Guest guest Posted November 25, 2007 Report Share Posted November 25, 2007 ] > The regular dr. is likely to give you supplements/drugs to treat your > symptoms, and they create new symptoms [..] > This reminds me of an article I read about nutrient robbery caused by meds, and doctors who don't know what's going on, so they just prescribe more meds.. Part of the book The Side Effects Bible. (It was noted either on this list, or the SulfurStories list which talks about sulfur pathyway disregulation, and a bunch of other stuff - oxylate pathway problems among them, as well as possible autism links to blocks in certain pathways) One example given (I'm sure I'm mis- remembering the details) was a person who comes in complaining of a headache, is put on an NSAID, which caused potassium depletion and thus causes constipation, so they are put on Dulcolax. This causes depletion of another mineral, and more symptoms, so they are put on something else.. And so on.. If they had been given a potassium supplements along with the NSAID, it would have been fine. Same thing with statins and Co-Q10 supplements. Statins are well- known to shutdown (direct) Co-Q10 production (although there are indirect ways to make it I think). The phase I trial of Lovastatin even had an arm that tested Co-Q10 supplementation+Lovastatin against Lovastatin alone. Lo and behold, the group that had the supplements had less muscle pain, and less rhabdomyolosis (that " rare but serious side effect.. " ). Merck even has 2 patents on a combination polypill that contains both Lipitor (does Merck make Lipitor or someone else?) and Co-Q10. No one knows *why* they have the patents, as they've never used them. My feeling is that they will pull them out of the drawer if they want to get Lipitor approved as over-the-counter or behind-the-counter status (which doesn't exist in US, but does in some or all of the EU). Built-in Co-Q10 supplementation makes it a lot safer, and they already have the data showing it does, and can get more easily.. Another example is alpha lipoic acid. It's use depletes the body of biotin for some reason. If you read Dr. K. Bernstien's book, which recommends it's use for diabetics because it's a potent anti- oxidant, anti-glycosylation agent, and insulin sensitizer (among other good things probably), that you should take a biotin supplement as well, or enough of a B-complex supplement. But how many other people know that? That's why I'm taking Insulow (aside from the fact that it only contains the " good " right-handed stereo-isomer of ALA) - it contains the biotin in the same capsule. Not sure if it's cheaper than just a high quality ALA (S-ALA mixture of right and left forms, which isn't as potent) as well as a biotin supplement, but it might be. Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.