Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 I assume there is a reason why things are done this way, and I will sleep better if someone could explain it to me. These two things have bothered me for years. The 1st is choanal atresia repair at newborn to one year. It appears to me that the operation fails 99% of the time, and must be repeated, sometimes several times. Why, with almost no chance of lasting repair, must it be attempted so early. I don't get the point. Part 2, is that palatal repair seems to be more valuable. So, why is that not the normal procedure. 2ndly, I thought that weight-bearing is essential for muscle development and strength. Yet 's lifts do not bring her to equal weight distribution, and therefore, her right side is doing all " standing " weight bearing. And her left side is the weaker, particularly at the core, and in reference to balance. How is this not a contributing factor to the problem? Thanks for any light you can shed. in Ma. (, 21 yrs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 Hi , Call me crazy, but I'd really like to get some solid stats on the repair-age,procedure,follow-up treatment, short and long-term results, and if its as " bad " as I think it is, then somehow do something about it. Any ideas how to go about this? Let me re-word. I don't want to gather stats-I want to find an appropriate professional who will gather stats. And we only need to deal with the CHARGE population, and let 'them' project it into the general population, if that's appropriate. We need a cage to rattle. The conference is so far in the future. Who, how can we rattle? P.S. With Kennedy, again, look at her age. How old was she for the final repair? in Ma. (, 21 yrs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 Ok. We have perhaps uncovered a conflict that's going to gooey up progress. So, let me refine my question, and separate the trans-palatal repair as its own entity, and not look at either repair in lieu of the other. Oops, forgot to check the manual for existing stats. Will do that now. (shame on me...) :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 I'm going to give a shout out to the first one, Part 2 - K had the transpalatal repair at age 8 weeks, with stents in for another 6 weeks post op. She still had to have numerous repeat surgeries to open it again. I think with the whole c. atresia repair game, it's a draw; some will get lucky and one time's the charm, others (like K) will need repeated procedures to keep things patent. I don't think there's a rhyme or reason to it, in my opinion! Mom to Kennedy 8 (CHARGE), 17, 15, and wife to Graeme New Brunswick, Canada http://www.chargesyndrome.info > > I assume there is a reason why things are done this way, and I will > sleep > better if someone could explain it to me. These two things have bothered > me for > years. > The 1st is choanal atresia repair at newborn to one year. It appears to me > > that the operation fails 99% of the time, and must be repeated, sometimes > several times. Why, with almost no chance of lasting repair, must it be > attempted > so early. I don't get the point. Part 2, is that palatal repair seems to > be more valuable. So, why is that not the normal procedure. > > 2ndly, I thought that weight-bearing is essential for muscle development > and > strength. Yet 's lifts do not bring her to equal weight distribution, > > and therefore, her right side is doing all " standing " weight bearing. And > her > left side is the weaker, particularly at the core, and in reference to > balance. How is this not a contributing factor to the problem? > > Thanks for any light you can shed. > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 Choanal Atresia Repair on a newborn who is either incredably sick and frail, or a premee, has a better fighting chance going through the procedure slowly and effectively then having a Palatal Repair, which is too much for a baby of that size and depending on how sick that baby is, to handle all at once. Yea there is a 99% chance that this repair either won't work, or will have to be repeated numerous of times, but the reason why it's repeated is that the baby is growing, and as it grows everything shifts, where with a Palatal everything breaks. Weight bearing and muscle development are two different things. Muscle strength is what a body part - arm, leg, back, etc - can withstand your own body weight while walking, and doing your every day thing. Weight bearing is the person trying to strengthen that body part, not the body doing it naturally. Sincerely yours; Krista Bach. 27 year old CHARGEr. mdlinda@... wrote: I assume there is a reason why things are done this way, and I will sleep better if someone could explain it to me. These two things have bothered me for years. The 1st is choanal atresia repair at newborn to one year. It appears to me that the operation fails 99% of the time, and must be repeated, sometimes several times. Why, with almost no chance of lasting repair, must it be attempted so early. I don't get the point. Part 2, is that palatal repair seems to be more valuable. So, why is that not the normal procedure. 