Guest guest Posted December 21, 2007 Report Share Posted December 21, 2007 It was about 9:30 a.m. Wednesday when a mayday distress call alerted County emergency workers to the possibility of a downed helicopter in the area. Immediately, 911 dispatchers, paramedics, police and fire company volunteers scrambled into action to locate the STAT MedEvac chopper - the type of helicopter that transports critically ill or injured patients to the nearest hospital capable of handling the emergency. Volunteer firefighters abandoned work to search for the chopper. Medic units left from Hanover Hospital. State police were notified in Gettysburg. Even another STAT MedEvac helicopter in nearby Hagerstown, Md., prepared to launch. Within 10 minutes of beginning to search, volunteers from Hampton Fire Co. located the chopper on a farm near Browns Dam Road. The chopper had landed, and its pilot was safe. But the relief that came from finding the helicopter was quickly replaced with an equal dose of frustration. " It was just a drill, and we didn't know it, " said County 911 coordinator Donna Powers. According to Powers, the short-lived chaos all boils down to a miscommunication, and the parties responsible are likely as far away as Pittsburgh - the location of STAT MedEvac headquarters. STAT MedEvac's own dispatchers - who initiated the mayday call - apparently did not know about the planned training mission designed to test whether the agency could locate its helicopters if they travel off radar. Because they didn't know about the drill, the dispatchers in Pittsburgh alerted local authorities in County when the chopper - which was supposed to be traveling from ville to Shippensburg - disappeared somewhere near Green Ridge Road in Hamilton Township, Powers said. Only the higher-ups at STAT MedEvac and the pilot were apparently aware of the training mission, Powers said. " They didn't want their own center to know, " she said. " But unfortunately they forgot to tell us. " STAT MedEvac periodically holds drills throughout the state similar to disaster drills fire and emergency personnel run, said spokesman Dan Nakles. " We fly a lot of missions, and there ... are specific safety requirements, " Nakles said. " We try to review them. " Nakles confirmed that the STAT MedEvac supervisor at the dispatch center did not know about the drill, although he should have in order to oversee operations, Nakles said. STAT MedEvac last held a drill about six or seven months ago in Armstrong County near Pittsburgh, but the supervisor at the dispatch center was aware of that drill so dispatchers calling the 911 center identified it as a drill, Nakles said. Personnel could then go through the appropriate steps " on paper, " he said, which is STAT MedEvac's intention. Nakles said the drill was STAT MedEvac's first in the middle of the state, which could have been a reason for the miscommunication. But Nakles stressed the 911 center and other emergency personnel " did a great job " nevertheless. " I can't tell you how well they responded, " Nakles said. " It went the way you would want it to go. " The incident had a happy ending, although Hampton Fire Co. President Rodney Heagey said such mishaps are nothing to laugh at. " We're talking millions of dollars of equipment on the road for a false alarm, " Heagey said. When the call came in that a chopper had disappeared around Green Ridge Road, Heagey said it crossed his mind that a local man was a STAT MedEvac pilot who lives on a farm off of Browns Dam Road - located less than a mile from Green Ridge Road. While most personnel raced to Green Ridge Road, Heagey said he gave in to his hunch and sent a few private individuals to Browns Dam Road - where they found the chopper and its pilot. " It really helps to know who lives around you, " Heagey said. Powers said she intends to discuss the matter with STAT MedEvac officials to ensure that a similar incident does not happen again. " It tied up my dispatch center, " she said. STAT MedEvac will reevaluate the situation Monday and see what it could have done better, Nakles said. " I understand their concerns, " Nakles said. " The question is, do you really want emergency vehicles responding when it's a drill? " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2007 Report Share Posted December 24, 2007 So how do you know how the resources will respond when it is not a drill??? " Bledsoe, DO " wrote: It was about 9:30 a.m. Wednesday when a mayday distress call alerted County emergency workers to the possibility of a downed helicopter in the area. Immediately, 911 dispatchers, paramedics, police and fire company volunteers scrambled into action to locate the STAT MedEvac chopper - the type of helicopter that transports critically ill or injured patients to the nearest hospital capable of handling the emergency. Volunteer firefighters abandoned work to search for the chopper. Medic units left from Hanover Hospital. State police were notified in Gettysburg. Even another STAT MedEvac helicopter in nearby Hagerstown, Md., prepared to launch. Within 10 minutes of beginning to search, volunteers from Hampton Fire Co. located the chopper on a farm near Browns Dam Road. The chopper had landed, and its pilot was safe. But the relief that came from finding the helicopter was quickly replaced with an equal dose of frustration. " It was just a drill, and we didn't know it, " said County 