Guest guest Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 In a message dated 10/26/04 12:56:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, quarteracreorchids@... writes: > Research companies want more familles to participate, they should do it > blind ... label a family " family x: mother, father, siblings, cousins... etc " > .. and go from there. The " who " is completely irrelevant to the study. It's > the familial link that's the important part. > If the group wants. I will contact Dr. Ellinor and specifically ask him about patient confidentiality procedures, and report back to the group. What do you all think? Rich O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 , thanks as always fo your factual and up-to-date responsiveness. My family in fact is one of those in the case files of Dr. Ellinor at Mass General. He and his team are eager to hear from families where there are several AF cases, and they are very willing to " come to you " to take the minor DNA samples that are necessary ias they try to isolate the genes involved in predispositions to AF. Unfortunately, all too many people are unwilling to participate in such research, because of fears that somehow their information will be " leaked, " so progress is slow. I had no problems, because I know the safeguards for subject privacy on this kind of funded research are rigorous, and certainly at this poiht there is not enough known about AF genetics to penalize anyone's insurance, for example. So I would urge anyone whose family does have several AF cases, especially if they fall in the same bloodline side of the family, to contact him. Kathleen (24/7, atenolol, digoxin, coumadin) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2004 Report Share Posted October 26, 2004 If research companies want more familes to participate, they should do it blind... label a family " family x: mother, father, siblings, cousins... etc " .. and go from there. The " who " is completely irrelevant to the study.. it's the familial link that's the important part. I was labeled as having a form of rhumatoid arthritis several years ago, because I have a genetic marker that is LINKED to people with this type of arthritis, and I was having lots of lower back and hip pain at the time. I subsequently went on thyroid medication and all trace of joint pain dissappeared, but yet my medical record still shows this diagnosis. I do not need another tag in my files to indicate some other chronic condition, so would be very hesitant to submit to a genetic study where my personal information was obtained. I'm sorry now that I did the first test, since I fear it will come back to haunt me someday, yet my family would be perfect for such a study on afib. Stef. kageygreenbay wrote: , thanks as always fo your factual and up-to-date responsiveness. My family in fact is one of those in the case files of Dr. Ellinor at Mass General. He and his team are eager to hear from families where there are several AF cases, and they are very willing to " come to you " to take the minor DNA samples that are necessary ias they try to isolate the genes involved in predispositions to AF. Unfortunately, all too many people are unwilling to participate in such research, because of fears that somehow their information will be " leaked, " so progress is slow. I had no problems, because I know the safeguards for subject privacy on this kind of funded research are rigorous, and certainly at this poiht there is not enough known about AF genetics to penalize anyone's insurance, for example. So I would urge anyone whose family does have several AF cases, especially if they fall in the same bloodline side of the family, to contact him. Kathleen (24/7, atenolol, digoxin, coumadin) Web Page - http://www.afibsupport.com List owner: AFIBsupport-owner For help on how to use the group, including how to drive it via email, send a blank email to AFIBsupport-help Nothing in this message should be considered as medical advice, or should be acted upon without consultation with one's physician. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 -- > > If the group wants. I will contact Dr. Ellinor and specifically ask him about > patient confidentiality procedures, and report back to the group. What do you > all think? > Rich O Rich, that would be wonderful. Of course the data are all " blind, " otherwise it wouldn't be decent research. Yet, because the individuals are often scattered all over the place, somewhere there is a cross-tab of names against the blind data. But please, I greatly support this kind of research, else progress never gets made, and you are a visible and respected member of this forum, so your input would be most welcome. (I have no personal investment beyond my belief in the right way to accumulate valuable knowledge). Kathleen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.