2ndly, I thought that weight-bearing is essential for muscle development and strength. Yet 's lifts do not bring her to equal weight distribution, and therefore, her right side is doing all " standing " weight bearing. And her left side is the weaker, particularly at the core, and in reference to balance. How is this not a contributing factor to the problem? Thanks for any light you can shed. in Ma. (, 21 yrs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 I would like to give my opinion, for what it is worth, as Amelie does not have choanal atresia, BUT, I thought that all new borns can not breath through their mouths (innateness theory), only through the nose, the mouth is purely designed for breastfeeding to establish, latching on and suckling etc, therefore if a child is born with atresia and it is severe enough it must warrant immediate and early surgery to sustain life, regardless of the failure rate. Thats what I thought not sure of this though!! hugs Les x > > Choanal Atresia Repair on a newborn who is either incredably sick and > frail, or a premee, has a better fighting chance going through the procedure > slowly and effectively then having a Palatal Repair, which is too much for a > baby of that size and depending on how sick that baby is, to handle all at > once. Yea there is a 99% chance that this repair either won't work, or will > have to be repeated numerous of times, but the reason why it's repeated is > that the baby is growing, and as it grows everything shifts, where with a > Palatal everything breaks. > > Weight bearing and muscle development are two different things. Muscle > strength is what a body part - arm, leg, back, etc - can withstand your own > body weight while walking, and doing your every day thing. Weight bearing is > the person trying to strengthen that body part, not the body doing it > naturally. > > Sincerely yours; Krista Bach. 27 year old CHARGEr. > > > mdlinda@... <mdlinda%40aol.com> wrote: > I assume there is a reason why things are done this way, and I will sleep > better if someone could explain it to me. These two things have bothered > me for > years. > The 1st is choanal atresia repair at newborn to one year. It appears to me > > that the operation fails 99% of the time, and must be repeated, sometimes > several times. Why, with almost no chance of lasting repair, must it be > attempted > so early. I don't get the point. Part 2, is that palatal repair seems to > be more valuable. So, why is that not the normal procedure. > > 2ndly, I thought that weight-bearing is essential for muscle development > and > strength. Yet 's lifts do not bring her to equal weight distribution, > > and therefore, her right side is doing all " standing " weight bearing. And > her > left side is the weaker, particularly at the core, and in reference to > balance. How is this not a contributing factor to the problem? > > Thanks for any light you can shed. > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 It was a couple of years ago, about age 5 or 6 I think for the last one. It would be interesting to see the data collected on the CHARGE pop. for sure. Lis > > Hi , > Call me crazy, but I'd really like to get some solid stats on the > repair-age,procedure,follow-up treatment, short and long-term results, and > if its as > " bad " as I think it is, then somehow do something about it. Any ideas how > to > go about this? Let me re-word. I don't want to gather stats-I want to find > > an appropriate professional who will gather stats. And we only need to > deal > with the CHARGE population, and let 'them' project it into the general > population, if that's appropriate. We need a cage to rattle. The > conference is so > far in the future. Who, how can we rattle? > P.S. With Kennedy, again, look at her age. How old was she for the final > repair? > > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 had the c.atresia palatal repair at 4 days old. But she weighed in at 4 pounds 10 ounces(she was 8 weeks early and the nurses said she'd have been a 10 pound term baby!), and she did not have bone to repair, just fibrous tissue. She was lucky and has only needed the single surgery to date. I think a lot depends on which " type " of atresia it is. If it is bony, I believe the chances of scarring over or closing again with growth is a very real possibility. Friends in CHARGE, Marilyn Ogan Mom of (14 yrs, CHARGE+ JRA) Mom of Ken (17 yrs, Asperger's) Wife of Rick oganm@... Re: My 2 biggest gripes with CHARGE trtmnts I'm going to give a shout out to the first one, Part 2 - K had the transpalatal repair at age 8 weeks, with stents in for another 6 weeks post op. She still had to have numerous repeat surgeries to open it again. I think with the whole c. atresia repair game, it's a draw; some will get lucky and one time's the charm, others (like K) will need repeated procedures to keep things patent. I don't think there's a rhyme or reason to it, in my opinion! Mom to Kennedy 8 (CHARGE), 17, 15, and wife to Graeme New Brunswick, Canada http://www.chargesyndrome.info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 had his done (choanal atresia repair) at 4 weeks of age, 7 weeks of age and then 10 weeks of age by an ENT who had no idea what he was doing. He kept taking the stents out. Then he had it done by another ENT who had much more experience who did it at 12 weeks of age, transpalatal, and kept the stents in for 8 MONTHS. He is now 9 years old and hasn't had a problem since. The only problem now