Guest guest Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 , I may have missed one of your posts (forgive me if it has been addressed previously), but I'm not understanding why you are having difficulty getting your lab reports. I know that some nephs don't just hand them over, but if you ask for them or make it clear that you would like a copy given to you at each visit, you should have them! Rita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 Oh - what an ordeal! You are entitled to those lab reports - how incredibly frustrating. Good luck in your pursuit for a new doctor, hope you find one soon! Hugs, Rita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2005 Report Share Posted July 24, 2005 Hi Rita... Thanks for responding. I don't know what the reluctance is over giving a patient their results from the viles of blood they donated. After my last appointment this week I became a bit more 'sassy' in getting those results and let me tell you, it was a quite the task. I was able to get results from the Nephrologist secretary but she refused to give me the results from the lab directly (the ones in which are printed with the test, the value and the reference range). Instead I was sent a flowsheet that is used by the doctor which only has the letter of the test performed and a value written in. Hence I have spent many hours on the internet trying to decipher what these letters (tests) mean and what value they are reported in. I'm still lost on a few of them, which brought me to this website in hopes of finding others who can help me understand what is what. I am currently in need of a new family physician as the one I've been with for many years has left to begin a walk-in clinic and isn't taking patients with him. I hope to find a doctor who is willing to allow the patient to have some knowledge in their care and not just sit there and be a 'yes mam'...if you know what I mean. ....back to 4 years of deciphering! :op Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2005 Report Share Posted July 28, 2005 Hi , That is pretty annoying that they won't just simply give you your lab report, after all, it's your own information! I actually never ask for a copy of my lab report. Instead, I always ask very specific questions about my lab values and what they mean, things such as " what's my creatinine level? " " what's the normal range? " " at what level does it become a concern. Usually after a few such questions, my neph usually then shows me the data on the lab report, goes over it with me AND interprets it for me, b/c it's just easier than me " interrogating " him. Hope it helps, Sophia > Hi Rita... > > Thanks for responding. I don't know what the reluctance is over giving a patient their results from the viles of blood they donated. After my last appointment this week I became a bit more 'sassy' in getting those results and let me tell you, it was a quite the task. I was able to get results from the Nephrologist secretary but she refused to give me the results from the lab directly (the ones in which are printed with the test, the value and the reference range). Instead I was sent a flowsheet that is used by the doctor which only has the letter of the test performed and a value written in. Hence I have spent many hours on the internet trying to decipher what these letters (tests) mean and what value they are reported in. I'm still lost on a few of them, which brought me to this website in hopes of finding others who can help me understand what is what. I am currently in need of a new family physician as the one I've been with for many years has left to begin a walk-in clinic and isn't taking patients with him. I hope to find a doctor who is willing to allow the patient to have some knowledge in their care and not just sit there and be a 'yes mam'...if you know what I mean. > > ...back to 4 years of deciphering! :op > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2005 Report Share Posted July 28, 2005 Hi Sophia, Well, since I posted my little venting session of frustration I have spoken with the hospital in which I see my Nephrologist and found the answer as to why I have such a hard time getting my results...due to confidentiality and new security measures put in place over the past year or so, patients have to go to a specific section of the hospital and request their results. Don't know why anyone who I asked about getting my results couldn't tell me this information but atleast now I know. My labs won't even go to my family doctor unless the family doctor contacts the hospital with a written request! Up until a few months ago I didn't give much thought to my diagnosis because despite a few set backs here and there I didn't feel 'sick'. Also because I haven't had a biopsy to officially diagnose what type of glomerulnephritis I was dealing with, so it seemed to me that it wasn't that bad of a thing to have. I didn't understand the ins and outs of this disease, nor the effects that the 'set backs' have on the ultimate function of my kidneys, so I didn't know specific questions for my doctor. As well, I see my Nephrologist in a hospital and the majority of hospitals in Toronto are teaching hospitals so as a patient we see about 2-3 'strangers' before the big kahuna comes in and my kahuna is intimidating to me. Having said all that, I'm on the road to getting my latest lab results. I've purchased a book about medical tests from a patients view and it's very informative about each test, it's values and so on. So once my results arrive via snail mail I'll be on my way to understanding just what is going on. Thanks for responding, it's nice to know that someone else had to interrogate to get their answers! ) > > Hi Rita... > > > > Thanks for responding. I