Guest guest Posted July 26, 2007 Report Share Posted July 26, 2007 So based on Doc's post. What changes would you like to see implemented or at least tested to improve safty? Has a study been done to see if it is safer to transport patients head first rather than feet first? Renny Spencer EMT-B (still waiting on the state to send my EMT-I) > > > > Nadine Levick and I spoke about this last week before this horrible tragedy. > There is about as much pseudoscience in ambulance design as there is in many > EMS practices. Ambulances are motor vehicles and more similar to cars than > rocket ships or salamanders. Why then do we not look at the auto safety > literature and follow their tenets (ambulance manufacturers are largely > removed from the automotive industry in terms of design)? > > > > Several things have to occur: > > > > 1. We need to totally redesign our ambulances from the wheels up using > safety standards and practices from the international automotive industry. > > 2. Ambulances should be tested and achieve similar safety ratings to my > 2007 Acura MDX. > > 3. Ambulances may need to be smaller with a lower center of gravity. > > 4. Ambulances need to carry less junk. > > 5. Lights and siren responses must be extremely limited and almost > non-existent. Only patient condition should drive use of lights and sirens > and nothing else (including some PUM at LEVEL 0). > > 6. Improve driver education. We take the youngest, least experienced > person (usually an EMT in their twenties) and ask them to drive a > Freightliner in an emergency with their catecholamines and hormones raging. > Perhaps we need " ambulance drivers " whose sole job is to safely operate the > ambulance. > > 7. We need to look at integrated warning systems that will override the > sound systems in cars to alert people to the ambulance/fire truck. > > 8. All intersections need a system to change the lights from red to green > for the approaching emergency vehicle EVEN when not responding with lights > and sirens. > > 9. Do away with dispatch categorization. Ask a few questions to determine > what type of response is needed and that is it. The first priority should be > to dispatch the ambulance. > > 10. Assure personnel on duty have adequate rest. > > 11. Keep people with problem driving records from driving. > > 12. Use dash cams and low energy driving techniques. > > 13. Periodically practice emergency driving (skids, emergency > braking, turns) so that personnel are familiar with the operating > capabilities of the ambulance. > > 14. Like it or not, an ambulance such as the MB Sprinter is > probably in EMS' future. > > > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ambulance_Germany.jpg > > > > BTW, those squad bench safety restraint systems are custom made for inducing > a spinal injury in the provider-mark my words. > > > > And now, back to your regularly scheduled dribble. > > > > BEB > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 2007 Report Share Posted July 26, 2007 In a message dated 7/26/2007 10:56:18 A.M. Central Daylight Time, spenair@... writes: So based on Doc's post. What changes would you like to see implemented or at least tested to improve safty? Has a study been done to see if it is safer to transport patients head first rather than feet first? Renny Spencer EMT-B (still waiting on the state to send my EMT-I) Great to the point question Renny! First and foremost while I will respond to the Doc's post directly on this let me recant what I did in my last job as a training Officer for a service. 1) We took the time (and money) to train in-house VFIS EVOC & NSC CEVO I & II instructors. We chose five folks from our in house staff to make EVOC Instructors and Mentors. The ones we chose were those that we knew were safe and experienced EVO's and we were able to make use of the resources that were availed to us via the National Safety Council (CEVO I and II) as well as through VFIS Insurance since they offered their insured's a behind the wheel EVOC and EVOC Instructor Course. While we were not insured by them my volunteer vire department was and we were able to access that resource in that way (a double benifti for the VFD as well I might add). We had those 5 folks and myself take all the base courses at locations other then our home area (a new Instructor and fresh view was the purpose of that), we then took each of the respective instructor courses. Once we did that we brainstormed and created a " hybrid version " of a behind the wheel EVOC that we then required our folks to all take upon hiring. We ran them on Friday night, Saturday, and Sunday in a 20 hour course format with classes no lager then 15 Students with 2-3 Instructors and at least one Type 1, II and III rig (we ran all 3) as well as one of our Command SUV's and our one Crown Vic. We ran these at least once a month when we had new hires, it was mandatory that they sit for this course BEFORE they drove our units of any kind. We paid them to be there and we even fed them. All of our on the books folks came to one within 8 months of the implementation of this (80 folks or so on the job when we did this). We also would post on all training boards at our stations articles and news clippings and the like about ambulance or other related crashes. We tried to make the idea of behind the wheel safety a part of the " company culture " I think we did a decent job in that. We never had a lot of " crashes " but we had our sharing of backing incidents and the like while it's been 5 years since I left that job and came to Texas I speak with them a lot and their accidents are down. