Guest guest Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 ,We are also with BCBS/FEP, and we are just beginning the process. We are on week 5 of the docband, and I just sent in my claim form to BCBS (for some reason Cranial Tech listed BCBS/IL on the form, and they say that it will go through there, at least initially). We paid CT upfront, with 10% discount, so $2700, and I would love to get any reimbursement possible. Keep me posted if you have any success, and I'll let you know what happens with us.-Crisemily_timberline <emily_timberline@...> wrote: I am having issues with our insurance paying for the helmet. I called after seeing our physician back in March and the Customer Service told me that the helmet just started being covered January 2006. So I called our Orthotist and told them. The office manager then called our insurance to double check and they told her that it was not covered unless they had the fused skull. We knew that we couldn't put a price on our son's head and health, so we got the helmet. The day of the fitting the office manager at the orthotic clinic called them again. This time asked specifically if this diagnosis code was covered and she said yes, that it just started being covered in Janauary. We got the helmet the end of April and he is a week from getting it off now and I just got a bill saying that they aren't paying. The orthotic office sent a letter with her documentation and the insurance sent one back saying that an oral statement can't modify or otherwise affect the benefits, limitations, and exclusions of the policy. So, My question is, what is my next step. I am with Blue Cross Blue Shield federal employee plan. Can anyone help me? Thanks Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2006 Report Share Posted July 10, 2006 We also have BCBS federal insurance health plan in CA and my son has been wearing the DOC band for 6 weeks and we are still waiting for BCBS to pay. We have called BCBS in May to find out if the band is covered and the answer was " yes " . So far I have only received a letter from BCBS telling us that they have requested further information from Cranial Therapies INC to process the claim. I have a feeling they might deny our claim too from reading your post, so please keep us updated the status of your claim. I would like to find out what to do next if they deny our claim. Regards Bonnie > > I am having issues with our insurance paying for the helmet. I > called after seeing our physician back in March and the Customer > Service told me that the helmet just started being covered January > 2006. So I called our Orthotist and told them. The office manager > then called our insurance to double check and they told her that it > was not covered unless they had the fused skull. We knew that we > couldn't put a price on our son's head and health, so we got the > helmet. The day of the fitting the office manager at the orthotic > clinic called them again. This time asked specifically if this > diagnosis code was covered and she said yes, that it just started > being covered in Janauary. We got the helmet the end of April and he > is a week from getting it off now and I just got a bill saying that > they aren't paying. The orthotic office sent a letter with her > documentation and the insurance sent one back saying that an oral > statement can't modify or otherwise affect the benefits, > limitations, and exclusions of the policy. > > So, My question is, what is my next step. I am with Blue Cross Blue > Shield federal employee plan. Can anyone help me? > > Thanks > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 After I saw a neuro pediatrician my insurance company started paying. I have United HealthCare HMO. They never sent a letter stating they would pay they just are. The neurologist gave us physician's orders staing my son had a neurological problem and he requires speech therapy. Best wishes. They still sometimes refuse to pay for some sessions and my therapist's office has to resubmit many claims for me... > > My insurance is denying my child speech threrapy under the diagnosis of > verbal apraxia. She must have a congenital anomaly to qualify for > benefits. Is anyone familiar with this struggle, and if so, can you > offer any advice? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 Very familiar and not happy..the only thing that has saved us is that my husband is retired military and we get some assistance with TRICare..I talked to many specialists at United Health Care even had a very sympathetic associate whose son was tourettes she gave me 3 additional codes but they also where not justified or covered by insurance when I refiled for an appeal...It is so frustrating!!!! I think it should be covered as it is a neurological based problem not a developmental one.... _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of jaemegcola Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 3:31 PM Subject: [ ] insurance appeal My insurance is denying my child speech threrapy under the diagnosis of verbal apraxia. She must have a congenital anomaly to qualify for benefits. Is anyone familiar with this struggle, and if so, can you offer any advice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2006 Report Share Posted September 7, 2006 I have United Health and they told me the same crap!!!!!!! Lucas was recently diagnosed with hearing loss so they will now start paying for speech therapy. We start on Monday. jaemegcola <jaemegcola@...