Guest guest Posted March 6, 2001 Report Share Posted March 6, 2001 I totally agree with phine. It is very frustrating, but so worth it when they are finally trained. The more you push them, the more accidents my son would have. Finally, I backed off and it literally took 2 days for him. No questions, no threats, nothing!! It was wonderful. Good Luck! FREE SIGN-UP NOW - Limited Time Only!!! Ground Floor Opportunity!!! Visit Our Website for more details.... <A HREF= " www.gabbygoodies.com " >www.gabbygoodies.com</A> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2001 Report Share Posted March 6, 2001 I had a nightmare, really stressed potty training DS1 with the pressure of playgroup starting at 2.5 years. (One afternoon found me at the bottom of the garden shut in the shed unable to come out as I was so furious) - my 2 boys were looking out from the house, at me, in amazement and horror (DS1 with no pants on) through the patio doors when DH came home. However as soon as he wanted to DS1 was dry within a week (around 2 years 7 months) and it took less than that to get him dry at night (just recently)! I'm definatley of the " wait until he's ready " point of view. Good luck phine (Mum to 3.5 & Ben 2.5, Cambridge NCT) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2001 Report Share Posted March 21, 2001 Your sausage roll story reminds me of my eldest daughter, now fully adult,and a mother herself, when I was potty training her. Anxious to encourage her, I said if she " performed " on the potty, she could have any present she wanted. She duly produced a wee and amidst much applause and praise, I asked her what she had chosen as her prize. She looked up at me, wide eyed. " I want my nappy back on. " Ruthie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2001 Report Share Posted March 22, 2001 " I want my nappy back on. " Ruthie That was one smart kid Cerys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2001 Report Share Posted March 29, 2001 -As a mother of 8, by the time I reached the last few kids I gave up potty training altogether; couldn't be bothered. I found out the following: it either takes you a few months if you start when they aren't ready, or one day, if you start when they are. So I wait till they're about 3 and they do it on their birthday usually, day and night on the same day. I turned a deaf ear to the " isn't he/she trained YET? " and just waited it out. So much simpler! Ruthie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2001 Report Share Posted March 29, 2001 > So I wait till they're about 3 and they do it on their birthday > usually, day and night on the same day. I turned a deaf ear to the > " isn't he/she trained YET? " and just waited it out. So much simpler! Yep - but he'd miss a term of pre-school and it is a pre-requisite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2001 Report Share Posted March 29, 2001 > > I have just started with him sitting on his potty at each nappy change > I'm curious if anyone has done what I'm doing.... I've been sitting DD on the potty since around 7 months - first just before bedtime, where for a while she always pooed!! and now for the last 2/3 months after every nappy change. She always does a pee and quite substantial ones too!! but obviously her nappy is not dry. I'm not expecting her to be potty trained for quite a while (she's only 13 months) but at least she's seen a potty and knows what it's for. Now I know nothing about potty training so my thoughts may be completely wrong, but I wondered if some of the problems of potty training could be because the potty isn't introduced at all until the child is 2/3 years old. Could it make a difference introducing the potty earlier (she asks hopefully)? Of course, I realise I'm influenced and ever hopeful because my mother had all four of her children potty trained well before 2 years old. I guess I'll be buying the NCT Potty Training book in due course! Janet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2001 Report Share Posted March 29, 2001 --- In nct-coffee@y..., " & -Jane " <bj@g...> > Yep - but he'd miss a term of pre-school and it is a pre-requisite > I get SOOOOO angry when I hear this. All pre-school groups should be tolerant of non-trained children. Mine certainly weren't trained till past three - and to expect it before that is totally out of order. My pre-school takes children in trainer pants and nappies. They only change a child's nappy if they do poos! Fortunately neither of mine did - but they both wore trainer pants for the first term. I found they learnt quite quickly once they started going to the toilet with the other children - early peer pressure. Joe still has accidents - but this is more to do with holding in poo, which can go on for a week or so. He is having a kidney scan soon as he has had a constant stream of UTIs. If anyone has had this problem I would love to hear from them. Caroline Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2001 Report Share Posted March 29, 2001 > Of course, I realise I'm influenced and ever hopeful because my > mother had all four of her children potty trained well before 2 years > old. Probably because she had to wash terry nappies!! (todays washables being very different I hasten to add!) It doesn't sound wrong at all - I'm sure she will make it clear when she is ready to try pants. I expect most of the 'results' so far have been a pavlov's dog type thing - potty=wee. or just luck! The potty training book does look excellent. Caroline Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2001 Report Share Posted March 29, 2001 caroline@... wrote: > --- In nct-coffee@y..., " & -Jane " <bj@g...