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) (Home Phone) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 2007 Report Share Posted July 26, 2007 I'll bite this one: First, some facts for everyone:? A) There is approximately 5,000 ambulance crashes a year in the US (helicopters are unsafe?); There is approximately 1 fatality a week on average (52 a year) C)? Our fatality rate in EMS is about 12.7/100,000 workers...lower than LEO and FF...but when you look at transportation deaths we are at approx 9.5/100,000 while LEO is 6/100,000 and FF is 5.5/100,000....we are killing ourselves with our driving....74% of EMS on the job fatalities are transportation related D)? 82% of rear occupants killed in ambulance accidents were unrestrained E)? >65% of ambulance accident fatalities had serious head injuries F) Over 70% of fatal ambulance accidents occur while using the lights and sirens Changes I would advocate TODAY (most a low if any cost) 1.? ALL patients transported should be transported head first, sitting up as much as clinically possible with FIVE straps securing them...legs, pelvis, chest and 2 should straps securely fastened.? The patient's only chance of survival is to remain secured to the stretcher...flat without shoulder straps creates a missile into the bulkhead wall. 2.? All care providers should be strapped into a seat or on the squadbench with whatever straps are available.? Even the lap belt works...wear the seatbelts! 3.? All equipment in the back of the ambulance should be secured so that it CANNOT move around while anyone is back there.? A cellphone at 40mph to the head can be lethal. 4.? Red lights and sirens should not be used UNLESS absolutely necessary.? I would even suggest NEVER when a patient is on board.? We do not use priority dispatch methodology in our agency yet...but we do not respond emergency to any type of standby, to any call where we have a report from the scene that there is no critical situation (1st responder or LEO), and, after this accident in Ohio, we will soon no longer be responding emergency to any call we will have to stage on.? In addition, our transport emergency priority has fallen to way less than 5% of our transports (and for those interested this is trauma alerts as well...we use helicopters on 0.5% of our transports).? In our research in our agency, the quickest time an ambulance transporting emergency ever beat a vehicle following traffic laws was 45 seconds.? None of my 35 people are worth 45 seconds of standing in an ED waiting on a bed... 5.? Examine different vehicle designs.? Ideally, we should be able to be seated, secured and able to reach the equipment we need to care for the majority of our patients.? We are able to accomplish this in aircraft...why shouldn't we be able to do so in an ambulance?? Think outside the box on this one. 6.? We should all start wearing helmets in the rear compartment of the ambulance while it is in motion.? 7.? Anytime we are operating outside the vehicle on a street crews should be wearing reflective vests with 5 point break away velcro (both sides of torso, front of body, tops of both shoulders). 8.? Ambulances should come with black-box vehicle monitoring and driver feedback systems installed in them that encourage and promote low forces driving 9.? Agencies must write policy requiring their vehicles, when using lights and sirens,?to come to complete stops at all stop signs, red-lights, and uncontrolled intersections...COMPLETE STOPS...and then enforce it (All the city department heads and city councils we service have my cell number on a card to report this to me personally if they ever see it in their city) 10.? Low force driver training must be provided annually.? 11.? Efforts must be made to develop and mandate appropriate ambulance operator driving courses...just because it works in a cop car or fire truck doesn't mean it will work in an ambulance. 