> wrote: My insurance is denying my child speech threrapy under the diagnosis of verbal apraxia. She must have a congenital anomaly to qualify for benefits. Is anyone familiar with this struggle, and if so, can you offer any advice? --------------------------------- Get your email and more, right on the new .com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2006 Report Share Posted September 7, 2006 I was denied initially as well. They requested a letter of medical necessity from my nuero-developmental pediatrician and it was approved a week later... " jaemegcola " <jaemegcola@...> Sent by: cc: @yaho Subject: [ ] insurance appeal ogroups.com 09/06/2006 03:31 PM Please respond to My insurance is denying my child speech threrapy under the diagnosis of verbal apraxia. She must have a congenital anomaly to qualify for benefits. Is anyone familiar with this struggle, and if so, can you offer any advice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2006 Report Share Posted September 7, 2006 My child was born with birth defects on his hands and hypospadia (opening where urine exits in the wrong spot). (An ultrasound showed he has hydronephrosis; enlarged kidney.) We took him to the Shriner's in Tampa and they felt he had Streeter's Syndrome (amniotic band syndrome). From there we went to UCLA and the hand surgeon/director Dr. Neil Ford felt my son had Poland's Sequence. When he was 30 mos we took him to a SLP-CCC because he still wasn't talking. We saw a neurologist and a geneticist and then United started paying. After we saw our second SLP-CCC and the neurologist and geneticist was when we had United (before that we had Aetna HMO). I am just trying to show that maybe United is paying because my child has birth defects your doesn't have and that's why they are paying. I don't know yet if they are going to pay for OT... Best wishes, Debra > My insurance is denying my child speech threrapy under the diagnosis of > verbal apraxia. She must have a congenital anomaly to qualify for > benefits. Is anyone familiar with this struggle, and if so, can you > offer any advice? > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Get your email and more, right on the new .com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 Try googling " class action lawsuit humana " I'm battling united right now. Sounds like they could use a class action lawsuit too, considering how many are having problems. It's been lots of fun fighting health insurance and home owners RE: Katrina damage. These insurance " people " surely will get their own ring in hell, if you ask me. > > I'm having the biggest battle with Humana to pay for my son's > therapy. They refuse, stating that his problem is an " educational > delay that will resolve itself. " But none of the doctors or > therapists or specialists to which I've sent my son seem to think > that this is an " educational delay, " or that it will " resolve > itself " . > > Humana just doesn't want to pay. > > My son has had oral-motor dysfunction since birth, as evidenced by > the milk coming out of his nose from breastfeeding and the gagging on > soft foods, that continues to this day. He was also diagnosed with > reflux at 4 months. But most striking is the fact that he was saying > words before he became ill at 11 months, and then stopped. A year > after he got out of the hospital, he started speaking again, but > incomprehensibly. Even words that he was saying before he became ill > were markedly different. If you didn't know him, you wouldn't have > known what he was saying. > > I have to exhaust all of my appeals before I can file a lawsuit. Does > anyone know of a class action lawsuit going on against Humana? How > would I find out if one has been filed? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 Look at the procedure codes your professionals are using. We had Blue Cross and have a 20 session limit per year. My son has appraxia, aphasia (codes are 784.3,784.69 & 784.5) Let your PT & OT know your codes for speech/language and not to use any developmental/educational codes. (just medical necessity). Insurance battles are fought and won every day but you have to be persistent. What does their policy state as far speech therapy? Can you tell me the reason for denial? Ask for the master policy -they will tell you there is none. They don't like to give it out -but you need a copy for your appeal. Physicians are busy - if you need a 'good' letter quoting research then write it yourself and ask the medical provider if they would be willing to sign on their letterhead. Here is an archived letter from Sandy in Illinois: SAMPLE LETTER: [DATE] VIA CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED [iNSURANCE CO INFO] To Whom It May Concern: My son, __________, has been diagnosed with apraxia by his pediatrician, his pediatric neurologist, and his speech and language pathologist. (See enclosed information). To remediate this condition, has been receiving speech and language therapy as well as occupational therapy (the apraxia affects his oral motor musculature as well as his fine and gross motor functions). His progress has been excellent, and all concerned believe continued therapy is crucial to overcome this condition. [HERE I DISCUSSED ENCLOSURES: LETTERS FROM PEDIATRICIAN, SLP, OT] Since apraxia is a relatively uncommon condition, let me explain briefly what it is. Apraxia " 'is a neurological disorder that affects the planning and production of speech. " (, Jakielski, & Marquardt, 1998)'.