Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 I was to the point that they were going to do surgery. Thankfully my OBGYN referred me to a woman who did visceral MFR on me. (Mike can probably tell you better then I what that is and how it is done.) Briefly they go in vaginally and released my hip flexors and it relaxed the pelvic organs. Also she released the urethera and it rid me of a constant cycle of being cathetered (sp) which would only retraumatise my pelvic muscles. ----------------------- Visceral MFR (myofascial release) is essentially the same thing as Visceral Manipulation. I won't say " exactly " the same thing because there are different ways of teaching it. You did a good job of explaining how it is done, what is involved, and what it achieves. VMFR is the type of thing that a well trained Osteopath will also do. Yes, it is an " invasive " procedure. But so is surgery and the relative risks with VMFR are far, far lower. Straight VM at the basic levels focuses on working externally. Again, I have not taken the classes myself yet so I do not know at what point, if at all, they do any internal work with it. The only thing I can say here is that Osteopaths would be able to work internally under their licenses. PT's may or may not be able to depending on their individual licensing requirements. And LMP's/LMT's would NEVER be able to legally work internally because it is clearly outside their scope of practice and in violation of ethical standards for massage. That doesn't mean you won't find LMP's/LMT's trained and qualified to do it, it just means their licenses won't allow it. I have training in Cranialsacral Therapy for working inside the mouth but I can't legally (for hire) do that either because it is outside my scope of practice in the state of Washington. Being outside my scope of practice, however, would not stop me for even a heart-beat if I felt it was necessary for any of my family members. My personal interest in VM is three-fold. My wife suffers from stress incontinence and I want to know more about it for her for referral work if necessary. As with Helen's post this morning, I also think there are applications for others on the Board and I need to know more in general if I am going to be able to make meaningful recommendations for people. And third, one of my Jin Shin Do instructors (a PT herself) has been pushing me for months to take it. She has become quite adamant and insistent that I need to add this modality to my toolbox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 I was to the point that they were going to do surgery. Thankfully my OBGYN referred me to a woman who did visceral MFR on me. (Mike can probably tell you better then I what that is and how it is done.) Briefly they go in vaginally and released my hip flexors and it relaxed the pelvic organs. Also she released the urethera and it rid me of a constant cycle of being cathetered (sp) which would only retraumatise my pelvic muscles. ----------------------- Visceral MFR (myofascial release) is essentially the same thing as Visceral Manipulation. I won't say " exactly " the same thing because there are different ways of teaching it. You did a good job of explaining how it is done, what is involved, and what it achieves. VMFR is the type of thing that a well trained Osteopath will also do. Yes, it is an " invasive " procedure. But so is surgery and the relative risks with VMFR are far, far lower. Straight VM at the basic levels focuses on working externally. Again, I have not taken the classes myself yet so I do not know at what point, if at all, they do any internal work with it. The only thing I can say here is that Osteopaths would be able to work internally under their licenses. PT's may or may not be able to depending on their individual licensing requirements. And LMP's/LMT's would NEVER be able to legally work internally because it is clearly outside their scope of practice and in violation of ethical standards for massage. That doesn't mean you won't find LMP's/LMT's trained and qualified to do it, it just means their licenses won't allow it. I have training in Cranialsacral Therapy for working inside the mouth but I can't legally (for hire) do that either because it is outside my scope of practice in the state of Washington. Being outside my scope of practice, however, would not stop me for even a heart-beat if I felt it was necessary for any of my family members. My personal interest in VM is three-fold. My wife suffers from stress incontinence and I want to know more about it for her for referral work if necessary. As with Helen's post this morning, I also think there are applications for others on the Board and I need to know more in general if I am going to be able to make meaningful recommendations for people. And third, one of my Jin Shin Do instructors (a PT herself) has been pushing me for months to take it. She has become quite adamant and insistent that I need to add this modality to my toolbox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 I was to the point that they were going to do surgery. Thankfully my OBGYN referred me to a woman who did visceral MFR on me. (Mike can probably tell you better then I what that is and how it is done.) Briefly they go in vaginally and released my hip flexors and it relaxed the pelvic organs. Also she released the urethera and it rid me of a constant cycle of being cathetered (sp) which would only retraumatise my pelvic muscles. ----------------------- Visceral MFR (myofascial release) is essentially the same thing as Visceral Manipulation. I won't say " exactly " the same thing because there are different ways of teaching it. You did a good job of explaining how it is done, what is involved, and what it achieves. VMFR is the type of thing that a well trained Osteopath will also do. Yes, it is an " invasive " procedure. But so is surgery and the relative risks with VMFR are far, far lower. Straight VM at the basic levels focuses on working externally. Again, I have not taken the classes myself yet so I do not know at what point, if at all, they do any internal work with it. The only thing I can say here is that Osteopaths would be able to work internally under their licenses. PT's may or may not be able to depending on their individual licensing requirements. And LMP's/LMT's would NEVER be able to legally work internally because it is clearly outside their scope of practice and in violation of ethical standards for massage. That doesn't mean you won't find LMP's/LMT's trained and qualified to do it, it just means their licenses won't allow it. I have training in Cranialsacral Therapy for working inside the mouth but I can't legally (for hire) do that either because it is outside my scope of practice in the state of Washington. Being outside my scope of practice, however, would not stop me for even a heart-beat if I felt it was necessary for any of my family members. My personal interest in VM is three-fold. My wife suffers from stress incontinence and I want to know more about it for her for referral work if necessary. As with Helen's post this morning, I also think there are applications for others on the Board and I need to know more in general if I am going to be able to make meaningful recommendations for people. And third, one of my Jin Shin Do instructors (a PT herself) has been pushing me for months to take it. She has become quite adamant and insistent that I need to add this modality to my toolbox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.