12.? Agencies must start rewarding calm, cool collected decision making that leads to non-emergency transports instead of hooping and hollering in excitement everytime we take that " Code 3 TRAAAMA " to the hospital. Whew...well I guess that is a good start....anyone else? Dudley What changes to ambulances would make it safer? So based on Doc's post. What changes would you like to see implemented or at least tested to improve safty? Has a study been done to see if it is safer to transport patients head first rather than feet first? Renny Spencer EMT-B (still waiting on the state to send my EMT-I) > > > > Nadine Levick and I spoke about this last week before this horrible tragedy. > There is about as much pseudoscience in ambulance design as there is in many > EMS practices. Ambulances are motor vehicles and more similar to cars than > rocket ships or salamanders. Why then do we not look at the auto safety > literature and follow their tenets (ambulance manufacturers are largely > removed from the automotive industry in terms of design)? > > > > Several things have to occur: > > > > 1. We need to totally redesign our ambulances from the wheels up using > safety standards and practices from the international automotive industry. > > 2. Ambulances should be tested and achieve similar safety ratings to my > 2007 Acura MDX. > > 3. Ambulances may need to be smaller with a lower center of gravity. > > 4. Ambulances need to carry less junk. > > 5. Lights and siren responses must be extremely limited and almost > non-existent. Only patient condition should drive use of lights and sirens > and nothing else (including some PUM at LEVEL 0). > > 6. Improve driver education. We take the youngest, least experienced > person (usually an EMT in their twenties) and ask them to drive a > Freightliner in an emergency with their catecholamines and hormones raging. > Perhaps we need " ambulance drivers " whose sole job is to safely operate the > ambulance. > > 7. We need to look at integrated warning systems that will override the > sound systems in cars to alert people to the ambulance/fire truck. > > 8. All intersections need a system to change the lights from red to green > for the approaching emergency vehicle EVEN when not responding with lights > and sirens. > > 9. Do away with dispatch categorization. Ask a few questions to determine > what type of response is needed and that is it. The first priority should be > to dispatch the ambulance. > > 10. Assure personnel on duty have adequate rest. > > 11. Keep people with problem driving records from driving. > > 12. Use dash cams and low energy driving techniques. > > 13. Periodically practice emergency driving (skids, emergency > braking, turns) so that personnel are familiar with the operating > capabilities of the ambulance. > > 14. Like it or not, an ambulance such as the MB Sprinter is > probably in EMS' future. > > > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ambulance_Germany.jpg > > > > BTW, those squad bench safety restraint systems are custom made for inducing > a spinal injury in the provider-mark my words. > > > > And now, back to your regularly scheduled dribble. > > > > BEB > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 I would like to see a cot lift to help avoid back injurys. For examples see: http://www.pls-access.co.uk/products_stretcher.asp Heres a site with more UK ambulances. You will find several pics of ramps and lifts on the ambulances. Apparently it's pretty standard there. Guess we're just to cheap, we'll just replace the medic that gets hurt cheaper than than upgrading our ambulances or so it seems. http://www.ukemergency.co.uk/ Also have there been any studys proving that it is safer to have patients head first rather than feet first? Renny Spencer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 1. Something that ALWAYS bothered me was the hard edge above the " action table " that was right beside my head at temple level mere inches away from my noggin. I frequently thought rolling over or a quick evasive turn would plant my head squarely into it knocking me cold or worse. There are other hard edges, why so many? 2. A practical interior design that would allow for the easy and effective secure storage of equipment and bags. A monitor, oxygen tank, pulse oximeter, trauma bag, med bag, etc all out in the open ready to fly around. What about the vent, IV pump and so forth? 3. Why no airbags in the rear of the rig? 4. Driver training, driver record checks and driving tests should be required to obtain your license/certification in my opinion. Why is real vehicle operations training not required at the state or national level? A local D/FW firefighter, Ron , has developed the single best course I know of on safe vehicle parking and scene safety. Check www.firehouse.com for more info. 5. Retro reflective chevron striping should be mandatory on the rear of ALL emergency services vehicles, no exceptions. (again, check firehouse.com for more details) 6. In the end it will take EMS personnel to drive this issue. Management types must hold folks accountable, staff must take responsibility and the public must demand more. My two cents. J. Reeves EMT (Texas, Missouri, NR) Freeman Health System (Joplin, MO) Formerly w/ CareFlite > > > > > > > > Nadine Levick and I spoke about this last week before this horrible > tragedy. > > There is about as much pseudoscience in ambulance design as there > is in many > > EMS practices. Ambulances are motor vehicles and