[it] is a loss in ability to voluntarily position the articulators (e.g., lips, jaw, tongue) on a consistent basis when speaking. This disorder interferes with the child' s sequencing of sounds into words. In other words, the child has the ability to produce the sounds, but when he/she tries to purposefully plan speech, the articulators do not always function together properly. " S. Whitebreak, C. Dvorak, and K. Jakielsi, " Treatment Effect on Speech Intelligibility in Developmental Apraxia of Speech, " Presentation at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1999. " '.This disability has a neurological basis of unknown origin. It may reflect neuro-anatomical/physiological differences that are inherited (see Hurst, Baraitser, auger, Gramah, and Norell, 1990; Shriberg, 1993) or damage that occurs pre- or postnatally during the period of speech development (Crary, 1984; Marquardt and Sussman, 1991). " It is similar to the condition stroke victims suffer from when they lose the ability to speak after a stroke. In fact, many children initially have speech ability but then lose it (as is the case with , who had a larger vocabulary at 18 months of age than when diagnosed at 25 months of age). As to medical necessity of treatment of apraxia, the American Speech Hearing Association (ASHA) defines verbal apraxia as " a medical condition consistent with the definition of illness and disease.'a disorder of body function.' " (Keystater, the official publication of the Pennsylvania Speech Hearing Language Ass'n, Sept.. 1992; Source: ASHA, Rockville, MD). Apraxia is not a developmental disorder or delay. If left untreated, my son will not develop meaningful speech or coordinated fine and gross motor abilities. Lack of meaningful speech and fine and gross motor abilities would result directly in a deterioration of my son's health and safety, in that he will not be able to communicate medical needs and will be unable to function and do daily life skills. With treatment, however, the prognosis is good. In fact, _____'s progress has been excellent. Speech and occupational therapy are the recommended treatments for apraxia (see enclosed letters). They are the least expensive, least invasive, and most successful forms of treatment, are accepted by the medical community, and are not implemented for the convenience of the child or therapist. See also a Square, " Introduction, " Clinics in Communication Disorders, 4(2) ( " apraxia is a motor speech disorder in the ability to regulate and control oral movement sequences. Apraxia is a separate speech disorder that requires a motor treatment, apraxia is remediable if the clinician knows that this must be the focus of treatment " ); Penelope Hall, Jordan and Robin, " Theory and Clinical Practices " ( " Intensive services are needed for children with apraxia " ); Edythe Strand, " Childhood Motor Speech Disorder Treatment, " ( " The earlier and more intensive the intervention, the more successful the therapy.Children with apraxia really need the intensive individual therapy " ). In fact, the research indicates and experience dictates that apraxic children need intensive consistent therapy. The leading researchers in the field have indicated that this is the best therapeutic route to take. Such researchers include Edythe Strand, PhD., Mayo Clinic; a Square, Ph.D., University of Toronto; and Robin, Ph.D., University of Iowa. The research indicates that the key to success is intensive therapy continually throughout the year. In short, since apraxia is a medical condition and not a developmental delay or disorder, and since speech and occupational therapy are medically necessary, I submit that the enclosed expenses should be a covered benefit under the plan. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, contact me privately at mulholland34@... if you have any questions All the best, Joanne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 --I also have United Healthcare and I am now searching for a pediatric Neurologist. What has your child been diagnosed with and would you happen to know the insurance codes your therapist is using? Also, is there a way around the 20 sessions per year thing - In , " debjward " <debjward@...