Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 I have my 3 and 1/2 year old son on Omega -3 pills.I give him 2 pills in the morning and 2 pills at night. Does it matter tha it's not Pro-Efa? Just as long as he get the right amount of DHA and EPA. Or does it have to be Pro-Efa? Haydee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Nick, in the case I was reffering to they said that the man excluded ALL plant-based oils and was taking only fish and algae oild for omega-3. That was my question - why was the flax oil excluded, why they said that plan-oils are tumor-promoting. I would understand tumor promotion of safflower oil as it's high in omega-6, but he was not taking flax as well. > What made you worry that flax oil would be considered tumor promoting? > > In all the studies I recall reading it was the opposite - tumor growth > inhibiting (as is the case for omega-3 fats in general). > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Is lard good for cooking? > It is the " normal " vegetable cooking oils which replaced coconut oil and > lard which cause so many health problems. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 It is possible that flaxseed oil was included because it is a phytoestrogen. Some oncologists fail to understand that not all phytoestrogens are created equally. So, they just lump everything into one category. ar > > Nick, in the case I was reffering to they said that the man excluded ALL plant-based oils and was taking only fish and algae oild for omega-3. That was my question - why was the flax oil excluded, why they said that plan-oils are tumor-promoting. I would understand tumor promotion of safflower oil as it's high in omega-6, but he was not taking flax as well. > > > What made you worry that flax oil would be considered tumor promoting? > > > > In all the studies I recall reading it was the opposite - tumor growth > > inhibiting (as is the case for omega-3 fats in general). > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 No, lard is not good for cooking. > > Is lard good for cooking? > > It is the " normal " vegetable cooking oils which replaced coconut oil and > > lard which cause so many health problems. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 > Can someone please explain me if flax oil would be considered tumor-promoting? It's a bit confusing because flax oil is also high in omega-3. You might want to think about using Flaxseed as well as Flaxseed Oil. In this study: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15849746 They write: Previous studies have shown that the n-3 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), as well as its metabolites, eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and secoisolariciresinol diglycoside (SDG), the precursor to the mammalian lignans, enterolactone (EL) and enterodiol (ED), can inhibit the various stages of mammary carcinogenesis. Flaxseed (FS) contains the highest level of SDG, with values 75–800 times those in other plant foods, and is also the richest source of ALA, suggesting that it may be protective against mammary cancer. Dietary supplementation of 5 or 10% FS indeed has been shown to inhibit the initiation and early and late promotion stages of mammary carcinogenesis in carcinogen-treated rats. They conclude: The anti-metastatic effect induced by Flaxseed may be attributed to both the lignan and oil components. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Unfortunately, this study only talks about ER negative breast cancers. The fear is still that the phytoestrogen properties of flaxseeds will cause ER positive tumors to grow. My personal opinion is that it won't, but my personal opinion doesn't account for much. ar > > You might want to think about using Flaxseed as well as Flaxseed Oil. > > In this study: > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15849746 > > They write: > > Previous studies have shown that the n-3 fatty acid, alpha-linolenic > acid (ALA), as well as its metabolites, eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and > docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and secoisolariciresinol diglycoside (SDG), > the precursor to the mammalian lignans, enterolactone (EL) and > enterodiol (ED), can inhibit the various stages of mammary > carcinogenesis. Flaxseed (FS) contains the highest level of SDG, with > values 75–800 times those in other plant > foods, and is also the richest source of ALA, suggesting that it may be > protective against mammary cancer. > Dietary supplementation of 5 or 10% FS indeed has been shown to inhibit > the initiation and early and late promotion stages of mammary > carcinogenesis in carcinogen-treated rats. > > They conclude: > > The anti-metastatic effect induced by Flaxseed may be attributed to both > the lignan and oil components. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 > > Is lard good for cooking? > > It is the " normal " vegetable cooking oils which replaced coconut oil and > > lard which cause so many health problems. Lard is good for cooking in that it doesn't oxidize and go rancid at high temperatures like most vegetables oils. It has always been a good traditional cooking oil which didn't cause problems. However, animal fats these days come from animals that are raised on hormones, antibiotics and other chemicals, which probably concentrates in the fat. The animals tend to be raised on grain, rather than grass-fed. So it's a good idea to choose your source carefully. But I would choose organic cold pressed virgin coconut oil for cooking and other use. It won't go rancid when cooking and increases HDL (good) cholesterol and strengthens the immune system. Coconut Oil and Cancer http://www.westonaprice.org/knowyourfats/coconut_oil.html Lim-Sylianco (1987) has reviewed 50 years of literature showing anticarcinogenic effects from dietary coconut oil. These animal studies