more similar to > cars than > > rocket ships or salamanders. Why then do we not look at the auto > safety > > literature and follow their tenets (ambulance manufacturers are > largely > > removed from the automotive industry in terms of design)? > > > > > > > > Several things have to occur: > > > > > > > > 1. We need to totally redesign our ambulances from the wheels up > using > > safety standards and practices from the international automotive > industry. > > > > 2. Ambulances should be tested and achieve similar safety ratings > to my > > 2007 Acura MDX. > > > > 3. Ambulances may need to be smaller with a lower center of > gravity. > > > > 4. Ambulances need to carry less junk. > > > > 5. Lights and siren responses must be extremely limited and almost > > non-existent. Only patient condition should drive use of lights and > sirens > > and nothing else (including some PUM at LEVEL 0). > > > > 6. Improve driver education. We take the youngest, least > experienced > > person (usually an EMT in their twenties) and ask them to drive a > > Freightliner in an emergency with their catecholamines and hormones > raging. > > Perhaps we need " ambulance drivers " whose sole job is to safely > operate the > > ambulance. > > > > 7. We need to look at integrated warning systems that will > override the > > sound systems in cars to alert people to the ambulance/fire truck. > > > > 8. All intersections need a system to change the lights from red > to green > > for the approaching emergency vehicle EVEN when not responding with > lights > > and sirens. > > > > 9. Do away with dispatch categorization. Ask a few questions to > determine > > what type of response is needed and that is it. The first priority > should be > > to dispatch the ambulance. > > > > 10. Assure personnel on duty have adequate rest. > > > > 11. Keep people with problem driving records from > driving. > > > > 12. Use dash cams and low energy driving techniques. > > > > 13. Periodically practice emergency driving (skids, > emergency > > braking, turns) so that personnel are familiar with the operating > > capabilities of the ambulance. > > > > 14. Like it or not, an ambulance such as the MB > Sprinter is > > probably in EMS' future. > > > > > > > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Ambulance_Germany.jpg > > > > > > > > BTW, those squad bench safety restraint systems are custom made for > inducing > > a spinal injury in the provider-mark my words. > > > > > > > > And now, back to your regularly scheduled dribble. > > > > > > > > BEB > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2007 Report Share Posted August 2, 2007 Failure to use proper patient strapping, including shoulder straps, will probably result in liability if a crash with ensuing injury occurs. It is, in my judgment, provable standard of care to use shoulder restraints. Also, it is, in my judgment, provable standard of care to use enough straps, and a sufficient method of strapping, to secure a patient to a spine board in such a way that lateral movement will not occur if the board has to be tipped to the side, as in when the patient vomits, et cetera. See my article in EMS Magazine on the subject in 2004, I think it was. Two standard straps are insufficient, as are three. Also, " X " type strapping doesn't work either. Dropping a patient or allowing a patient to be injured from failure to properly secure, is going to usually be provable gross negligence, which negates the Good Samaritan protections. Gene G. > > Amen! > > THEDUDMAN@... wrote: > > Changes I would advocate TODAY (most a low if any cost) > > 1.? ALL patients transported should be transported head first, sitting up as > much as clinically possible with FIVE straps securing them...legs, pelvis, > chest and 2 should straps securely fastened.? The patient's only chance of > survival is to remain secured to the stretcher... 1.? ALL patients transported > should be transported head first, sittin > > 2.? All care providers should be strapped into a seat or on the squadbench > with whatever straps are available.? Even the lap belt works...wear the > seatbelts! > > 3.? All equipment in the back of the ambulance should be secured so that it > CANNOT move around while anyone is back there.? A cellphone at 40mph to the > head can be lethal. > > 4.? Red lights and sirens should not be used UNLESS absolutely necessary.? I > would even suggest NEVER when a patient is on board.? We do not use priority > dispatch methodology in our agency yet...but we do not respond emergency to > any type of standby, to any call where we have a report from the scene that > there is no critical situation (1st responder or LEO), and, after this > accident in Ohio, we will soon no longer be responding emergency to any call we will > have to stage on.? In addition, our transport emergency priority has fallen > to way less than 5% of our transports (and for those interested this is > trauma alerts as well...we use helicopters on 0.5% of our transports). 