Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 And if it is less than 6, say 5.5, what would that be. Mine was 10.8, so what number would that be. Margaret Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 > > And if it is less than 6, say 5.5, what would that be. Mine was 10.8, > so what number would that be. > > Margaret There is a table here: http://www.webmd.com/hw/health_guide_atoz/uq1181abc.asp 5.5 around 110 10.8 around 270 These numbers are APPROXIMATE. If you test once a day...fasting; and that blood sugar is always 110, does NOT mean you will have an A1C of 5.5... If your untested blood sugars are much higher than 110, your A1C will be higher than 5.5 This is a 3 month (approximately) average of your blood sugar at the time the blood cells are made. Since your body produces blood cells continuously, every blood sugar level throughout the day, all 24 hours of it, is included in this reading. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 Here is some more info about the A1C test: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c Mike > > And if it is less than 6, say 5.5, what would that be. Mine was 10.8, > so what number would that be. > > Margaret > > > > > > > Diabetes homepage: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/diabetes/ > > To unsubscribe to this group, send an email to: > diabetes-unsubscribe > Hope you come back soon! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 Wikipedia entries should always be treated with caution, they are sometimes very suspect in factual content. Take care. Barry UK ----- Original Message ----- To: diabetes > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 2:29 AM > Here is some more info about the A1C test: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c > > Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 > > Wikipedia entries should always be treated with caution, they are > sometimes > very suspect in factual content. > > Take care. Barry UK Why not read it before you condem it? There are also a couple of good links there as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 > > Wikipedia entries should always be treated with caution, they are > sometimes > very suspect in factual content. > > Take care. Barry UK > Very true, although I have often found them to give a good general overview of a topic, such as in this case. I think the important thing for anyone to remember is that the A1C is an *average*. As Mike pointed out, if your fasting number every day is 100 and that's all you check, that doesn't mean your A1C will necessarily be 5.0(the corollary to an average BG of 100). Maybe you're going up pretty high after meals. That's why the A1C is important: because it shows you your overall average, including the times you did check and the times you didn.'t Molly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 The links Eunice provided for A1C measurements are exact numbers so there is no guessing. I've used other charts before and mostly they are too far off to get a real good idea. Again, I recommend printing out that info on the link Eunice provided. They even have a pocket version. I was about to provide that link myself til I saw she already did. I keep my copy inside my diabetes binder where I keep my food diaries. When I see my averages from my meter I can check it and see somewhat how I am doing with A1C as I go along. It is a great help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 Mike, I use a Free Style Flash glucometer. I have no idea whether it tests plasma or the other kind (forgot the name) of blood. Does it matter? And I am totally confused on this one: The first number that appears on the monitor is a 14 day average of the BSs I've taken. How does this differ from the A1C? I am under the impression that since I am controlling my BS#s through diet and no meds, the relative number is what I am looking for- i.e., I don't really want my 2hr post meal BS# to be over 140. I'd like my morning fasting # to be no higher than 120. And as my dr told me if I go up to 170 for 3 days without dropping down I should call him. this has never happened so I am not terribly worried. I am not even 'required' to call in my BS#s weekly - just call if I hit 170 for 3 days etc. So I am watching, taking BS#s for new foods or new meals, both before and after new foods to see what I can and can't eat to stay within the above goals. Can you give me your thoughts on that - anyone else too :-) thanks JUDITH == > There is a table here: > > http://www.webmd.com/hw/health_guide_atoz/uq1181abc.asp > > 5.5 around 110 > > 10.8 around 270 > > These numbers are APPROXIMATE. > > If you test once a day...fasting; and that blood sugar is always 110, does > NOT mean you will have an A1C of 5.5... > > If your untested blood sugars are much higher than 110, your A1C will be > higher than 5.5 > > This is a 3 month (approximately) average of your blood sugar at the time > the blood cells are made. Since your body produces blood cells > continuously, every blood sugar level throughout the day, all 24 hours of > it, is included in this reading. > > Mike > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/342 - Release Date: 5/17/06 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 > > > > And I am totally confused on this one: The first number that appears on > the > monitor is a 14 day average of the BSs I've taken. How does this differ > from the A1C? > I will give this one a shot. In simple terms (because those are the only ones I understand, ah ha ha), the A1C is a measure of how much glucose (aka, sugar) has attached to your red blood cells. Red blood cells have a lifespan of 2-3 months or so, so by measuring how much glucose they have attached to them, you can get an idea of what your blood sugar has been doing over the past 2-3 months. The number is weighted more heavily towards the most recent month or so, I believe. The average on your meter is the average of all the numbers you have checked over the past 14 days. It can be a helpful indicator of how your overall control is, but it only measures THE TIMES YOU CHECKED. Your A1C number is a measure of what your blood sugar has been doing 24/7 around the clock for the previous month or two. I hope that helps? I know some people provided some links explaining A1C more thoroughly, earlier in this conversation. Molly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 - > And I am totally confused on this one: The first number that appears on the > monitor is a 14 day average of the BSs I've taken. How does this differ > from the A1C? > The 14 day average is only an average of the BG's you have actually tested yourself for. It does not take into account all of those you did not know about. The A1C takes into account all numbers up and down, highest and lowest. Your 14-day average would not show this obviously since you are not continuously monitoring