Guest guest Posted January 27, 2007 Report Share Posted January 27, 2007 Missouri Seeks Fix in Minimum-Wage Glitch Kansas City Star (MO) (KRT) via NewsEdge Corporation JEFFERSON CITY, Mo.-- Missouri lawmakers want to fix a glitch with the state's new minimum-wage law that could force cities to pay millions in overtime to firefighters and police officers. Voters in November adopted Proposition B, which raised the state's minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $6.50 an hour. However, the law, which took effect Jan. 1, also deleted provisions in the old law that dealt with which workers were exempt from normal overtime pay rules. That change, according to the Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, means that firefighters and police officers who work more than 40 hours a week now are eligible for overtime. As a result, a lawsuit was filed Friday in Cole County Circuit Court seeking an injunction retroactive to Jan. 1 against enforcing the new minimum wage law for local governments. The 18 plaintiffs include several St. Louis area local governments, the Missouri Municipal League and the Missouri Association of Fire Protection Districts. Under the old law, a firefighter who worked more than 212 hours in 28 days was eligible for overtime. A police officer had to work 171 hours in 28 days to receive overtime. Firefighters commonly have 24-hour shifts; police sometimes work 10- and 12-hour shifts. Markenson, executive director of the Missouri Municipal League, said the new rules would be expensive for cities if they remained in place. " If the Department of Labor's interpretation is not changed by legislation or litigation, the cost to Missouri taxpayers would be in the millions of dollars for overtime pay " or adding additional personnel, he said. Markenson said Rolla, for example, estimates the law could cost an additional $180,000 a year in police overtime and $350,000 a year in firefighter overtime. In the St. Louis County community of land Heights, the cost could be $750,000 in police overtime, he said. Three fire protection districts in Jefferson County, southwest of St. Louis, said they were asking their firefighters to take hourly pay cuts so that their pay with overtime would equal their current salaries. , president of the Missouri Association of Fire Chiefs, said his organization supports efforts to tweak the language in the new law. " We'd have to lose staffing to go to a 40-hour workweek, " said. " It wouldn't be an improvement of service, and what it really boils down to is how good of a service can we provide the taxpayer. " , chief of the North Kansas City Fire Department, said he was unaware of any Kansas City area departments that were affected by the law. Kansas City Fire Chief Smokey Dyer said the city's legal department believes that the contract between the department and the firefighters' union overrides the law. Dyer said the union has not asked for any changes to firefighters' schedules. " We don't feel that there's any legal or fiscal impact on Kansas City, Missouri, " he said. Still, Dyer said he would prefer that the law was changed. " We would rather have the fix to clarify it and make sure there's nothing left in a gray area, " he said. State Sen. Griesheimer, a Washington Republican, is one of several lawmakers who have filed bills to address the issue. Griesheimer said lawmakers wanted to put a bill on Gov. Matt Blunt's desk quickly. By Tim Hoover and Shultz. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant Buddhist philosopher at-large LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (Home Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) " A Texan with a Jersey Attitude " " Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people " Eleanor Roosevelt - US diplomat & reformer (1884 - 1962) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.