4.? Red > lights and sirens should not be used UNLESS absolutely necessary.? I would even > suggest NEVER when a patient is on board.? We do not use priority dispatch > methodology in our agency yet...but we do not respond emergency t > > 5.? Examine different vehicle designs.? Ideally, we should be able to be > seated, secured and able to reach the equipment we need to care for the majority > of our patients.? We are able to accomplish this in aircraft...why shouldn't > we be able to do so in an ambulance?? Think outside the box on this one. > > 6.? We should all start wearing helmets in the rear compartment of the > ambulance while it is in motion.? > > 7.? Anytime we are operating outside the vehicle on a street crews should be > wearing reflective vests with 5 point break away velcro (both sides of > torso, front of body, tops of both shoulders). > > 8.? Ambulances should come with black-box vehicle monitoring and driver > feedback systems installed in them that encourage and promote low forces driving > > 9.? Agencies must write policy requiring their vehicles, when using lights > and sirens,?to come to complete stops at all stop signs, red-lights, and > uncontrolled intersections. 9.? Agencies must write policy requiring their > vehicles, when using lights and sirens,?to come to complete stops at all stop signs, > red-lights, and uncontrolled intersections.<wbr>..COMPLETE STO > > 10.? Low force driver training must be provided annually.? > > 11.? Efforts must be made to develop and mandate appropriate ambulance > operator driving courses...just because it works in a cop car or fire truck > doesn't mean it will work in an ambulance. > > 12.? Agencies must start rewarding calm, cool collected decision making that > leads to non-emergency transports instead of hooping and hollering in > excitement everytime we take that " Code 3 TRAAAMA " to the hospital. > > Whew...well I guess that is a good start....anyone else? > > Dudley > > Recent Activity > > 15 > New Members > > Visit Your Group > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2007 Report Share Posted August 2, 2007 Amen! THEDUDMAN@... wrote: Changes I would advocate TODAY (most a low if any cost) 1.? ALL patients transported should be transported head first, sitting up as much as clinically possible with FIVE straps securing them...legs, pelvis, chest and 2 should straps securely fastened.? The patient's only chance of survival is to remain secured to the stretcher...flat without shoulder straps creates a missile into the bulkhead wall. 2.? All care providers should be strapped into a seat or on the squadbench with whatever straps are available.? Even the lap belt works...wear the seatbelts! 3.? All equipment in the back of the ambulance should be secured so that it CANNOT move around while anyone is back there.? A cellphone at 40mph to the head can be lethal. 4.? Red lights and sirens should not be used UNLESS absolutely necessary.? I would even suggest NEVER when a patient is on board.? We do not use priority dispatch methodology in our agency yet...but we do not respond emergency to any type of standby, to any call where we have a report from the scene that there is no critical situation (1st responder or LEO), and, after this accident in Ohio, we will soon no longer be responding emergency to any call we will have to stage on.? In addition, our transport emergency priority has fallen to way less than 5% of our transports (and for those interested this is trauma alerts as well...we use helicopters on 0.5% of our transports).? In our research in our agency, the quickest time an ambulance transporting emergency ever beat a vehicle following traffic laws was 45 seconds.? None of my 35 people are worth 45 seconds of standing in an ED waiting on a bed... 5.? Examine different vehicle designs.? Ideally, we should be able to be seated, secured and able to reach the equipment we need to care for the majority of our patients.? We are able to accomplish this in aircraft...why shouldn't we be able to do so in an ambulance?? Think outside the box on this one. 6.? We should all start wearing helmets in the rear compartment of the ambulance while it is in motion.? 7.? Anytime we are operating outside the vehicle on a street crews should be wearing reflective vests with 5 point break away velcro (both sides of torso, front of body, tops of both shoulders). 8.? Ambulances should come with black-box vehicle monitoring and driver feedback systems installed in them that encourage and promote low forces driving 9.? Agencies must write policy requiring their vehicles, when using lights and sirens,?to come to complete stops at all stop signs, red-lights, and uncontrolled intersections...COMPLETE STOPS...and then enforce it (All the city department heads and city councils we service have my cell number on a card to report this to me personally if they ever see it in their city) 10.? Low force driver training must be provided annually.? 