Guest guest Posted February 6, 2001 Report Share Posted February 6, 2001 Lynda wrote: > > My rubella immunity was found to be low when I was expecting DS3 and I had a > rubella jab after he was born. I suffered with HORRENDOUS joint pains for > about 6 months afterwards. BTW, my rubella immunity was borderline again > when I was pregnant with DS4 less than 2 years later - I refused the post > baby booster this time. > > Lynda Oh Lynda, I can sympathise, that must have been awful, especially with babies to lift and carry. I get very hot under the collar on the issue of rubella vaccination.... I have suffered in the past with joint problems - a mild form of rheumatic arthritis. It luckily burned itself out over a course of about 15 years, and was been helped by steroid treatments. Anyway, back to rubella... I was never vaccinated as a teenager (my school was too disorganised, I think), but probably had the disease as a child. So when I got broody, I went to my GP and asked for the blood test to check my immunity. This was refused on the grounds of cost! However, I was told that the vaccine was totally safe, so I should just get the jab anyway - at my own expense, of course. I decided to have the vaccination, and happily had no reaction afterwards. It was only much later, when researching side effects of vaccines for DD's immunisations, that I realised that I had run a huge risk of reigniting my newly recovered joint problems. Apart from my experience, two of my postnatal mum friends found out that they had insufficient immunity to rubella at the 10 week antenatal check. Why, if the 'caring' government is so concerned about our babies' health, is the rubella blood test not freely available to any woman about to start a family? Testing when pregnant is too late... Liz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2001 Report Share Posted February 6, 2001 >Why, if the 'caring' government is so concerned about our babies' >health, >is the rubella blood test not freely available to any woman about to >start a family? Testing when pregnant is too late... I couldn't agree more. I was tested for rubella immunity at my booking appointment at 10? weeks. I was not told the results of the test (immunity low) until I had my next routine appointment with the community midwife at 24 weeks. The results had been sitting on my file for nearly 3 months and nobody had bothered to tell me despite the fact that I might have put my baby at risk during that time. I was livid. Lynda, SAHM to (7), (5), Fraser (3), Callum (15/5/00) Newsletter Editor, Mid-Northumberland Branch Area Rep, Region 7 www.lyndagarland.co.uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2001 Report Share Posted February 6, 2001 > I was tested for rubella immunity >at my booking >appointment at 10? weeks. I was not told the results of >the test (immunity >low) until I had my next routine appointment with the >community midwife at >24 weeks. >Lynda, They never tested mine. They did in France before we moved here and my level of immunity was low, as well. But they didn’t even ASK here if I had had it tested. Of course, it took me bringing it up about 20 times and being pushy before I got an Anti-D shot, as well, though I am RH neg and DH is RH pos. And they took my blood to see if I was starting to produce antibodies, they said (both while I was preg and right after Calvin's birth), but the blood lab told me that they only test to see if I’m really RH neg - in case it had changed from the other two times they checked it??? Ah, the disadvantages of going to the antenatal clinic at the hospital and never seeing the same midwife or doctor twice. Phyllis __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.