Re: What does metastasize really mean?/marianne

[Guest guest]

>nne

I agree, I think the combination is well worth the shot on this issue.

We can go on and on about something that is better naturally than the

other. I got so involved in the B17 Apricot Seeds when I first got

diagnosed. I cant stand to taste/eat them so I have tappered off

eating them. I do agree with the healthy diet, healthy foods is

important. But dont rule out Chemo and Rads. One has to try

everything when it comes to survival.

hugs

char

I disagree. Being a 16 1/2 yr survivor I have NEVER heard of anyone

doing it naturally and surviving or surviving if the cancer has

spread and living to tell about it without chemo and/or radiation..

My mother in law was one of those people.

>

> I know why you are pushing this as we talked when you first joined.

I caution anyone thinking about stopping their treatments and going

natural or trying one of these so called miracles cures to talk to

your drs first. As I have said many times I had 3 friends that did

this that had a better outlook than I did and ALL 3 of them died

leaving 9 kids behind between the 3 ladies. The smallest one was 2

yrs old.

> Hugs

> nne

> Breast Cancer Patients Soul Mates for Life

> http://www.geocities.com/chucky5741/breastcancerpatients.html

> BreastCancerStories.com

> http://www.breastcancerstories.com/content/view/433/161/

> Angel Feather Loomer

> www.angelfeatherloomer.blogspot.com

> Check out my other ornaments at

> www.geocities.com/chucky5741/bcornament.html

> Lots of info and gifts at:

> www.cancerclub.com

> Re: What does metastasize really mean?

>

>

> Argument logic flaw - then why do Drs. prescribe anti-virals and

> anti-bacterials if the lymph can do the job with viruses and

bacteria and

> not with cancer?

>

> I DO NOT BELIEVE CANCER CANNOT BE DEALT WITH NATURALLY. Too many

people

> have done it with MAJOR lifestyle, diet, emotional and spiritual

changes.

>

> However, I do believe taking out parts of your immune system,

whether

> through chemo or surgery or radiation, CREATES more problems. Did

you ever

> ask your Dr. for stats on reocurrence after all of these

treatments or mets

> after these treatments versus not? Don't bother they won't have

the real

> numbers anyhow. Your oncologist, surgeon and radiologist WILL

NEVER TELL

> YOU that they can get every single cancer cell, because they have

> liability. They will only tell you they got all they could see,

detect,

> etc.

>

> One of the finest oncologists I know, Dr. Royce, of UNM

here in ALB,

> said to me once " All cancer treatments are experimental in

nature. " SO what

> does that tell me about the lymph question - THEY DON'T KNOW. May

be

> believing in their system is really the placebo effect?

>

> Cancer is a systemic problem, a total degeneration of the body

terrain. It

> is the development, IMO, of cells that can survive the massive

IMBALANCE

> that exists in the body.

>

> Based on what you have said, you've proven my belief. We need no

> antibiotics, no antivirals, only....transformation from within

and without.

> I would urge you to look into serious cancer cases that have been

put into

> remission through these changes.

>

> Clearly, the lymph as up to it! A little change went a very long

way in

> these cases. I can quote them for you if you like. Perhaps you

prefer

> looking them up yourself on the Net?

>

> Blissed be, Annie

>

> Anne Kaspar

>

> www.bodybybliss.com

> bodybybliss@...

>

>