> wrote: > > After I saw a neuro pediatrician my insurance company started paying. > I have United HealthCare HMO. They never sent a letter stating they > would pay they just are. The neurologist gave us physician's orders > staing my son had a neurological problem and he requires speech > therapy. > > Best wishes. They still sometimes refuse to pay for some sessions and > my therapist's office has to resubmit many claims for me... > > > > > > My insurance is denying my child speech threrapy under the diagnosis > of > > verbal apraxia. She must have a congenital anomaly to qualify for > > benefits. Is anyone familiar with this struggle, and if so, can you > > offer any advice? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 My son's therapist uses " Dysarthria " 784.5. The neurologist used 783.4 which is " neurodevelopmental dysfunction " and 784.69 " apraxia of speech " . I don't know how to get around the 20 visits per year other than I just kept going after I noticed they started paying. No one has told me they will pay and no one has sent a letter stating they will pay. My DH says they won't acknowledge it in writing so they can stop paying at any time and not have to honor the acknowledgment! > > --I also have United Healthcare and I am now searching for a > pediatric Neurologist. What has your child been diagnosed with and > would you happen to know the insurance codes your therapist is using? > Also, is there a way around the 20 sessions per year thing > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 Henry, You mentioned that you get medicaid. Is there a salary limit on Medicaid or is attainable for people with disabilites? thanks, -- In , stehn4@... wrote: > > hi- charlotte henry here- we use lack of coordination for ot and bc- bs > covers it- thee is a 1000 dollar limit on speech so we get medicaid to pick up > the rest- > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 I am using a letter from the prescribing doctor, as well as an evaluation from the pt stating cranial banding is neccessary. HTH. Candace, AZ mommy to Tiernan, 4.5 mos tort, plagio Holcombe <stacy_holcombe@...> wrote: Did anyone have a letter of medical necessity submitted by their orthotist? Or is this something the pediatrician, neurologist, or PT does? Symborski Media Specialist stacy_holcombe A library is a hospital for the mind. Anonymous Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. All-new - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2006 Report Share Posted November 13, 2006 Hi CrisI have good news. They paid for our helmet. I think after they reimbursed us we ended up paying 150.00 or something, which I was very happy about. I hope you have had good luck as well. Albrecht Re: Insurance Appeal ,We are also with BCBS/FEP, and we are just beginning the process. We are on week 5 of the docband, and I just sent in my claim form to BCBS (for some reason Cranial Tech listed BCBS/IL on the form, and they say that it will go through there, at least initially). We paid CT upfront, with 10% discount, so $2700, and I would love to get any reimbursement possible. Keep me posted if you have any success, and I'll let you know what happens with us.-Crisemily_timberline <emily_timberline@...> wrote: I am having issues with our insurance paying for the helmet. I called after seeing our physician back in March and the Customer Service told me that the helmet just started being covered January 2006. So I called our Orthotist and told them. The office manager then called our insurance to double check and they told her that it was not covered unless they had the fused skull. We knew that we couldn't put a price on our son's head and health, so we got the helmet. The day of the fitting the office manager at the orthotic clinic called them again. This time asked specifically if this diagnosis code was covered and she said yes, that it just started being covered in Janauary. We got the helmet the end of April and he is a week from getting it off now and I just got a bill saying that they aren't paying. The orthotic office sent a letter with her documentation and the insurance sent one back saying that an oral statement can't modify or otherwise affect the benefits, limitations, and exclusions of the policy. So, My question is, what is my next step. I am with Blue Cross Blue Shield federal employee plan. Can anyone help me? Thanks Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2006 Report Share Posted December 19, 2006 Hello everyone, I just thought that I would update you guys on my insurance appeal. Basically, I'm at square one...Their decision was that they need an " official " prognosis(I thought that's what I gave) and how long at what cost will he need therapy. Well, if they would have paid for his eval, they should know all this...I'm livid. Today, I contacted an attorney. We'll see what happens. All I know is if they think that if they push me hard enough that I will give up, they've got another thing coming. The angier I get, the more I will fight!!! I am NOT giving in!!! Anyway, Thursday, we see a pediatric neurologist that comes highly recommended. I hope all goes well. I'll let you know! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2006 Report Share Posted December 19, 2006 The following is from SpeechvilleExpress insurance section: Diagnosis Destinations Apraxia Appealing Insurance Denials Apraxia is " Developmental " . " Developmental delays " are not Covered. Reason for Denial: " Apraxia is developmental. Developmental delays are not covered. " One of the most important things to do when applying for insurance coverage of apraxia-related therapy is to ensure that the evaluator (that is, the speech-language pathologist) does not use the word " developmental " in his or her report, as in " Developmental Apraxia of Speech " or " Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia. " While these terms are common in apraxia and speech therapy literature, for many families these phrases have been the sole cause of denials of insurance coverage. Insurance companies' claims evaluators see the word " developmental " and think, " developmental delay. " Most insurance companies and HMOs do not see it as their responsibility to pay for speech therapy if speech is developmentally delayed, which they interpret to mean " will improve with time, with or without treatment " . The person who is denying claims often does not know that " Developmental Apraxia " is not the same as " developmental delay, " nor may he or she know that " Developmental Apraxia " is used primarily to distinguish the condition from " Acquired Apraxia " (the loss of speech caused by a known incident of stroke or other brain trauma). The therapist should use a term such as " apraxia of speech, " " oral motor planning disorder, " or " speech motor disorder. " The insurance company might also be confusing apraxia of speech with a " developmental disability " . The United States government's definition of " developmental disability " requires that the disability be a mental and/or physical impairment, manifest before the individual is 22 years old, will likely continue indefinitely, results in substantial functional limitations in 3 or more major life activities, and will necessitate special services and supports of either lifelong or extended duration. Apraxia is not a " developmental disability, " though apraxia can co-occur, in some children, with a developmental disability. Regardless of whether or not a child is developmentally disabled, in addition to having apraxia of speech, the insurance company should not deny the claim on the basis of the developmental disability, if oral motor speech disorders would otherwise be covered. Therapists and doctors use diagnostic codes for insurance purposes. Again, the provider should not code a diagnosis for a child with Apraxia of Speech as " developmental delay " (code 315.9) or " developmental speech or language " (code 315.31). Codes to use are: a neurological code (codes 340 - 349) or coordination disorder (code 315.4). It is worth your while to ask the therapist or doctor (depending on if you need your physician's referral) what diagnostic code they will use in the report or referral. If you have already received a denial of insurance because of the " developmental " confusion, you will need to provide documentation to your insurance company or HMO demonstrating that apraxia of speech is not a developmental delay of speech. Apraxia of speech is disordered speech, speech that is not following a typical developmental path, whereas a child with developmentally delayed speech has typical speech patterns, albeit those of a younger child. Sometimes describing apraxia of speech as a neurological disorder or condition seems to help. Therefore here is a quote about the nature of apraxia from a well-known speech-language pathologist who specializes in apraxia of speech in children, Hodge, " ...This disability has a neurological basis of unknown origin. It may reflect neuro-anatomical/physiological differences that are inherited (see Hurst, Baraitser, Auger, Graham, and Norell, 1990; Shriberg, 1993) or damage that occurs pre- or postnatally during the period of speech development (Crary, 1984; Marquardt and Sussman, 1991)... " chadmissy@... wrote: Hello everyone, I just thought that I would update you guys on my insurance appeal. Basically, I'm at square one...Their decision was that they need an " official " prognosis(I thought that's what I gave) and how long at what cost will he need therapy. Well, if they would have paid for his eval, they should know all this...I'm livid. Today, I contacted an attorney. We'll see what happens. All I know is if they think that if they push me hard enough that I will give up, they've got another thing coming. The angier I get, the more I will fight!!! I am NOT giving in!!! Anyway, Thursday, we see a pediatric neurologist that comes highly recommended. I hope all goes well. I'll let you know! __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2006 Report Share Posted December 19, 2006 Thank you for this information! I will be using it in my complaint to the Dept. of Insurance since my appeal was denied. Mandy Knapp Creative Memories Unit Leader (847) 245-4133 (224) 577-8304 Available Nov. 1st download your free StoryBook software at www.mycmsite.com/mandyknapp Action Code 27169225 your life | your story | your way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2006 Report Share Posted December 19, 2006 The following is from SpeechvilleExpress insurance