Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 In a message dated 12/12/2007 9:51:19 A.M. Central Standard Time, hbarber@... writes: My issue is the ones that are irresponsible. No one controls them and they answer to no one. Sure they do and sure they are. If an FR is certified be it a person or an organization by the TxDSHS then you and I and everyone else even john Q Public has the complaint process to fall back upon if you feel that's the way to go. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 In a message dated 12-Dec-07 15:16:00 Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: I'm presuming that Henry, as the local EMS director, wants an organized EMS system to respond to emergencies. Having a more or less non-regulated group of first-aiders is much akin to our neighbors listening to a scanner and showing up with a first aid kit, tank of oxygen, CPR and first aid card and saying, " I can help. " the funny part is that emergency oxygen (defined as a minimum of 6 liters per minute delivered by a simple face mask) is specifically exempted from the requirements under the USP for physician oversight. This is due to an agreement between the US FDA, the Compressed Gas Association and the US National Fire Protection Association that was renewed a couple of years ago. Ergo, as long as the 'friendly neighbor' meets the standards mentioned above (does not exceed his/her training), does not accept payment for his/her actions (basic qualification for 'Good Sam' standard), keeps his/her mouth shut about what went on (basic privacy standards), receives permission to provide the help (or provides care to a person meeting 'implied consent' therefore avoiding the tort of battery) and does not commit gross negligence in the process, I'm not sure that there are any legal ramifications that can be brought against the neighbor. Solons, what say you? ck S. Krin, DO FAAFP **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 I think this is what Henry is thinking: I'm Bart P. Pharquahar, and I stayed at the Holiday Inn Express last night. Today, I'm walking through the airport and I see a commotion in front of one of the gates. I immediately run to the AED, retrieve it, take it to the patient, who is blue on the floor with nobody doing CPR, attach the pads and let it do its thing. I defibrillate the patient successfully. However, after he regains ROSC he vomits and aspirates because my night at the Holiday Inn didn't include post resuscitation care. Unfortunately, he dies later from aspiration pneumonia. I may be held liable to the patient's survivors (not likely), but the EMS service is not liable for my actions because there is absolutely no relationship between them and me. Now, let's change the situation by adding one little fact. I am a FRO for the EMS service in that area, and I have received permission from them to perform BCLS. Now, are they responsible for my actions? The answer depends upon the law of agency. Am I an agent of EMS? If I am, then they may very well be liable for my actions according to the law of respondeat superior. The situation will depend upon many facts. Some of them are: (1) the degree of control that EMS exercises over me and my organization; (2) the amount of training I have had; (3) who provided the training (was it EMS or my organization?); (4) was the training adequate; (5) am I acting under protocols of the EMS agency; (6) am I operating under delegated orders from their medical director; (7) does EMS oversee my service's actions in any way, such as providing QA/QI for the FRO; (8) does EMS have actual knowledge or constructive knowledge of my level of training and abilities; (9) does EMS have actual or constructive knowledge that I have previously made mistakes that were not remediated; (10) and the ultimate question: Does EMS have a close enough relationship with the FRO that a reasonable and prudent person would determine that they should be responsible for my actions? These questions are difficult, and the answers will vary as widely as services vary. For the EMS service to be liable there must be a close enough relationship that a jury could reasonably determine that they had the ability, through control, to have anticipated the kind of problem that happened and failed to take reasonable actions to correct the deficiencies. I submit that in order to find an EMS service liable for acts of an agent of the FRO, there must be closer control than usually exists between EMS and FRO; however, such a situation could exist. It is not reassuring that the more control the EMS service has over FROs in an attempt to improve quality, the more likely it is to be liable for the actions of the FRO. I haven't addressed the other problems of sovereign immunity, practical aspects of suing a FRO (what's its corporate structure, if any; is it an agency of a municipality? a county? a volunteer agency? and so on). One suggestion I will make to all EMS organizations who have relationships with FROS is to discuss liability matters with their insurers. Does the EMS organization's liability insurance extend to the actions of a FRO? Most insurers have risk management folks who will gladly discuss risk management with the insured, and often some answers can be elicited from those discussions. This is not meant to be a treatise on the subject upon which whole books have been written. All I have attempted to do is highlight some of the considerations. Gene G. > > > I think Henry's concern is with NON-certified first responders.  