from having the c.atresia in the first place is that he has a deviated septum which needs to be fixed in a few years. Debbie Matasker Re: My 2 biggest gripes with CHARGE trtmnts Hi , Call me crazy, but I'd really like to get some solid stats on the repair-age,procedure,follow-up treatment, short and long-term results, and if its as " bad " as I think it is, then somehow do something about it. Any ideas how to go about this? Let me re-word. I don't want to gather stats-I want to find an appropriate professional who will gather stats. And we only need to deal with the CHARGE population, and let 'them' project it into the general population, if that's appropriate. We need a cage to rattle. The conference is so far in the future. Who, how can we rattle? P.S. With Kennedy, again, look at her age. How old was she for the final repair? in Ma. (, 21 yrs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 Vinny had bilateral, bony choanal atresia. He had the transpalatal repair done on July 1st- he was born on June 4th... so we'll say he was about 4 weeks old. From what I understand, the NICU at Children's Hospital of Michigan (in Detroit, part of the DMC) would have preferred to do earlier if (1) the original NICU he was at actually diagnosed it, and (2) he did not develop endocarditis within his 1st 2 weeks of life. I think it was Les who posted that newborns innately breathe through their noses- I am sure you have heard the " obligatory nose breather " term from your various ENTs. That is exactly what we were told which makes bilateral choanal atresia a " medical emergency. " Since Vinny couldn't get the surgery right away, he was put on a ventilator. (He was also in heart failure- I am sure that had something to do with being placed on a vent!) Once he had the first repair on July 1st, he had stents until mid-August. His openings closed up almost immediately (just tissue this time) so he had laser surgery to open his airway again. He had to have the laser surgery in August, September, November, and December - each time requiring anesthesia but almost all were paired with other surgeries. He has been good- or shall I say " good enough " ever since. Though the bone started to grow back, HE finally started to grow. The bottom line? ALL of this was done in an effort to prevent a trach. It worked. We were (are) lucky to have an amazingly gifted ENT who has been practicing for over 30 years... I am sure that was a factor in Vinny not ending up with a trach. Okay, that is our story! ina, mom to Luca (3) & Vinny (14 months w/ cHARgE) --- mdlinda@... wrote: > I assume there is a reason why things are done this > way, and I will sleep > better if someone could explain it to me. These two > things have bothered me for > years. > The 1st is choanal atresia repair at newborn to one > year. It appears to me > that the operation fails 99% of the time, and must > be repeated, sometimes > several times. Why, with almost no chance of lasting > repair, must it be attempted > so early. I don't get the point. Part 2, is that > palatal repair seems to > be more valuable. So, why is that not the normal > procedure. > > 2ndly, I thought that weight-bearing is essential > for muscle development and > strength. Yet 's lifts do not bring her to > equal weight distribution, > and therefore, her right side is doing all > " standing " weight bearing. And her > left side is the weaker, particularly at the core, > and in reference to > balance. How is this not a contributing factor to > the problem? > > Thanks for any light you can shed. > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 Tyler had his first attempt at a repair at a couple weeks old, but they found out that it was solid bone. He was also 7 weeks early, and then he had his 2nd repair at 4 months. He had stents in for 6 weeks and then at 1 year had another surgery, had stents placed for another 8 weeks. Overall he has had about 8-10 surgeries on his c. atresia, last one when he was 3. The last few were just a little drilling and dilitation mostly of the tissue. He has not needed one since. He is now 8. However he was trached for 22 months, not needing vent support. We did not choose to do the transpalate operation, all were done non- invasive. Hope this helps. I also agree, it just depends on the kid. Our first ENT didn't really know what she was doing, but the 2 one (who placed the 2nd stents did). I think it is one of those things that just makes our kids special. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 i have the palate thing dont have the c thing and i think wat everyone is syaing is right les i think id agree with you that artresia is fixed first so that people as paulina says dotn need a trach with me and my palate it wasnt so ergent as soem of my medical isues coz they knew i couldnt swallow anyway as for weight bearing i think i agree with kirsta there i try all the time to do it and im stornger for it lol > > Tyler had his first attempt at a repair at a couple weeks old, but they > found out that it was > solid bone. He was also 7 weeks early, and then he had his 2nd repair at 4 > months. He > had stents in for 6 weeks and then at 1 year had another surgery, had > stents placed for > another 8 weeks. Overall he has had about 8-10 surgeries on his c. > atresia, last one when > he was 3. The last few were just a little drilling and dilitation mostly > of the tissue. He has > not needed one since. He is now 8. However he was trached for 22 months, > not needing > vent support. We did not choose to do the transpalate operation, all were > done non- > invasive. Hope this helps. I also agree, it just depends on the kid. Our > first ENT didn't > really know what she was doing, but the 2 one (who placed the 2nd stents > did). I think it > is one of those things that just makes our kids special. