Guest guest Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 Re: HB 1212, increasing the penalty for causing injury to a police officer or firefighter by a drunk driver. EMS personnel are not covered by this bill's provisions unless they are fire-based. If you believe that EMS personnel, when responding to or providing care in emergencies, should be afforded the additional protection proposed for police and firefighters, please contact Rep. a Pierson at the following address and express your thoughts. http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/email.php?dist=93 & rep=a.Pierson Gene Gandy, JD, LP ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/local/16847374.htm?source=rss & channel=dfw_local The legislation, House Bill 1212 by state Rep. a Pierson, D-Arlington, is named for Freeto and Medlin. It would take intoxication assault from a third-degree felony to a second-degree felony if a police officer or firefighter is injured. The prison sentence, now two to 10 years, would increase to two to 20 years. The maximum fine, $10,000, would not change. Intoxication manslaughter involving a police officer or firefighter would go from a second-degree felony to a first-degree felony, which carries a prison sentence of five to 99 years and a maximum fine of $10,000. Any chance of including EMS responding to or working an emergency call as well? (EMSAT, are you listening?) Regardless, it's a great idea... -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, EMT Austin, Texas ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 In a message dated 3/7/2007 2:19:59 P.M. Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: Any chance of including EMS responding to or working an emergency call as well? (EMSAT, are you listening?) The answer to your question is yes, EMSAT is listening. The problem is about 50,000 certified EMS people expect a hand full of people to make sure their needs and wants are met. So, my question is, are the EMS folks in Texas ready to get behind something and support it? When I say support, I mean much more than just firing off emails to a list and debating the issue online. Sure, there is a chance of getting EMS included in this bill. All it takes is a unified voice. <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 , You're RIGHT ON TARGET! Thank you for saying this. Where are the 50,000+ certificants when things that affect us are proposed in the Legislature? Nowhere to be found, most of the time. Folks, If you're not a part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Who loves you? EMSAT! But do you support your ONLY REPRESENTATIVE IN THE STATE OF TEXAS? Of course you don't. Why should you? What's in it for you? Well, what's in it for you is keeping the wolves away, making sure that your interests are preserved, and so forth, but y'all don't care about that do you? Join EMSAT if you care. If you don't, then don't whine about what happens to you when the legislature meets. Gene G. ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 Gene, Thanks for that link I just email Ms Pierson and asked why EMS is not included in this bill. I also requested the bill be amended to include all EMS personnel in addition to fire and police that are covered under the current format. Bernie Stafford EMTP _____ From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of wegandy1938@... Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:28 PM To: ExLngHrn@...; texasems-l Cc: ce-bar@... Subject: Re: Tougher penalties for DWIs injuring killing LEOs/FFs Re: HB 1212, increasing the penalty for causing injury to a police officer or firefighter by a drunk driver. EMS personnel are not covered by this bill's provisions unless they are fire-based. If you believe that EMS personnel, when responding to or providing care in emergencies, should be afforded the additional protection proposed for police and firefighters, please contact Rep. a Pierson at the following address and express your thoughts. http://www.house. <http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/email.php?dist=93 & rep=a.Pierson> state.tx.us/members/email.php?dist=93 & rep=a.Pierson Gene Gandy, JD, LP ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol. <http://www.aol.com.> com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2007 Report Share Posted March 11, 2007 In a message dated 3/7/2007 2:20:05 P.M. Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/local/16847374.htm?source=rss & channel=dfw_loca l The legislation, House Bill 1212 by state Rep. a Pierson, D-Arlington, is named for Freeto and Medlin. It would take intoxication assault from a third-degree felony to a second-degree felony if a police officer or firefighter is injured. The prison sentence, now two to 10 years, would increase to two to 20 years. The maximum fine, $10,000, would not change. Intoxication manslaughter involving a police officer or firefighter would go from a second-degree felony to a first-degree felony, which carries a prison sentence of five to 99 years and a maximum fine of $10,000. Any chance of including EMS responding to or working an emergency call as well? (EMSAT, are you listening?) Regardless, it's a great idea... EMSAT hears sadly few hear EMSAT at 300 Members. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 In a message dated 3/21/2007 2:20:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time, spiband@... writes: Often times we are omitted by ignorance rather than lack of respect. A very true statement and it's EMS's job to educate those that need same but it's awfully hard to be heard when out of 50,000 Providers EMSAT boasts a Membership base of less than 300. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 Gene, The TAA has asked that Rep. Pierson specifically add EMS personnel to the bill and she has reportedly done so when the bill went to Committee. The problem is one of educating the politicans/public that not all EMS is fire based. Often times we are omitted by ignorance rather than lack of respect. Dave wegandy1938@... wrote: Re: HB 1212, increasing the penalty for causing injury to a police officer or firefighter by a drunk driver. EMS personnel are not covered by this bill's provisions unless they are fire-based. If you believe that EMS personnel, when responding to or providing care in emergencies, should be afforded the additional protection proposed for police and firefighters, please contact Rep. a Pierson at the following address and express your thoughts. http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/email.php?dist=93 & rep=a.Pierson Gene Gandy, JD, LP ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2007 Report Share Posted March 21, 2007 Isn't it amazing how dumb some politicians are? All they have to do is look around, but they don't. Anyway, I'm glad she has added us to the bill. Gene > > Gene, > > The TAA has asked that Rep. Pierson specifically add EMS personnel to the > bill and she has reportedly done so when the bill went to Committee. The > problem is one of educating the politicans/public that not all EMS is fire based. > Often times we are omitted by ignorance rather than lack of respect. > > Dave > > wegandy1938@wegandy wrote: > Re: HB 1212, increasing the penalty for causing injury to a police officer > or > firefighter by a drunk driver. > > EMS personnel are not covered by this bill's provisions unless they are > fire-based. If you believe that EMS personnel, when responding to or > providing > care in emergencies, should be afforded the additional protection proposed > for > police and firefighters, please contact Rep. a Pierson at the following > address and express your thoughts. > > http://www.house.http://wwhttp://www.http://wwwhttp:// & rep=rep=<wbr> > > Gene Gandy, JD, LP > > ************ ******** ******** ******* > AOL now offers free > email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at > http://www.aol.http > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.