section: Diagnosis Destinations Apraxia Appealing Insurance Denials Apraxia is " Developmental " . " Developmental delays " are not Covered. Reason for Denial: " Apraxia is developmental. Developmental delays are not covered. " One of the most important things to do when applying for insurance coverage of apraxia-related therapy is to ensure that the evaluator (that is, the speech-language pathologist) does not use the word " developmental " in his or her report, as in " Developmental Apraxia of Speech " or " Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia. " While these terms are common in apraxia and speech therapy literature, for many families these phrases have been the sole cause of denials of insurance coverage. Insurance companies' claims evaluators see the word " developmental " and think, " developmental delay. " Most insurance companies and HMOs do not see it as their responsibility to pay for speech therapy if speech is developmentally delayed, which they interpret to mean " will improve with time, with or without treatment " . The person who is denying claims often does not know that " Developmental Apraxia " is not the same as " developmental delay, " nor may he or she know that " Developmental Apraxia " is used primarily to distinguish the condition from " Acquired Apraxia " (the loss of speech caused by a known incident of stroke or other brain trauma). The therapist should use a term such as " apraxia of speech, " " oral motor planning disorder, " or " speech motor disorder. " The insurance company might also be confusing apraxia of speech with a " developmental disability " . The United States government's definition of " developmental disability " requires that the disability be a mental and/or physical impairment, manifest before the individual is 22 years old, will likely continue indefinitely, results in substantial functional limitations in 3 or more major life activities, and will necessitate special services and supports of either lifelong or extended duration. Apraxia is not a " developmental disability, " though apraxia can co-occur, in some children, with a developmental disability. Regardless of whether or not a child is developmentally disabled, in addition to having apraxia of speech, the insurance company should not deny the claim on the basis of the developmental disability, if oral motor speech disorders would otherwise be covered. Therapists and doctors use diagnostic codes for insurance purposes. Again, the provider should not code a diagnosis for a child with Apraxia of Speech as " developmental delay " (code 315.9) or " developmental speech or language " (code 315.31). Codes to use are: a neurological code (codes 340 - 349) or coordination disorder (code 315.4). It is worth your while to ask the therapist or doctor (depending on if you need your physician's referral) what diagnostic code they will use in the report or referral. If you have already received a denial of insurance because of the " developmental " confusion, you will need to provide documentation to your insurance company or HMO demonstrating that apraxia of speech is not a developmental delay of speech. Apraxia of speech is disordered speech, speech that is not following a typical developmental path, whereas a child with developmentally delayed speech has typical speech patterns, albeit those of a younger child. Sometimes describing apraxia of speech as a neurological disorder or condition seems to help. Therefore here is a quote about the nature of apraxia from a well-known speech-language pathologist who specializes in apraxia of speech in children, Hodge, " ...This disability has a neurological basis of unknown origin. It may reflect neuro-anatomical/physiological differences that are inherited (see Hurst, Baraitser, Auger, Graham, and Norell, 1990; Shriberg, 1993) or damage that occurs pre- or postnatally during the period of speech development (Crary, 1984; Marquardt and Sussman, 1991)... " chadmissy@... wrote: Hello everyone, I just thought that I would update you guys on my insurance appeal. Basically, I'm at square one...Their decision was that they need an " official " prognosis(I thought that's what I gave) and how long at what cost will he need therapy. Well, if they would have paid for his eval, they should know all this...I'm livid. Today, I contacted an attorney. We'll see what happens. All I know is if they think that if they push me hard enough that I will give up, they've got another thing coming. The angier I get, the more I will fight!!! I am NOT giving in!!! Anyway, Thursday, we see a pediatric neurologist that comes highly recommended. I hope all goes well. I'll let you know! __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2006 Report Share Posted December 19, 2006 Thank you for this information! I will be using it in my complaint to the Dept. of Insurance since my appeal was denied. Mandy Knapp Creative Memories Unit Leader (847) 245-4133 (224) 577-8304 Available Nov. 1st download your free StoryBook software at www.mycmsite.com/mandyknapp Action Code 27169225 your life | your story | your way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.