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 I had a operation as soon as i was born coz i couldnt breathe, i ended up having more and the doctor stuffed something up and i had this big hole at the top of my mouth for years and years > solid bone. He was also 7 weeks early, and then he had his 2nd repair at 4 > > months. He > > had stents in for 6 weeks and then at 1 year had another surgery, had > > stents placed for > > another 8 weeks. Overall he has had about 8-10 surgeries on his c. > > atresia, last one when > > he was 3. The last few were just a little drilling and dilitation mostly > > of the tissue. He has > > not needed one since. He is now 8. However he was trached for 22 months, > > not needing > > vent support. We did not choose to do the transpalate operation, all > were > > done non- > > invasive. Hope this helps. I also agree, it just depends on the kid. Our > > first ENT didn't > > really know what she was doing, but the 2 one (who placed the 2nd stents > > did). I think it > > is one of those things that just makes our kids special. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 I had the hole thing too. Apperently though i still need one more opperation for my atresia. Too bad thats probably not covered by the provincial government now that im over 18. sigh. I should see an ENT though. I could always write to local charities and stuff. I dont think its a cosmetic repair though. It would allow me to breath better. Because of the growth of scar tissue and stuff i have kinda Stinosis. Im just waiting for this doctor that i was told about from the list to call or write me back. Its summer holiday atm so its possible the doctor is away. I will go back this week again to see. Chantelle > > I had a operation as soon as i was born coz i couldnt breathe, i ended up > having more and the doctor stuffed something up and i had this big hole at > the top of my mouth for years and years > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solid bone. He was also 7 weeks early, and then he had his 2nd repair at > 4 > > > months. He > > > had stents in for 6 weeks and then at 1 year had another surgery, had > > > stents placed for > > > another 8 weeks. Overall he has had about 8-10 surgeries on his c. > > > atresia, last one when > > > he was 3. The last few were just a little drilling and dilitation > mostly > > > of the tissue. He has > > > not needed one since. He is now 8. However he was trached for 22 > months, > > > not needing > > > vent support. We did not choose to do the transpalate operation, all > > were > > > done non- > > > invasive. Hope this helps. I also agree, it just depends on the kid. > Our > > > first ENT didn't > > > really know what she was doing, but the 2 one (who placed the 2nd > stents > > > did). I think it > > > is one of those things that just makes our kids special. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 I am sorry I can't you to much with your concerns because I have not had to deal with your 1st worry. But Eva seems to have a stronger side also. She will bare weight on one side more then the other and I am thinking that is why she can't sit up yet. I hope everyone else has been able to help you. Crystal mom to (10), (3), and Eva (16 month old CHARGEr) wife to Dan > > I assume there is a reason why things are done this way, and I will sleep > better if someone could explain it to me. These two things have bothered me for > years. > The 1st is choanal atresia repair at newborn to one year. It appears to me > that the operation fails 99% of the time, and must be repeated, sometimes > several times. Why, with almost no chance of lasting repair, must it be attempted > so early. I don't get the point. Part 2, is that palatal repair seems to > be more valuable. So, why is that not the normal procedure. > > 2ndly, I thought that weight-bearing is essential for muscle development and > strength. Yet 's lifts do not bring her to equal weight distribution, > and therefore, her right side is doing all " standing " weight bearing. And her > left side is the weaker, particularly at the core, and in reference to > balance. How is this not a contributing factor to the problem? > > Thanks for any light you can shed. > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Carmen's ENT would not repair her choanal atresia until she got bigger (she was 4 pounds at birth). He said that she was too small and narrow in her nasal cavity to even get the instruments in. So, her first repair was not at a year. I don't regret it because I know she would have only had to have had it done again if we had done it earlier due to growth, etc. B. > > had his done (choanal atresia repair) at 4 weeks of age, 7 weeks of > age and then 10 weeks of age by an ENT who had no idea what he was doing. > He kept taking the stents