Re: Snip, snip, snip! - Autumn?

[Guest guest]

Autumn,

Unfortunately I go to the website to read and respond to email for

this group.

I am not completely sure what you are asking. Are you asking us to

delete the body of the post we are responding to?

Dianne

>

> Hi All,

>

> I have a tiny favor to ask everyone, especially those who receive

their

> posts in digest form. Could you please snip your replies so as not

to

> include the entire digest? When I pulled up yesterday's digests,

they

> *each* were over 50 pages long. I simply do not have the time to

read

> through all of that. And when you reply to an individual post,

could you

> please snip your reply so you are not including excessively long

posts or

> 2 or 3 posts together.

>

> It is becoming increasingly difficult for me to read everything,

and my

> small inbox doesn't hold as much as I'd like. I had an awfully

hard time

> with bouncing before and nearly had to leave the group entirely. I

am

> now receiving the list in digest form (as reading/replying online

is not

> an option for me), and this is my last hope.

Pullllleeeeeeassssseeeeee

> *begging*

>

> Thanks so much!

> Hugs,

> Autumn

>

> ________________________________________________________________

> The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!

> Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!

> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

[Guest guest]

Hey Autumn, or anyone else that gets their mails in the digest format - why

don't you just send one back to the group. Let everyone see what a mess it

is when people don't clean up their messages. If everyone tries to read it,

they'll see pretty quickly what you mean.

Why don't you label it - EVERYONE TRY TO READ THIS PLEASE!!! Then at the

top of the L O N G message, write a short note as to why you sent it out and

ask everyone to actually try to read it and they'll see where they've gone

wrong pretty quickly. (hopefully) Because people that don't do the digest,

really don't understand what the big deal is.

Sherlyn

http://community.webshots.com/user/spudberry

[Guest guest]

Dianne,

I know this is late but just thought I'd reply anyway. When you get a

post in e-mail or digest or even on the web site, if you go all the way

to the bottom you will see all this stuff, like a signature, stuff

about the site, Yahoo, ect... plus the previous post. Sometimes a reply

is a reply to a reply and so on. That is when they get really long so

what helps is if you delete the older stuff and just keep some of the

post you are replying to.

> Autumn,

>

> Unfortunately I go to the website to read and respond to email for

> this group. 

>

> I am not completely sure what you are asking.  Are you asking us to

> delete the body of the post we are responding to?

>

> Dianne

>

>

> > Hi All,

> >

> > I have a tiny favor to ask everyone, especially those who receive

> their

> > posts in digest form.  Could you please snip your replies so as not

> to

> > include the entire digest?  When I pulled up yesterday's digests,

> they

> > *each* were over 50 pages long. 

[Guest guest]

Dianne,

I know this is late but just thought I'd reply anyway. When you get a

post in e-mail or digest or even on the web site, if you go all the way

to the bottom you will see all this stuff, like a signature, stuff

about the site, Yahoo, ect... plus the previous post. Sometimes a reply

is a reply to a reply and so on. That is when they get really long so

what helps is if you delete the older stuff and just keep some of the

post you are replying to.

> Autumn,

>

> Unfortunately I go to the website to read and respond to email for

> this group. 

>

> I am not completely sure what you are asking.  Are you asking us to

> delete the body of the post we are responding to?

>

> Dianne

>

>

> > Hi All,

> >

> > I have a tiny favor to ask everyone, especially those who receive

> their

> > posts in digest form.  Could you please snip your replies so as not

> to

> > include the entire digest?  When I pulled up yesterday's digests,

> they

> > *each* were over 50 pages long.