11.? Efforts must be made to develop and mandate appropriate ambulance operator driving courses...just because it works in a cop car or fire truck doesn't mean it will work in an ambulance. 12.? Agencies must start rewarding calm, cool collected decision making that leads to non-emergency transports instead of hooping and hollering in excitement everytime we take that " Code 3 TRAAAMA " to the hospital. Whew...well I guess that is a good start....anyone else? Dudley Recent Activity 15 New Members Visit Your Group Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2007 Report Share Posted August 2, 2007 I think that it would be wise to have Opticom lights as standard equipment for those times when we do run hot. Granted, not all intersections have the sensors however, they are becoming more prominent in the suburbs and it would be safer at the busier intersections. With regard to crew safety, like Dudley mentioned, improved attendant restraints. Possibly something like a restraint bar with a shoulder harness. Something like a seat belt that locks when the vehicle is jolted or stops hard. The ambulance manufactures need to pay more attention to crew comfort as well. Leg room, armrests, improved seats in the cab and a little bit more room to recline the seats. One last thing--proximity sensors on the sides and rear. I am sure that most services have lost a mirror or two or some body damage. Just my two cents. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 In a message dated 8/3/2007 9:15:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time, csuprun@... writes: No offense brother..but, baloney. If you want to be safe at busy (or slow) intersections.slow) intersections.<WBR>be safe at busy or s your senses not a pieceof equipment. Too many trucks head towards the same intersection from separate lanes and if you don't watch because 'it's gonna change, it's gonna change' then the machine didn't do anything positive except help you become complacent. I never said sacrifice safe and responsible driving. All I am saying is that the Opticom lights should be a standard piece of equipment on ambulances to enhance the safety of the crews, patients and public. It is folly to assume that the Opticom will make it 100% safe. It is the driver's responsibility to make sure they slow or stop the unit at all intersections. The Opticom does make it safer for the public in general. I am sure that most of us have seen a rookie or two try to barge their way through traffic at a red light or try to contra-flow the opposing traffic. That is not very safe or responsible. At least the opticom will change the light (in theory...) and enable other motorist to pull over. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 " Granted, not all intersections have the sensors however, they are becoming more prominent in the suburbs and it would be safer at the busier intersections. " , No offense brother..but, baloney. If you want to be safe at busy (or slow) intersections.be safe at busy or slow intersections meaning use your senses not a pieceof equipment. Too many trucks head towards the same intersection from separate lanes and if you don't watch because 'it's gonna change, it's gonna change' then the machine didn't do anything positive except help you become complacent. We need to lose the assumption that someone else or something else is responsible for our safety. When I'm approaching a busy, or slow, intersection it's my job to proceed through with caution. If my light is red, I stop.then we continue through after checking every lane. Having been in a city that was entirely covered by Opticom, it can be a very nice tool but it didn't make me safe. At the end of the day, I make me safe or not and I don't think we are going to be any safer until that is the mindset we develop. Re: What changes to ambulances would make it safer? I think that it would be wise to have Opticom lights as standard equipment for those times when we do run hot. Granted, not all intersections have the sensors however, they are becoming more prominent in the suburbs and it would be safer at the busier intersections. With regard to crew safety, like Dudley mentioned, improved attendant restraints. Possibly something like a restraint bar with a shoulder harness. Something like a seat belt that locks when the vehicle is jolted or stops hard. The ambulance manufactures need to pay more attention to crew comfort as well. Leg room, armrests, improved seats in the cab and a little bit more room to recline the seats. One last thing--proximity sensors on the sides and rear. I am sure that most services have lost a mirror or two or some body damage. Just my two cents. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover. <http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour> aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 I couldn’t agree more, Chris. _____ From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of Suprun Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:23 AM To: texasems-l Subject: RE: What changes to ambulances would make it safer? " Granted, not all intersections have the sensors however, they are becoming more prominent in the suburbs and it would be safer at the busier intersections. " , No offense brother..but, baloney. If you want to be safe at busy (or slow) intersections.be safe at busy or slow intersections meaning use your senses not a pieceof equipment. Too many trucks head towards the same intersection from separate lanes and if you don't watch because 'it's gonna change, it's gonna change' then the machine didn't do anything positive except help you become complacent. We need to lose the assumption that someone else or something else is responsible for our safety. When I'm approaching a busy, or slow, intersection it's my job to proceed through with caution. If my light is red, I stop.then we continue through after checking every lane. Having been in a city that was entirely covered by Opticom, it can be a very nice tool but it didn't make me safe. At the end of the day, I make me safe or not and I don't think we are going to be any safer until that is the mindset we develop. Re: What changes to ambulances would make it safer? I think that it would be wise to have Opticom lights as standard equipment for those times when we do run hot. Granted, not all intersections have the sensors however, they are becoming more prominent in the suburbs and it would be safer at the busier intersections. With regard to crew safety, like Dudley mentioned, improved attendant restraints. Possibly something like a restraint bar with a shoulder harness. Something like a seat belt that locks when the vehicle is jolted or stops hard. The ambulance manufactures need to pay more attention to crew comfort as well. Leg room, armrests, improved seats in the cab and a little bit more room to recline the seats. One last thing--proximity sensors on the sides and rear. I am sure that most services have lost a mirror or two or some body damage. Just my two cents. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover. <http://discover. <http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour> aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour> aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2007 Report Share Posted August 3, 2007 ...good answer. The Opticom system (or any traffic light interrupter) can cause complacency. It is nice if they are on the unit, but they are not the only answer. The problem is big when multiple units are responding and arrive at the intersection at the same time...2 fire trucks in Chicago suburbs in 2005; both expecting the lights to change...collided in the intersection...2 of the four were killed, 2 critically injured...both units responding to a fire alarm. In 2006 an ambulance and a commuter light rail train arrived in the intersection at the same time...both had traffic light interrupters...they collided in the intersection injuring several and knocking the train off the tracks... If the agency is not stopping at red lights interrupters will only increase the case of accidents. We have them on two of our units and we have the receivers on 5 to 8 lights. We have not told our crews which intersections have them so that our crews do not depend upon them working. We treat them like any other intersection...and when they work they merely keep us from stopping as we have the green light... Dudley Re: What changes to ambulances would make it safer? I think that it would be wise to have Opticom lights as standard equipment for those times when we do run hot. Granted, not all intersections have the sensors however, they are becoming more prominent in the suburbs and it would be safer at the busier intersections. With regard to crew safety, like Dudley mentioned, improved attendant restraints. Possibly something like a restraint bar with a shoulder harness. Something like a seat belt that locks when the vehicle is jolted or stops hard. The ambulance manufactures need to pay more attention to crew comfort as well. Leg room, armrests, improved seats in the cab and a little bit more room to recline the seats. One last thing--proximity sensors on the sides and rear. I am sure that most services have lost a mirror or two or some body damage. Just my two cents. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover. <http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour> aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2007 Report Share Posted August 4, 2007 In a message dated 03-Aug-07 09:15:30 Central Daylight Time, csuprun@... writes: At the end of the day, I make me safe or not and I don't think we are going to be any safer until that is the mindset we develop. there is a little logo out there from a fairly famous 'shooting school' down in y'all's neck of the woods.... it's also on a line of CRKT knives... 1*....because that's all you have.... Taking risks in the line of duty is one thing...but it also helps to MINIMIZE the risks you do take. ck S. Krin, DO FAAFP ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.