out. Then he had it done by another ENT who had > much more experience who did it at 12 weeks of age, transpalatal, and kept > the stents in for 8 MONTHS. He is now 9 years old and hasn't had a problem > since. The only problem now from having the c.atresia in the first place is > that he has a deviated septum which needs to be fixed in a few years. > > > > Debbie Matasker > > > > Re: My 2 biggest gripes with CHARGE trtmnts > > > > Hi , > Call me crazy, but I'd really like to get some solid stats on the > repair-age,procedure,follow-up treatment, short and long-term results, and > if its as > " bad " as I think it is, then somehow do something about it. Any ideas how to > > go about this? Let me re-word. I don't want to gather stats-I want to find > an appropriate professional who will gather stats. And we only need to deal > with the CHARGE population, and let 'them' project it into the general > population, if that's appropriate. We need a cage to rattle. The conference > is so > far in the future. Who, how can we rattle? > P.S. With Kennedy, again, look at her age. How old was she for the final > repair? > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 had her first choanal atresia repair when she was 12 days old - 8 days after her first open heart surgery. The choanal atresia surgery was too much for her (apparently it can be very bloody when going through the bone and tissue) and she crashed and was on life support (ECMO) for 12 days and suffered 3 strokes and then had fluid on her heart and we almost lost her several times (she was on blood thinners with ECMO and had open wounds in her nose that would not stop bleeding!) I don't mean to scare anyone, but in retrospect I would have waited until she was much healthier to do the choanal atresia repair. She had a trach for 8 months, and in a later surgery one side of her nose stayed successfully open and when she could mouth breath we removed the trach. Her last choanal atresia surgery was a couple of years ago and thankfully both sides are now open. Lori Myers Spouse - Trent, Children - (9), (6 in a few days!, CHARGE Syndrome, Congenital Heart Defects/TOF Pulmonary Atresia/repaired, ECMO 12 days, Bi-lateral Choanal Atresia, Decanullated Trach, G-button, partial hearing loss, walking as of 12/22/04!, and Emma (3) Dallas, Texas Re: My 2 biggest gripes with CHARGE trtmnts > > > > Hi , > Call me crazy, but I'd really like to get some solid stats on the > repair-age,procedure,follow-up treatment, short and long-term results, and > if its as > " bad " as I think it is, then somehow do something about it. Any ideas how to > > go about this? Let me re-word. I don't want to gather stats-I want to find > an appropriate professional who will gather stats. And we only need to deal > with the CHARGE population, and let 'them' project it into the general > population, if that's appropriate. We need a cage to rattle. The conference > is so > far in the future. Who, how can we rattle? > P.S. With Kennedy, again, look at her age. How old was she for the final > repair? > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 Kate, Thanks for the in-depth answer. That makes sense. But if you can still stand me, I have another question. What if she had been kept even the whole time, so that weight distribution had been equal throughout the years? (before the fixed position). Any guesses as to impact/outcome of that? And yet another one? (don't know much, do I). No one says conclusively that chiari causes scoliosis. But is the reason they suggest it might because the chiari would also generate a neuromuscular dysfunction (regardless of CHARGE.)? If, in fact, the " lesser than even " lifts even MIGHT have aggravated the scoliosis, by contributing to the shift through posture, and/or through playing into the existing hypotonia, and if its 'standard practice', then maybe we can help head off a problem for any younger CHARGERS who present with scoliosis. (fyi-the pt rough measurement suggested only a 1/4 " true length discrepency btwn legs) Sooo! glad your on the list! Thank you most sincerely, in Ma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 tim had his reapaired at 8 days and again at 8 weeks--stents in both times that had to be suctioned every 2 hours. then he had it again at 6 years--but didn't have to be suctioned that time--just saline salution--hopefully, that will be the last time! Re: My 2 biggest gripes with CHARGE trtmnts > > > > Hi , > Call me crazy, but I'd really like to get some solid stats on the > repair-age,procedure,follow-up treatment, short and long-term results, and > if its as > " bad " as I think it is, then somehow do something about it. Any ideas how to > > go about this? Let me re-word. I don't want to gather stats-I want to find > an appropriate professional who will gather stats. And we only need to deal > with the CHARGE population, and let 'them' project it into the general > population, if that's appropriate. We need a cage to rattle. The conference > is so > far in the future. Who, how can we rattle? > P.S. With Kennedy, again, look at her age. How old was she for the final > repair? > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2006 Report Share Posted August 29, 2006 - Cannot answer about #1, but will take a stab at #2: Except in rare occasions, leg length discrepancies