Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 Hubby and I got into it again yesterday about Zach. This whole thing started about the spinning question I asked yesterday. His claim is that Zach may be a little behind, but he thinks all this hubub is blown out of proportion. He does not believe Zach has any permanent disabilities and that he'll catch up and be fine. He says that I am always looking for reasons he's sick, and that most 'normal' kids do these things too, that it's just his age. So, I wanted to see if truly I was just making more of it than it was. I called the OT/Speech and asked them to send me their most recent evaluation of him. They sent me a summary of where he was a month ago, and now. These are based on age. They use the Hawaii Early Learning Profile. Fine Motor: 56% delay: 31% delay *improvement Cognitive: 36% delay: 21% delay *improvement Communication: 50% delay: 38% delay *improvement Self Help: 47% delay: 55% delay *fallen behind Personal-Social: 36% delay: 38% delay *fallen behind After reading all the material they sent, he still said it's all based on his worst performances and not his best, therefore inaccurate. Banging my head against the wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 does Zach have a dx? I can't remember. This is very common among our hubbies, especially with sons, most especially with first or only sons. There's NOTHING WRONG with MY SON. They go through the greiving process in a very different way than women do. They generally take a lot longer to accept that there's a problem at all, and they usually leave it to us to take care of the therapies and evaluations and knowledge. Of course I have no knowledge of your own personal situation. These are only broad generalizations. But I hoped it would be helpful for youto know that most of us here have gone through thte same thing with our husbands. {{{hugs}}} Hang in there. You're doing what you need to do for Zacha nd that's the important thing. -Sara. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 i'm sorry for your husband teresa. and sorry for you having to deal with this on your own. he'll figure it out eventually. nobody wants to believe their child has a disability. not acknowledging it isn't doing your child any favours though. michelle mg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 Well, you could tell him it obviously wasn't based on his worst performance or he wouldn't have shown any improvement. Hang in there, eventually he'll have to quit denying it. Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 In a message dated 2/14/03 2:47:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, shanley_n_teresa@... writes: > His claim is that Zach may be a little behind, but he thinks all this hubub > is > blown out of proportion. He does not believe Zach has any permanent > disabilities and that he'll catch up and be fine. If you look back about a year ago I swear I posted the exact same kind of thing about my husband. It will take time. Once he sees improvement he will be ok. My husband now is ok with everything. Even though he's still half in denial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 Ugh. So sorry. It can really take men alot longer to see and understand sometimes. Jeff was the one who told me Alec was autistic. I was the one who said Greggory was. I was the one who suggested BP for Alec. Jeff suggested ADHD for Alec. It took a little while for Jeff to accept that Greggpory really was autistic. (or is) but he did and so there is hope. Jacquie H Zach's assessment Hubby and I got into it again yesterday about Zach. This whole thing started about the spinning question I asked yesterday. His claim is that Zach may be a little behind, but he thinks all this hubub is blown out of proportion. He does not believe Zach has any permanent disabilities and that he'll catch up and be fine. He says that I am always looking for reasons he's sick, and that most 'normal' kids do these things too, that it's just his age. So, I wanted to see if truly I was just making more of it than it was. I called the OT/Speech and asked them to send me their most recent evaluation of him. They sent me a summary of where he was a month ago, and now. These are based on age. They use the Hawaii Early Learning Profile. Fine Motor: 56% delay: 31% delay *improvement Cognitive: 36% delay: 21% delay *improvement Communication: 50% delay: 38% delay *improvement Self Help: 47% delay: 55% delay *fallen behind Personal-Social: 36% delay: 38% delay *fallen behind After reading all the material they sent, he still said it's all based on his worst performances and not his best, therefore inaccurate. Banging my head against the wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 Sara, It is interesting that you should say this about dads and sons. As a longtime kdg. and first grade teacher, I have had to have a few conversations with parents about children being developmentally immature and possibly not ready for the academics and structure in class. Dads always take it well if it is their daughter, but LORDY, the reaction was often different if it was their son. We kdg. teachers laughed and said you could almost see the dad's grabbing their crotch and protecting their manhood! LOL " MY son? Immature!?? Outrageous! " It was like you were saying that they themselves were not manly or something. Mothers, on the other hand, rarely reacted poorly. They always knew. They would say, " Yes, he or she walked later than my friends kids or talked later. Yes, I agree. " But often not the dads. Finally found a way to phrase it to dads. We would tell them that their son just needed to be red shirted like they do on college teams and that he would benefit from being the oldest, largest and most mature male " on the team. " They liked that! LOL MEN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 Thats funny. Jeff isnt like this at all. Hmmmmm...... Jacquie H Re: Zach's assessment Sara, It is interesting that you should say this about dads and sons. As a longtime kdg. and first grade teacher, I have had to have a few conversations with parents about children being developmentally immature and possibly not ready for the academics and structure in class. Dads always take it well if it is their daughter, but LORDY, the reaction was often different if it was their son. We kdg. teachers laughed and said you could almost see the dad's grabbing their crotch and protecting their manhood! LOL " MY son? Immature!?? Outrageous! " It was like you were saying that they themselves were not manly or something. Mothers, on the other hand, rarely reacted poorly. They always knew. They would say, " Yes, he or she walked later than my friends kids or talked later. Yes, I agree. " But often not the dads. Finally found a way to phrase it to dads. We would tell them that their son just needed to be red shirted like they do on college teams and that he would benefit from being the oldest, largest and most mature male " on the team. " They liked that! LOL MEN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 > Thats funny. Jeff isnt like this at all. Hmmmmm...... Jeff is a pretty special guy. -Sara. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.