There's no > real complaint process for them. > > Sure, the local county attorney could file charges for impersonating an EMS > provider, but charges are unlikely if the first responder isn't exceeding a > layperson's first aid efforts. (Which is probably why Henry and others keep > discussing emergency oxygen.) > > I'm presuming that Henry, as the local EMS director, wants an organized EMS > system to respond to emergencies. Having a more or less non-regulated group > of first-aiders is much akin to our neighbors listening to a scanner and > showing up with a first aid kit, tank of oxygen, CPR and first aid card and > saying, " I can help. " > > While such help is welcome in some cases, we owe it to our public who we > serve to ensure standards for quality and safety are met. > > -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, LP > > -Attorney/Licensed Paramedic > > Re: Re: FRO Questiono > > In a message dated 12/12/2007 9:51:19 A.M. Central Standard Time, > hbarber@... writes: > > My issue is the ones that are irresponsible. No one controls them and they > answer to no one. > Sure they do and sure they are. If an FR is certified be it a person or an > organization by the TxDSHS then you and I and everyone else even john Q > Public > has the complaint process to fall back upon if you feel that's the way to > go. > > Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET > FF/NREMT-B/FSI/ FF/ > Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) > Freelance Consultant/Trainer/ Freelance Consu Freelance Consultant/Traine > > LNMolino@... > > (Cell Phone) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) > (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) > > The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the > author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or > organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with > unless I > specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only > for its > stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials > retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by > the > original author. > > ************ ******** ******** ************<wbr>*********<wbr>**** > (http://food.http://food.http://food.<whttp://food.<wbrhttp://fo) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 In a message dated 12-Dec-07 15:42:18 Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: Doc Krin -- I'm inclined to agree with you.?? Shall I send your application to law school to you? will the Texas bar accept home study/apprentiship to sit for the Bar exam? and if so, will any other state (or the federal court system accept those results? ck S. Krin, DO FAAFP **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 Doc Krin -- I'm inclined to agree with you.?? Shall I send your application to law school to you? I definitely agree that is probably legal, albeit with very strictly defined parameters.?? I could also see an issue where in Texas, the voluntary training standards for volunteer firefighters, as promulgated by the State Firefighters & Fire Marshal's Association, specifically include first aid training. So, in the instance of a volunteer fire department being dispatched along with the ambulance, and the volunteer firefighters providing only that level of traning (IE first aid), I think it would be hard to stop through DSHS.? The local political process may or may not be a different animal.? (STANDARD DISCLAIMER ABOUT THIS NOT BEING LEGAL ADVICE, NOR AM I PROVIDING LEGAL REPRESENTATION) Regardless, it's no way to design or run an EMS system. -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, LP Re: Re: FRO Questiono In a message dated 12-Dec-07 15:16:00 Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: I'm presuming that Henry, as the local EMS director, wants an organized EMS system to respond to emergencies. Having a more or less non-regulated group of first-aiders is much akin to our neighbors listening to a scanner and showing up with a first aid kit, tank of oxygen, CPR and first aid card and saying, " I can help. " the funny part is that emergency oxygen (defined as a minimum of 6 liters per minute delivered by a simple face mask) is specifically exempted from the requirements under the USP for physician oversight. This is due to an agreement between the US FDA, the Compressed Gas Association and the US National Fire Protection Association that was renewed a couple of years ago. Ergo, as long as the 'friendly neighbor' meets the standards mentioned above (does not exceed his/her training), does not accept payment for his/her actions (basic qualification for 'Good Sam' standard), keeps his/her mouth shut about what went on (basic