your BG all day and all night. The 14-day average is a general idea of how you are doing with what you have tested. For instance if you had many highs missed you could end up with an A1C higher than your average shows on the meter average. A1C results are going to be the whole picture not part of the picture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 Molly, Yup, that helps! Thanks.... Now I have to figure out why my BS#s are coming down even with food becoming sloppy. Judith > > > I will give this one a shot. In simple terms (because those are the only > ones I understand, ah ha ha), the A1C is a measure of how much glucose (aka, > sugar) has attached to your red blood cells. Red blood cells have a > lifespan of 2-3 months or so, so by measuring how much glucose they have > attached to them, you can get an idea of what your blood sugar has been > doing over the past 2-3 months. The number is weighted more heavily towards > the most recent month or so, I believe. > > The average on your meter is the average of all the numbers you have checked > over the past 14 days. It can be a helpful indicator of how your overall > control is, but it only measures THE TIMES YOU CHECKED. Your A1C number is > a measure of what your blood sugar has been doing 24/7 around the clock for > the previous month or two. > > I hope that helps? I know some people provided some links explaining A1C > more thoroughly, earlier in this conversation. > > Molly > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/342 - Release Date: 5/17/06 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 Thanks! Judith > The 14 day average is only an average of the BG's you have actually > tested yourself for. It does not take into account all of those you > did not know about. The A1C takes into account all numbers up and > down, highest and lowest. Your 14-day average would not show this > obviously since you are not continuously monitoring your BG all day > and all night. The 14-day average is a general idea of how you are > doing with what you have tested. For instance if you had many highs > missed you could end up with an A1C higher than your average shows on > the meter average. A1C results are going to be the whole picture not > part of the picture. > > > > > > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/342 - Release Date: 5/17/06 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 what happen to the red blood cell after 3 months , do they go a way or do they attach to your arthery ?? I'm new at these and trying to learn all I can becaue I have hart problems too , I had two hart attcks and just got out of the hospital with my COPD .I guess I had and infection in my lungs. They do tell you anything at all because I learn I had diebetes was from my hart docter because he has the hospital for my rectors an Then he ask me if I had diabetes becaue my blood sugar was 260 when I was admitted in the hospital and I went to my doctor and then he did more blood work and conferm I do know. I have olsar on both feet and the one I had 5 years . And finaly they are starting to heal. Your truly Charlie mkcheerfulheart joyfulhearts4him@...> wrote: - > And I am totally confused on this one: The first number that appears on the > monitor is a 14 day average of the BSs I've taken. How does this differ > from the A1C? > The 14 day average is only an average of the BG's you have actually tested yourself for. It does not take into account all of those you did not know about. The A1C takes into account all numbers up and down, highest and lowest. Your 14-day average would not show this obviously since you are not continuously monitoring your BG all day and all night. The 14-day average is a general idea of how you are doing with what you have tested. For instance if you had many highs missed you could end up with an A1C higher than your average shows on the meter average. A1C results are going to be the whole picture not part of the picture. Diabetes homepage: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/diabetes/ To unsubscribe to this group, send an email to: diabetes-unsubscribe Hope you come back soon! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 > > what happen to the red blood cell after 3 months , do they go a way or do > they attach to your arthery ?? I'm new at these and trying to learn all I > can becaue I have hart problems too , I had two hart attcks and just got out > of the hospital with my COPD .I guess I had and infection in my lungs. They > do tell you anything at all because I learn I had diebetes was from my hart > docter because he has the hospital for my rectors an Then he ask me if I had > diabetes becaue my blood sugar was 260 when I was admitted in the hospital > and I went to my doctor and then he did more blood work and conferm I do > know. I have olsar on both feet and the one I had 5 years . And finaly they > are starting to heal. > Your truly Charlie They are filtered out (by the spleen I believe)... They don't attach to your arteries. Platelets do and plaque does (of course, if the blood cells cot anywhere they can get stuck)... Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 As a school librarian,I always caution our students to check their facts on another site. Anyone can change information in any entries on Wikipedia, with truth or falsehoods. Donna R _____ From: diabetes [mailto:diabetes ] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:17 AM To: diabetes Subject: Re: So if someone has an A1c of 6, what BS number does that correspond to? > > Wikipedia entries should always be treated with caution, they are > sometimes > very suspect in factual content. > > Take care. Barry UK Why not read it before you condem it? There are also a couple of good links there as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 > > As a school librarian,I always caution our students to check their facts > on > another site. Anyone can change information in any entries on Wikipedia, > with truth or falsehoods. > > Donna R Donna, I understand that. And as you just said, I suggest you look at the info I pointed to before discouraging someone to reference it. There is nothing wrong with the entry and it's very easy to understand and contains links outside of the dreaded Wikipedia to support the information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Yes that's what I meant Donna Take care. Barry UK RE: So if someone has an A1c of 6, what BS number does that correspond to? > As a school librarian,I always caution our students to check their facts on > another site. Anyone can change information in any entries on Wikipedia, > with truth or falsehoods. > > Donna R Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Anyone can change information in any entries on Wikipedia, > > with truth or falsehoods. > > > > Donna R > Wow! Good thing to know! Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.