are only corrected about half of the discrepancy. Correcting the full amount tends to be uncomfortable. After a body is in a prolonged posture for a time, it becomes fixed that way. Correcting the full amount puts strain on the hundreds of areas that are fixed. Joint mobilizations can help to losen the joints, but it has to be done slowly and gradually, which is why the full amount is not corrected off the bat. After years of being shifted, has to learn to move over her left side again, gradually building up the strength and stability and learning a new way to move. For example, my sacrun is rotated. A collegue was working on it the other day, then I spent 3 days in pain because things were moving that hadn't moved in years, plus I have compensated with my movement patterns and have had to re-learn how to stand. And this is for a very minute rotation at only one segment of the body. Give PT time to work on all avenues. Additionally, some of the discrepancy might be due to muscular tightness, which can be released and stretched and change the amount of discrepancy, and lifting too much would blok that. Gott run, but any ?? Kate (PT in NY) > > I assume there is a reason why things are done this way, and I will sleep > better if someone could explain it to me. These two things have bothered me for > years. > The 1st is choanal atresia repair at newborn to one year. It appears to me > that the operation fails 99% of the time, and must be repeated, sometimes > several times. Why, with almost no chance of lasting repair, must it be attempted > so early. I don't get the point. Part 2, is that palatal repair seems to > be more valuable. So, why is that not the normal procedure. > > 2ndly, I thought that weight-bearing is essential for muscle development and > strength. Yet 's lifts do not bring her to equal weight distribution, > and therefore, her right side is doing all " standing " weight bearing. And her > left side is the weaker, particularly at the core, and in reference to > balance. How is this not a contributing factor to the problem? > > Thanks for any light you can shed. > in Ma. (, 21 yrs) > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2006 Report Share Posted September 3, 2006 , Patty had four surgeries before the surgery worked. It also was the surgery through the palate that worked. We had to do all of them for her health. It stinks but apparently remains true for some children. About the weight bearing, it needs to be done but there are some things that just can't be changed. Patty has asymmetric hips, ankles and so on. She now has inserts made to equalize her. It helps her. It is a factor but one we can't change. You just have to keep what you have and/or try to improve on it. Bonnie, Mom to Kris 23, Patty CHARGE 21 and wife to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Hi Simon, Thanks for commenting. Does Jess have good air passage with both nostrils now? I need to compare " stent time " vs results in the responses I've filed. She is fortunate, I believe, that she made it with only one major repair. I''ve saved the histories which were posted. also needed immediate oral airway, and also contd. intubation after atresia repair, which then led us to the trach. There ought to be a way for the docs to determine outright which surgical protocal works best for which physical presentations, so we can avoid these repeated surgeries for 'new to the world' Chargrs. That means someone finding an interested ENT. (I assume there is a 'publish or perish' edict in the medical community as well.) ** I also looked at patella mistracking---OUCH!!!! Are you a marathoner? Geez-you do everything right, and it still gets ya. Where's the justice, I ask...lol Tell Flo I miss her, and that you're doing a good job representing the family! in Ma. (, 21 years) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Hi I'm still way behind with my posts but thought I would chip at this late stage. had choanal atresia only, and Lesley said babies are nose breathers only so Jess had be intubated. Following a PDA repair at 5 weeks (life saving operation) she had stents inserted at 7 weeks. These stayed in for 14 weeks (due out earlier but illness and a hospital appt cancellation delayed thier removal). She had to go back in after a few days and had a tidy up done by laser. Since then ENT have done a couple of tidy ups while Jess was having other procedures. These tidy ups were not scheduled. We had not noticed any difference in Jess's breathing prior hence I am calling them tidy ups rather than additional procedures. She also had mitamycin to reudce the scar tissue. Again from a personal perspective I am teaching myself to walk and stand differently to alleviate patella mistracking. I am also having to release my TFE's (the muscle's over the front of the hip). They were not just overdeveloped but have been solid for decades. When they are loose I really notice the difference particilarly in my pelvis which I regularly pull out of alignment. My body has been used to the way I have stood and walked for years and also used to the locked muscles. It is possible to re educate your body but it is slow and painful. It also involves much conscious effort which is perhaps the hardest part. Best wishes Simon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.