Guest guest Posted January 3, 2007 Report Share Posted January 3, 2007 Anyone seen the new version of the DWI blood draw bill proposed this year? FYI, text in brackets [] is STRIKETHROUGH, meaning that it's redacted from the current law. I think this is a resaonable compromise and will go a long way to aid the prosecution of drunk drivers, increase public safety and build stronger relationships with peace officers. There's also a bill (that I can't find, but I've seen discussed) that would " just admit " certain types of evidence in DWI cases, lowering the chance that someone drawing the blood gets called to testify in the first place. Mike By: Corte H.B. No. 259 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1-1 AN ACT 1-2 relating to the persons authorized to draw a blood specimen from a 1-3 vehicle operator to test for alcohol concentration or other 1-4 intoxicating substances. 1-5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-6 SECTION 1 . Section 724.017, Transportation Code, is amended 1-7 to read as follows: 1-8 Sec. 724.017. TAKING OF BLOOD SPECIMEN. (a) Only the 1-9 following [a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered 1-10 professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse] may take a blood 1-11 specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this 1-12 chapter: 1-13 (1) a physician; 1-14 (2) a qualified technician; 1-15 (3) a chemist; 1-16 (4) a registered professional nurse; 1-17 (5) a licensed vocational nurse; or 1-18 (6) a licensed or certified emergency medical 1-19 technician-paramedic or a licensed paramedic, except that a peace 1-20 officer may not request or order a technician-paramedic or 1-21 paramedic to: 1-22 (A) travel to a location solely to take a blood 1-23 specimen; or 1-24 ( take a blood specimen when the 2-1 technician-paramedic or paramedic reasonably believes that 2-2 complying with the request or order would interfere with the 2-3 treatment or transportation of a patient. 2-4 ( A [The] blood specimen must be taken according to 2-5 recognized medical procedures [in a sanitary place]. [(] The 2-6 person who takes a [the] blood specimen under this chapter, or the 2-7 facility [hospital] where a [the] blood specimen is taken, is not 2-8 liable for damages arising from the request or order of the peace 2-9 officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if 2-10 the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical 2-11 procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from 2-12 liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. 2-13 [© In this section, " qualified technician " does not 2-14 include emergency medical services personnel.] 2-15 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives 2-16 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as 2-17 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this 2-18 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this 2-19 Act takes effect September 1, 2007. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2007 Report Share Posted January 3, 2007 Mike, I agree....we need to be involved in this...we speak of the horrors of DUI deaths and accidents and how we need to get and keep these guys off the road...BUT don't ask us to do anything to assist with it. This is exactly what was said last year in reference to this topic...but I am sure many stakeholders will stand up and start talking about how this will hurt our good guy image and will make patients not trust us anymore....or that we aren't protocoled to do this...or we will have to do assessments and follow protocols....yada...yada...yada... What many forget is that this is in the transportation code relating to accidents involving fatalities or possible fatalities. Blood draws are mandated at this time and in MANY parts of the states, if the LEO has to wait until the accident is cleaned up, scene clear and then drives to the hospital, the blood draw may be old and have more loopholes for clever defense lawyers. In many states EMS personnel have a role in this process. During my 10 years in Florida I drew more of these than I care to think about. There is a legal blood draw kit that has all the paperwork, releases, seals, and equipment including vacutainer holder, vacutainer needles, vacutainers, iodine prep pads, instructions, etc...it takes about 10 to 15 minutes to perform this and although there is a chance of going to court...more times than not EMS is subpeoned in these criminal cases anyway due to the fatality and the severity of the charges as well as our role on scene and interaction with those who were involved. We all like the money we get from successful DUI convictions...we like the fact that these guys get prosecuted when they wipe out the family of five....maybe....just maybe...we can get this passed so that we can help our other healthcare and legal brethren in this battle. Just my 0.02.... Dudley EMS DWI Blood Draws Anyone seen the new version of the DWI blood draw bill proposed this year? FYI, text in brackets [] is STRIKETHROUGH, meaning that it's redacted from the current law. I think this is a resaonable compromise and will go a long way to aid the prosecution of drunk drivers, increase public safety and build stronger relationships with peace officers. There's also a bill (that I can't find, but I've seen discussed) that would " just admit " certain types of evidence in DWI cases, lowering the chance that someone drawing the blood gets called to testify in the first place. Mike By: Corte H.B. No. 259 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1-1 AN ACT 1-2 relating to the persons authorized to draw a blood specimen from a 1-3 vehicle operator to test for alcohol concentration or other 1-4 intoxicating substances. 1-5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-6 SECTION 1 .. Section 724.017, Transportation Code, is amended 1-7 to read as follows: 1-8 Sec. 724.017. TAKING OF BLOOD SPECIMEN. (a) Only the 1-9 following [a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered 1-10 professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse] may take a blood 1-11 specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this 1-12 chapter: 1-13 (1) a physician; 1-14 (2) a qualified technician; 1-15 (3) a chemist; 1-16 (4) a registered professional nurse; 1-17 (5) a licensed vocational nurse; or 1-18 (6) a licensed or certified emergency medical 1-19 technician-paramedic or a licensed paramedic, except that a peace 1-20 officer may not request or order a technician-paramedic or 1-21 paramedic to: 1-22 (A) travel to a location solely to take a blood 1-23 specimen; or 1-24 ( take a blood specimen when the 2-1 technician-paramedic or paramedic reasonably believes that 2-2 complying with the request or order would interfere with the 2-3 treatment or transportation of a patient. 