privacy standards), receives permission to provide the help (or provides care to a person meeting 'implied consent' therefore avoiding the tort of battery) and does not commit gross negligence in the process, I'm not sure that there are any legal ramifications that can be brought against the neighbor. Solons, what say you? ck S. Krin, DO FAAFP **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 And again I ask, how is mandating more rules and hoops for rural volunteer FDs to follow and jump through, going to stop Ma and Pa Kittle from listening to the scanner and showing up and trying to help? If the FR's are a part of an organized department then registered or not you have the ability to control them, yes Virginia you can fire a volunteer. If they are not part of an organized department, then when you do arrive to find them helping, stop them, send them to the nearest law enforcement vehicle to provide their ID and take over patient care. Rick ________________________________ From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of Wes Ogilvie Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 3:15 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: Re: FRO Questiono I think Henry's concern is with NON-certified first responders. There's no real complaint process for them. Sure, the local county attorney could file charges for impersonating an EMS provider, but charges are unlikely if the first responder isn't exceeding a layperson's first aid efforts. (Which is probably why Henry and others keep discussing emergency oxygen.) I'm presuming that Henry, as the local EMS director, wants an organized EMS system to respond to emergencies. Having a more or less non-regulated group of first-aiders is much akin to our neighbors listening to a scanner and showing up with a first aid kit, tank of oxygen, CPR and first aid card and saying, " I can help. " While such help is welcome in some cases, we owe it to our public who we serve to ensure standards for quality and safety are met. -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, LP -Attorney/Licensed Paramedic Re: Re: FRO Questiono In a message dated 12/12/2007 9:51:19 A.M. Central Standard Time, hbarber@... <mailto:hbarber%40cableone.net> writes: My issue is the ones that are irresponsible. No one controls them and they answer to no one. Sure they do and sure they are. If an FR is certified be it a person or an organization by the TxDSHS then you and I and everyone else even john Q Public has the complaint process to fall back upon if you feel that's the way to go. Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI Owner and President of LNM Emergency Services Consulting Services (LNMECS) Freelance Consultant/Trainer/Author/Journalist/Fire Protection Consultant LNMolino@... <mailto:LNMolino%40aol.com> (Cell Phone) (IFW/TFW/FSS Office) (IFW/TFW/FSS Fax) The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for its stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the original author. **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004 <http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004> ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 I am pretty sure that's how Wes became an attorney. ________________________________ From: texasems-l [mailto:texasems-l ] On Behalf Of krin135@... Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 3:53 PM To: texasems-l Subject: Re: Re: FRO Questiono In a message dated 12-Dec-07 15:42:18 Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... <mailto:ExLngHrn%40aol.com> writes: Doc Krin -- I'm inclined to agree with you.?? Shall I send your application to law school to you? will the Texas bar accept home study/apprentiship to sit for the Bar exam? and if so, will any other state (or the federal court system accept those results? ck S. Krin, DO FAAFP **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004 <http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004> ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2007 Report Share Posted December 12, 2007 If I remember correctly, they closed that option a few years ago.? In fact, as I recall, the last people to have the " home study " option available to them were state legislators who had been in office for a set period of time.? (Sounded a lot like the regulation was written for a specific person or persons.) I'll talk to the state bar about getting you an " Honorary Junior Attorney " certificate and decoder ring.? Please send me three Cracker Jack boxtops and $19.95 for postage.? Your certificate will be autographed by a REAL Texas judge or mental patient.? (These aren't necessarily mutually?exclusive, ya know.) -Wes Re: Re: FRO Questiono In a message dated 12-Dec-07 15:42:18 Central Standard Time, ExLngHrn@... writes: Doc Krin -- I'm inclined to agree with you.?? Shall I send your application to law school to you? will the Texas bar accept home study/apprentiship to sit for the Bar exam? and if so, will any other state (or the federal court system accept those results? ck S. Krin, DO FAAFP **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.