Guest guest Posted November 30, 2007 Report Share Posted November 30, 2007 I've been thinking about the Wang studies, both airway and National Registry/accredited programs. Instead of us trying to nitpick the studies, how about we find ways to improve EMS on our own so we can actually have a real reason to say why the studies are inapplicable to Texas or our respective programs? What are y'all doing to improve ventilation success at your service?? Bougies?? Supraglottic airways?? SLAM or other training? Waveform capnography? As for EMS education, what are our respective programs doing to ensure that students are fully exposed to the National Standard Curriculum?? Are we actually teaching?? Or are we just showing PowerPoints interspersed with war stories and hoping that students learn by osmosis, holding a Bledsoe text up to their foreheads? I don't like the conclusions of the studies myself.? But instead of complaining about the studies, let's try to fix the faults as identified. -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, LP -Attorney/Licensed Paramedic -Austin, Texas ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp0\ 0050000000003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.