Guest guest Posted October 10, 2001 Report Share Posted October 10, 2001 > > > > > The Libertarian Party and its fans have a habit of > contradicting > > > themselves and their purported ideals. The support of Prop. 36 > > > (government-forced " treatment " ) is one example. Another is the > support > > > of laws which limit women's reproductive freedoms. LP speaks > with a > > > forked tongue, I'm afraid. > > > > > > I've never heard of any Libertarian party supporting a law which > > limits anyone's reproductive freedom. What are you referring to? > > > > > > > > --------------------- > > I've seen several Libertarian articles on Roe v. Wade in which > they slam the decision, and declare that in keeping with Libertarian > principles, there should be no laws which infringe on " the right of > an unborn person to reside in its mother's uterus " or which allow > women to " kill persons who happen to be pre-born " . Accordingly, they > oppose all measures which have been passed to ensure women's right to > access to abortion services (including access to the RU486 medication > which expels a blastocyst days after fertilization), and support > those measures which limit such access. > > I'll post a link to such articles, if you'd like. I'd like to read those articles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2001 Report Share Posted October 10, 2001 > > > > > The Libertarian Party and its fans have a habit of > contradicting > > > themselves and their purported ideals. The support of Prop. 36 > > > (government-forced " treatment " ) is one example. Another is the > support > > > of laws which limit women's reproductive freedoms. LP speaks > with a > > > forked tongue, I'm afraid. > > > > > > I've never heard of any Libertarian party supporting a law which > > limits anyone's reproductive freedom. What are you referring to? > > > > > > > > --------------------- > > I've seen several Libertarian articles on Roe v. Wade in which > they slam the decision, and declare that in keeping with Libertarian > principles, there should be no laws which infringe on " the right of > an unborn person to reside in its mother's uterus " or which allow > women to " kill persons who happen to be pre-born " . Accordingly, they > oppose all measures which have been passed to ensure women's right to > access to abortion services (including access to the RU486 medication > which expels a blastocyst days after fertilization), and support > those measures which limit such access. > > I'll post a link to such articles, if you'd like. I'd like to read those articles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2001 Report Share Posted October 10, 2001 In a nutshell. The Libertarian Party needs more education of the dangers of AA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2001 Report Share Posted October 10, 2001 In a nutshell. The Libertarian Party needs more education of the dangers of AA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.