> > Yep > - but he'd miss a term of pre-school and it is a pre-requisite > > > And Emma wasn't even vaguely potty trained when we sent her to pre-school. we just sent about 4 changes of clothes and the preschool changed her and sent her home with a full carrier bag of washing. She got the hang of it eventually, but is still wet at night (4.5) and still damp during the day. If I had waited until she was dry during the day she would never had made preschool and would have missed out on 18 months of inter child interaction which she badly needed. Sue -- Again a hearty Hmmm... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 > --- In nct-coffee@y..., " & -Jane " <bj@g...> > Yep > - but he'd miss a term of pre-school and it is a pre-requisite > > > > I get SOOOOO angry when I hear this. All pre-school groups > should be tolerant of non-trained children. Mine certainly weren't > trained till past three - and to expect it before that is totally out of > order. Caroline; my pre school group also didn't mind if my kids came in nappies. To be completely fair, I lived locally, and if mine did a poo I would get a phonecall and would go along and change him or her, but in general this didn't happen. I did worry this would unsettle the kid and they would want to come home afterwards, but IIRC this seldom happened anyway, and if I changed the child quickly and left, they knew they weren't coming home till hometime. I can well understand people's feeling of pressure if a playgroup won't accept children in nappies, but under 3 yr olds are very young to be reliably dry and clean anyway. Ruthie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 At 13 months its more likely to be a Pavlov's responds than a conscious thing i.e. cold potty on bum makes her wee. I think the general view of very early potty training is that it is the parents who are trained, not the child, in that they remember to produce the potty at regular intervals. But I know of a couple of little girls who were reliably trained by 21 mths so hopefully you're one of the lucky ones. Lesley ------------------------ From: kassc-dj I'm curious if anyone has done what I'm doing.... I've been sitting DD on the potty since around 7 months - first just before bedtime, where for a while she always pooed!! and now for the last 2/3 months after every nappy change. She always does a pee and quite substantial ones too!! but obviously her nappy is not dry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 Hi All, Thought this would make you laugh. I'm on a list for mums who had baby's in February 2000 and a couple of the mums there are trying to potty train their baby's already. One woman was bragging about how her little girl has the potty next to the toilet and when she (the mum) goes to the toilet, so does her daughter. I didn't like to tell her that it was probably luck more than the daughter knowing what the hell she was doing :-) Sue M ____________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 > At 13 months its more likely to be a Pavlov's responds than a conscious > thing i.e. cold potty on bum makes her wee. I think the general view of > very early potty training is that it is the parents who are trained, not the > child, in that they remember to produce the potty at regular intervals. But > I know of a couple of little girls who were reliably trained by 21 mths so > hopefully you're one of the lucky ones. > > Lesley Yes, it does vary a lot. Lawrie I actively trained at 2.5 years and it took a month of persuasion and rewarding, whereas Verity started asking to use to loo at 17 months! I humoured her, which was easy at home as she used to constantly strip and be running around naked and she used to do about 70% on the loo/potty. She was completely dry and clean in the day the week after her second birthday. Hannah, 27 Mum to Bethany 6 1/2, Lawrence 5, Verity 2 1/2 and Alfie, born 13/02/01 See our family photos at :- http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=58003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 Oh yes, Lesley, thank you. I would get this every time from my mother " you four were all trained practically as soon as you could walk, you modern mothers you just don't do it right, make a rod for your own back....carp, carp.... " Personally I have better things to do with my time and nursed two kids with prolapsed rectum from being forced to sit on potties and strain. (Not