don't know what the reluctance is over > giving a patient their results from the viles of blood they donated. After > my last appointment this week I became a bit more 'sassy' in getting > those results and let me tell you, it was a quite the task. I was able to > get results from the Nephrologist secretary but she refused to give me > the results from the lab directly (the ones in which are printed with the > test, the value and the reference range). Instead I was sent a > flowsheet that is used by the doctor which only has the letter of the > test performed and a value written in. Hence I have spent many hours > on the internet trying to decipher what these letters (tests) mean and > what value they are reported in. I'm still lost on a few of them, which > brought me to this website in hopes of finding others who can help me > understand what is what. I am currently in need of a new family > physician as the one I've been with for many years has left to begin a > walk-in clinic and isn't taking patients with him. I hope to find a doctor > who is willing to allow the patient to have some knowledge in their care > and not just sit there and be a 'yes mam'...if you know what I mean. > > > > ...back to 4 years of deciphering! :op > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2005 Report Share Posted July 30, 2005 Hi , I'm glad it worked out, altho I'm a little surprised that the dr or the nurse couldn't just tell you where you could get copies of your lab reports. It sounds like b/c you go to the hospital for your neph appts, I guess they have to have lots of measures in place to keep your info secure. I don't recall that this much procedure, usually my neph gives copies of all med reports to my family dr as a matter of course. Sophia > > > Hi Rita... > > > > > > Thanks for responding. I don't know what the reluctance is over > > giving a patient their results from the viles of blood they > donated. After > > my last appointment this week I became a bit more 'sassy' in > getting > > those results and let me tell you, it was a quite the task. I was > able to > > get results from the Nephrologist secretary but she refused to give > me > > the results from the lab directly (the ones in which are printed > with the > > test, the value and the reference range). Instead I was sent a > > flowsheet that is used by the doctor which only has the letter of > the > > test performed and a value written in. Hence I have spent many > hours > > on the internet trying to decipher what these letters (tests) mean > and > > what value they are reported in. I'm still lost on a few of them, > which > > brought me to this website in hopes of finding others who can help > me > > understand what is what. I am currently in need of a new family > > physician as the one I've been with for many years has left to > begin a > > walk-in clinic and isn't taking patients with him. I hope to find > a doctor > > who is willing to allow the patient to have some knowledge in their > care > > and not just sit there and be a 'yes mam'...if you know what I > mean. > > > > > > ...back to 4 years of deciphering! :op > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2005 Report Share Posted July 30, 2005 Hi Sophia, Yep, I agree, it seems like it was a simple task for those in charge at the hospital to just tell me that new measures have been placed in giving out results and that I had to go to a specific place to get them if I wanted...but you know the old saying... " the left hand doesn't always know what the right hand is doing " . The hospital I'm at is going through renovations and wing additions so I think maybe this added to the confusion as well because where I see my Nephrologist now is on a different floor of the new wing and it's amoung transplant patients unlike a few years earlier where I was in a different part of the hospital and on a floor just for Nephrology appointments and where his secretary is (now you can't even get to his secretary unless you are hospital staff with a swipe badge!). The staff at the check-in part where I'm at now seem like their all just filling in from different sections of the hospital and thus I get the ping-pong ball effect of being passed to all different places. It was frustrating but as of last week my results are supposed to be in the mail from last month's testing and in the future I'm hoping that the place I was told to go to for a copy of results will be hassle free. As for my question regarding home testing. I was just curious as to what different people keep track of at home in between appointments because it appears that your body goes through some major symptoms between the 2nd and 3rd stage of CKD. I'm in the 2nd right now and some days I wonder if symptoms I feel are kidney disease related, paranoia or something else. It seems like the majority of people in this group are in the later stages and deal with alot more stuff than we milder ones, but that's not to say we milder ones don't feel stuff. As well, my doctor a few years back told me to get a medic-alert bracelet and a home blood pressure machine, so I do occassionaly check my blood pressure. It's never been as low as my doctor wants it to be but it does creep up to the hypertensive stage. Others in this group have commented about feeling worse after a cold or throat infection. I've suffered for years with sinus infections and have undergone surgery twice now to help correct the amount of infections I get but to no avail. My urine contains large amounts of blood but I don't actually see blood...my urine to me is always yellow or a little bit darker yellow with bubbles. I just thought that if blood and protein where things that equal kidney disease that I could home test with the dipstick