911 coordinator Donna Powers. According to Powers, the short-lived chaos all boils down to a miscommunication, and the parties responsible are likely as far away as Pittsburgh - the location of STAT MedEvac headquarters. STAT MedEvac's own dispatchers - who initiated the mayday call - apparently did not know about the planned training mission designed to test whether the agency could locate its helicopters if they travel off radar. Because they didn't know about the drill, the dispatchers in Pittsburgh alerted local authorities in County when the chopper - which was supposed to be traveling from ville to Shippensburg - disappeared somewhere near Green Ridge Road in Hamilton Township, Powers said. Only the higher-ups at STAT MedEvac and the pilot were apparently aware of the training mission, Powers said. " They didn't want their own center to know, " she said. " But unfortunately they forgot to tell us. " STAT MedEvac periodically holds drills throughout the state similar to disaster drills fire and emergency personnel run, said spokesman Dan Nakles. " We fly a lot of missions, and there ... are specific safety requirements, " Nakles said. " We try to review them. " Nakles confirmed that the STAT MedEvac supervisor at the dispatch center did not know about the drill, although he should have in order to oversee operations, Nakles said. STAT MedEvac last held a drill about six or seven months ago in Armstrong County near Pittsburgh, but the supervisor at the dispatch center was aware of that drill so dispatchers calling the 911 center identified it as a drill, Nakles said. Personnel could then go through the appropriate steps " on paper, " he said, which is STAT MedEvac's intention. Nakles said the drill was STAT MedEvac's first in the middle of the state, which could have been a reason for the miscommunication. But Nakles stressed the 911 center and other emergency personnel " did a great job " nevertheless. " I can't tell you how well they responded, " Nakles said. " It went the way you would want it to go. " The incident had a happy ending, although Hampton Fire Co. President Rodney Heagey said such mishaps are nothing to laugh at. " We're talking millions of dollars of equipment on the road for a false alarm, " Heagey said. When the call came in that a chopper had disappeared around Green Ridge Road, Heagey said it crossed his mind that a local man was a STAT MedEvac pilot who lives on a farm off of Browns Dam Road - located less than a mile from Green Ridge Road. While most personnel raced to Green Ridge Road, Heagey said he gave in to his hunch and sent a few private individuals to Browns Dam Road - where they found the chopper and its pilot. " It really helps to know who lives around you, " Heagey said. Powers said she intends to discuss the matter with STAT MedEvac officials to ensure that a similar incident does not happen again. " It tied up my dispatch center, " she said. STAT MedEvac will reevaluate the situation Monday and see what it could have done better, Nakles said. " I understand their concerns, " Nakles said. " The question is, do you really want emergency vehicles responding when it's a drill? " Danny L. Owner/NREMT-P PETSAR INC. (Panhandle Emergency Training Services And Response) Office Fax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2007 Report Share Posted December 24, 2007 Because its in the nature of those of us involved with emergency services to respond when the call for help is made. Kirk EMT-B **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2007 Report Share Posted December 25, 2007 In a message dated 12/25/2007 1:06:05 A.M. Central Standard Time, petsardlj@... writes: So how do you know how the resources will respond when it is not a drill??? That's likely the oldest and lamest excuse for such incidents on the planet. There is NO excuse for these kinds of things, they invite disaster. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2007 Report Share Posted December 25, 2007 In a message dated 12/25/2007 5:24:20 P.M. Central Standard Time, petsardlj@... writes: Ok, please explain. If it was not going to cause disaster if it were a real situation how would it cause disaster in this case. By not informing people maybe someone was left out of the loop (I'll give you a tissue and perhaps I will let you know next time). Perhaps resources were used that may not have had to be used if it were considered a drill. If there were a major disaster in this case what is going to happen if or when the real event happens. Is it not better to find out now instead of losing personnel later? Have you ever planned a large scale exercise or drill? I have and frankly if I did so for any of my previous employers within the Federal and state systems I worked for and I pulled a no notice stunt like this I'd have been fired in about 30 minutes. The two main reasons you do not do this is 1) allocation of resources that may well be needed to respond to a REAL emergency but then you have this thing called RESPONDER SAFETY. You do not set people out on missions where the risk is for nothing. Yes that means you may well do things differently but if you are trained right and you exercise right (with the recognition of the artificialities that are inbred in a well designed exercise, you will respond well to the real thing if you take the time to learn fro your mistakes made both in the real world and in the exercise world. It's OK to risk lives to save live it is a part of the job but to send folks out on a mission where they may do something that gets them killed while they are responding to a drill is again inviting disaster. if you were killed while you responded to this you would get one hell of a funeral (about the ONLY thing that the fire and EMS world does with ANY consistency) but in about 3 weeks your loved ones attorney would be filing a lawsuit (rightfully so) against some entity. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2007 Report Share Posted December 25, 2007 In a message dated 12/25/2007 5:24:20 P.M. Central Standard Time, petsardlj@... writes: Were any personnel lost? Were any damages done? Just please let me know what the train of thought is, I ain't catchin " it. Yea I see that and here is why. If you do something and don't get hurt, don't have damages, etc you assume it will always be that way. Well firefighters, EMT's, Medics and cops die everyday in training accidents. Everyone of those are presentable and some of them happen in these kinds of events. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2007 Report Share Posted December 25, 2007 I'm going to play the role of the safety nazi here. Accidents imply that nothing can be done to prevent them. There is no reason why sufficient preparation can't prevent a training injury or death. -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, LP -Attorney/Licensed Paramedic -Austin, Texas In a message dated 12/25/2007 6:18:27 P.M. Central Standard Time, lnmolino@... writes: In a message dated 12/25/2007 5:24:20 P.M. Central Standard Time, _petsardlj@sbcglobalpets_ (mailto:petsardlj@...) writes: Were any personnel lost? Were any damages done? Just please let me know what the train of thought is, I ain't catchin " it. Yea I see that and here is why. If you do something and don't get hurt, don't have damages, etc you assume it will always be that way. Well firefighters, EMT's, Medics and cops die everyday in training accidents. Everyone of those are presentable and some of them happen in these kinds of events. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/FF/N Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Freelance CoFreelance Consultant/Trainer _LNMolino@..._ (mailto:LNMolino@...) (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ******************************************<WBR>*********<WBR>********* (_http://food.http://food.http://food.<Whttp://food.<WBRhttp://fo_ (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) ) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2007 Report Share Posted December 25, 2007 There are many things I'll doubt and second-guess Louis on, but operations and planning are not among them. (Cardiology may be a different story, though. I'm sure Louis will always second-guess me on pediatric alternative vascular access, likewise.) Seriously, though, even the drills with the least notice have some notice. At the very least, there's enough notice to say, " We're having some sort of drill today. " While there's great value to the statement, " You train like you play and you play like you train, " TRAINING should not involve necessarily the same risks involved with an actual response. The training should limit outside risks. Just my $0.02. But I'm not the operations guru. Louis actually is. -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, LP -Attorney/Licensed Paramedic -Austin, Texas In a message dated 12/25/2007 6:15:07 P.M. Central Standard Time, lnmolino@... writes: In a message dated 12/25/2007 5:24:20 P.M. Central Standard Time, _petsardlj@sbcglobalpets_ (mailto:petsardlj@...) writes: Ok, please explain. If it was not going to cause disaster if it were a real situation how would it cause disaster in this case. By not informing people maybe someone was left out of the loop (I'll give you a tissue and perhaps I will let you know next time). Perhaps resources were used that may not have had to be used if it were considered a drill. If there were a major disaster in this case what is going to happen if or when the real event happens. Is it not better to find out now instead of losing personnel later? Have you ever planned a large scale exercise or drill? I have and frankly if I did so for any of my previous employers within the Federal and state systems I worked for and I pulled a no notice stunt like this I'd have been fired in about 30 minutes. The two main reasons you do not do this is 1) allocation of resources that may well be needed to respond to a REAL emergency but then you have this thing called RESPONDER SAFETY. You do not set people out on missions where the risk is for nothing. Yes that means you may well do things differently but if you are trained right and you exercise right (with the recognition of the artificialities that are inbred in a well designed exercise, you will respond well to the real thing if you take the time to learn fro your mistakes made both in the real world and in the exercise world. It's OK to risk lives to save live it is a part of the job but to send folks out on a mission where they may do something that gets them killed while they are responding to a drill is again inviting disaster. if you were killed while you responded to this you would get one hell of a funeral (about the ONLY thing that the fire and EMS world does with ANY consistency) but in about 3 weeks your loved ones attorney would be filing a lawsuit (rightfully so) against some entity. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/FF/N Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Freelance CoFreelance Consultant/Trainer _LNMolino@..._ (mailto:LNMolino@...) (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. ******************************************<WBR>*********<WBR>********* (_http://food.http://food.http://food.<Whttp://food.<WBRhttp://fo_ (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) ) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2007 Report Share Posted December 26, 2007 I believe that the others have made my points for me. Every run/drill/exercise has a risk period and to add to that risk is just plain DUMB. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2007 Report Share Posted December 26, 2007 http://cms.firehouse.com/web/online/In-The-Line-Of-Duty/Four-German-Fire fighters-Killed-in-Crash/39$49873 Four German Firefighters Killed in Crash Four German firemen were killed when their fire engine crashed as they rushed to what turned out be a training exercise, police said Tuesday. The firemen from the small town of Wolmirstedt, near the eastern city of Magdeburg, were alerted Monday evening that a fire had broken out at a kindergarten in a nearby town. They were not told that it was an exercise, police said. The fire truck, with eight firefighters on board, collided with a van at a crossroads and turned over. Four firemen, ranging in age from 20 to 22, were killed and the other four, along with their driver and the driver of the van, seriously injured. ________________________________ From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of THEDUDMAN@... Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 11:05 AM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: Oops3 Very well said...thank you. Go look in Firehouse magazine about 15 months ago about an engine company of 4 was killed in a traffic accident enroute to an unannounced exercise. How do we explain that one to their families... Dudley Re: Oops3 In a message dated 12/25/2007 5:24:20 P.M. Central Standard Time, petsardlj@... <mailto:petsardlj%40sbcglobal.net> writes: Ok, please explain. If it was not going to cause disaster if it were a real situation how would it cause disaster in this case. By not informing people maybe someone was left out of the loop (I'll give you a tissue and perhaps I will let you know next time). Perhaps resources were used that may not have had to be used if it were considered a drill. If there were a major disaster in this case what is going to happen if or when the real event happens. Is it not better to find out now instead of losing personnel later? Have you ever planned a large scale exercise or drill? I have and frankly if I did so for any of my previous employers within the Federal and state systems I worked for and I pulled a no notice stunt like this I'd have been fired in about 30 minutes. The two main reasons you do not do this is 1) allocation of resources that may well be needed to respond to a REAL emergency but then you have this thing called RESPONDER SAFETY. You do not set people out on missions where the risk is for nothing. Yes that means you may well do things differently but if you are trained right and you exercise right (with the recognition of the artificialities that are inbred in a well designed exercise, you will respond well to the real thing if you take the time to learn fro your mistakes made both in the real world and in the exercise world. It's OK to risk lives to save live it is a part of the job but to send folks out on a mission where they may do something that gets them killed while they are responding to a drill is again inviting disaster. if you were killed while you responded to this you would get one hell of a funeral (about the ONLY thing that the fire and EMS world does with ANY consistency) but in about 3 weeks your loved ones attorney would be filing a lawsuit (rightfully so) against some entity. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... <mailto:LNMolino%40aol.com> (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004 <http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004> ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2007 Report Share Posted December 26, 2007 THEDUDMAN@... wrote: " ...It amazes me that people will buy bullet proof vests, stage on violent scenes, etc when that only accounts for a small percentage of EMS deaths...yet we will run emergency for any old stupid reason ... " The low percentage from violence is due to awareness, usually introduced the first night of the first ECA/EMT classes and continuously repeated in classes throughout the career. Vehicle safety, because it is also part of our non-career lives, is given less diligent a discussion and as the saying goes " familiarity breeds contempt " . " A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences. " Proverbs 22:3 --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 In a message dated 12/25/2007 6:28:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: I'm sure Louis will always second-guess me on pediatric alternative vascular access, likewise.) I might lean over your shoulder and whisper " are you sure you want to put that there? " , but it would be between us only. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.