saying that anyone here is doing that !!) Carys trained herself with a couple of days at her own instigation just after her 2nd birthday but she was the earliest. Kieran at 5 still has to be reminded to go to the loo ) Like just about everything else, its what " suits you madam " ) Lesley, Antenatal teacher, trainee breasteeding counsellor. Demented mother of 3. Worthing. " We are born naked, wet and hungry. Then things get worse " . RE: Re: Potty Training > At 13 months its more likely to be a Pavlov's responds than a conscious > thing i.e. cold potty on bum makes her wee. I think the general view of > very early potty training is that it is the parents who are trained, not the > child, in that they remember to produce the potty at regular intervals. But > I know of a couple of little girls who were reliably trained by 21 mths so > hopefully you're one of the lucky ones. > > Lesley > ------------------------ > > From: kassc-dj > > > I'm curious if anyone has done what I'm doing.... > I've been sitting DD on the potty since around 7 months - first just > before bedtime, where for a while she always pooed!! and now for the > last 2/3 months after every nappy change. > She always does a pee and quite substantial ones too!! but obviously > her nappy is not dry. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 > All pre-school groups > should be tolerant of non-trained children. Is it not more often than not a staffing issue in that changing a nappy takes a member of staff away with one child for a length of time, so that the ratios for the staff/children remaining in the playgroup are not sufficient? Also I don't know if a higher level of social services vetting has to take place for nappy changing than for accompanying to the toilet - though what's the difference really between changing a nappy and wiping a bottom? Just musing. Lynda SAHM to (8), (5), Fraser (3), Callum (15/5/00) Newsletter editor, Mid-Northumberland Branch Area Rep, Region 7 www.familygarland.co.uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 Lynda Garland wrote: > > All pre-school groups > > should be tolerant of non-trained children. > > Is it not more often than not a staffing issue in that changing a nappy > takes a member of staff away with one child for a length of time, so that > the ratios for the staff/children remaining in the playgroup are not > sufficient? Also I don't know if a higher level of social services vetting > has to take place for nappy changing than for accompanying to the toilet - > though what's the difference really between changing a nappy and wiping a > bottom? Just musing. Our preschool said that they didn't have the facilities to get rid of nappies, and with 20 children that was potentially 20 or more dirty nappies. Apparently this constitutes clinical waste and they can't afford to have it removed from the premises. Of course my answer would be to return the nappies to the parents to dispose of, but then you are faced with a health and safety issue, in storing poo-ey nappies until hometime. Mind you they didn't have a problem with throwing away a pair of poo-ey knickers of Emma's. They were very embarrassed that they had thrown away my property, but I reassured them that I couln'dt bear washing poo either so would have done the same. God help me if I have a child who poos in his/her knickers next time. It is either going to be very expensive or I am going to spend a lot of time retching. And why is it I can cope with poo in a nappy, but not poo in knickers? Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 Also I don't know if a higher level of social services vetting >has to take place for nappy changing than for accompanying to the toilet - Yes think so. This is why 's nursery will take children in pull-ups but not in nappies - to have children in *nappies* they have to provide " changing facilities " . Saying they can attend in pull-ups is a way of getting around this. Newsletter Editor, Leighton Buzzard & District NCT SAHM to 19/9/97 and Caitlin 12/1/00. Photo Album http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=697874 & a=11513591 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 >Mind you they didn't have a problem with throwing away a pair of poo-ey knickers of Emma's. They >were very embarrassed that they had thrown away my property, Exactly this happened to a pair of 's pants Sue! So they let me keep the ones they put on him as compensation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 > And why is it I can cope with poo in a nappy, but not poo in knickers? Glad I'm not the only one who has to cope with this! I've discovered that leaving them for a few hours means it has dried up enough to peel off into the loo! Yuck!!!!!!!!! Caroline mother of 'Joe the poo monster' aged 4.5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 No, I'm sorry but life is too short. I throw the whole thing in the bin and buy some more knickers ) Lesley, Antenatal teacher, trainee breasteeding counsellor. Demented mother of 3. Worthing. " We are born naked, wet and hungry. Then things get worse " . Re: potty training > > And why is it I can cope with poo in a nappy, but not poo in knickers? > Glad I'm not the only one who has to cope with this! > I've discovered that leaving them for a few hours means it has dried up > enough to peel off into the loo! Yuck!!!!!!!!! > Caroline > mother of 'Joe the poo monster' aged 4.5 > > > > *** NCT enquiry line - 0 *** > > Live chat http://www.yahoogroups.com/chat/nct-coffee > > Have you found out about all the other groups for the NCT online? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 > >Mind you they didn't have a problem with throwing away a pair of >poo-ey knickers of Emma's. They >were very embarrassed that they had thrown away my property, but I >reassured them that I couln'dt >bear washing poo either so would have done the same. God help me if >I have a child who poos in >his/her knickers next time. It is either going to be very expensive >or I am going to spend a lot >of time retching. And why is it I can cope with poo in a nappy, but >not poo in knickers? > >Sue I dunno, but you are not alone! (Actually it is a) a lot harder to get off the child without getting it all over and a lot harder to get a good dea of it to drop off into the toilet) Oh and to answer someone else - it isn't the terries that were the problem for earlier generations of parents, it was the washing technology! -- jennifer@... Vaudin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2001 Report Share Posted March 30, 2001 Call me optimistic, but I have been putting DS on the potty and toilet since about 13 months, Now he is 20 months and trys to pull his trousers down standing next to the potty when he wants a wee! I don't put him there, I wait to see him pull at his pants or take my hand and lead me to the loo. Over the last couple of months I don't remember not getting a good wee from him when he asks. By no means is he dry all the time but probably 4 days in 5 he is. However he is like many other I suspect in that he will sit in a poo quite happily and deny all knowledge of a smelly bum! I always let the child make the choice, DS showed an interest very early so I let him, If my next doesn't want the potty, I won't force it. Kirsten Mum to 20 months Membership admin Woking & Knaphill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2001 Report Share Posted March 31, 2001 Just my 2p worth..... As many of you will know, I have just recently had problems trying to potty train (2 and 11 months). I reckon 2 things: 1) If you start early, you will probably get success earlier, but the period of 'accidents' will be longer too. 2) If you start later, you will have a completely dry and clean child in a much shorter space of time. Could be completely wrong, but it's just my opinion. , incidentally, is doing brilliantly. He is dry and clean most days. He has very occassional accidents - mostly when he is playing with other children and 'forgets' to go - but on the whole I think he has cracked it! I can't remember which of you wonderful people suggested the 'put him in pants and go for it' strategy, but it certainly worked. On the subject of playgroups. ' playgroup allow the children to go if they are in nappies, but the mums must stay on the premises unless they are toilet trained. ' school nursery will not take him unless he is fully toilet trained. I found this unbelievable. After all, the same school would insist he went the following year, potty trained or not. Hopefully, this isn't now going to be a problem, but that's not the point. Some of the children going into that nursery will only have turned three a few days before they start. Why should a three year old be told they can't be like all their friends, just because they aren't toilet trained? After all, they are only there for 2 and a half hours. The chances of a poo in that time are very slim, and their nappies don't need changed in that time otherwise. Rant over!!!! Aileen Tired but wide-awake in Doncaster (if that makes any sense at all!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2001 Report Share Posted March 31, 2001 Potty training is like everything else to do with parenting - variable! My older children came out of terry nappies at just over two, while the next was nearly 21/2, and the youngest one, nearer three (both in disps). There hasn't been any real difference in the reliability of any of them. They all seem to have cast iron bladders, once trained. The major traumas came with training the older ones. Whether that was because they were girls or wore disposables, or indeed were bloodier minded - who knows?? At any rate, well done !! Lesley ---------------------- From: Aileen Just my 2p worth..... I reckon 2 things: 1) If you start early, you will probably get success earlier, but the period of 'accidents' will be longer too. 2) If you start later, you will have a completely dry and clean child in a much shorter space of time. Could be completely wrong, but it's just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.