite some time ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ Dunno about AA, but I would perhaps wonder if you were being a tad ingenuous - or is that ingenious? I'm sure I could have driven a coach and horses (loaded with six packs?) through that statement - subject to the availability of funds of course... OT: Dintya just hate those oldtimers using phrases like " quite some time " or " a little while " to refer to their " sobriety " and then wait for the murmered AApproval and other psychophantic simperings? When I arrived in AA, I genuinely wanted to know how much people had drunk, what were their experiences, how did they STOP and what did they do instead etc. It was all just so cliche-ridden... Mack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2001 Report Share Posted September 25, 2001 >but I haven't been to a meeting in over a year! Surely you jest.< I should've closed my remark with ! jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2001 Report Share Posted September 25, 2001 Don't forget the good old comment, " I've got a few 24 hours under my belt. " > > While we are on this topic. I just got out of the shower, and I > > haven't used any expensive illegal drugs in quite some time > ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ > > Dunno about AA, but I would perhaps wonder if you were being a tad > ingenuous - or is that ingenious? I'm sure I could have driven > a coach and horses (loaded with six packs?) through that statement - > subject to the availability of funds of course... > > OT: Dintya just hate those oldtimers using phrases like " quite some > time " or " a little while " to refer to their " sobriety " and then wait > for the murmered AApproval and other psychophantic simperings? When I > arrived in AA, I genuinely wanted to know how much people had drunk, > what were their experiences, how did they STOP and what did they do > instead etc. It was all just so cliche-ridden... > > Mack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2001 Report Share Posted September 25, 2001 Don't forget the good old comment, " I've got a few 24 hours under my belt. " > > While we are on this topic. I just got out of the shower, and I > > haven't used any expensive illegal drugs in quite some time > ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ > > Dunno about AA, but I would perhaps wonder if you were being a tad > ingenuous - or is that ingenious? I'm sure I could have driven > a coach and horses (loaded with six packs?) through that statement - > subject to the availability of funds of course... > > OT: Dintya just hate those oldtimers using phrases like " quite some > time " or " a little while " to refer to their " sobriety " and then wait > for the murmered AApproval and other psychophantic simperings? When I > arrived in AA, I genuinely wanted to know how much people had drunk, > what were their experiences, how did they STOP and what did they do > instead etc. It was all just so cliche-ridden... > > Mack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.