when I'm well and when I get an infection to see if there is any change...but the few responses to my question don't mention dipstick testing at home, only blood pressure. I'm the kinda person who prepares for the worst rather than hope for the best...it's a character flaw I've yet to overcome, so I guess I'd rather test at home for certain things to know before the doctor tells me something has changed. Up until this past month's appointment I haven't taken much of an interest in my kidney disease because I don't think it had set in... but after this last appointment where I was told that I'm still stable as far as the kidneys go but was in the pre-diabetes stage I got a wake up call. I'm weeks away from turning 34 and I have 2 young girls...hypertension, cholesterol problems, diabetes...these are all things I used to think affected the old age. Pierre said it perfectly when he said that most Nephrologists are interested in dialysis/ transplant patients because that's where their bread and butter are, that coupled with the fact that kidney disease is a maintenance disease rather than a curable disease kinda makes those of us who have been diagnosed in the early stages feeling like their less important, when infact what I've learned the direct opposite from being a part of this group. Knowledge is power and if I can have the power to slow this disease down than I want to do everything possible to gain it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2005 Report Share Posted July 30, 2005 I never kept track of anything between appointments, except my blood pressure. I checked it every once in a while just to see how I was doing with exercise primarily, but I would go for long periods without checking it at all - and even that was only after I was already at about 50% kidney function. The follow-up intervals are usually appropriate, because nothing can really happen in between. It's a bit different in pediatric cases and in adult cases where heavy proteinuria is a problem. But the majority of IgAN patients do not have heavy proteinuria. Originally and for many years, as the nephrology specialty developed in the 1960's and 70's, nephrologists were internal medecine specialists who handled dialysis (and there was really only one kind, as PD wasn't really available until the very late 1970's). Patients usually didn't see a nephrologist until they were in kidney failure, more or less, and until then, they were simply followed by their family doctor. Then, as time went by, they started seeing patients with earli kidney disease more and more, long before they had renal failure. Up until almost the 1990's, you might be referred to a nephrologist to determine what the problems was with the kidneys, but unless there were obvious complications, you were then only seen once a year, or not at all. Pierre Re: Function and Failure/ Hi Sophia, Yep, I agree, it seems like it was a simple task for those in charge at the hospital to just tell me that new measures have been placed in giving out results and that I had to go to a specific place to get them if I wanted...but you know the old saying... " the left hand doesn't always know what the right hand is doing " . The hospital I'm at is going through renovations and wing additions so I think maybe this added to the confusion as well because where I see my Nephrologist now is on a different floor of the new wing and it's amoung transplant patients unlike a few years earlier where I was in a different part of the hospital and on a floor just for Nephrology appointments and where his secretary is (now you can't even get to his secretary unless you are hospital staff with a swipe badge!). The staff at the check-in part where I'm at now seem like their all just filling in from different sections of the hospital and thus I get the ping-pong ball effect of being passed to all different places. It was frustrating but as of last week my results are supposed to be in the mail from last month's testing and in the future I'm hoping that the place I was told to go to for a copy of results will be hassle free. As for my question regarding home testing. I was just curious as to what different people keep track of at home in between appointments because it appears that your body goes through some major symptoms between the 2nd and 3rd stage of CKD. I'm in the 2nd right now and some days I wonder if symptoms I feel are kidney disease related, paranoia or something else. It seems like the majority of people in this group are in the later stages and deal with alot more stuff than we milder ones, but that's not to say we milder ones don't feel stuff. As well, my doctor a few years back told me to get a medic-alert bracelet and a home blood pressure machine, so I do occassionaly check my blood pressure. It's never been as low as my doctor wants it to be but it does creep up to the hypertensive stage. Others in this group have commented about feeling worse after a cold or throat infection. I've suffered for years with sinus infections and have undergone surgery twice now to help correct the amount of infections I get but to no avail. My urine contains large amounts of blood but I don't actually see blood...my urine to me is always yellow or a little bit darker yellow with bubbles. I just thought that if blood and protein where things that equal kidney disease that I could home test with the dipstick when I'm well and when I get an infection to see if there is any change...but the few responses to my question don't mention dipstick testing at home, only blood pressure. I'm the kinda person who prepares for the worst rather than hope for the best...it's a character flaw I've yet to overcome, so I guess I'd rather test at home for certain things to know