show quite clearly the nonpromotional effect of feeding coconut oil. In a study by Reddy et al (1984) straight coconut oil was more inhibitory than MCT oil to induction of colon tumors by azoxymethane. Chemically induced adenocarcinomas differed 10-fold between corn oil (32%) and coconut oil (3%) in the colon. Both olive oil and coconut oil developed the low levels (3%) of the adenocarcinomas in the colon, but in the small intestine animals fed coconut oil did not develop any tumors while 7% of animals fed olive oil did. Studies by Cohen et al (1986) showed that the nonpromotional effects of coconut oil were also seen in chemically induced breast cancer. In this model, the slight elevation of serum cholesterol in the animals fed coconut oil was protective as the animals fed the more polyunsaturated oil had reduced serum cholesterol and more tumors. The authors noted that " ...an overall inverse trend was observed between total serum lipids and tumor incidence for the 4 [high fat] groups. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 I believe that the reason fish and algae oils were used was because the subject of the article decided that EPA and DHA rich oils were his best bet - very likely due to the fact that he lived next door to Prof. Pardini who was and is doing research on Omega-3 fats and cancer. Prof. Pardini's focus was on fish and algae oils, so I'm guessing that's why the focus was not on flax oil. As a general comment: I have read many articles on the effectiveness of the various omega-3 fats on tumor growth and at this point, the evidence is somewhat mixed in terms of which are the most effective for inhibiting or regressing tumor growth. If my memory serves me, EPA and DHA have on balance appeared to show a stronger effect, but it should be noted that ALA, EPA and DHA may have specific and possibly different mechanisms by which they act on tumor growth. There may also be co-factors present in the sources of these fatty acids that also come into play. Kind regards, Nick On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, katerinka70 wrote: > Nick, in the case I was reffering to they said that the man excluded > ALL plant-based oils and was taking only fish and algae oild for > omega-3. That was my question - why was the flax oil excluded, why > they said that plan-oils are tumor-promoting. I would understand tumor > promotion of safflower oil as it's high in omega-6, but he was not > taking flax as well. > > > What made you worry that flax oil would be considered tumor promoting? > > > > In all the studies I recall reading it was the opposite - tumor growth > > inhibiting (as is the case for omega-3 fats in general). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 " arlynsg " wrote: > Unfortunately, this study only talks about ER negative breast cancers. The fear is still that the phytoestrogen properties of flaxseeds will cause ER positive tumors to grow. My personal opinion is that it won't, but my personal opinion doesn't account for much. > If you search Google Scholar, you'll find most of the studies seem to be on ER+ bc with flaxseed. So I think this one was particularly useful for people with ER- bc who may wonder whether FS will benefit them or not. Here's one I found previously on ER+ bc: Dietary Flaxseed Enhances the Inhibitory Effect of Tamoxifen on the Growth of Estrogen-Dependent Human Breast Cancer (MCF-7) in Nude Mice http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/10/22/7703.full.pdf Conclusions: FS inhibited the growth of human estrogen- dependent breast cancer and strengthened the tumorinhibitory effect of TAM at both low and high E2 levels. Discussion: This study showed for the first time that dietary FS can inhibit the growth of human ER+ breast cancer, and enhance rather than antagonize the anticancer effect of TAM in nude mice in the presence of low or high E2 level, which mimics the hormone status of post- and premenopausal women, respectively. It also agrees with the results from a double-blinded placebocontrolled clinical trial, which showed that 25 g of FS reduces the tumor cell proliferation of preoperative breast cancer in postmenopausal patients. The mammalian lignans enterodiol and enterolactone, derived from flaxseed SDG, possess weak and/or antiestrogenic activities, which may be ER-mediated. Although lignans promoted MCF-7 tumor cell growth in vitro with E2 deprivation because of weak-estrogen activity (24), this was not observed in ovariectomized athymic mice in this study. In fact, the present study showed that FS regressed the tumors to a similar extent as the negative control, and failed to stimulate cell proliferation and uterus development in mice after E2 pellet withdrawal, suggesting that FS does not elicit an estrogenic effect on the tumor and uterus. In addition to ER-mediated effects, lignans can modulate the activities of enzymes involved in estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism. Lignans have been shown to moderately inhibit the activity of aromatase, an estrogen synthetase converting androgen to estrogen, in human tissues and MCF-7 cells. Continues.... I'd say flaxseed might be good enough without Tamoxifen, if that's what one wants to do. Ketogenic flaxseed and coconut cookie ------------------------------------------------ 2 tbsp coconut oil 15 g butter 4 tbsp flaxseed, ground 1 tsp cinnamon Pure Stevia Mix and form into a cookie shape, place on baking paper on top of a small plate. Put in fridge until formed. " This cookie packs it all. Coconut oil (MCT), Flax Seed (Omega-3), and Cinnamon as a glucose disposal agent. Eat one of these and you will be humming along all day. Great as a meal replacement. " Modified from this recipe, which contains almond, also probably great. http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=288667 & page=1 & pp=15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.