Re: Re: eating and numbers - Sandy

[Guest guest]

--- Sandy wrote:

> See this is where I get confused (and accused of being

> too strict) - I hear people saying that every single

> reading over 140 is doing damage. So I think geez, if

> 3 or 4 times a week, I get a reading over 140, then I'm

> doing continuous (sort of) damage and I worry which is

> why I feel I have to check after all meals (running to

> the meter) But then I hear others say if they get a

> higher reading - as long as it doesn't last long . . .

>

My opinion. We are not machines. It is more then food

that effects our readings. So I'm one that don't worry

about occasional highs from a meal. On the other hand,

I do try to figure out the cause for any morning fasting

number out that's unusual -- be it high or low.

Drew

T2 since '91