2-4 ( A [The] blood specimen must be taken according to 2-5 recognized medical procedures [in a sanitary place]. [(] The 2-6 person who takes a [the] blood specimen under this chapter, or the 2-7 facility [hospital] where a [the] blood specimen is taken, is not 2-8 liable for damages arising from the request or order of the peace 2-9 officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if 2-10 the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical 2-11 procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from 2-12 liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. 2-13 [© In this section, " qualified technician " does not 2-14 include emergency medical services personnel.] 2-15 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives 2-16 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as 2-17 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this 2-18 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this 2-19 Act takes effect September 1, 2007. ________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 While talking with our local JP, she referred to this bill from the Legislative Session 76®. If this was passed, as it appears was the case, then “Paramedic†has been in the wording since 1999. The major change with HB3775 that was submitted in the current session is that “A JP shall order…, rather than “A JP may order…â€. The EMS community in our county will be meeting with the County Judge and JPs in our county to discuss present and pending legislation so that conflict can be avoided. H.B. No. 3775 AN ACT relating to the persons a justice of the peace may order to take a specimen of blood from the body of a person who died in a vehicle accident. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Article 49.10(j), Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended to read as follows: (j) A justice of the peace may order a physician, qualified technician, paramedic, chemist, registered professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse to take a specimen of blood from the body of a person who died as the result of a motor vehicle accident if the justice determines that circumstances indicate that the person may have been driving while intoxicated. SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 1999. SECTION 3. The importance of this legislation and the crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an emergency and an imperative public necessity that the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended. _______________________________ _______________________________ President of the Senate Speaker of the House I certify that H.B. No. 3775 was passed by the House on May 8, 1999, by a non‑record vote. _______________________________ Chief Clerk of the House I certify that H.B. No. 3775 was passed by the Senate on May 26, 1999, by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 0. _______________________________ Secretary of the Senate APPROVED: _____________________ Date _____________________ Governor , Director Seminole EMS 302 S. Main Seminole, Texas 79360 FAX Cell EMS DWI Blood Draws Anyone seen the new version of the DWI blood draw bill proposed this year? FYI, text in brackets [] is STRIKETHROUGH, meaning that it's redacted from the current law. I think this is a resaonable compromise and will go a long way to aid the prosecution of drunk drivers, increase public safety and build stronger relationships with peace officers. There's also a bill (that I can't find, but I've seen discussed) that would " just admit " certain types of evidence in DWI cases, lowering the chance that someone drawing the blood gets called to testify in the first place. Mike By: Corte H.B. No. 259 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1-1 AN ACT 1-2 relating to the persons authorized to draw a blood specimen from a 1-3 vehicle operator to test for alcohol concentration or other 1-4 intoxicating substances. 1-5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: 1-6 SECTION 1 .. Section 724.017, Transportation Code, is amended 1-7 to read as follows: 1-8 Sec. 724.017. TAKING OF BLOOD SPECIMEN. (a) Only the 1-9 following [a physician, qualified technician, chemist, registered 1-10 professional nurse, or licensed vocational nurse] may take a blood 1-11 specimen at the request or order of a peace officer under this 1-12 chapter: 1-13 (1) a physician; 1-14 (2) a qualified technician; 1-15 (3) a chemist; 1-16 (4) a registered professional nurse; 1-17 (5) a licensed vocational nurse; or 1-18 (6) a licensed or certified emergency medical 1-19 technician-paramedic or a licensed paramedic, except that a peace 1-20 officer may not request or order a technician-paramedic or 1-21 paramedic to: 1-22 (A) travel to a location solely to take a blood 1-23 specimen; or 1-24 ( take a blood specimen when the 2-1 technician-paramedic or paramedic reasonably believes that 2-2 complying with the request or order would interfere with the 2-3 treatment or transportation of a patient. 2-4 ( A [The] blood specimen must be taken according to 2-5 recognized medical procedures [in a sanitary place]. [(] The 2-6 person who takes a [the] blood specimen under this chapter, or the 2-7 facility [hospital] where a [the] blood specimen is taken, is not 2-8 liable for damages arising from the request or order of the peace 2-9 officer to take the blood specimen as provided by this chapter if 2-10 the blood specimen was taken according to recognized medical 2-11 procedures. This subsection does not relieve a person from 2-12 liability for negligence in the taking of a blood specimen. 2-13 [© In this section, " qualified technician " does not 2-14 include emergency medical services personnel.] 2-15 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives 2-16 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as 2-17 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this 2-18 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this 2-19 Act takes effect September 1, 2007. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.