before the doctor tells me something has changed. Up until this past month's appointment I haven't taken much of an interest in my kidney disease because I don't think it had set in... but after this last appointment where I was told that I'm still stable as far as the kidneys go but was in the pre-diabetes stage I got a wake up call. I'm weeks away from turning 34 and I have 2 young girls...hypertension, cholesterol problems, diabetes...these are all things I used to think affected the old age. Pierre said it perfectly when he said that most Nephrologists are interested in dialysis/ transplant patients because that's where their bread and butter are, that coupled with the fact that kidney disease is a maintenance disease rather than a curable disease kinda makes those of us who have been diagnosed in the early stages feeling like their less important, when infact what I've learned the direct opposite from being a part of this group. Knowledge is power and if I can have the power to slow this disease down than I want to do everything possible to gain it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2005 Report Share Posted July 31, 2005 Hi , I think it's a very good quality you have to ensure that you try and learn as much about the disease as possible. I wish I had done that myself when I was diagnosed with IgAN at 100% kidney function. It's great to learn more about the disease so that you have more certainty and know how to cope. It's not so great if learning about the disease causes more fear and pessimism, b/c at the end of the day, the statistics at your stage are very much in your favour, in that it's a small percentage who get to ESRD. Coincidentally, I'm also 34. No kids tho. Sophia. > Hi Sophia, > > Yep, I agree, it seems like it was a simple task for those in charge at the hospital to just tell me that new measures have been placed in giving out results and that I had to go to a specific place to get them if I wanted...but you know the old saying... " the left hand doesn't always know what the right hand is doing " . > > The hospital I'm at is going through renovations and wing additions so I think maybe this added to the confusion as well because where I see my Nephrologist now is on a different floor of the new wing and it's amoung transplant patients unlike a few years earlier where I was in a different part of the hospital and on a floor just for Nephrology appointments and where his secretary is (now you can't even get to his secretary unless you are hospital staff with a swipe badge!). The staff at the check-in part where I'm at now seem like their all just filling in from different sections of the hospital and thus I get the ping-pong ball effect of being passed to all different places. It was frustrating but as of last week my results are supposed to be in the mail from last month's testing and in the future I'm hoping that the place I was told to go to for a copy of results will be hassle free. > > As for my question regarding home testing. I was just curious as to what different people keep track of at home in between appointments because it appears that your body goes through some major symptoms between the 2nd and 3rd stage of CKD. I'm in the 2nd right now and some days I wonder if symptoms I feel are kidney disease related, paranoia or something else. It seems like the majority of people in this group are in the later stages and deal with alot more stuff than we milder ones, but that's not to say we milder ones don't feel stuff. > > As well, my doctor a few years back told me to get a medic-alert bracelet and a home blood pressure machine, so I do occassionaly check my blood pressure. It's never been as low as my doctor wants it to be but it does creep up to the hypertensive stage. Others in this group have commented about feeling worse after a cold or throat infection. I've suffered for years with sinus infections and have undergone surgery twice now to help correct the amount of infections I get but to no avail. My urine contains large amounts of blood but I don't actually see blood...my urine to me is always yellow or a little bit darker yellow with bubbles. I just thought that if blood and protein where things that equal kidney disease that I could home test with the dipstick when I'm well and when I get an infection to see if there is any change...but the few responses to my question don't mention dipstick testing at home, only blood pressure. > > I'm the kinda person who prepares for the worst rather than hope for the best...it's a character flaw I've yet to overcome, so I guess I'd rather test at home for certain things to know before the doctor tells me something has changed. Up until this past month's appointment I haven't taken much of an interest in my kidney disease because I don't think it had set in... but after this last appointment where I was told that I'm still stable as far as the kidneys go but was in the pre-diabetes stage I got a wake up call. I'm weeks away from turning 34 and I have 2 young girls...hypertension, cholesterol problems, diabetes...these are all things I used to think affected the old age. > > Pierre said it perfectly when he said that most Nephrologists are interested in dialysis/ transplant patients because that's where their bread and butter are, that coupled with the fact that kidney disease is a maintenance disease rather than a curable disease kinda makes those of us who have been diagnosed in the early stages feeling like their less important, when infact what I've learned the direct opposite from being a part of this group. Knowledge is power and if I can have the power to slow this disease down than I want to do everything possible to gain it. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.